.
by
Wladimir Guglinski
retired, author of the Quantum Ring Theory
.
In the book Quantum Ring Theory I had proposed a double-field model for elementary particles (composed by two concentric fields), therefore a field model fundamentally different of the mono-field model considered in the Quantum Electrodynamics (QED).
The inner field, named principal field Sp, gyrates and induces the outer field, named secondary field Sn. In the book, published in 2006, it was considered that the outer field Sn gyrates.
In this model, the outer field Sn is responsible for the electric charge of the particles as the electron, the proton, etc.
Later in 2010 I changed the double-field model, by considering that the outer field Sn does not gyrates. However, in 2014, after a long discussion with the reader Mr.Joe in the Comments of the Journal of Nuclear Physics, he drew our attention to two key points:
- An outer field Sn induced by the rotation of an inner field Sp must have rotation.
- A mono-field model violates the monopolar nature of the electric charge in the even-even nuclei with Z=N, because they have null magnetic moment, but as all the nuclei have rotation then the even-even nuclei with Z=N would have to have non-null magnetic moment (because the rotation of the positive charge of the proton would have to induce a magnetic moment). Therefore QED violates the monopolar nature of the electric charge in the case of the even-even nuclei with Z=N.
- A double-field model in which the outer field Sn gyrates would have to induce a magnetic field in the case of even-even nuclei with Z=N, if we consider the field Sn in the classical sense of Euclidian space. But the space considered in Quantum Ring Theory is not Euclidian, in order that the rotation of the field Sn never induces magnetic fields, and this is the reason why the even-even nuclei with Z=N have null magnetic moment.
Here we will analyse these questions in details.
.
.
Propagation of gravity
The propagation of gravity will be done in an instant. For this, here are two reasons. One reason is that two-body problem, many-body problem are true for celestial bodies. The other reason is that the whole solar system is in an uniform linear motion and planets are in elliptical revolution on their revolution planes.
Hiroji:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi-san
Will the Ecat be distributed also in Japan ?
Is it patented also in Japan ?
Hiroji Kurihara:
I am quite far from this, but thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Aether is Measurable
On the moon’s surface, there is a passenger car. To the roof, waves of sun-light (plane waves) are coming horizontally. In the roof, there is a small hole. When the passenger car moves to the right (or to the left), a point of light projected on the floor will move.
Moon’s motion (horizontal) will have an effect (on the point of light) also. The angle of light ray (in the passenger car) will not be 90 degrees.
http://www.geocities.co.jp/Technopolis/2561/eng.html
Sorry, I cannot receive E-mail. I do not have PC.
Richard Pollack,
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Firstly, I wish you and your associates all good things following the end of the litigation with IH.
As I saw mention recently, Iou are looking for the coupling of the E-Cat with a turbine: I propose you to consider also the Rankyne cycle engines
http://cyclonepower.com
Best Regards,
Richard Pollack
Elton:
My legal Team and I, we are very confident that out position is grounded on solid evidence to support our claims. All the more after the last copious production of discoveries from both parties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In the last days an enormous amount of documents have been published by the Court: how do you feel after all this production?
Giovanniontheweb:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
even if none of the above will be useful yet your inspirational lesson will be to me very valuable and priceless.
Industrial achievements being money and research achievements being knowledge by definition they do not match. Yet, as far as I got it, you are in the middle and very much well placed to judge the stage extra, the question of mine is, does your point of view show any incoherence between the actual scientific knowledge and an eventual process explanation?
My deep respect
Henry E.:
Thank you for your information about the Italian version of “An impossible invention” of Mats Lewan.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello all,
For the myriad of you who in the deep of their dark souls prefer Italian to English, the second edition of Mats Lewan’s book An Impossible Invention is now available in Italian. :)))
Here is the link: http://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/09/07/the-italian-edition-uninvenzione-impossible-is-finally-out/
Enjoy!
Henry.
James Rovnak:
Thank you for the information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea, when you have a minute take a look at the work or Denis Vasilenko on utube. He also has a spread sheet ” Fast test project “little sun” by Firax Tech, April 27, 2015 shared on MFMP whose power vs temperature curve clearly shows the presence of the Lady LENRs visit to his beautifully executed work & the brilliance of her fiery presence in the night air when she took his fuel element in a control system limit cycle as he strives for a 1200 C setpoint. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOg4IoEar6kZwmyTi-npEiA I tried to help during that test via MFMP connection which is also an engineering marvel. Incidentally his Russian PID controller did not have a manual option which I think could have averted a fuel melt down. Hope we can discuss this further another day!
Also Robert Greenyer has a beautifully done spreadsheet covering pertinent information on Lugano report as well as other very useful LENR information ie I especially like his look at decay product time constants as Lugano fuel proceeds from fresh to final ash you so kindly shared with the worlds replicators. Also Stephen of MFMP is starting done the trail of discovery in how the fresh fuel got to the final ash which I wish I had the energy to help him with. To bad Bob’s PCE 830 power analyzer got tied up in the Euro mail system & did not arrive in time for his ICCF19 demo this year which we enjoyed.
I just looked into the PCE 830 & that is a marvelous power analyzer. The picture in the Lugano report of the freq analyser clearly shows the spectral content of your TRIAC based power source driving the Hot E-Cat & I believe giving it the EM field it needs to get started as well as to maybe continue the New Fire, just maybe, seems only you can be positive definite right now. Nice picture of current pulse feeding the Hot E-Cat and the analysis team examination of its frequency spectrum content. Have also pointed out before Sanjeev’s plot of raw & filter freq content of MFMPs power source which of course was aliased by data sampling time available & PCE 830 were it available could have shed even more light.
Well those are just a few thought I awoke with this morning & wanted to share with your blog. I like the summary version you referred to yesterday http://www.rossilivecat.com/
Thanks again Andrea you sure do keep an old man happy following you & who has so much trouble even graphing with a spread sheet when I even did dynamic analysis of Nuclear Plant accidents at one time using a finite difference time program I developed with them. 15 moves around the sun can build up a lot of rust so keep trucking Andrea you & the MFMP group fascinate me.
Jim
Cheer again!
Edward Davenport:
He,he,he…no, you are just a little bit malicious, not maleficent. Maybe you hoped to be maleficent.
The human relationships inside our great Team are, as always, based upon reciprocal esteem for the professional skill of every component. My personal relationship with all the components of the team and Dr Darden are, as always, perfect. Our union is our main source of force. If you have experienced what you say in a boat, perhaps is because the boat had a hole and you all were not able to repair it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
After all this time, at least several months, that you share space and time 24 hours per day with your team inside the restricted space of the plant and around it: how is the relationship between all the members of your team, between Leonardo and Industrial Heat, between you and Tom Darden? They say that during a long cruise inside a boat also the best friendship goes shaky.
Maybe I’m maleficent.
Edward
Patrick Mc Elvenny:
It is not impossible, using a technology to forbid that the photo can reveal undisclosable particulars, but at the same time allowing a good view. We already did in former photos, we are refining the technique.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Is it possible that you publish some photo of the 1 MW plant, maybe hiding particulars that could disclose the site ?
Waiting for the final results of the test we could get some solace from some photo of this historic thing.
Godspeed,
Patrick
Brigitte:
Yes. By the way, the test on course on the Hot Cat adjacent to the 1 MW E-Cat are going well, and it is the core of what will be the domestic E-Cat; we made improvements respect the Lugano reactor, obtained by the successful application of a new design that has been born studying the results of Lugano.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Do you think that if the year long test of the 1 MW plant – if the results will be positive and the safety will be sound – will make easier to obtain the safety certification for the domestic E-Cat?
Curiosone:
Yesterday, at 2.35 a.m., a nasty leak of steam. Fixed. Particularly nasty because interrupted me while I was reading the draft of a very important paper, that will be soon published, written by mainstream scientists, not belonging to the LENR “aficionados” echelons, that have confirmed with rigorous mathematic cacculations of Physics equations that the reverse Mossbauer effect can reconciliate the theory published in the Cook-Rossi paper.
It is a very, very, very interesting paper. I suppose will be published shortly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Curiosone:
In this moment inside the container of the E-Cat where I am the time is 08.40 pm, the plant is working well, thanks to God, and I will spend here the night.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Can you tell us what time is it now, where are you and how is going the E Cat of 1 MW?
Thank you
WG
Another question: can you “confess” us which has been the last problem you had to fix in the 1 MW plant, and when?
W.G.
Curiosone: No, I prefer maintain this information undisclosed until the publication is made.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Curiosone:
I think May, but I am not sure. At the moment it is under peer reviewing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Can you inform us about when your paper will be published in a peer reviewed magazine?
You said that you are writing a theoretical paper about the Rossi Effect in collaboration with a mainstream scientist: can you tell us who he is?
Thank you,
W.G.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Again thank you for this thread of very interesting links to the work of Dr Parkhomov.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi , here is the report of Professor Alexander Parkhomov March 26
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/1269-Parkhomov-Paper-2015-03-26-English-pdf/
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you! Interesting link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
PARKHOMOV”S 3rd PAPER, TEXT
Conclusions.
1. The apparatus worked continuously for more than 3 days, producing more than twice as much as the applied electrical energy. 50 kWh or 18MJ were produced in excess of the electrical energy expended. This amount of energy could be obtained by burning 350g of petroleum products.
2. The reactor chamber pressure during slow burning was relatively low (in this experiment up to 5 bar)
3. The used fuel had the appearance of soft droplets of golden color mixed with grey powder.
4. The resultant used fuel mixture was sent for analysis of atomic and isotopic composition. But the results, unfortunately, have not yet been received.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.it/2015/03/parkhomovs-3rd-paper-text.html
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Fro what I can read and see in the internet, Alexander Parkhomov is making a good work. Thank you for the new link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi:
Dr Parkhomov presented the results of his experiments , it seems that talks of a COP 3,3. What do you think: is he on the right track ?
https://youtu.be/iAgvs9-tbsA
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bz7lTfqkED9Wfll6bDlfWE5lbnVSRW53RHYxU0hqYkI5VE9kYldJWDdmekF0WnZaMW43ZlE&usp=sharing
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
One thing is certain: Dr Parkhomov is a strong worker, like me.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Also Airbus, after Lockeed Martin and NASA, has made a patent application inspired by our work: well, sounds our work has been taken very seriously from very serious concerns.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi ,
Also the giants in the LENR field:
Airbus Files Patent for LENR ‘Power-Generating Device’
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/