.
Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent
|
|||||
United States Patent US 9,115,913 B121,598 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1Leave a Reply |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Nuclear Physics - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
|||||
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your consideration. As a matter of fact, I do not take seriously myself, but I fight to death for the seriousness of the work of my Team. We believe in what we are doing.
What counts is only the result of our work, all the rest is written in the sand. The attention in Researchgate toward my paper is not given from my name: I have published other papers on Researchgate, but those papers got an average attention. The incredible success has been achieved only by http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and this means that what counts is not my name, but what I wrote, that. obviously, has been considered useful. Nobody would read that paper, that is difficult to digest, unless he consider it useful. To read my paper is a work, not a leisure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Emily Richel:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are you making use of superconductors in the Ecat SK Leonardo to make electricity directly from the plasma?
Thanks if you can answer,
Emily
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the increased Researchgate publicity. Just some consideration. You are not yet world-famous, but in case you will be, since it is hard to predict how publicity develops. There are many examples of good people who have risen from neglicence to fame, and then fallen because they could not handle it. Being famous is a test of a person’s psychological strength, and it can be harder to withstand than being neglected. That said, honestly it seems to me that you have the strength of personality that is needed to handle fame, including that you do not take yourself too seriously and can laugh to yourself, although at the same time you take your duty& work very seriously. But one never knows. It can be a devilish thing & no one has infinite strength. I’m not suggesting to do anything differently, just giving my perspective of the situation…
Best regards, /pekka
DR Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the correction,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi, Modestino
The link to the paper by ‘Tadahiko Mizuno & Jed Rothwell’ does not work properly.
‘Increased Excess Heat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel’ – that was posted by Modestino doesn’t work.
The following link should work.
(tiny.url was used to shorten the url length to minimize errors.
https://preview.tinyurl.com/y2mm4v9f
Sustaining Regards,
Joseph Fine
Adella Yoshi:
Every day I read the stats on Researchgate and everyday I get stunned.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Modestino:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
After your publication http://www.researchgate.ner/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions the replication of your effect are multiplying:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/mizunotincreasede.pdf
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I saw here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/researchgate
that Researchgate has 15 millions of papers. Your paper is in the 1st 1% of the most read, but with the numbers you reached today I think you are in the top 10:
full readings 25748
research interest index 543.6
Recommendations 1575
With these numbers you are in the top of the top and for a LENR based paper, with the general hostility toward this matter, you made cultural revolution. Actually, your paper is very difficult to read, so it is unbelievable that you collected these results, because means that you intercepted the strong interest of all the field of the scientists and researchers of this field. This success of yours is important in this period.
Strong congrats
A.Y.
Dear Readers,
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kirby:
I have been contacted from many journalists, but refused any interview.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Have you been interviewed about the Woodford-IH mess?
Pavel Vrbovsky:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If we talk about your e-cats, is the fuel the same?
I think that You are mentioned Ni, LiAlH4 , H2.
Warm Regards
P.V
Guglielmo:
I suggest you to start from this:
“Physics and Our Universe: How It All Works” by Prof Richard Wolfson, Professor of Physics at Middlebury College.
Find it here:
http://www.thegreatcourses.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I know nothing about Physics, just some remembrance of my high school time. I am retired and would like to start from somewhere to study physics: what can you suggest?
Thank you if you find the time to answer.
Guglielmo
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Stunned.
Obviously I am deeply grateful to all the scientists and researchers that are dedicating their time to read an undoubtly not easy paper.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congrats on your fine theoretical paper. The one concern I have is that it does not offer why LENR reactions are so difficult to produce/re-produce. Dr. Storms talks, in his theory, about a Nuclear Active Environment (NAE) being required. Can you provide some thoughts on this issue?
On Power Engineering of June 18 2019: Rod Walton gives the latest stories in power generation, renewable energy and the smart grid, plus: coal to cofire dual fuel conversionconcernsand clarifications.
Rod Walton
Hi Andrea,
your publication today raexhed 25624 (the average is 100) full readings, 537.3 index of interest for R&D (the average is 10) 1557 recommendations (the average is 50) .
You are in the top 1% of millions of publications on Researchgate.
In particular, 1557 recommendations means 1557 experts that have put out their face recommending your paper.
How do you feel?
Cheers
Prof
Steven N. Karels:
a. yes
the others no.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
“you stopped the E-Cat SK Leonardo test because of certain components failing.”
Were the failed components involved in:
a. Electrical energy conversion (output from the LENR process)?
b. Control problems?
c. Thermal issues?
d. Starting and Stopping issues?
e. prototype board reliability?
Colin Watters:
We are serving a restricted number of “pioneers” and fixing problems.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
We have still the R&D on course,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
Can you tell us a few words about the development of E-Cat-gas turbine coupling?
All my support to the R & D team
Best regards
Raffaele Bongo
Dear Andrea,
Do you still consider the SK to be at the prototype stage? Given the amount of time and money you have spent I had hoped you were at the pre-production stage at least.
Steven N. Karels:
Exactly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The purpose of prototype testing is to see what works and what needs improvement. Congrads on accomplishing a major step forward. Do the needed redesign and test again.
Bob:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
We strongly appreciate your candor when you tell us of your unsuccessful trials. This is evidence of your sincerity.
Cheers
Bob
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- 1 month
3- we will never give up
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You said that you stopped the E-Cat SK Leonardo test because of certain components failing.
1. Do you know yet what corrections need to be made?
2. What is the timetable for retesting?
3. How serious is do you feel this setback for the prospects of direct electricity production from the E-Cat SK?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Billy:
Indeed!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Letisha Maranda:
The one contained in paragraph 4.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Can you explain which is the main thread you are following after the general exposition in your Researchgate paper?
Many thanks
Dr Rossi,
I saw that the numbers on Researchgate are exploding, going exponential. More than 1500 scientists and researchers have recommended your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
That is some peer reviewing !
Gennady:
IH cannot use our technology, based on the settlement that has been reached in June 2017. I do not have any kind of financial, industrial or commercial collaboration with them since February 2016.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am a big fan of your work and has been following eCat for many years. Earlier today I sent a link about IH, but it looks like it did not pass the filter. I did not mean to offend you in any way. Just wanted to share what I read and my concern about IH using your technology.
Kind Regards,
Gennady
Jack:
1- no
2- no
3- no
no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
1- Is IH still using your technology?
2- Have you been financed by Woodford?
3- Have you ever been in contact with Neil Woodford?
4- did you have any further contact with IH after the settlement?
Dominique F.:
If we will succeed, that is probable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Reuben:
I never comment the work of our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberto:
No, I will be too much engaged with my work, but I wish success to the organization.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
No cigar yet.
See the answer to Gerard McEk.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard MkEk:
1. Partly: some parts of the Ecat SK-Leonardo worked very well, better than expected, but some worked poorly. We had to suspend the test and return to remanufacture some parts differently. Much work still to do. Never give up.
2. yes
3. yes
4. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. Are you happy about the progress in testing your E-cat SKe?
2. Has the reliability of the heat supply to your customers already improved?
3. Are you already satisfied with that heat supply?
4. Do you already accept and deliver new orders for heat supply?
I hope things are developing well!
Kind regards, Gerard McEk