Black hole Cosmos and the Micro Cosmos

.
by
.
U.V.S.Seshavatharam
Honorary faculty, I-SERVE, Alakapuri
Hyderabad-35, AP, India
Email: seshavatharam.uvs@gmail.com
.
S.Lakshminarayana
Dept.of Nuclear Physics, Andhra University
Visakhapatnam-03, AP, India
Email: lnsrirama@yahoo.com
.
.
Abstract
Point of ‘big bang’ can be considered as the center or characteristic reference point of cosmic expansion in all directions.
If so, the existence of ‘preferred direction’ in the universe may not be wrong.
Based on the Mach’s principle, it can be suggested that, within the ‘Hubble volume’ overall distribution of ‘Hubble mass’ will explain the
observed physical phenomena.
With the discovered applications it is very clear to say that, without a joint and unified study of cosmology and atomic & particle physics, one should not deny the concepts of black hole cosmology.
The most interesting thing is that, at any given cosmic time, if the universe is a primordial growing black hole, then certainly its ‘Schwarzschild radius’ can be considered as its characteristic minimum size at that time.
Clearly speaking, “forever rotating at light speed, high temperature and high angular velocity small sized primordial cosmic black hole gradually transforms into a low temperature and low angular velocity large sized massive primordial cosmic black hole”.
Independent of the redshift observations and considering the proposed relations, with a great confidence now one can start seeing/observing the universe as a primordial expanding and light speed rotating black hole. Based on the proposed relations and concepts of black hole cosmology, definitions of cosmic homogeneity and cosmic isotropy must be re-addressed.
It is also clear that, now the black hole universe is expanding in a decelerating mode at a very small rate in such a way that with current technology one cannot measure its deceleration rate.
Finally it can be suggested that cosmic acceleration and dark energy can be considered as pure mathematical concepts and there exists no physical base behind their affirmation.
For the most serious cosmologists this may be a bitter news, but it is a fact.
Authors hope that, by 2015 definitely this subject will come into main stream physics.
With reference to Black hole cosmology, it can be suggested that, characteristic nuclear charge radius and the characteristic angular momentum of the revolving electron increase with cosmic time.
In addition, characteristic nuclear charge radius is more fundamental than the reduced Planck’s constant.
The key point to be noted is that the Planck’s constant can be considered as a cosmological constant.
.
.

556 comments to Black hole Cosmos and the Micro Cosmos

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jean Pierre:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • To all blog readers.

    I am now old, and my accurate recall of the early 60s when I was a young technician in a chemical factory is now a bit in doubt. However, I recall the following names and their meanings;

    1) A catalyst is a substance that changes the rate of reaction without being modified itself.

    2) An accelerator is a chemical that changes the rate of reaction but does become modified by the reaction.

    From these two recollections I propose that ,in the Lugano test, if Andrea had added a catalyst to the fuel powder as
    his magic ‘sauce’ then it would have come through the reactions unscathed and been detected easily. This would not have been the case with an accelerator.

    If the magic ‘sauce’ was not an accelerator but a catalyst, then it seems reasonable to assume that the catalyst was the lattice itself ,which, presumably, came through the reaction unchanged. No added powder catalyst was detected.

    Perhaps my musings are flawed because the above ideas are rooted in old chemistry and not advanced nuclear considerations. Comments humbly and gratefully received.

    Thank you in anticipation. Jean Pierre

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jean Pierre:
    There are many different systems of maintainance, depending on the specific situations.
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hi Andrea,
    Your idea of changing out 10 modules at a time so that there will be no cessation of 1mWh/h to inconvenience the customer is a valid idea.
    However, I am not convinced that the customer will appreciate there being a continuous 24 hour maintenance going on for about two weeks. Also, using a more practical 12 hour day would mean extending this to about a month.
    It would seem to me to be a better idea to lease the plant for a year (assuming it will run for this time before maintenance) and then bring in a replacement that can stand close to the old plant and be run up to full power and then switched in to replace the old one . Of course, thought must be given to the necessary associated hardware that will need to cope with this switching.
    The advantage would be that the old plant can be taken to a central refurbishment factory where all the expertise would be concentrated and the plant worked on at leisure.
    Thinking ahead into the future when many customers will be involved , then it follows that there will be a large number of trained maintenance men spread all over the country rather than far less in one central place where perhaps robotic repairs might be feasible to assist. There would be greater quality control via this method and greater safety too?
    Best wishes. Jean Pierre

  • Andrea Rossi

    April:
    The electron capture happens ( very rarely) only when the atomic nucleus contains a superabundance of protons, which is not our case. The theories that try to explain LENR with electron capture contain basic errors, about which I already have written, due to lack of knowledge of elementary Physics laws and can only add confusion to an already complicated matter. My sensation is that among most of LENR “experts” ( either positively or negatively biased) is maintained the following equation:
    Physics pages written : Physics pages studied = 100 : 1
    This does not help.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Do you think electron capture can explain the so called “Rossi Effect”?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>