BCC lattice model of nuclear structure

.
by
Gamal A. Nasser
Faculty of science, Mansoura University, Egypt
E-mail: chem.gamal@hotmail.com
.
.
Abstract
This model is development of solid nuclear models. Like FCC model, this model can account for nuclear properties that have been explained by different models. This model gives more accurate explanation for some nuclear properties which are Asymmetric fission, Nuclear binding energy and the most bound nuclei, Natural radioactivity and Number of neutrons in nuclei depending on the structures of these nuclei. The structures of nuclei in this model have special advantage, as there is separation between lattice positions of similar nucleons giving new concept for nuclear force.
.
.

563 comments to BCC lattice model of nuclear structure

  • Peter Wolstenholme

    Dr. Rossi:
     Congratulations: the report was issued at around the time you forecast, and it ought to raise considerable interest, although I suppose that many prominent scientists will pretend it does not exist.
    A C.O.P  –  which I prefer to call energy gain factor to distinguish it from heat pumps where the C.O.P. has a very different meaning –  of around 3.6 is of course not ideal in practical terms, because in many countries natural gas heating  costs around 30% of the cost of electrical heating. There are clearly at least two ways around this, apart from trying to heat the e-cat with natural gas. Firstly it is clear that operating at a higher temperature can increase the energy gain factor. Secondly some sort of cascading system, whereby one e-cat heats another one, could give a factor over 10. Would a triple cascade be possible, for really stunning results?  You have already written about the cat-and-mouse system, without explaining how it functions, so we are all awaiting news on that topic, which you may be able to release in the coming months.
      Regards,
         Peter Wolstenholme.

  • Carlo Marcena

    Great!!!
    CM

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gianvico:
    Grazie, Architetto.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gian:
    Thank you, very kind words. But this is the beginning of the war, not the end.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • gian

    Ho atteso pazientemente 3 anni. Valeva la pena.

    L’Italia così spesso ridicolarizzata ha grazie

    ad un Grande Italiano la sua rivincita.

    Grazie Andrea. Iddio benedica Te e la tua opera.

    Gian

  • Gianvico

    Grande Andrea GRANDE!!!
    Con infinito affetto e gioia
    Gianvico

  • Andrea Rossi

    Malcom Lear:
    Yes, it has been released from the ITP very surprisingly, but now the publication has been done and everybody can read it in full and uncut version.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gian Luca:
    Thank you also from Prof. Focardi.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dima Redko:
    The important is not if it is a success or not, the important is that it worked. Now an enormous amount of work Waits for us to develope the technology.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Martyn Aubrey:
    Thank you!
    Yes, the Hot Cat based 1 MW plants will be very small.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Manfred:
    You are right!!! I wrote an incomplete address, it was the emotion, because I was not expecting it. It has been a big surprise, also because I did not expect that publication…I know the length of the report created difficulties to other publishers and the Professors wanted not to cut the report. Probably they have chosen this solution to be fast and complete. They wanted to be independent to the last, so I was totally not expecting this. I have been informed of this publication this morning at 8 a.m. from a bloggist, while I was going to see my 1MW baby.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mark Saker:
    Maybe, yes, maybe… be patient.
    Thank you for your kind attention.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
    Thanks to you and to all for your attention to our work! This result comes from the work of all our great Team.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stan Lippmann

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Congratulations on the successful results. Do you have a theory for how the transmutations work? Are you able to share this information yet?
    Thanks,
    Stan in Shenzhen

  • Andrea Rossi

    Renatoestri:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dave K:
    …and more work is coming.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marc Fouchi:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    Andrea Rossi

  • Andrea Rossi

    Thorbjorn:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Martin:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you for your attention.
    C
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Thank you.
    All combined,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Claudio:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    TO THE READERS:
    TODAY ON THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS HAS BEEN PUBLISHED THE PAPER “BCC LATTICE MODEL FOR NUCLEAR STRUCTURE” BY DR GAMAL A. NASSER, MANSURA UNIVERSITY, EGYPT.
    JoNP

  • Claudio

    Dear Andrea, before going any further I wish to send lot of congratulations to you.

    C.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Congratulations on another report that demonstrates the reality of your invention!

    One question: The reactor we see in the report — is this the cat, the mouse, or the cat and mouse combined?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Am I understanding correctly in the report that the (dummy) reactor without a charge in it output (~456 watts) the same amount of power as input (~455 watts)?

    A) yes
    B) no
    C) the report says what it says …

    Thank you for your kindness in replying to questions in this blog!

    Sincerely,

    Tom Conover

    ———————————-
    The report text is quoted below:

    “Page 20:
    Let us now compare this dissipated power with the power supply, the average of which over 23 hours of test is = (486 ± 24) W (uncertainty here is 5% of average, calculated as standard deviation). Keeping in mind the Joule heating of the power cables discussed in paragraph 4.3, we have the following results:
    Power supply (W) Joule heating (W) Actual input (W) Output (W)486 ± 24 7 486 – 7 = 479 ± 24 446 ± 10
    If we take error percentages into account, we will see that where input is at minimum possible value (455 W) and output at maximum possible value (456 W), our method overestimates by about 1 W, i.e. 0.2%. Vice versa, where input is at maximum possible value (503 W) and output at minimum possible value (436 W) our method underestimates the power supplied to the reactor by about 67 W, i.e. 14%.
    We can therefore rely on the fact that applying the very same procedure to data gathered from the E-Cat test does not lead to any significant overestimation; rather, there is a good chance that the power actually generated by the reactor is underestimated.

    Page 26:
    Considering that we do not know the internal structure of the reactor, and therefore cannot completely rule out that there were other charges inside it besides the one weighed and inserted by us, we may repeat the above calculations taking the weight of the entire reactor (452 ± 1 g) into consideration:
    (1618194 / 0.452) = (3580075 ± 10%) [Wh/kg] = (3.6· 106
    ± 10%) [Wh/kg] =
    = (1.3· 104
    ± 10%) [MJ/kg] (31)
    (3580075 / 768) = (4661 ± 10%) [W/kg] = (4.7· 103
    ± 10%) [W/kg] (32)
    Even if taken from this extremely conservative point of view, the reactor lies beyond the limits of the above Ragone plot. ”
    ———————————-

  • Martin

    Dear Andrea,

    Many many congratulations with te good results of the ITP test!!

    Early follower

    Martin

  • Thorbjörn

    Congratulations!

    Warm Regards,
    TM

  • Marc Fouchi

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Congratulations on another milestone on your amazing journey!

    I have been following you since 2011, and I have become more and more passionate about your work. I strongly believe in your mission, and I love that it will also benefit families in their battles with cancer – another passion of mine.

    The eCat is too important for me to sit on the sidelines and watch. I must get involved somehow. I have sent an email to info@leonardocorp1996.com to inquire how I can help change the world.

    Sincerely,
    Marc Fouchi

  • Dave K

    Congratulations! You have worked hard and persevered! Enjoy this moment!

    Dave

  • renatoestri

    Dear Andrea,
    warmest congratulations for the Positive Report results :
    (page 30)
    “In summary, the performance of the E-Cat reactor is remarkable.
    We have a device giving heat energy compatible with nuclear transformations,
    but it operates at low energy and gives neither nuclear radioactive waste nor emits radiation.”

    Highly conservative COP calculated: > 3,2

    An huge success, what to say more ?
    Best compliments !

  • Giannino Ferro Casagrande

    GRAZIE ANDREA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Mark Saker

    Great News Andrea,

    I’m very pleased for you! Fingers crossed this gets the attention it deserves, perhaps a nice little photo of the 1MW plant (prior to installation if you don’t want to give away client details) will help to put the icing on the cake?

    well done you clever clever man!

  • manfred

    Dear Mr. Rossi!

    Congratulations on the publication of the remarkable new 3rd party report!!!
    Just want to let you know that the link you posted
    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/
    returns “Forbidden page”. You might want to correct that by adjusting the link to
    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf

    All the best,
    Manfred

  • Martyn Aubrey

    Excellent News!!!

    Many Congratulations Andrea, to you and your team, on this very supportive report (I’m still reading it).

    The size of the new reactor is very small. Surely, this must mean that the 1MW plant will be quite compact – Brilliant!

    Looking forward to any more news to come.

    Happy Regards,
    Martyn

  • Dima Redko

    Dear Andrea,
    how do you eveluate the results described in the report? Is it a success or not?

  • Gian Luca

    “This amount of energy is far more than can be obtained from any known chemical sources in the small reactor volume”

    This is sufficient for all people that respect the ECAT

    Thanks a lot Mr. Rossi and Mr Focardi

    G.Luca

  • Malcolm Lear

    No matter how it was released, it seems a positive result, so may I be amongst the first to congratulate you Andrea :-)
    Cheers,
    Malcolm

  • Andrea Rossi

    To all the Readers of the Journal of Nuclear Physics:
    The Report of the Independent Third Party has been published on
    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf
    Warm Regards
    Andrea Rossi

  • Malcolm Lear

    Hi Andrea,
    It seems the report is now released, is it official or a leaked early version?
    Cheers,
    Malcolm

  • pg

    A copy of the 3rd Party Report has somehow been unofficially released and is now posted at the web site Sifferkol.se

    Link: http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf

    Key findings: COP of COP of 3.2-3.6 over a 32 day period and isotopic change in nickel and lithium was found to have changed substantially after run.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Silvio Caggia:
    All the options are available.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • silvio caggia

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    In case of input power failure, how is the automatic shutdown of e-cat achieved?
    A) by a completely passive system
    B) by a low power backup system, only for powering controllers till the complete shutdown of the reactor
    C) by a high power backup system to supply the full input power for the short time necessary to complete shutdown
    Regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Forsberg:
    Thank you!
    About the ITP report, we all are very anxious.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Silvio Caggia:
    1-B
    2-B
    I do not know if it happened.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • silvio caggia

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    What would be happened if, during the six months long third party test, the input power had failed?
    A) runaway till melting
    B) automatic shutdown
    C) normal stable functioning
    And what would be happened when input power had come back?
    A) short circuit
    B) system restart
    C) normal stable functioning
    Do you know if third party testers had experienced or simulated this condition?
    Regards

  • Peter Forsberg

    I hope you are right Andrea. You have the same optimism as my own father in this subject matter. :)

    Good luck with the upcoming ITP-report.

    Regards

    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    I am not able to answer you; maybe Orsobubu is.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Consider if the nickel particles within an eCat reactor were not spherical but had small nodules or cylinders. Say, if the average nickel particle size was 10 microns but each cylinder has the equivalent of a diameter of 2 nanometers. These might be what is referred to as NAE or nuclear active environments.

    On each nickel particle there might be several million small 2 nanometer diameters cylinders. These NAE cylinders would, of course, melt when a nuclear event occurred on or within them, because of their small amount of mass to absorb the nuclear energy. This would eventually remove a portion of the total number of these NAE cylinders. However, if the percentage removed was small over the six month operating period of the eCat reactor, then the eCat control system would still be able to achieve a constant thermal output.

    Of course, the spent fuel could be melted and reprocessed or commercially sold. If one of the nickel isotopes was more favorably consumed in the eCat reaction, then new “virgin” nickel might be used instead of reprocessing the used fuel. Perhaps you should consider some form of surface treatment in your eCat fuel processing? Maybe a simple analysis is in order to look at this possibility.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Dear Gamal A. Nasser

    All the even-even nuclei with Z=N are stable, except the 4Be8.

    There is not explanation for the unstability of the 4Be8 by considering the current models of the Standard Nuclear Physics.

    How do you explain why 4Be8 is not stable?

    I did not see the structure of the 4Be8 in your paper

    regards
    wlad

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>