Black hole Cosmos and the Micro Cosmos

.
by
.
U.V.S.Seshavatharam
Honorary faculty, I-SERVE, Alakapuri
Hyderabad-35, AP, India
Email: seshavatharam.uvs@gmail.com
.
S.Lakshminarayana
Dept.of Nuclear Physics, Andhra University
Visakhapatnam-03, AP, India
Email: lnsrirama@yahoo.com
.
.
Abstract
Point of ‘big bang’ can be considered as the center or characteristic reference point of cosmic expansion in all directions.
If so, the existence of ‘preferred direction’ in the universe may not be wrong.
Based on the Mach’s principle, it can be suggested that, within the ‘Hubble volume’ overall distribution of ‘Hubble mass’ will explain the
observed physical phenomena.
With the discovered applications it is very clear to say that, without a joint and unified study of cosmology and atomic & particle physics, one should not deny the concepts of black hole cosmology.
The most interesting thing is that, at any given cosmic time, if the universe is a primordial growing black hole, then certainly its ‘Schwarzschild radius’ can be considered as its characteristic minimum size at that time.
Clearly speaking, “forever rotating at light speed, high temperature and high angular velocity small sized primordial cosmic black hole gradually transforms into a low temperature and low angular velocity large sized massive primordial cosmic black hole”.
Independent of the redshift observations and considering the proposed relations, with a great confidence now one can start seeing/observing the universe as a primordial expanding and light speed rotating black hole. Based on the proposed relations and concepts of black hole cosmology, definitions of cosmic homogeneity and cosmic isotropy must be re-addressed.
It is also clear that, now the black hole universe is expanding in a decelerating mode at a very small rate in such a way that with current technology one cannot measure its deceleration rate.
Finally it can be suggested that cosmic acceleration and dark energy can be considered as pure mathematical concepts and there exists no physical base behind their affirmation.
For the most serious cosmologists this may be a bitter news, but it is a fact.
Authors hope that, by 2015 definitely this subject will come into main stream physics.
With reference to Black hole cosmology, it can be suggested that, characteristic nuclear charge radius and the characteristic angular momentum of the revolving electron increase with cosmic time.
In addition, characteristic nuclear charge radius is more fundamental than the reduced Planck’s constant.
The key point to be noted is that the Planck’s constant can be considered as a cosmological constant.
.
.

558 comments to Black hole Cosmos and the Micro Cosmos

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    Thank you
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Coppi:
    Really, as soon as I will have available information I will be happy (or maybe unhappy) to give it to our Readers.
    Warm regards
    A.R.

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    Thank you for your kind words. It is people like you who discover and develop new and once considered difficult principles of science who keep me young.
    Fond regards.

  • Alessandro Coppi

    Hi Andrea, you wrote something with capital letters: “I still do not have AVAILABLE information to give”.
    Is 12 october a good day in your opinion for an announce of a discovery?

    Terra!!!
    Alessandro Coppi

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    Old??? You are vivacious like a kid ! I wish I arrive to your age with your freshness of mind.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jean Claud Renoir:
    Mats Lewan is a man whose main characteristic is the sincerity, and his book mirrors this characteristic of his. He is a scientific-investigative journalist, with a solid cultural base ( he has an engineering degree), curious to know anything new around and to investigate about. When he writes he is honest and sincere. When he writes a thing, is because he is convinced it is fit to be reported as he has sincerely understood it. For this reason his writing is interesting, as well as interesting the Journal he writes for ( Nyteknik).
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jean Claud Renoir:
    Global Symmetry does not produce forces, it just gives an idea that something is moving around in the fields, everywhere and uniformly, at the same time; LOCAL Symmetries ( separately, at every point) can produce connection fields that generate Nature’s forces.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Xavier Pitz:
    I meant: ” I still do not have AVAILABLE information to give”. Thank you from your kind attention from the great France, where I worked very much in the Seventies.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bill Nichols:
    Fantastic comment!
    Let me digest it, dropped like a bomb from a B 52. Booomm!
    Gotta return to my 1 MW baby, he decided Sunday is the best day to make troubles. Especially during the night.
    Talk to you soon,
    Andrea

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gian Luca:
    The “Ragazzi di Via Panisperna” have been the pioneers of the Nuclear Physics.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gian Luca

    Dear A.R.
    Majorana with his studies he was a man of the future.
    If he were here today would certainly be a supporter of
    Rossi / Focardi.
    I’m sure…
    saluti
    Gian Luca

  • JCRenoir

    Dr Rossi:
    Is Global Symmetry responsible for bearing the forces?
    JCRenoir

  • JCRenoir

    I read the book of Mats Lewan ” An Impossible Invention”: what do you think of this book?
    JCR

  • Bill Nichols

    Dear Andrea:

    Thanks for your response and question.

    Since the e cat is a closed system (as we know it), your findings/comments are reasonable. Please be open (hint) to eventual offshoots if your important e cat endeavor is as successful as we all hope it is. Perhaps a gold mine in future research.

    Regarding your question. Yes and No. First, the No portion to your question.

    No. Projects I most heavily was involved with personally did not directly measure what we call positrons since much has been learned recently. Suggest this is a tree in the energy forest. Stealth principles and survivability were also always first.

    Yes. Simply described. Offer it is part of the Cascade of Energy of radiant energy, atmospheric physics, what I describe for lacking a better word electro-chemistry (Nano-technology enhanced, localized atmospheric conditions interactions roughly defined as resonance and coherence and so on) in stealth technology properties.

    Can we agree?

    • The simpler the explanation the better, “Occam’s razor” principle.

    • Science essentially explains our world that is testable and verifiable. Nature is the judge and jury, theories are man’s opinion. History shows too much emphasis on opinion and this is dangerous.

    • Data is never pristine. Caveats are critical. In Situ and Proxy data are not the same. Even In Situ data must be fully understood to what it measures.

    • The more I learn, the less I’m certain, and more I question. That is good.

    • The 5 blind men and elephant story reflects my 4 decades journey in science and others seem to suffer the same affliction.

    • Truth is our goal for a better life for all of us, Science is the vehicle to truth, the process of inquiry is the compass and fuel.

    Consider 3 concepts in adding to key on while using existing science concepts…

    1. Frame Of Reference. Are we using the correct tools?
    2. Scale Analysis (spatially, temporally, changing properties/characteristics of 6 forms of what we commonly define as energy) continuously applied to phenomena.
    3. Differentials (more than just G gravity or Q charge).

    When I gave high level briefings to key decision-makers in USAF/USN/Army/DOD, besides keep it simple, pictures to visualize were quite helpful. Mostly with Stealth Technology, Radiant Energy Principles, Climate Change, Future Weapon Systems including high altitude platforms.

    Here’s one picture I ask you to keep in your mind and as you move to the next section…

    Our current understanding may be more like a square peg of G/Q and accompanying mathematics, while cosmology is more like a round hole that operates like a slinky (type of oscillation?). It’s close, just incomplete for fuller, better applications.

    Now,

    Since I know your very busy…basic thoughts to your question.

    A.) We learned in USAF from large scales (macro) to the smallest (micro) importance of size and shape toward energy properties. You’ve noticed this too in some of your statements.
    B.) The broad concept, the “Global Electric Circuit” is poorly understood, ask for your consideration evidence continues to increase its more dynamic and holistic involvement with earth’s weather and climate. A tome could be written on this.
    C.) The thunderstorm phenomenon is not understood well (offer at all). Experiments we did if your interested may be of utility. These data reside in very closed circles. Directed these programs if you have questions.
    D.) Blue Jet , Red Sprites, Elves, high altitude ionization appear are more dynamic and holistic to earth-atmosphere system.
    E.) Do we fully understand the “y-axis” of the x-y axis of wavelength/frequency?
    F.) Properties of stealth may share similarities to micro size-shape relations you use.
    G.) Keep in mind the propagation properties of E-M…water is a remarkable compound, alchemy? Nexus of Atmospheric parameters link to lightning is beyond basic thermodynamics you’ve learned.
    H.) My experiences as an aviator (B-52), operating the most powerful E-M platforms in 1970s and early 1980s has proven priceless before my grounding and becoming a full time scientist. Meritocracy was always first order.

    Keeping the slinky picture in mind. Perhaps positrons are not even a tree, but a leaf. Yet, a useful clue though, we are not in a desert of energy.

    On the larger scales, look at our solar system, then, add the magnetic electric sheath of solar system graphical multi-variant pictures. Can our basic principles fully explain based in “gravity” and “charge”? Visualize Galaxy groups, Galaxies, hurricanes, extra-tropical systems, eddies (tornadoes, dust devils, smaller), similar characteristics coincidence? Go on to the smaller scales. See any inconsistencies and opportunities for testing toward improved understanding? Are you aware there are world atmosphere energy changes in the 25 to 35 day period that are very close (positive statistical correlation) to sun’s rotation pattern periodicity? Is this coincidence? Are you familiar with eigenvectors and eigenvalues? Uses and limitations? Keep in mind Big Bang, Dark Matter, Dark Energy are man’s theories (opinion) with no real direct concrete evidence, at incredible scales of energy for the slinky picture analogy. Example: Are you aware of eV profiles in dust devils, Tornadoes?

    Final point. My sense is we are living in continuous foam of energy that again operates like a slinky.

    Keep an open mind, Since you mentioned your very interested, this in my military records, I was the Weather Commander at Holloman AFB, NM while bringing F-117A Stealth Fighters during DESERT STORM. Worked with Gen Curtis Le May, (contacted by him) who was very energized, desperate and sincere, just before he passed, questions he had access to. Was told me had contacts to some things we were doing to things many, many, decades before.

    If you’re very interested in positrons, on the correct path. Consider the tree and forest analogy as you move forward?

    I can understand if you and others are scratching your heads. Can only postulate nature (data) and scales of cosmological phenomena suggests much of this.

    One very, very, big one benefit and truth is there is no conflict with science and spirituality. Keep in mind 1st Principle of Thermodynamics: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; only TRANSFORMED.

    Trust you found this at least curious and thought provoking to your question. This is already too long, could provide much, much, more but also wrong venue due to complexity of thought and areas worked and ramifications.

    Use your gut to assess if there is value to anything above. Found truth leads to comfort, less comfort is further from the truth. Science and feelings…yes. You must digest and decide.

    Again, good luck!

    Kind Regards,

    Bill Nichols

  • Xavier Pitz

    Dear Andrea,

    Concerning your answer to Silvio Caggia.

    Did you just meant “He,he,he…” or
    “He,he,he… I still do not have information to give.” ?

    :-)

    Regards from France,

    Xavier Pitz

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    The Majorana fermion concept is as old as I(1930), and is similar to the epo(electron- positron) of Dirac and the particle(photon-anti photon) of our Wlad that theoretically fills the aether. Perhaps the investigators who claim to have seen the Majorana fermion have only found another method of extracting this energy from the aether.

  • Andrea Rossi

    P. Janhunen:
    Thank you for your interesting and correct explication.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • P Janhunen

    Dear Andrea,

    Concerning positrons in thunderstorms, I find the wpedia page “Relativistic runaway electron avalanche” to be a readable introduction to the topic.

    The main idea is that once an electron moves in air fast enough (with more than 100 eV kinetic energy or so), the average friction that it experiences due to Coulomb collisions with atomic electrons and nuclei gets smaller when the energy gets larger (for lower energies, the reverse is true). Hence, if a fast electron is created by some seed mechanism such as cosmic ray, it can be accelerated until it becomes relativistic. The limit is set by the voltage drop that exists between ground and cloud which can be several million volts. Electrons with such high energies are able to create positrons when colliding with other electrons.

    The faster a charged particle moves, the less time it has to interact coulombically with other particles when passing by. The same mechanism explains why radiation therapy is possible: when a charged particle beam moves through tissue, it deposits most of its energy at a certain depth, not at the skin.
    regards, /pekka

  • Andrea Rossi

    Silvio Caggia:
    He,he,he…
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear JoNP Readers,
    while waiting for the ITPR, in my free time I gathered a sort of “LENR theory”. Yet Another one!
    I would very much appreciate any comments/suggestions/sharp criticism … . So I prepared a trivial web site with the “theory” in a pdf document and a blog page for your comments.
    The page is:

    http://lenr-calaon-explanation.weebly.com/

    The “theory” is more of a collection of ideas comprising the set of what I think are the real LENR reactions (nothing really new as you will read), plus the mechanism that makes them possible. Nothing outside the realm of accepted physics.

    I hope you’ll find it interesting.

    Best regards

    Andrea Calaon

  • silvio caggia

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    So you will not be allowed to tell us that you received the report (3 days before publishing)…
    But we can ask you daily if you received the report and you will answer “I still do not have information to give.”… Till that day! :-)
    This is like non-destructive quantic measuring 😀
    Quantic Regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    John L.:
    Thank you for the suggestion, that is interesting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • John L

    Hello Andrea,
    I was thinking along the line of using hot molten salt to trigger and regulate the Rossi effect/LENR and as the same time, a medium for storage of the extra heat generated. Perhaps an integration of existing concentrated solar molten salt plant with Hotcats for electric power generation.

    Respectfully regards, John L

  • Andrea Rossi

    To the Readers:
    On Science has been published the discovery of the “Majorana Fermion”, so called because it has been hypotised by Ettore Majorana ( fellow student of Enrico Fermi , when they were called “I ragazzi di via Panisperna”). This particle is extremely interesting because it is, at the same time, an elementary particle AND its own antiparticle. The discovery has been made in the Princeton University by the Group of Nadj- Perge.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hugh D.:
    Very interesting: when NASA is around, there is much to learn.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    John L.:
    No, not yet. What are you thinking about, precisely?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • John L

    Hello Andrea,
    Have you tried to combine a Hotcat with molten salt technologies – any productive outcome?

    Respectfully regards, John L

  • Hugh D

    Dear Andre,
    Thunderstorm produced positrons
    Thunderstorms produce plenty of positively charged particles and negatively charged particles by forces causing electrons to be added or subtracted by convection from aerosol particles. The result is lightning which is believed to create bursts of positrons.

    “Scientists think the antimatter particles were formed in a terrestrial gamma-ray flash (TGF), a brief burst produced inside thunderstorms and shown to be associated with lightning. It is estimated that about 500 TGFs occur daily worldwide.”

    See http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/GLAST/news/fermi-thunderstorms.html

    I am certainly no expert on positrons or antimatter.

    Best regards,
    Hugh

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mats Lewan:
    Good luck for your honest and sincere book.
    Andrea Rossi

  • Andrea Rossi

    Joseph J.:
    Maybe.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pietro F.:
    Our patent strategy is made by out patent attorneys.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giuliano Bettini:
    I still do not have information to give.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    LucaS:
    Thank you for your kind comment. Let’s hope.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • LucaS

    Caro Andrea,

    Ti seguo dall’inizio della tua avventura come un tifoso segue la sua squadra del cuore…. e ti auguro un grandissimo in bocca al lupo in vista del prossimo report!

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    You mentioned that under the protocol, you will receive a advanced release of the independent report three days before the publication. Are you allowed to reveal that you have received that release?

  • Giuliano Bettini

    Dear Andrea,
    happy Saturday and good Sunday.
    do you give us a warning, when you’ll receive the report?
    If I remember you said “…they will deliver to me the report several days before the publication”.
    “Several” = “3 to 4 days”, you said.
    Regards,
    Giuliano Bettini.

  • Pietro F.

    e se cambiasse strategia riguardo la proprietà intellettuale e il prossimo brevetto? Potrebbe seguire il pensiero di Elon Musk, ceo di Tesla:
    And if he changes his strategy regarding intellectual property and the next patent ? Could follow the thought of Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla:

    http://www.industrie-techno.com/tesla-donner-ses-brevets-rapporte-plus-que-de-les-defendre.30696

    buon lavoro.

    Pietro F.

  • Joseph J

    Dear Andrea

    Is the e-cat also suitable for containerized desalination as, for example this company is offering?
    Canadian Clear http://www.canadianclear.com/desalination.html
    Or these http://www.hohusa.net/InsideViews.html

  • To the readers of JONP:
    My book ‘An Impossible Invention — The Energy Source that Could Change the World’ is now available as an ebook on Amazon:
    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00O38417S

  • Andrea Rossi

    Wladimir Guglinski:
    He,he..yes, but I am a servant of God and I need coffee. Hungry and nervous is the perfect state to work for something.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    Interesting, thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Joe:
    Thank you for the information.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Joe

    Dr Rossi,

    Concerning your question about positrons and thunderstorms, the following might help:

    “And under the clouds the investigators documented extraordinary strikes of “positive” lightning. These bolts were six times as powerful as ordinary “negative” lightning, and they lasted ten times as long.”
    http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/060322sprite.htm

    Maybe that factor of six is directly responsible for the COP of six found in the E-Cat.

    All the best,
    Joe

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Andrea Rossi wrote in October 3rd, 2014 at 2:17 PM

    Hank Mills:
    Coffee.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.
    ————————————–

    Andrea,
    God built the world in 6 days, and in the seventh He drunk champaign.

    regards
    wlad

  • Robert Curto

    Dr. Rossi, Google:
    Thunderstorms Make Antimatter
    Click on:
    NASA Science
    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
    USA

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    eernie1 wrote in October 3rd, 2014 at 10:33 AM

    Wlad,

    1) ————————-
    In your remarks, you dismiss Dirac and say the difference between your theory and his is that he uses a massive particle and antiparticle(although he states the particles are made up of waves in a string) and your particles are massless photon like particles.
    ———————————————

    Eernie,
    the particle and antiparticle of the aether are not massless. They have mass, but their mass is very very smaller than the mass of electron and positron.
    QRT and Dirac’s theory are similar, the difference is the mass of the particle-antiparticle considered in the two theories.

    .

    2)———————————–
    Since you dismiss SQM do you also dismiss the Higgs field and Higgs Boson?
    ————————————-

    Of course.
    Higgs proposed his theory 60 years ago, when the theorists were sure the space is empty, as proposed by Einstein.

    The experiment published in 2011 by Nature proved that space is no empty, and therefore Higgs theory is wrong.
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Light-created-from-vacuum-shows-empty-space-a-myth/articleshow/10789049.cms

    The boson detected in the LHC is not the Higgs boson.
    In 2015, when the LHC will work in full potency, other bosons will be detected.

    .

    3) ———————————
    Dirac envisions his epo as two fields(electron and positron) intertwined and phase related to maintain its character. Isn’t this similar to your particle made up of two fields?
    ————————————

    No.
    My model of double-field of the elementary particles was conceived with the aim to solve the puzzles of the hydrogen atom and the nucleus, not explained in the Standard Model.

    The model of elementary particle proposed in QRT is the following:

    1- a body-ring formed by quarks

    2- the rotation of the body-ring induces a flux of gravitons (distributed in the form of Dirac strings performing spires crossing the ring). The flux of gravitons induces an inner principal electromagnetic field involving the body-ring.

    3- the rotation of the inner principal field induces an outer secondary electromagnetic field (concentric and involving the inner field). This secondary field is responsible for the Coulomb interactions.

    When a nucleon perforates the secondary outer field of a nucleus, it is captured by the flux of gravitons produced by a central 2He4, and so the nucleon takes a place in a region within the principal field of the 2He4, where the nucleon does not experiences the Coulomb repulsions.

    So, in the nuclear model proposed in my QRT, the nuclei aggregation is not due to the strong nuclear force.
    The protons and neutrons are kept thanks to the equilibrium between centripetal force and magnetic force on them. This is shown in my paper Stability of Ligth Nuclei, published in the JoNP:
    http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Stability%20of%20light%20nuclei.pdf

    regards
    wlad

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bill Nichols:
    No, atmospheric conditions cannot affect in any way the operation of the E-Cat. Thank you very much for your comment, though, and one question from me: do you know tests that gave evidence of production of positrons during thunderstorms? I am very interested to that effect.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    Coffee.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    If you were to go grocery shopping in the near future and were required to add one extra item to your list, what purchase do you think would be most appropriate: natural curcumin powder (a natural anxiety reliever), coffee (to get more work done), or champaign?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>