JANUARY 15th EVENT – Prof. Levi, Dr. Bianchini and Prof. Villa reports

Prof. Giuseppe Levi, Dr. David Bianchini and Prof. Mauro Villa  (Bologna University) final reports about January 15th scientific experiment.

Download here
Download the ZIP file

180 comments to JANUARY 15th EVENT – Prof. Levi, Dr. Bianchini and Prof. Villa reports

  • giovanni guerrini

    La copertura mediatica non dipende da voi.
    Il fatto che essa sia irrisoria invita a profonde riflessioni.
    Grazie al cielo esiste la rete,esempio di come la tecnologia se usata saggiamente liberi l’uomo.
    Questa nuova risorsa energetica è un dono enorme,spetta a noi esserne degni.
    Voi state facendo il massimo,dall’altro lato c’è la gente che se sarà capace di evolversi informandosi e comprendendo la portata della innovazione,allora ne sarà degna.
    L’unica cosa che ognuno di noi può e deve fare è diffondere la notizia,nel proprio piccolo mondo.
    Continuate così,se qualcosa non andrà per il verso giusto,la vostra coscienza sarà comunque tranquilla.
    Saluti.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Nicola Barbini:
    We are working at the maximum possible efficiency. All the possible disclosure has been already made in the web. Everybody from everywhere can draw from there.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Nicola

    On 12th June Italians will be asked to decide (among other things) if they want to permit the construction of new Nuclear Plants.

    I think that the news about your findings should be spread as widely as possible BEFORE that date for two reasons:
    1) to avoid confusion on “nuclear plant”: should we choose to do without Nuclear plants, this shouldn’t involve this technology.
    2) If everything goes at we all hope, it is possible that in a decade classic Nuclear plants will be obsolete, in this case Italians should know it.

    Please consider a disclosure at least for domestic press.

    Thank you,
    Nicola.

  • giovanni guerrini

    Meno male,mi sento molto sollevato.Graze mille.
    Cari saluti.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Giovanni Guerrini:
    Actually, we have no difficulties: we are manufacturing our 1 MW plant that will be started up in Athens in October. The patent is another issue, but we are going on indipendently from it, and after the October start up we will begin the production.
    Thank you anyway for your very appreciated sustain,
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • giovanni guerrini

    Molto interessante.Se non ho inteso male ad oggi la difficoltà sarebbe di carattere burocratico in fase di brevetto.Possibile che non si possa brevettare una tecnologia in modo che soddisfi la tutela degli autori anche in mancanza della teoria definitiva relativa al fenomeno?Possibile che addirittura si discuta ancora sulla natura nucleare del fenomeno dopo tutte le evidenze ,dal rapporto 41 ENEA fino a quello IFNI 2009
    http://download.luogocomune.net/download/FusioneFredda/LNF-09-1(P).pdf
    ?
    Mi rivolgo ancora apertamente alle autorità politiche, affinchè si adoperino a risolvere eventuali problematiche relative alla tutela dei diritti sulla invenzione,specialmente ora che i recenti eventi politici e naturali hanno mostrato tutti i limiti e vetustità delle fonti energetiche finora utilizzate.
    Buon lavoro il mondo vero tifa per voi.

  • Andrea Rossi

    INFORMATION: ON THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS TODAY HAS BEEN PUBLISHED A VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE OF WLADIMIR GUGLINSKY, WHICH SUGGESTS AN INTRIGUING INSIGHT IN OUR MATTER.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Grazie, Paolo!
    A.R.

  • Paolo

    Volevo segnalarvi il seguente video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uxz7063AZJ0

    Tifiamo per voi!!

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Marco Cazzola:
    We can reach 550°C, maintaining substantially the same efficiency. We are making these tests with the Lab in the USA we are working with in these days. The maintainance is necessary every 6 months, therefore we supply more modules than necessary, to have always the requested power production during the maintainance of the single modules, which are maintained in turn.
    Thank you very much for your very kind attention, I appreciate.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Marco Cazzola

    Professor Rossi e Prof. Focardi Vi faccio i miei complimenti per i risultati che siete riusciti ad ottenere, spero che a breve riuscirete ad ottenere i brevetti e a portare a termine l’ industrializzazione con l’ impianto da 1 mw.
    Passo subito a farVi alcune domande dal punto del processo industriale termotecnico :
    Pensando ad un utilizzo di moduli serie+parallelo del reattore, per un impiego di cogenerazione vapore + energia elettrica, dovendo disporre di vapore a pressione medio/alta ad esempio 12 bar e 250 °C è stato sperimentato da parte vostra lo stesso rendimento e quindi incremento entalpico fornito al fluido anche lavorando a pressioni elevate ? Da quel che vedo nel vostro esperimento si lavorava a pressione atmosferica o poco più e per un uso a fini di cogenerazione non vengono dati parametri in merito.
    In pratica vi sono limiti funzionali in termini di pressione e temperatura del fluido di processo (acqua di alimentazione e vapore in uscita) e inoltre confermate lo stesso “salto entalpico” fornibile da 1 modulo anche facendolo lavorare a pressioni del fluido superiori a quelli ottenuti pressione atmosferica ?
    Altra domanda, il reattore oltre ad assorbire (anche se in modo non costante da quel che ho capito) una quantità di energia elettrica pari a circa 1/15 di quella termica resa richiede altri tipi di alimentazioni e / o manutenzioni programmate (nickel ? idrogeno ?)
    Quest’ ultimo è un fattore importante tendendo conto del fatto che per avere impianti di elevata potenza servono molti moduli in serie e parallelo e quindi eventuale RICARICA o MANUTENZIONE sarebbero moltiplicati per i X moduli dell’ impianto.
    Per ora mi piacerebbe approfondire in questi termini , per quanto concerne il FUNZIONAMENTO capisco benissimo le vostre motivazione di mantenerle “segrete” almeno fino al brevetto, quel che importa ai fini del sfruttamento industriale in fin dei conti è che VENGA GARANTITO il rendimento e i parametri di processo, i livelli di sicurezza di funzionamento e gestione .
    Vi ringrazio e spero possiate godere quanto prima di grande successo a coronamento dei sacrifici spesi nello studio di tale importante invenzione.
    Saluti Marco

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Ivan Moho:
    Our tech will be at disposal of everyone will want it, everywhere in the World.
    By the way: I am extremely sorry for what is happened in Japan, but the great People of Japan will overcome also this terrible obstacle.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Ivan Moho

    Mr. Rossi,

    After the failure of Fukushima nuclear power plant, it’s clear that the world needs a new source of safe large-scale energy as soon as possible.
    Please think of Japan too.

    I.M.

  • giovanni guerrini

    Condivido pienamente la sua amarezza nel constatare come spesso per interessi di bottega si possa essere fuorvianti mettendo a repentaglio o limitando l’esistenza delle persone.
    Cari saluti.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Caro Sig. Giovanni Guerrini:
    Quello che trovo insopportabile è ascoltare esperti che con cognizione di causa minimizzano quello che sta succedendo per motivi di bottega. E’ uno spettacolo desolante. Pochi secondi dopo il primo annuncio dei TG relativo alla prima esplosione superficiale io, che di centrali termonucleari non ho esperienza diretta, apprendendo che vi erano difficoltà a mantenere il livello di acqua nel primario, mi sono detto: “Qui si rischia la fusione del nocciolo”. Contemporaneamente un papavero della scienza ufficiale specializzata ha “tranquillizzato” tutti, dicendo “Non bisogna esagerare, questo è un piccolo incidente, ben lontano dal livello di rischio di quanto avvenne a Three Miles Island…”. Quando si dice mentire sapendo di mentire: eccone un esempio paradigmatico.
    Cari Saluti,
    A.R.

  • giovanni guerrini

    Dopo il disastro giapponese tutti nei talk show a blaterale nucleare si,nucleare no…ma il governo si è interessato alla vs invenzione?Cosa aspettano?E se tra qualche mese sarà un fatto compiuto,con quale faccia si presenteranno dopo un totale disinteresse? Sempre con la stessa,immagino.
    Che amarezza.
    Cordiali saluti.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Giovanni Guerrini:
    I partially agree with Prof. Franchini. The recoil energy is one of the player, and we are calculating it in the context of our theoretical research. The calculation is not easy, and the numbers given by Franchini are wrong, I can say this based on our experimental work. In any case, the R&D work we are carrying on with the University of Bologna will work theoretically also in this sense and at the end of the research we will make a publication. Still, Franchini has focused the attention upon an issue which we are probing too.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Francesco Razzauti

    Today 22passi blogspot published a report about an unofficial test made with your e-catalyzer. Data were released by Prof.Levi, showing a production of at least 15kwh for a period of 18 hours.
    Have you any comment about this ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Ernst:
    The reaction is not reversible.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Ernst

    Dear Mr Rossi,

    I’m not really an expert, but an interesting question would be, is that reaction reversible, if you put enough heat on the resulting copper molecules, would they mutate back to nickel? If so, the whole process might be considered as a concept similar to oxidation, where H2 is placed inside the nickel lattice, with lower energy level of the H2/Ni system as result.

  • W.GUGLINSKI

    Italian journalist Daniele Passerini has compiled some recent dialogue he has had with Andrea Rossi. In his interview, Passerini said:

    22PASSI – the fact remains that there is still a scientific explanation of what happens inside the machine…

    And Andrea Rossi replied:
    ROSSI: CERN has made that immense ring just to try and start to truly understand how atoms are made, because they do not know.

    Yes, Rossi is right.

    So, look this strange hope of the theorists that try to explaind cold fusion:

    1- they do not know the structure of the nuclei, they do not know how exactly the nuclei work when they produce some ordinary nuclear phenomena, and many nuclear properties of the nuclei cannot be explained by current Nuclear Physics.

    2- Then, as the current Nuclear Physics cannot explain several ordinary nuclear phenomena and many properties of the nuclei, how could a theorist succeed to explain cold fusion by trying to do it from the foundations of the current Nuclear Physics ?

    3- If the nuclear model of current Nuclear Physics should be correct, it would be able to explain all the nuclear phenomena and all the nuclear properties of the nuclei. But it is not able to to it.

    4- Therefore, is it reasonable to expect to explain cold fusion by taking as a point of departure a WRONG nuclear model, unable to explain even some ordinary nuclear phenomena ?

    For the explanation of cold fusion, there is need a NEW nuclear model.

    A new theory capable to explain cold fusion must be developed by taking in consideration a new nuclear model capable to explain those nuclear phenomena not explained yet by the current Nuclear Physics.
    Such new nuclear model is proposed in the book Quantum Ring Theory-Foundations for Cold Fusion.

    Quantum Ring Theory was published by the Bäuu Institute Press in August 2006.

    Quantum Ring Theory is not a cold fusion theory. Actually QRT proposes news foundations, from which a cold fusion theory must be developed.

    The new nuclerar model proposed in QRT is named Hexagonal Floors Model. It has a central 2He4, which produces gravitational Dirac strings (an experiment in 2009 yields evidence on the existence of those strings: http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:magnetic_monopole_-_new_experiment_corroborates_Quantum_Ring_Theory ).
    The Dirac strings produced by the central 2He4 captures deuterions, and they form several hexagonal floors around the central 2He4. The distance between the floors is submitted to contraction and expansion, a phenomenon called Accordion-Effect.
    The resonance between the Accordion-Effect of nuclei in the lattice (for instance palladium) and the osciLlatory motion of free deuterions of the heavy water used in the electrolitycc cell helps the cold fusion occurrence.

    According to QRT, the nuclei are surrounding by two concentric fields. For instance, the palladium nucleus has a principal field Sp(Pd), surrounded by a secondary fied Sn(Pd). There is a “hole” in the secondary field, and this lack helps the cold fusion occurence (see bellow “Cold Fusion and Gamow’s Paradox).

    QRT also proposes a new model of neutron, formed by proton+electron.
    A free electron moves with helical trajectory (zitterbewegung). When it is captured by the proton and they form a neutron, the electron loses its spin (it becomes a boson). The energy of the electron’s helical trajectory is the unique theoretical solution capable to explain the 2009 Pamela Mosier-Boss experiment, which emitted neutrons with 10MeV, while the energy available was only about 2MeV. There is not, from the principles of Quantum Mechanics, an explanation for this excess energy of the neutrons emitted in her experiment (see bellow “How zitterbewegung contributes for cold fusion in Pamela Mosier-Boss experiment”).

    See:
    PowerPedia:Foundations for Cold Fusion
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Foundations_for_Cold_Fusion

    Article: How zitterbewegung contributes for cold fusion in Pamela Mosier-Boss experiment http://peswiki.com/index.php/

    Article:_How_zitterbewegung_contributes_for_cold_fusion_in_Pamela_Mosier-Boss_experiment
    PowerPedia:Cold Fusion Theories
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_Fusion_Theories

    Article:Cold Fusion and Gamow’s Paradox
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Cold_Fusion_and_Gamow%27s_Paradox

    PowerPedia:Cold fusion, Don Borghi’s Experiment, and hydrogen atom
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom

    PowerPedia:New model of neutron: explanation for cold fusion
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:New_model_of_neutron:_explanation_for_cold_fusion

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Florentin Margarit:
    I have passed your warning to our informatic to fix the problem.
    Thank you for the infotmation,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Florentin Margarit

    Hello there, from few days i try to download “Prof. Giuseppe Levi, Dr. David Bianchini and Prof. Mauro Villa (Bologna University) final reports about January 15th scientific experiment.”
    Impossible task…only first page , after that… stop, server close connection.Checked on 3 differents IP and PC’s.
    Anyone knows why?
    Thank you and best regards,
    F.Margarit

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Dana Troxel:
    The radiation issue is extremely important, this is why we use modules of 10 kW, because years of tests have certified that no significant radiation are emitted at this power .
    About the Black Light Power technology, there are substantial differences which appear clearly reading both. Nevertheless, the theoretical explication given is interesting and worth to be studied.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dana Troxel

    Mr Rossi,
    In an article posted Feb 07, 2011 Thomas Prevenslik, gives an analysis that seems to confirm the reality of your catalyzer.

    http://www.prlog.org/11277508-qed-induced-cold-fusion-in-italy.html

    He makes the following conclusions:

    1. The Italian Cold Fusion experiment is yet another application of QED induced radiation in physics over the past century. Contrary to classical physics, QM forbids nanostructures to conserve absorbed EM energy by an increase in temperature. Instead, conservation proceeds by the creation of QED photons inside the
    nanostructure having a frequency at its TIR resonance, typically beyond the UV.

    2. QM places no limit to the number of QED photons that may accumulate under the TIR confinement of NPs. Upon reaching the 2.6 MeV/atom necessary to transmute 62 Ni to 63 Cu, fusion of Ni atoms may be considered to occur. Hydrogen atoms in contact with the NP surface also fuse, but how this occurs requires
    further study.

    3. LENR and catalysts have nothing to do with the observed 12,400 W output of the Italian Cold Fusion reactor. The Ni-H reactions are truly nuclear fusion, and claims of net power generation by Rossi and Focardi are valid. But like conventional nuclear fusion, the commercialization of the reactors for public use
    should clearly state the radiation dangers.

    4. The similarity of the Black Light Power and Italian Cold Fusion reactors suggests the same QED physics should also apply. But again, radiation dangers should be included in any commercialization for public use.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Leon:
    Thank you for your enthusiasm. Sincerely, I think there is no relationship at all between what is happening in the Middle East and my work. Not at all.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Leon R.

    Dear Mr. Rossi,

    It’s great!!! My congratulations to you!

    This invention will have huge impact on all our life. And may be…
    What do you think about a relationship between what is happening in the Middle East and your invention? Is that may be reality…?

    I believe in your invention. And good luck to you with all next works.

    Best regards.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Svein Utne,
    That is very interesting, although our catalysts work differently.
    Very interesting, anyway,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Svein Utne

    Dear Mr. Rossi,
    Blicklight Power will hold a presentation on Monday February 14, and have put this presentation up on their web. After reading it, I started to wonder if it might be related to your power source too?

    http://www.blacklightpower.com/new.shtml
    Dr. Mills will present “Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New Power Source” at the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Conference on February 14, 2011, at 4:10 PM at the Gaylord National Hotel & Conference Center, 201 Waterfront Street, National Harbor, MD, in the Chesapeake 10-11 conference room. For the abstract click here. Dr. Mills’ PowerPoint presentation is available for viewing

    On page 21 of this presentation there is “Hydrino Identification”
    • Power with multiple solid fuels chemistries
    This might also explain the power found in Rossi’s catalyzes, with no harmful radiation.
    10.1 nm radiation and 22.8 nm is mention in Milles presentation, but that will be blocked by small amount of led shielding.
    With hydrino, there might be an increased chance for real fusion too, but at a very low number, but still that might give of some gamma burst and some harmful radiation, and also give some transmutation. Maybe this could explain the Cu found in the “ash”?
    Regards
    Svein Utne

  • Massimo

    I recently visited Louisiana and Mississippi states to check the effect of the oil spill. It was really sad to listen to the stories of the fishermen, their wives, the fish industry owners and restaurant owners. For some reasons the poors pay the bills for all the mistakes.
    Not to count the environmental disaster.

    I hope your invention will go far enough to prevent these disasters from happening again. Good luck.

  • Luca T

    Rossi the problem is that a lot of people read about your demostration only after it took place.

    I find out the news with a week delay on Phisorg and pre-announcements passed under my eyes unnoticed, if any.

    Best regards

  • Per

    If you feel the need for inspiration, I suggest reading “Atlas Shrugged” by Ayn Rand. It will be released as a movie this year.

    /Per

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Radek Svoboda:
    We are not interested to further media coverage. We are only focused on the production of our reactors. Public demos are over, we are now exclusively focused on the respect of thre delivery terms we have guaranteed to our Customers.
    Of course inside our factories we are making what you suggest: that’s our R&D.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Radek Svoboda

    Why not to setup another run of the reactor in the lab, now with a web camera showing that it continuously generates water vapor? Day by day, week by week? The web page could report actual temperature and water flow.

    This would attach a lot of interest and would be very easily understandable even by the major media. Plus, your experiment will be safe in the terms of user security and your intelectual property.

  • giovanni guerrini

    …noto dai media e parlando con le persone che incontro che la maggior parte di essi(anche se di livello culturale medio alto)o non sono informati o sono scettici in quanto,secondo me,il loro ego gli impedisce una visione corretta di questa cosa meravigliosa.Chi sa e ha capito incrocia le dita ed è in trepida attesa.Cosi’ mi permetto di rinnovare l’invito agli autori del progetto a non mollare qualsiasi cosa accada.E’una fase molto delicata,una volta sul mercato sarà un fatto compiuto e la verità dovrà vincere.Grazie.
    saluti G.G.

  • Have a look at the Greek “Net TV” coverage on the Energy Catalyzer. There are two brief interviews to Prof. C.Stremmenos and to a Defkalion Green Technologies official.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RbTWfhLohY&feature=player_embedded#

  • Il prof. Mauro Villa, autore del report sulla misurazione dei gamma, ieri mi ha gentilmente concesso un’intervista: http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/02/intervista-al-prof-mauro-villa.html
    Ricordo che il prof. Mauro Villa insegna presso l’Università di Bologna Alma Mater e collabora con il CERN di Ginevra e con l’ INFN.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Ing. Luca Gasparini:
    Good point.
    In the combination of the modules diagrams must be at hand to arrive to the desired power.
    You are right.
    The rules, with this technology, are the same as usual, once you deal with the produced steam, as if you are dealing with a combination of normal boilers. It becomes thermotechnic engineering.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Ms Petra Wegs,
    Please, for any commercial issue contact
    stsalikoglou@gmail.com
    I do not deal with commercial issues.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Petra Wegs

    Dear Mrs. Rossi,

    Please subscribe me to your newsletter to inform me from the beginning of selling your reactor. Could you estimate a price range yet?

    Regards,
    Petra Wegs

  • Luca Gasparini

    Dear Mr. Rossi,
    I want to ask there are no problems connecting modules in series? because as we all know the specific heat at boiling point is much higher than the gas phase as a result you can use the same modules with pressure, temperature, and then heat transfer composite curves are very different?
    Thank you so much and best regards.

    Ing.Luca Gasparini

  • giovanni guerrini

    ing Rossi,grazie per il chiarimento.
    Cordiali saluti,G.G.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Giovanni Guerrini:
    We evry day have a reactor of ours in operation, and take under measurement the radiations emitted outside the reactor. I myself am working with them at few centimeters since years. No radiations above the normal levels have ever been detected, with reactors up to 10 kW of power. More power is obtained combining the modules of 10 kW.
    No radioactive materials are used, no radioactive materials are left few hours after the operation.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Svein Utne,
    Yes, the tests are going on, for our internal R&D. We have more to learn. Anyway, the official presentation of our product will be with the 1MW plant start up in October.
    Thank you for your kind attention,
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Svein Utne

    Dear Mr. Rossi,
    If all I read here is true, I would like to congratulate you and hope you will be able to harvest the enormous welt and glory this invention could bring you. From what I read in the interview Professor Giuseppe Levi made with NyTeknik in Sweded, they talked about a third test run or your invention where it would run for a more extensive time, to rule out that any chemical process could be behind this. I hope this longer run will happen as soon as possible, so I personally can be satisfied that this is for real.
    Thank you so much and best regards.
    Svein Utne

  • giovanni guerrini

    leggendo il rapporto di Mark L.LeClair mi sovviene una domanda:é possibile che un tipo di reazione nuova e non ancora completamente compresa generi un tipo di radiazione sconosciuta e quindi non rilevabile in quanto non esistenti gli strumenti opportuni? Sono stati effettuati esperimenti con cavie per valutare l’eventuale impatto biologico?Se non sono stati fatti,auspico che vi si ricorra al più presto,in modo da testare la sicurezza fugando eventualmente ogni dubbio,evitando danni alla salute e che qualcuno possa insinuare dubbi sulla sicurezza.
    cordiali saluti G.G.

  • Joseph Fine

    Mr. Utne’s comment is on (the previous) page [2] not on page [3]. It is right under Defkalion Green Technologies’ comment.

    J.F.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DEAR MR SVEIN UTNE (swein_utne@hotmail.com):
    UNFORTUNATELY, YOUR COMMENT, WHICH IS VERY IMPORTANT, FOR SOME REASON WHEN HAS BEEN APPROVED TO BE PUBLISHED IS DISAPPEARED, INSTEAD OF BEING PUBLISHED HERE. SORRY, BUT I WANT ANYWAY TO ANSWER, BECAUSE THE ISSUE YOU RAISED IS QUITE IMPORTANT.
    I RESUME BRIEFLY WHAT YOU WROTE: YOU WROTE THAT IT IS HAPPENED TO OTHER RESEARCHERS WORKING WITH LENR THAT RADIATIONS EMITTED FROM THE REACTORS HAVE CAUSED PROBLEMS, AND YOU ARE AFRAID THAT SCALING UP THE REACTOR WE ARE WORKING WITH WE COULD HAVE RADIATIONS PROBLEMS, OR WORSE.
    IT IS IMPORTANT TO OBSERVE THAT:
    1- WE ARE NOT GOING TO SCALE UP THE REACTORS. TO GET HIGHER POWER WE JUST CONNECT MORE REACTORS OF 10 KW (WHICH IS THE MODULE WE TESTED THOUSANDS OF TIMES, WITHOUT EMITTING SIGNIFICANT RADIATIONS OUTSIDE THE REACTOR).
    2- WE PERFORMED ANDLESS SERIES OF MEASUREMENTS ON THE RADIATION EMITTED OUTSIDE THE REACTOR WITH EXPERTS SPECIALISTS OF THE FIELD, AND NEVER WE GOT PROBLEMS WITH THE 10 KW MODULES.
    WARM REGARDS,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Mr Dotto Egrasso:
    Again thank you. By the way, the publication you mentioned is among the world leaders in the field of the scientific publications.
    Warmest Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Dr Ellul,
    Thank you. Few persons can really understand the gigantis difference that there is between a lab experiment that gives some watt and an apparatus that actually works. The difference is tenths of thousand of hours of work (dangerous work).
    Now we have something really useful.
    Thanks again
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>