By
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson,
Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron
Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron
Abstract
Abstract-A heat by product of an oscillation has an exploitable potential as this relates to the efficient use of energy, which is the subject of the first part of this two-part paper.
This second part looks at the implications of that oscillation as it confronts certain assumptions related to current flow.
An oscillation is induced on a circuit that then enables a reversing current flow that exceeds the circuit restrictions to this flow.
This is explained using an extension to Faraday’s model of Lines of Force to include a dual charge in the material property of current flow.
These explanations are nonstandard and form a small part of a magnetic field model that predicted and required these results.
The analysis concludes that energy can be sourced from the inductive and conductive circuit material.
Dear Herb Gills:
No, they couldn’t be.Unfortunately.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi:
Do you think the certification [of the small Ecats] could be expedited if they were leased rather than sold, and the terms of lease restricted what the customer can do with the device? The terms of the lease might also contain some requirements for customer training, and insist that the device must be returned in a fixed period of time. It seems to me there are lots of products on the market (ie. hybrid cars, microwave ovens, space heaters, etc.) that pose great hazard if the user is negligent. The Ecat would appear to be safer than most of these.
Dr. Rossi, it has been suggested, (Steven N. Karels Augest 4, 2:03A
that E-Cat may be used to replace charcoal to cook.
This will never happen.
CleanStar Mozambique has Farmers grow cassava.
It needs no Fertilizer.
Dry conditions does not affect it.
It improves the Soil.
They call it ‘The Rambo Root’
They convert cassava to cooking fuel.
They have opened a 500,000 gallon a year Plant.
They make a Stove that uses the cooking fuel.
In the first month June, they sold 200 Stoves.
They have on order 3,000.
Cost $30
The cooking fuel cost the same as charcoal.
Charcoal smoke is the same as smoking 2 packs of cigarettes a day !
The life expectancy in Mozambique is 49 years.
Charcoal also destroyes Trees.
To make charcoal, they
chop down all the Trees
on a Mountainside.
When it rains the dirt turns to mud, slides down the Mountain, and buries the Village, and all the people in it.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
USA
Dear Bob Saunders:
We calculated, in the papers you read, the energy produced from the liquid phase in the secondary circuit.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Steven N. Karels:
“declination” in this case means, basically, derivation from a source: it is nothing negative, it is a positive evolution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You responded “Interesting declination”. Definitions:
1. A sloping or bending downward.
2. A falling off, especially from prosperity or vigor; a decline.
3. A deviation, as from a specific direction or standard.
4. A refusal to accept.
5. Magnetic declination.
6. Astronomy The angular distance to a point on a celestial object, measured north or south from the celestial equator.
I assume from your comment that I failed to “rise” to your expectations? (LOL) Steve
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If you take water of room temperature and heat it to the boiling point the energy that is added to the water is, due to heat losses, slightly smaller than the energy that has been fed into the water heating system. Therefore you can say that the COP (Coefficient Of Performance) for the process of heating the water is slightly less than 1.
On the other hand, if you in addition to the above ASSUME that all the water is vaporized and then you calculate the COP you will find that it is around 6. Therefore it is very importent to make sure that all the water is vaporized or you may end up fooling yourself.
// Kind regards Bob Saunders
Dear Larry Jameson:
No, the delay derives from the intrinsic difficulty of this certification regarding the domestic apparatuses: a domestic apparatus has to be sold from any shop to any Customer without further control and without guarantee that instructions are even read.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
LENRConnect is a worldwide networking site designed to become resource and community of professionals and others wanting to get seriously involved in working in the LENR field. Join us at: http://www.lenrconnect.com
Frank Acland
Dear Engineer Rossi
Was the delay in certification of the home e-cat made at your request to allow you to incorporate new features in the design based on your recent discoveries or was it at the request of the certificators.
Thanks
Larry Jameson
Dear Joe:
Probably there has been a misunderstanding: I never said the COP will be more than 6.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
1. If you are able to solve the problem that is presently limiting the E-Cat to a COP of 6, do you foresee a similar problem reoccurring at higher COPs?
2. When you are able to achieve higher COPs, do you foresee a duty cycle that is
a) greater
b) smaller
c) about the same?
All the best,
Joe
Dear Steven N. Karels:
Interesting declination, thanks.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Another eCat application has occurred to me. Replace MEI (charcoal) heaters commonly used in asia with eCats. I recall seeing these relatively large charcoal cylindrical briquettes that are used for residential heating and cooking. The problems with large consumption of charcoal for cooking and heating include deforestation and carbon loading of the environment. If eCat technology could be made at a sufficiently low price, a huge beneficial impact on the environment could be achieved. With the “Hot” eCats now able to provide temperatures approaching those used in cooking and heating, the application is possible. In addition, carcinogins such as PAH, would not be introduced in the cooking process.
[…] 140 Pages, “Scientific Magazine” to Publish Report. August 3, 2012I thought this comment on the Journal of Nuclear Physics was worth a post of its own. I will add to it if more information […]
Dear Giuliano Bettini:
We will explain briefly the highlights of the report ( whose complete version is 140 pages long) and the data that eventually will be published in a scientific magazine.
Warm Regards.
A.R.
Dear Joe:
Thank you for your suggestion; the design of the reactor does not allow this configuration. The reason why is confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
If the drive is used for lowering the rate of reaction, can this end be achieved structurally rather than procedurally? Placing an optimal amount of nickel within COMPARTMENTS within the reactor would prevent a runaway reaction by limiting the interaction between modules of nickel to nanometre-sized windows within the walls of the compartments. The reactor would be structured (circularly, cylindrically, spherically) to have its interior surface lined with these compartments, and where gamma photons would meet at the focal point and engage in pair production – the most efficient means for creating electricity – having exited from the sole focus-facing windows in the compartments. This type of window would only allow photons through it. Chemical reactants (hydrogen, catalysts) would only be allowed to traverse larger windows in the four sides of the compartments that are in direct contact with each other, allowing the initiation of nuclear reactions in those neighboring compartments but always constrained by physical structures from ‘running away’. Seeking the optimal window size – and shape,number – would be the sole activity of present E-Cat research. The back – and sixth – wall of the compartment would obviously be facing us, and have no windows. The compartments would be made of a very heat-resistant substance. All of this would eliminate the need for a drive, or at least minimize its use.
All the best,
Joe
Dear Andrea Rossi
about the presentation in Zurich on September 8 and 9:
“Test results of the 600 degree E-Cat, validation by third party company”
Correct?
Best regards
Giuliano Bettini
Dear Mark Saker:
No, too low energy can be focused this way.
But I thank you very much for your will to help!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I wonder if there is a possibility of using a similar reaction found in pocket handwarmers (google ‘peacock handwarmers’) which use lighter fluid(butane) and a platinum catalyst to create heat without a flame. Could a variation of this reaction be used to generate the ‘drive’ for the e-cat removing the need for heat.
I guess it depends on the amount of heat required and whether you can control the heat of the platinum catalytic reaction, perhaps by just moving the proximity of the heat source to the reactor?
Dear Herb Gills:
We followed another path.
To answer to your question an experiment must be done.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Nixter:
Thank you for the info, but in any case the certification is necessary.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Engineer Andrea Rossi,
There is a possible solution for the domestic installation, there is an outdoor type of boiler that is safe and does not necessarily increase the Homeowners Insurance rates. Certification should be MUCH easier to obtain if the unit is outside.
http://www.centralboiler.com/images/Above-Ground.gif
http://www.centralboiler.com/applications.php
Neutral beam injection (NBI) has been studied for heating plasma in hot fusion research. The neutral beam is produced by first accelerating deuterium ions to very high energy, then neutralizing the ions with electrons. The result is a neutral beam of D atoms. Could the neutral beam concept (using H instead of D), at much lower energies, be used to drive an LENR reaction? For example; by focusing the H atom neutral beam onto nickel particles or nickel film? It seems to me that this process might provide an alternate way to solve both the problems of providing H atoms (not H2 molecules) and providing the drive. Just a thought.
Dear Hank Mills:
You are right.
I understand you and you understand me. It’s matter of time.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Andrea,
(Disclaimer: The following post in no way whatsoever is meant to belittle a COP of 6 which is an amazing accomplishment. As it is right now, the E-Cat technology with a COP of 6 and stable temperatures of 1,000C offers a total solution to the energy crisis. However, as with any technology, improvement is possible.)
The concept of the “drive” that is required to keep the reactor stable (being turned on every so often between periods of self sustained operation) is very interesting to me. Without the drive, it has been indicated that the reactions in the core would start to increase to the point of becoming uncontrollable. A runaway situation could be possible in which the nickel powder could melt, and render the device non-functional.
My current guess — which could be totally wrong — is that during operation more and more reaction sites are created, increased levels of atomic hydrogen are produced, or additional nuclear processes may start taking place that may not be controllable. The purpose of the drive may be to focus high levels of heat (perhaps above 1,200C) onto the nickel powder, to damage or destroy a certain number of reaction sites. By destroying some small number of them, the reactor can remain controllable. Over time, reaction sites may start to build up, and the drive is needed to be “turned on” again.
If this is the reason for the “drive” it seems to me that eventually a method could be developed to prevent too many from forming. The same could be true if too high a level of atomic hydrogen is formed in the reactor core after a long period of time.
Somehow, there must be a way to construct the device so there are the equivalent of “control rods” or some other component that prevents excessive production of reaction sites, atomic hydrogen, or unwanted nuclear reactions. Coming up with such a system is probably much easier said than done, but I do not think it is impossible.
I sincerely hope that such a control method, eliminating the drive, can be achieved in the not too distant future. It would allow for this technology — which is already a total solution to the energy crisis — to become even more spectacular. Basically, it would make the technology simpler, because there would be no need to direct a portion of the output back to the input.
I wish there was a way you could share at least a little information about what is taking place inside the reactor core, so perhaps we could brainstorm ideas for you. Even if many of them were rubbish, a few of them might be useful. Of course I totally understand your need for secrecy due to the snakes and wannabe competitors that exist. There are many of them, and they cannot wait to use any bit of information you reveal against your company.
Hank Mills
Dear Piero:
You are not wrong, but there are big problems in the focusing. We are working on this, though: I hate any kind of constraint, and I want not to remain imprisoned in the necessity of electric drive for too long.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Jan Srajer:
No, it is impossible to focus its energy where we really need it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr.Rossi
Couldn’t in the place of drive resistor heater be able induction heater?
Right. After all even in my kitchen there is a chimney and it’s not a big deal. I also think of the webasto heaters burning gasoline in boats and rv’s. Fully automated and a snap to use. Regards Piero
Dear Piero:
A burner implies a combustion room, a chimney… But we have to resolve this problem, we cannot be bound to electricity for ever.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Reading your answer to Seppo, i’m lead to believe the opposite: using for example a gas burner allows for a better and faster control of the temperature. Think how harder it is to control the cooking of some food on an electric stove as compared to a gas one. May the issue is not that simple uh? All the best Piero
Dear Erik:
Thank you for your kind attention.
You will be contacted by our Licensee.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi, I follow your work for two years, I always optimistic about the results, now we are very near to see this technology spread around the world. I wonder if there is already a representative of the e-cat in Brazil and Latin America. I want to communicate with them and I apply to work with them in Brazil, would be a great honor for me to participate in this revolution. I am a Brazilian economist and a great enthusiast of this wonderful technology. If there are representatives in Brazil, you could send them this message showing my interest in working with them and join the revolution to come.
Thanks for your attention and I would be grateful if you put me in communication with your representatives in Brazil.
P. S. You do not need to answer on the site. Grateful.
Dear Seppo:
It is possible to have other heat sources, but not easy because the heating must be precisely focused. We are working also on this issue.
Thank you for rephrasing,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear dfnj:
The certification for the domestic E-Cat is pending. To sell domestic apparatuses without a certification is not possible, it is illegal, even by internet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I believe you make a statement we would be able to buy a home version of the E-Cat from Home Depot. What happened?
You do not need UL approval to sell in the USA. Why not just sell it direct from a website instead of through Home Depot. Or better yet, set the home E-Cat as a kit where only the key catalyzer is supplied by you.
Dr. Rossi, Siemens is expected to bid 1.3 billion euros for Ansaldo Energia
If you want to read about Ansaldo Energia, please click on this link.
http://www.ansaldoenergia.com/History.htm
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
USA
Dear Andrea Rossi, I am rephrasing my question: E-Cat takes in energy in the form of electricity and outputs energy in the form of heat, outputting in average 6 times more energy. Could part of the input energy be in the form of heat (perhaps conducted via solid materials under control of the electronics) to pre-heat the resistor or the reactor? Heat could be obtained from another E-Cat with less energy loss than electricity.
Dear Mark Saker:
No, that will not be a demo, but a convention.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Seppo:
I do not understand your question. Can you please rephrase it?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Peter Roe:
To have the address of our UK licensee, please contact
info@leonardocorp1996.com
giving us your exact address.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
As I live in the UK I am concerned that we may be among the last to benefit from the industrial e-cat technology, because of the unfortunate attachment of our present government to nuclear fission power and the complete silence of our news media on this subject.
Can you tell me whether there is a licensee for the UK please?
Regards, Peter
Dear Antenna,
Thank you for your interest in our model. We contend that our magnetic fields have a material structure, which has been rather overlooked within our standard model – albeit that this is logically required in terms of Faraday’s lines of force. The problem with this model, if there is one – is that it is almost offensively simple when compared to the complex machinations of the most of our theoretical physics. Our eternal hope is that it will speak to the quintessential clarity and logic and, indeed, the beauty – of Occam’s razor. But the full advantage of this field model also confronts the predictions required in terms of our standard model and the attendant constraints related to energy transfer. It is not likely to be immediately popular. But popularity does not always walk hand in hand with merit. Meanwhile, we are proposing that this material structure is the ‘carrier particle’ behind and fundamental to all our forces. Certainly we can resolve the ‘forces’ in line with these concepts. It seems to resolve most outstanding questions related to particle physics and it has the rare merit of being a self-consistent argument. But then, as ever, one needs to get past that ‘simplicity’ which in itself is somewhat confrontational. I’ve grown to realise that our theoretical physicists rather prefer a complex explanation. Sadly.
Kindest regards,
Rosemary Ainslie
Dear Andrea Rossi, from your recent comments, I have uderstood that the drive power for the E-Cat can also be in the form of heat, to some extend, instead of just electric power. This would make daisy-chaining the E-Cats much more effective in some future products, having less loss originating from conversion of heat to electricity. Is this correct?
Dear Hamdi Ucar
I am sorry I missed your questions. Essentially that oscillation only needs the application of a continual negative signal applied to the gate of Q1. This can be done variously through 555 switches, and according to a laboratory that has tested this device, can also be done by applying a negative signal directly from a small battery supply source.
If it’s a parasitic oscillation then it has the rare and contradictory attribute of also being self-sustaining and thereby potentially functional. What that paper is proposing is that this energy that is being measured to be in excess of the energy delivered by the battery supply – is indeed coming from magnetic fields. And the proposal is that these magnetic fields have a material structure. This is the only deviation from the standard model. We acknowledge also that the proposed particle would be non-standard and would have two distinct phases – both in and out of a structured field condition. Out of the field condition it would conform to the properties required by the Higg’s boson. But that is an even MORE contentious nature of our claim. We are soon to field a series of videos on all aspects of this discussion, and in the near future.
If you wish to join our discussion on this we have a forum devoted to these questions – and which also alerts our readers to updates on Andrea Rossi’s work. Here’s the link. http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/
We’d be delighted to have you join those discussions.
Kindest regards,
Rosemary Ainslie
Hi everyone!
I just updated my web site: http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/ . After two exhausting months, at last I completed the new version of my work (SEPPv4)! Additionally you will, an Aether Control Experiment or technically it is called Moving Standing Wave where the kinetic effects are based on Rhythmodynamics of Yuri.N.Ivanov, when we extend his theory for all propagation mediums. The dynamic effect calculations (Standing Wave, Sinking into Aether (Invisible matter), Negative Energy (Antigravity) are not related to Rhythmodynamics and they are new discoveries related to Space-Time Engineering (Planck constant for any propagation medium).
The link for the Aether Control Experiment (Video Link) is located at the beginning of the Web Page on the left upper corner with yellow color.
Be inspired!
Ioannis Xydous
Electronic Engineer
Web Site: http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/
Switzerland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. It is great news about you attending Zurich on September 8-9 for the conference entitled ‘Energy Change with E-Cat Technology’. Can you advise whether any working e-cats will be presented?
2. If the answer is yes, will it be the domestic low termperature e-cat, or high temperature e-cat?
Many Many Thanks
Mark
Hi Andrea, about the self sustained mode duration you said :”about 50% of the time”.
It is certainly related with the cop. and due that the self sustained sessions can be set for a different duration, and the longer sessions are definite unsafe, I can gather that it is relate to the different amount of H adsorbed from the NI: more amount of H longer session, the power modulation should depend from the quantity of H adsorbited for each session, and to a shorter session correspond a lower cop and safer operation.
The COP 6 should be a compromise between the COP and safety.
I gather also that during the productive operation the Ni cannot refilled of H and the intermittent mode of operation is necessary for this issue.
These informations are not useful for me (I am not involved in any research field) but could be useful to start understanding the e-cat mechanical.
Best regards
Alessandro Coppi