Categories

Peer Review

All the articles published on the Journal Of Nuclear Physics are Peer Reviewed. The Peer Review of every paper is made by at least one University Physics Professor.

Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe

by
U.V.S.Seshavatharam
Honorary Faculty, Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas(I-SERVE)
Hyderabad-35, India
Email: seshavatharam.uvs@gmail.com
.
.
Introduction
Now as recently reported at the American Astronomical Society a study using the Very Large Array radio telescope in New Mexico and the French Plateau de Bure Interferometer has enabled astronomers to peer within a billion years of the Big Bang and found evidence that black holes were the first that leads galaxy growth. The implication is that the black holes started growing first. Initially astrophysicists attempted to explain the presence of these black holes by describing the evolution of galaxies as gathering mass until black holes format their center but further observation demanded that the galactic central black hole co-evolved with the galactic bulge plasma dynamics and the galactic arms. This is a fundamental confirmation of N. Haramein’s theory described in his papers as a universe composed of “different scale black holes from universal size to atomic size”.
This clearly suggests that: galaxy constitutes a central black hole; the central black hole grows first; Star and galaxy growth goes parallel or later to the central black holes growth. The fundamental questions are: If “black hole” is the result of a collapsing star, how and why a stable galaxy contains a black hole at its center? Where does the central black hole comes from? How the galaxy center will grow like a black hole? How its event horizon exists with growing? If these are the observed and believed facts — not only for the author — this is a big problem for the whole science community to be understood.
Any how, the important point to be noted here is that “due to some unknown reason galactic central black holes are growing”! This is the key point for the beginning of the proposed expanding or growing cosmic black hole! See this latest published reference for the “black hole universe”. In our daily life generally it is observed that any animal or fruit or human beings (from birth to death) grows with closed boundaries (irregular shapes also can have a closed boundary). An apple grows like an apple. An elephant grows like an elephant. A plant grows like a plant. A human grows like a human. Through out their lifetime they won’t change their respective identities. These are observed facts. From these observed facts it can be suggested that “growth” or “expansion” can be possible with a closed boundary. By any reason if the closed boundary is opened it leads to “destruction” rather than “growth or expansion”. Thinking that nature loves symmetry, in a heuristic approach in this paper author assumes that“ through out its lifetime universe is a black hole”. Even though it is growing, at any time it is having an event horizon with a closed boundary and thus it retains her identity as a black hole forever. Note that universe is an independent body. It may have its own set of laws. At any time if universe maintains a closed boundary to have its size minimum at that time it must follow “strong gravity” at that time.
If universe is having no black hole structure any massive body(which is bound to the universe) may not show a black hole structure. That is black hole structure may be a subset of cosmic structure. This idea may be given a chance.
Rotation is a universal phenomenon. We know that black holes are having rotation and are not stationary. Recent observations indicates that black holes are spinning close to speed of light.
In this paper author made an attempt to give an outline of “expanding and light speed rotating black hole universe” that follows strong gravity from its birth to end of expansion.
Stephen Hawking in his famous book A Brief History of Time, in Chapter 3 which is entitled The Expanding Universe, says: “Friedmann made two very simple assumptions about the universe: that the universe looks identical in which ever direction we look, and that this would also be true if we were observing the universe from anywhere else. From these two ideas alone, Friedmann showed that we should not expect the universe to be static. In fact, in 1922, several years before Edwin Hubble’s discovery, Friedmann predicted exactly what Hubble found… We have no scientific evidence for, or against, the Friedmann’s second assumption. We believe it only on grounds of modesty: it would be most remarkable if the universe looked the same in every direction around us, but not around other points in the universe”.
From this statement it is very clear and can be suggested that, the possibility for a “closed universe” and a “flat universe” is 50–50 per cent and one cannot completely avoid the concept of a “closed universe”.
Clearly speaking, from Hubble’s observations and interpretations in 1929, the possibility of “galaxy receding” and “galaxy revolution” is 50–50 per cent and one cannot completely avoid the concept of “rotating universe”.
.
.

431 comments to Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe

  • DTravchenko

    Thank you for the three answers, and again
    Godspeed, from Russia, with love
    D.T.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N.Karels:
    I cannot give this information.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Since the E-Cat operation is insensitive to gravity, can we conclude that during normal operation there are no liquids, such as lithium (melting point 180.5C, boiling point 1,330C), within the reactor?

  • Robert Curto

    Dear eernie1, I forgot to add.
    Of course it would be great for E-Cat to get the safety certification for the domestic E-Cats.
    Robert Curto

  • eernie1

    Dear Robert Curto,
    Are you referring to Dr Ken Matsumura? He claims to be able to deliver side effect free chemo treatment which cured many patients. If you read his statements on his web site,he states that he received approval to begin clinical testing of his method in four days after submission of his proposal. Would you say it was close to immediate? He also claims that main stream medical institutions are trying to disrupt his efforts.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    The E-Cat’s operation is not affected from gravity. Horizontal orientation is just simpler to set up.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Can your eCat units work in any alignment relative to gravity? Specifically, we see photos of a horizontal eCat functioning. Will it work equally as well in the vertical orientation?

  • Robert Curto

    Dr.Rossi, this is a copy of an email, I sent to my friends:

    Dr. Andrea Rossi invented the E-Cat.
    It will provide inexpensive heat and electricity, with zero emissions and zero
    waste.
    No radioactive rods that take 300,000 years to decay.

    Dr. Rossi has a website where readers can post.
    Well this one person posted how a drug is released IMMEDIATELY.
    Well I could not let that stand, so I sent the enclosed email to Dr. Rossi.
    He asked me to post it on his website, JoNP.
    Journal of Nuclear Physics.

    I don’t which is going to come first:
    Dr. Rossi’s success in Physics, or
    Dr. Matsumura’s Nobel in Medicine.
    And both of them are my email buddies.
    Am I lucky or what.
    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
    USA

  • eernie1

    Dear Robert Curto,
    In the past some drugs bypassed much of the standard testing procedure you outlined. Especially in those cases where the drugs were the last resort for a patient. Despite all the precautions that are taken most drugs carry side effects that are known which do not keep them from use. In fact many drugs dealing with cancer were released before complete testing on the premise that the side effects were more acceptable than the death of the patient. The years of testing if the drugs were not released early would have resulted in many lost lives. How many lives can be saved if the Rossi devices can be approved for use as soon as possible. HIV drugs also were released early.

  • Andrea Rossi

    TO THE READERS OF THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS:
    TODAY HAS BEEN PUBLISHED THE NEW PAPER ” A BRIEF REPORT ON HUBBLE VOLUME, MOLAR ELECTRON MASS AND THE FOUR COSMOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS”, BY PROF. S. LAKSMINARAYANA (INDIA) AND PROF. U.V.S. SESHAVATHARAM (INDIA).
    JoNP’s B.o.A.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    Thank you for your precisation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frederic Maillard:
    I am not involved in commercial issues.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Frederic Maillard

    Dear Andrea,

    1) Correct me if I am wrong but it seems that only a handful of 1 MW E-Cats have been sold so far. Why so few as they have been certified by SGS for quite some time (Sept 2012) ?

    2) Any idea of when anyone of these clients will accept to publicize this acquisition ?

    Many thanks for your reply,
    Best regards
    Frederic

  • Robert Curto

    Dr. Rossi, Fernie 1 wrote:
    “In Pharmaceutical testing procedures a drug that shows positive results in mitigating physical problems is IMMEDIATELY released for patient use.
    It does not work that way.

    First the Drug Company experiments with many drugs, for God knows how long.
    When they find one that shows promise in the Lab, they try it on animals, then they apply to the FDA to do Clinical Trials.
    Clinical trail One is on a few patients for safety.
    Then they do Clinical Trail Two on a larger group, maybe a hundred, for safety, side effects, and effectiveness.
    Then they do Clinical Trial Three which involves thousands of patients, at maybe 6 Centers.
    If it shows some positive results, maybe 30 or 40% they summit the data to the FDA.
    The FDA studies for maybe a year or so, then they decide if they will approve it.

    This takes more then 5 years, and cost a few hundred million dollars, sometimes more then a half a billion dollars.
    This does not mean the drug has no side effects.
    Ask someone who has had chemo for cancer.
    The side effects effects are devastating.

    I am a layman, who happens to be interested in cancer research.
    I have exchanged over 5,000 emails with Doctors doing cancer research.
    They have become my friends.
    One is the Director of the Medicor Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada.
    One was on the cover of Time.
    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
    USA

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gary Cleghorn:
    Thank you, interesting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gary Cleghorn

    Dear Andrea, this article on phys.org might be of great interest to you and your R&D team.

    Researchers find tin selenide shows promise for efficiently converting waste heat into electrical energy

    http://phys.org/news/2014-04-tin-selenide-efficiently-electrical-energy.html

    Regards, Gary.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    1- I cannot give this kind of data before the publication of the report by the Third Indipendent Party.
    2- Very interesting. Thank you for the information.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andreas Moraitis

    Dear Wladimir,

    I think that Andrea Rossi meant that the “standard” is defined by nature, not by physics. Physicists can try to decode that standard, but in no way they can define it themselves. I agree, however, that this epistemological foundation is sometimes misunderstood.

    Best regards,
    Andreas

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    A couple questions and thoughts.

    1) If you increase the temperature of a hot cat, lets say from 500C to 1000C, to what extent does the input power have to increase? You have told us before that the output increases with temperature. I’m thinking that the extra input should be less than the additional resulting output.

    2) Indoor agriculture is a quickly growing industry. In a recent article I read, the biggest challenge and cost associated with indoor agriculture in northern areas of the United States is producing enough heat to keep the facility warm. Also, whay prohibits these companies from designing multiple story farms is the energy cost of moving people, equipment, and product up and down. I think the E-Cat would be capable of providing all the heat and electricity needed for this industry.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Andrea Rossi wrote in April 17th, 2014 at 7:47 AM

    Wladimir Guglinski:

    1) —————————
    My friend Prof. Sergio Focardi used to say: ” They sustain that known Physics are incompatible with LENR just because they do not study enough the so called known Physics”.
    The so called Rossi effect has nothing that cannot be explained by means of the well known Physics.
    ——————————

    COMMENT

    Dear Andrea
    as you know, LENR encompasses a wide range of experiences and each one of them requires a different theory to explain the experimental results.

    And some of the experiments cannot be explained by considering the foundations of the Standard Nuclear Physics.

    For instance, in Pamela Mosier-Boss experiment neutrons are emitted with energy of about 10MeV, while from the Standard Nuclear Physics only neutrons with 2MeV could be emitted.
    From Standard Nuclear Physics there is no way to explain the 8MeV excess energy.
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090323110450.htm

    Perhaps the Rossi efect can be explained via the known Physics, as claimed by your friend Prof. Focardi.
    However, there is need to verify his claim.
    Besides, even if Prof. Focari is right and Rossi effect can indeed explained via the known Physics, however it does not means that other LENR experiments can be explained either.

    2) —————————
    About “Standard Nuclear Physics”: this definition is an oxymoron.
    ——————————

    COMMENT

    Absolutely not.
    There are some principles of the Standard Nuclear Physics which are perfectly defined, with no any contradictory sense.
    For instance, in the Standard Nuclear Physics it is considered that protons and neutrons are bound within the nuclei via the strong nuclear force.

    It is a well defined proposal. There is not any contradictory sense in it.

    And the experiment which detected the halo neutron in the 4Be11 defy such well stablished principle of the Standard Nuclear Physics, because the strong force actuates in the maximum distance of 3fm, while the neutron halo has a distance of 7fm from the core of the 4Be11.
    http://www.uni-mainz.de/eng/13031.php

    regards
    wlad

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gherardo:
    Thank you, Happy Easter to you!
    A.R.

  • Gherardo

    Ok! The time has come…
    Happy Easter to Dott.Rossi and all readers.

    Gherardo

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    …and both can be turned into energy!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Coppi:
    I can give you my opinion, since this issue does not depend on me, absolutely. My opinion is that the publication will be made within June, but this is an opinion. I cannot give any information about the timing of the different phases of the Professors’ work ( reactor test phase, calculation phase, report writing phase, reviewing phase, publication).
    Happy Easter to you,
    A.R.

  • Alessandro Coppi

    Hi Andrea, this is the simple question that all of us are waiting for the answer: in your opinion how much time is far the end of the 3P test? in which manner you would define better such time lapse: days, weeks, months? could we find a surprise in the egg?

    Happy Easter

    Alessandro Coppi

  • Joseph Fine

    Andrea Rossi,

    Fermions can be positive (protons) or negative (electrons) just like the third independent party results. ;)

    Joseph Fine

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    You are asking for specific answers to issues that are object of R&D. The results of the R&D process that our team is making can be positive, but also negative, so it would be trivial, from my side, to give now specific answers to your intelligent questions.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Wladimir Guglinski:
    My friend Prof. Sergio Focardi used to say: ” They sustain that known Physics are incompatible with LENR just because they do not study enough the so called known Physics”.
    The so called Rossi effect has nothing that cannot be explained by means of the well known Physics.
    About “Standard Nuclear Physics”: this definition is an oxymoron.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    We are working in direction of heat production as well as in direction of electric power production. As for the scale issue, it depends on the evolution, therefore it is impossible right now to give specific answers. Opinions change with the results of tests and R&D. Please do not forget that the results of the test can be positive, but also negative.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Regardless of the independent testing, do you see the immediate role of eCat technology as one of warming (heat generation) at moderate temperatures or do you foresee eCat becoming the heat source for electric power plant generation with their required higher operating temperatures?

    While it may be more technologically difficult going to the electricity generation route, it probably is an easier adaptation into the current energy system(s). Make the technology change at the energy generation point and make use of existing infrastructure to move the energy. Or, another way of looking at it — managing a few hundred GW eCat units might be easier than managing a million 1MW warm eCat units. Opinion?

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Steven N. Karels wrote in April 16th, 2014 at 12:17 PM

    Wladimir,

    While LENR technology looks promising, nuclear is present technology. Its ugly parts are known. I would contend we don’t know yet if LENR has “ugly” parts.
    ———————————————

    COMMENT

    Dear Steven
    the ugliest part of LENR is overthrowing the Standard Nuclear Physics

    haha

    regards
    wlad

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>