United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

40,327 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Maico:
    Thank you for your support.
    As you know, we also put a big effort to test its application in an EV.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Maico

    dear Dr. Rossi,

    I am pleased to read that some of the people who follow your blog have already gone ahead with ordering the Ecat Sklep in the 3Kw power “cut” 😀
    I also believe that this is the most suitable version for use in the “Domestic” sector and I am sure that following the demonstrations he intends to carry out (demonstrations which we await with sincere interest) this model will certainly become the most requested 😉

    I hope you reach your goals as soon as possible, and as I “eagerly await” the next demos, I greet you warmly, thanking you for trying to keep us as updated as possible on the evolution of “your creature” 🙂

    Regards

    Maico

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bob:
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team.
    Answer: yes, correct.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Bob

    Dr Rossi,
    Reading the paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    I understood that you have invented the practical application of the zero point energy concept born from the experiments of Nikolas Tesla.
    This is a momentous fact and I am anxious to see your product enter the market: it will be a fantastictic game changer.
    I made a pre-order for a 3 kW Ecat: I suppose it will contain a system of 30 modules of 100 W each, am I correct ?
    All the best,
    Bob

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ron Stringer:
    Correct and yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ron Stringer

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    “The Ecat synergy with a PV system is not consistent with ‘shining’ “.
    See, now that is cool. I can hardly wait to find out what this process is! I think you mentioned earlier that the synergy would not necessarily be restricted to PV systems – is that correct? Will it apply to any DC source? Any AC source?
    Very exciting.
    Ron Stringer

  • Andrea Rossi

    The Ecat synergy with a PV system is not consistent with “shining”,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Helen Olstad

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    if the 100W ECAT is not a model that is intended for shining on the photovoltaic panels, then what model of ECAT will be intended for a shining on the photovoltaic panels?

    Have A Nice Sunday

    Helen

  • Andrea Rossi

    Johann:
    1- not yet
    2- see point 1
    3- will do when ready to deliver
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels:
    Wrong, it is not what I said: I just said that the basic module is the 100 W and that all the modules of higher power are made by the “monads” of 100 W,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Helen Holstad:
    1- I think so, eventually
    2- no
    3- no
    Have a nice Sunday you too !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Helen Olstad

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    1) As now the basic model is 100 Watt, I would like to ask: Will a 10 Watt model be produced?

    2) Will the basic 100 Watt model shine on the photovoltaic panels of the existing photovoltaic powerplant with its own photons?

    or

    3) will the ECAT 100 Watt model have to power an LED lamp that will shine on the photovoltaic panels of the existing photovoltaic powerplant?

    Have A Nice Sunday

    Helen

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    In response to my posting asking the status of different NGU units you responded:

    “The 100 W is the basic module, the modules can be combined to reach any power level.”

    From this I gather that the NGU products are only theoretical and there is no status.

  • Johann

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    i regularly read along your blog.
    But now i ask myself, the ecat is ready to produce, but you mention no effort how you want to reach the one million pre-orders.
    1) Do you have already invited enough big customers to your office to test the ecat and after that you have reached the aim of one million?
    2) Could you tell us the date when you show the running ecat to these big customers?
    3) Will there be additionally advertisement, short promo, youtube influencers who test it at your office? Soon?
    Warm regards
    Johann

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels:
    The 100 W is the basic module, the modules can be combined to reach any power level.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Can you briefly state the status of each of the following: (e.g., in-testing, design being modified, production version ready)

    1. the 10W NGU
    2. the 100W NGU
    3. the 3kW NGU
    4. the solar panel augmentation unit.
    5. the EV Demo unit

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank:
    I did it,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank

    Dr Rossi,
    Do you really think that studying the theoretic principles published on
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    it is possible to make something like the Ecat SKL NGU ?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Frank

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels,
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    WaltC (and Andrea Rossi),

    Killer Demonstration – 3kW NGU

    “The number of housing units in the United States has been growing year-on-year and in 2022, there were approximately 144 million homes.”

    Assume the following:

    1. Choose a residential home that is connected to the electrical grid – electrical power history is available from the supplier.
    2. Install an EG4 6000XP split phase all-in-one Solar inverter – $1,400USD unit cost.
    3. Install an EG4 PowerPro battery unit – $3,800USD unit cost.
    4. Demonstrate that the residential home can operate using electrical grid power only going to the Inverter.
    5. The inverter has two available solar panel inputs, each rated for 100VDC to 480 VDC, up to 4kW.
    6. Add one (or two) 3kW NGU unit(s) to the inverter’s solar panel input(s).
    7. Disconnect the electrical grid power going to the inverter.
    8. Monitor the residential home’s electrical usage for an extended period of time (months) – daily readings can be made available.

    The 3kW NGU unit(s) will supply the average required electrical power.
    The Battery unit will accommodate the peak power requirements (turn-on of motors, start-up of air conditioners, etc.)

    The EG4 6000XP performance may be monitored by a cell phone app showing energy usage – no disconnecting the configuration, shows “PV” statistics, other usage.

    If the 6000W unit is too small, there is also an 18kW inverter available.

    Note: a 3kW NGU, running continuously, will supply 72 kW-hrs of energy per day. Most residential homes average around 20 kW-hrs per day (or less).

    Thoughts?

  • WaltC

    Steven Nicholes Karels,
    Neri Accornero,

    Both of you raise issues that, I believe, are important and largely complementary:

    Steven talks about end-user applications which are important because the Ecat won’t make it into the market unless it finds real-world applications that it can serve better than current-day solutions. Identifying “Killer Applications” that would drive large-volume usage of the Ecat would seem like a very good thing.

    Neri talks about demonstrations, of which a 3kW Stand-Alone Power Source could potentially be the perfect “Universal Widget” that you’d want to demonstrate early on. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion in this forum about what might make the best “Killer Demonstrations” but I’d imagine that a highly scaleable, stand-alone power source might quickly catch interest across hundreds of industries and not just one or two.

    Anyway, I don’t view it as an either/or– I, for one, enjoy reading both of your ideas.

    Thanks and Best wishes, WaltC

  • Andrea Rossi

    Wilfried:
    The label we applied to the Ecat SKL NGU has been printed by a company that prints CE labels for many companies of any kind and nobody observed what you write, as far as we are aware of. Anyway, I passed on to them your observation,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    Neri Accornero,

    You posted “I honestly don’t understand the need for many bloggers to constantly suggest new applications for the ECAT.”

    There are many applications for eCat technology but only some of them make economic sense. The cost of eCat technology is approximately $2.50USD per Watt of electrical power. This will pay for itself if used continuously over the 100,000 specified lifetime.

    There are also applications where peak power demand is much greater than average power demand. The eCat technology may be too expensive where peak power is much greater than average power or where power is only required for short durations, e.g., a desktop lamp that is lit only a few hours per day.

    When I look for possible applications, I seek applications that have a continuous energy requirement or a very long period of usage. Such an example is a parked electric vehicle (EV) where charging stations are not easily available in a major city where there are very limited charging station locations, and very limited parking spaces.

    By suggesting applications, then AR might consider teaming with a major player in that industry or application and the eCat technology might proceed into major production.

  • Wilfried

    Dear Andrea,

    on X @LeonardoCorpor3 shows the 3 kW E-Cat. The CE mark is shown there. As I am a professional, I would like to point out that the geometry of the CE mark shown is not correct. It would be correct if the virtual right half of the circle of the C went exactly through the left center of the arc of the E. You can find the construction drawing via Google.

    Best Regards
    Wilfried

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels:
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    A combined test scenario and application – powering a residential house.

    “The average US household electricity consumption is 29 kWh per day, according to the most recent data from the US Energy Information Administration, which means the average kWh usage per month is around 870 kWh.”

    This suggests that an average power output of 1.2 kW is sufficient to power a typical residential house.

    So, as a test, install an all-in-one solar converter that outputs split phase 240VAC 60Hz power and that can receive solar panel power. The solar panels are typically tied in series so the input string voltage is usually between 100VDC and 500 VDC.

    In this test, replace the solar panels with NGU 100W units. Say two strings of 15 100W NGU units each. Each of the two NGU strings would provide 180 VDC at 1.5 kW.

    In a typical system, batteries would be included to handle surge requirements.

    Then run the home, totally disconnected from the electrical grid for a month or so, while measuring and recording the energy consumption.

    Thoughts?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Neri Accornero:
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>