«Hidden» thermodynamics – rational approach to known facts

Aleksei Savchenko
A.A. Bochvar Institute of Inorganic Materials (VNIINM), Rogova 5A, Moscow, Russia,
sav-alex111@mail.ru +7-977-520-5299

Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file


Russian version published in J. Atomic Strategy, S-Petersburg, in three articles (3 Parts):
1. The discrepancy between the approaches to the second law of thermodynamics and phase equilibrium. Solid and liquid solutions, Issue 109, December 2015, 17-23.
2. Entropy effects in real systems,. Issue 110, January 2016, 14-19.
3. Entropy effects in multiphase systems. Phase diagrams and eutectics melting mechanism, Issue 111, February 2016, 28-33.

Introduction to all 3 parts
Almost all natural processes are described by the laws of thermodynamics – the first (the law of energy conservation) or the second, determining the direction of physicalchemical processes.
The first law of thermodynamics is pretty clear, but it is not properly understood all the time. Sometimes the fact that there are no ideal isolated systems is ignored.
Sometimes the energy disappears when in the description of wave annihilation in a counterphase.
Many physics textbook note – in interference and diffraction, waves, if shifted by 180 degrees, damp each other and energy disappears.
I have mentioned this in an article [1].
As an additional example, fig.1 depicts wave interference pattern generated by the source when reflected. According to a common physics approach,
there are no oscillations to the right from the source in a narrow strip, and, therefore, energy.
And it is not correct as energy can’t disappear, it only transforms from one form (state) to another (currently unknown).
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file


2 comments to «Hidden» thermodynamics – rational approach to known facts

  • Andrea Rossi

    A- I’d say that our experiments and the theoretical system published in
    direi che i nostri esperimenti ed il sistema teorico descritti in
    would be oriented toward a new model of the electron, vs the puntiform particle concept, which, by the way, implies an infinite electric field
    vertono verso un modello di elettrone innovativo rispetto alla tradizionale concezione dell’elettrone come particella puntiforme, concetto che, peraltro, implica il paradosso di un campo elettrico infinito.
    B- Maybe the Ecat SKL will encourage a different kind of electricity distribution
    Forse l’Ecat SKL potrà modificare il modo di distribuire l’elettricità
    Warm Regards,

  • Daniele

    Buongiorno dottor Rossi, volevo sapere se il suo lavoro recente implica:
    A- un più preciso modello di atomo o di elettrone
    B- che si possa immaginare nuovi modi per trasportare l’energia elettrica.
    Grazie e complimenti per la sua attività

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>