.
by
Valeriy Y.Tarasov
E-mail: vytarasov@yahoo.com
.
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file
.
Abstract
The h-space theory is a variant of unified physical theory – a theory of everything.
This theory was built de novo, as the existing physical theories are incompatible and so unsuitable for unification.
A new approach is needed, and has been developed by re-evaluating the definitions of primary physical concepts.
The starting point for the re-evaluation was the following equation – Et = mvL, where energy – E, time – t, length – L, mass – m, velocity – v.
Analysis of these physical concepts resulted in the construction of a unique equation of the primary concepts such as space, length, energy and velocity.
From this, models could be developed that explain all well-known physical phenomena.
In addition, h-space theory predicts phenomena rejected by the current mainstream theories, such as limits to gravitational and electrostatic interactions, and the possibility of cold fusion (as a consequence of the electric charge definition, a modification of Coulomb’s law and the definitions of elementary particles in h-space theory).
The final section of this article describes a number of experimental tests that could be used to verify the h-space theory.
.
.
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file
.
Georgehants:
Thank you for the link.
Interesting. I am inclined not to take too seriously the UFO issue and do think that is more likely the explication that my friend ( very expert of the issue) told me. Anyway, you know that for us nothing is impossible, but everything is possible if associated to the proper calculus of probabilities for it to be possible.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KD:
The price to Customers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr.Rossi
You answered to Robert Curto:
I can give you our power density: about 10 kW/l, plus the heat exchangers.
The costs will be known after a massive production will have been started. Potentially 100 $/kW.
Is it approximate cost of production of the reactors or price to customers?.
Dear Mr. Rossi, the other day you took time to give a comment regarding area 51.
I would appropriate your comment regarding the below link.
http://www.cufos.org/cometa.html
Best wishes
Dear Andrea Rossi,
As I understand your cost goal of $100/kW for a mass produced eCat furnace, that mean an equivalent 90,000 BTU furnace (about 97kW) would cost around $9700 (not including installation, plumbing, etc). This would be 10 times more expensive than a natural gas furnace.
a. Do you have a cost goal for the annual fuel costs so a comparison might be made?
Here in New England, an average heating season may cost around $4,500 in fuel costs for a typical residential home. So if we assume a five year breakeven point analysis, then the oil furnace cost would be ($1,000 + 5 * $4,500) $24,500. For the eCat to be competitive, the five year fuel cost would be $24,500 – $9,700 = $14,800 or $2,900 per year. Assuming a 97kW unit, the year cost per kW for fuel must be $29 per kW.
b. Do you think this level of eCat fuel cost is achievable?
Robert Curto:
It depends in the place: in Sweden, for example, the demand of heat is much higher than in Southern Italy…
I can give you our power density: about 10 kW/l, plus the heat exchangers.
The costs will be known after a massive production will have been started. Potentially 100 $/kW.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
H Hansson:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regsrds,
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi,
I agreed with you..
Helping the MFMP-Team is a waste of time, The whole point with independent tests is that they are INDEPENDENT… Leave that to Dr. Alexander Parkhomov… the Russian guy that probably replicated your eCat on the couch. Assisting clueless MFMP will just start a new round of “manipulation” blame and you have won nothing.
As you “sold” your invention to a US. Company marketing and schedule is really not your problems any-more. I’m not worried, Americans usually do the right thing but only after exhausting all other options. Eventually the business model will adopt to the market needs. The discussion of VHS/JVC and Betamax/Sony is interesting but not relevant for your eCat.
Microsoft is a very bad example to drag into this discussion. The reason they succeeded with their Windows OS was that Windows was easy to copy.. When business started to use PC,.. Windows OS was the choice as staff already had that on their home PC:s.
For 30 years I was Windows friend but have found out that Ubuntu Linux is much better and totally free of both fees, virus and pop-ups.. and runs the PC much, much faster. It is simply a much better OS.
Thanks Dr. Rossi, I certainly agree with your answer.
However, 2,000 acres = 3.125 square miles.
How much land would be needed for E-Cat to provide power for 97,000 homes ?
The cost for this Solar Plant is 2 billion dollars.
How much would it cost for E-Cat to provide power for 97,000 homes ?
Robert Curto
Bernie Koppenhofer,
I.H and Rossi need a world patent or a safety certifications for the home unit. With either a patent or a safety certification, they can mass produce, compete and protect their IP, else can’t do but focusing on R&D and collecting data for certification(s) or selling a few large units to a few trusted close-by customers.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Our Team is working very well and very fast. Probably not all can understand the difference between a bench prototype and a 1 MW plant that works 24/7/350. Think about that.
Happy New Year, Bernie!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: You know I have followed the E-Cat development for over four years and I respect your genius. However, from where I sit the energy field is exploding with new technology, I would suggest IH drastically increase their research and development. Remember Betamax? Sony had the best technology, but did not succeed in the market place.
Robert Curto:
Thank you for the interesting information. The E-Cat has to be integrated with all the existing energy sources.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, your Readers may want to Google:
2014 THE YEAR OF CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER
Solar Power now provides power for 2 million homes.
I could be wrong but this is the way I read it.
Solana Plant, cost 2billion dollars, covers 2,000 acres, provides power for
97,000 homes.
Can E-Cat beat that ?
I think so.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
USA
David Kaiser:
Our team is making all the investments and R&D necessary to bring to the market this technology and the first 1 MW industrial plant already hit the market, thanks to our Team. Obviously the loss of Intellectual Property would stop any serious investment. Look at Microsoft’s business model ( from which we all have to learn) and learn how the Intellectual Property is at the essential base of any substantial investment that can bring to the common benefit a new technology. When our domestic small E-Cats will hit the market we will not have anymore a reverse engineering problem, as I already explained, because the economy scale will allow prices that will make competition not convenient. We are working on it. Requests of gifts as the one you are making are not generous attempts to give to the mankind a new technology, but attempts to get for free the fruits of 20 years of work, through what for you is an unimmaginable series of troubles, sacrifices and a good share of insults, blackmails, threats of any kind and also attempts to make me pass again through what I passed through 20 years ago, utilizing the same system and some of the same persons: the play did not succeed because what 20 years ago was enough to destroy me, today can’t even scratch me, due to the fact that such experiences either kill you or make you much stronger.
The First Principle of Thermodynamics should have teached to you that free meals do not exist. You can’t make the “Kaiser” with the Army of the others. Should I take seriously your request of Christmas gift, nobody could invest seriously in this technology and it would remain a social game. Quite a dangerous one.
I wish you a wonderful 2015, as well as, again, to all our Readers.
A.R.
p.s.: thank you for calling me “Dear Dr Rossi” this time…under a different pseudonym and in a different blog you had called me in a completely different way not much time ago…sic transit gloria mundi!
Dear Dr. Rossi
I think a little help to the MFMP-Team would not harm your business model. But please consider this; we are on the brink of a breakdown of our society. What is Happening now with the Oil Prices, the financial syste, with Russia and China, can trigger a new worldwar. If this is happening, to whom you will sell the E-Cats?
I got just one wish left from Christmas, please….
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You posted “I have only one 1 MW plant to attend to, and it is the one installed in the factory of our Customer, where I always work and where members of the team rotate. Today I am here with two of them, for example.”
My experience has been that it is invaluable to have a second unit, of exactly the same design and construction, before a one-of-a-kind unit is fielded to a customer location. So either the customer’s location and your workplace are in the same town/city or your travel and per diem budget must be very high.
Either case, it is invaluable to have a second system, a “Gold Standard” unit, to compare operation and flaws against the customer’s unit. If you do not have such a unit, then changes made by you and your people at the customer’s unit may be lost. This makes duplication very difficult and costly. What happens to one unit should happen to both units and should be fully documented.
Italo R.:
When we will sell small and domestic E-Cats they will be manufactured massively in million pieces and their price will make useless reverse engineering. The replication of the effect will be normal operation
Warm Regards
AR
Dear Dr. Rossi, as you know the Engineers of Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (MFMP) are trying to replicate a Hot-Cat also based on the experiences of Professor Parkhomov.
Obviously it’s a very difficult thing to be capable of switching on the “New Fire” as you have done, and moreover it can also be very dangerous.
If I remember well, you said that you have had many explosions during tests in your reactors before finding the safest construction.
But I am aware that those people know very well what they are doing and we hope that they will soon reach their goal.
Perhaps within one or two years it will be possible buying at Home Depot one DIY kit for a domestic hobby work, and there will be lot of people trying their LENR in their cellar.
Fantasy?
Dainel De Caluwè:
Thank you very much and very best Wishes to you too!
A.R.
Dear dr. Rossi,
After the very successfull 2nd third party report, and its impact that it already had in 2014, I wish you for 2015 a sequence of further successes, and very ‘positive results’, with all your projects and especially with the 1MW plant that you’re testing, and the further development of the gas driven Hot Cat.
And, of course, also very best wishes to all the Readers
Kind Regards,
To the Readers:
Yesterday we experienced a stop of this blog for all the day, many comments have been lost in the spam.
Who sent comments yesterday can resend, the problem has been fixed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Orsobubu,
I want to complete the answer to your comment with an anecdote regarding the UFO. As you know, UFO is an acronym for “Unidentified Flying Object”: as such, UFO are nothing exotic or extraterrestrial, they are just flying objects whose identity has not been individuated. If we understand this, what follows is very funny. Most of you have probably heard about that Area 51, in the desertic territory of western US, where many UFOs appeared and where they say special labs have been set up to understand misterious things…
Talking with an expert of the matter, several years ago I knew that in that area was on course R&D for warfare flying objects ( new kind of airoplanes, drones, and similar things); when such things started to fly, people around started asking what the heck was going on and some smart guy of the Area, to keep away noxious curiosity from military activity, whispered in the wind “this is an UFO infested area, but don’t tell this to anybody, it is a top secret”. So the metropolitan legend ( or, more appropriately, the desertic legend) spread around and the Area 51 became a UFO secrecy tomb. Funny, isn’t it?
Happy New Year, Unknown Permanent Friend ( UPF)
Andrea
Orsobubu:
Thank you for your intriguing comment and sincere wishes for a positive 2015.
Andrea Rossi
Given the special period of the year, I’m pointing you to a very interesting story, a little magic and which has several parallels with Rossi’s one. I state that personally I have no interest in UFOs or something.
In 1970 the pilot Bruce Gernon, flying to Miami, ran into a thunderstorm formation, still far from the goal, so he performed a deviation from the route entering a strange cloud. In the instants that remained inside, the plane went to meet various phenomena, and coming out it was standing just above the target, thus having walked the last 100 miles in a few seconds. The story is well documented by the reports of the instrumentation and control tower. It has obviously been cataloged under the series of scams related to the Bermuda Triangle and concocted to make money selling books, or explained as tail wind at best:
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=21569
But an engineering professor from Omaha, David Pares, took seriously the story and interpreted it in a completely different way:
http://www.paresspacewarpresearch.org/Bruce_Gernon/The_Flight.htm
Not only, taking up the Alcubierre theory on local space warp, he realized some devices which replicated the phenomenon on a small scale and low power levels; at present he is preparing to build a demonstrative vehicle based on this technology:
http://m.omaha.com/living/working-toward-a-warp-drive-in-his-garage-lab-omahan/article_b6489acf-5622-5419-ac18-0c44474da9c9.html?mode=jqm
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/space-warp-drive
This also seems a scam, but actually the warp drive has already been taken seriously by NASA:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21929300.300-meet-the-nasa-scientist-devising-a-starship-warp-drive.html#.VKP-6skggwA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_G._White_%28NASA%29
Pares’ story is similar in some ways to Rossi’s and worth at least to read it, remembering that even inventions by Wrights, Edison and countless others should have seemed like magic when they were disclosed!
I leave you here alone in 2014 while, with my space-warp/Ecat-powered vehicle I’m already here in 2015 hehe, best wishes to Andrea, his Team, IH and all readers!
Steven N. Karels:
Wrong, I have only one 1 MW plant to attend to, and it is the one installed in the factory of our Customer, where I always work and where members of the team rotate. Today I am here with two of them, for example.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Domenico Canino:
It appears you know about the energy market more than I do. Marketing is not my turf. What I would dare to add to your list, is the heavy effect that on the oil market had the foundings in the field of the fracking technology based hydrocarbons mining. Probably other Readers of the JoNP are more qualified than I am to answer properly to your question, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
what do you know that we don’t know about the energy market movement? We know that Rockefeller sold all theri petrol financial assets, that all the big petrol companies sold back to Putin their petrol assets in Russia, that Siemens has closed the division of solar panel production,that Bill Gates decidede to invest heavy money in LENR after read Mats Lewan’s book an impossible invention.This scenary is not under NDA and is not an industrial secret, you can give us your opinion.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
A Happy New Year to you and all my fellow readers of JONP. Since you are working with your team at 4 a.m., I discern that you must have at least two 1MW plants, one at the customer’s location and another at your corporate facility. Sounds like a good team and great leadership. I hope all stay motivated and each one avoids burn-out.
To the Readers of the JoNP:
It is 4 a.m. of the last day of the year: from the 1 MW plant, where we of the Team of Industrial Heat are working, Happy New Year to all of you, hoping that the 2015 will make all of us useful to the Mankind. The general situaton in the world is difficult, but difficult situations create fields that bring up forces to make History.
Happy New year to All of you, from the Great Team !
Marcel Baumann:
Thank you and happy New Year to you,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi
I hope for you and for all of humanity, that 2015 will finally be the year when mainstream is convinced that the Rossi effect is real, and that your work and the work of your team and the work of Frank Acland will be rewarded with respect and with honor.
Good luck! (I guess that many scientists are reading this in secret…trying to find an explanation for the Rossi Effect)
Happy new year!
Giovanni Guerrini:
Thank you very much, and 8760 hours of happiness to you and, obviously, all our Readers:
Andrea Rossi
Dear Andrea,
I wish to you,your family,your team and to all readers,a happy 2015 (8760 hours)
and I wish that 8400 of these will be very,very and again very happy !
Best wishes Giovanni
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you and Happy New Year to you and, as always, to all the Readers of the JoNP,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, thanks for giving us this interview year-end. I read the book of Vessela Nikolova and it’s exciting. The advice from newspaper reader. 2015 will be the year of Hot Cat.
Happy New Year.
http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/exclusive-interview-with-andrea-rossi/
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for the explication. I learnt from you a new thing. Yes, different sizes are in the 2015 IRAD.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
“Independent research and development, known as IR&D, is a contractor’s own investment in basic and applied research and development.” Also known as IRAD. Accounting wise, it is how your company categorizes the research you and your team do.
Steven N. Karels:
What the heck does mean IRAD ??
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
A while ago you mentioned the possibility of a small eCat reactor (~100W) and a larger eCat reactor (~100kW). Are these goals still active in your 2015 IRAD?
JHS:
I agree
Warm Regards
A.R.
I haven’t seen if has been posted yet but here: http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Lugano-Confirmed.pdf
you can find a complete translation of the full text.
My personal opinion is that it looks professional and far away from the “modus operandi” of a scam.
I think that we will need more details about that experiment and future developments.
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you, likewise to you and our Readers,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
I saw that prof. Alexander Parkhomov has a brilliant career as a Russian nuclear physicist, also worked at the Space research in Russia; he comes with more than a hundred publications in peer reviewed scientific magazines. Very interesting.
Thank you and Happy New year to you and our Readers,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I hope you have a wonderful New Year’s day and that next year is
indeed fortuitous for you.
Regarding the analysis I posted on JONP, I do believe, regardless of
how close to truth it was, it was an excellent analysis. I think this
shows the benefit of the “catalyst” in the LENR+ reactions. Keep that
a trade secret as long as you can.
Dear Andrea,
when people do write about “simplicity”, e.g. of the visible design, maybe they just mean “beauty”.
I just wish you both for 2015.
Kind Regards,
Koen
About the replication of the Rossi Effect made independently by the Russian University: I think it is worth to read full text. It looks very serious.
D. Travchenko:
Thank you and Happy New Year to you, to all our Russian Friends and to all the Readers of the JoNP.
Andrea Rossi
Steven N. Karels:
As I said, until I do not know the particulars, I cannot comment on this interesting experiment. The calorimetry used is the same that Prof. Focardi and I used in our initial experiments in 2008, or at least it seems so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.