Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Gullstrom-Rossi paper published in Arxiv Physics is extremely interesting.
It is a totally new approach.
We are working in this very moment on both issues.
You mention making a simulation of large scale production of QuarkXes.
Is this a software simulation, or actually combining QuarkXes in an industrial-size unit?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Did you receive a complete report about the replication of the Rossi Effect made by Nissan?
Yesterday this blog has been unaccessible for several hours during the afternoon for a hacking attack. Our IP guy has repristinated all well in short time.
Sorry for the gap of accessibility.
Thank you for your kind attention!
This morning we will make a simulation of large scale production in the factory of Miami, Florida. We are resolving problems.
Yes, correct. The patent has been applied for in 1998 and allowed by the USPTO in 2000. The technology has been applied in a plant to dispose of wood wastes turning them into liquid, solid and gaseous fuel. This makes me remember the wonderful period of my life I spent in New Hampshire in the nineties.
We continue to be in good standing.
The paper Gullstroem-Rossi is not in contrast with the Cook-Rossi paper.
About 4He, we are still studying on it.
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Dear Andrea, I’ve been continuing to look at your recent paper from time to time and still find it intriguing. I really appreciate the theoretical walk through as it helped me with the understanding quite a bit. Especially after re reading it a couple of times.
I’m quite curious how the 3N nucleon configurations line up with Norman Cooks models now but it seems to me there is an interesting link there.
Do you also have an explanation for what happens with the Helium 4 that is produced? Is it out gassed or is it also accounted for in the theory somehow.
After seeing the link of Ing. Michelangelo De Meo with your book of 1984, I compared itd content with the patent allowed by the US Patent Office in the year 2000 (patent N. 6,051,110) and discovered that you made in the USA a patent that was the development of your Italian patent of 1978 on the same subject. Correct?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going on the preparation of the industrial production in this litigation-filled period of time?
congratulation for the ArXiv publication of your article. It is indeed too complex to understand and appreciate for me and the majority here but some simple deductions are still possible. Output/Input power, alias COP, seems to be really astonishing.
We was very impressed in knowing the mean COP near 100 of the ECat used in the 1 year long test. And you stated that QuarkX COP overcomes the ECat one.
I also remember the barely retained excitement in your words when describing the performance of the first prototype of QuarkX.
I will not ask you the COP because we all know Rossi style to not give away numbers so easily.
So I’d like to ask you:
Is the COP of the QuarkX really that awesome ?
Thank you and God bless you
Thank you for your link,
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information,
Documents speak for themselves.
Also today we are on our way toward Sigma 5,