United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

22,438 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Anonymous

    Dear Andrea,
    Are you still optimst about the possibility to make the Ecat able to produce electric energy directly from the plasma ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marcos:
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Brent:
    Very useful to limit the expansion of polluting sources.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Brent

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    What do you think about the popular movement raised by Greta to protect the planet and of the chant “we do not have a second planet”?
    Good luck for your Ecat SK Leonardo,
    Cheers
    Brent

  • Marcos

    Dr Rossi,
    Thank you for the precious information contained in your publication
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    combined with the video
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    You have opened a Pandora crate.
    All the best,
    Marcos

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sal Hilley:
    I’ll see what I can do.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Sal Hilley

    Dr Rossi,
    the German icebreaker and research vessel Polarstern is leaving the Norwegian port of Tromso with scientists from 19 Countries to study the climate changes in the center of the Arctic. The mission will last one year: will be the Ecat SK Leonardo ready when their results will be published ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    This a thread from LENR Forum blog
    in honour of Norman Cook that
    you or others with that kind of
    of knowledge might be interested
    in joining.
    https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6111-the-nuclear-structure-research-group/

    Regards
    Sam

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yrka:
    The R&D on the Ecat has never ceased and coherently never ceased the evolution.
    The list you made is correct, albeit the Hot Cat has been developed before the QX.
    The best solution is always the next and the evolution will never stop, because every step creates the seed of the next one.
    Thank you for your permanent attention to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    This is a link to Dr Parkhomov
    presentation by Bob Grenyer
    at ICCF 22.

    https://youtu.be/7p8Y26d5gk0

    Regards
    Sam

  • Yrka

    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
    I had a free evening and I read the main publications about your work again, from the moment the test results were published in Lugano, in 2014. Then I began to read everything I could find about your work. And of course I looked through this blog, which I have been following almost every day since September 2015 (4 years!). I remembered all the main stages.
    – An attempt to organize the production of domestic installations at a factory in Sweden.
    – The fight for Sigma 5,
    – A tough year working with HI and litigation.
    – Great presentation in Stockholm and even better in 2019 on the Internet
    – and a triumphant article on researchgate.net (which, unfortunately, I did not understand).
    – The beginning of sales of heat to customers.
    And now fantastic, even against the backdrop of fantastic predecessors, Ecat SK Leonardo.
    Everyone is looking forward to your kitties in the market!
    Here is the evolution of the names of your Cats. Did I miss anything?
    1. E-Cat
    2. E-Cat X
    3. E-Cat QuarkX (QX)
    4. Hot Cat
    5. Ecat SK (“The SK would be my masterpiece, a real art ouvre.” Remember?)
    6. Ecat SK Leonardo
    Thank you, if you can briefly, in 2 – 3 words, comment on each name. In retrospect, you probably have an understanding and attitude towards each model.

    Good luck in work and tennis!

    Yuri Isaev
    Engineer
    Tyumen, Russia.

  • Andrea Rossi

    “Jag bara undrar”:
    Maybe you are right,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • "Jag bara undrar"

    My personal assessment for several years has been that the happy ending to the story of the cat would be in November, December 2019 or 1/1 2020 for various reasons.

    (I’ve asked you this question before about this time span)

    Would be fun if I got it right. My next assessment is that you will be in Stockholm in December 2019 or 2020.

    Best regards

    “Jag bara undrar”

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    You are right, but the matter of the fact is that now most of the electric ebergy is made by fossil fuels.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Martn Aubrey:
    None of all. Just make electricity to fuel the electric engine, that will be the load where send the electric energy to.
    Yes, we are in contact with a primary manufacturer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Martyn Aubrey

    Dear Dr Rossi,

    You said to Frank Acland that you are “optimist about launching the Ecat SK Leonardo with permanent ssm this year”.

    Well done to yourself and your very hard working team.

    You also said to Aki that the Ecat SK Leonardo “should eliminate the autonomy issue” for cars.

    How do you see the future development for using the Ecat SK Leonardo for powering motor vehicles?

    Would the Ecat be best used to:
    1. Power a generator to provide electricity to drive an electric motor.

    2. Directly heat water to make steam to drive an engine to provide mechanical force, as done in the steam cars of the early 20th Century (e.g. the Stanley Steamer and the Doble steam car).

    3. Directly heat air, or another gas, to drive a hot air engine to provide mechanical force.

    4. Some other method. Please specify if you are able.

    Could you also please tell us if you have had any discussions with anyone in the transport industry about their ideas for using the Ecat to power vehicles?

    Thank You if you can answer these questions.

    Best Regards, and good luck for your work,
    Martyn Aubrey

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    You posted ” I am baffled about the fact that electric cars that use batteries charged with fossil fuels generated electricity are considered madia to make us free from fossil fuels.”

    When electric power generation is primarily based on wind, solar, nuclear and eCat technology, then electric cars will be “free” of carbon emissions. Consider the efficiency of the automobile engine, the efficiencies on the gasoline production process and compare it to the fossil fuel efficiency of the fossil fuel electric production plants and the electric transmission losses. I do not know which alternative approach produces less of a carbon footprint. If carbon emissions is a worthwhile goal — there is still debate in the scientific community — then eCat technology applied to electric grid power generation and/or eCat powered automobiles is a worthy effort.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stacey:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stacey

    Glad I discovered this on google .

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Aki:
    If we will succeed, yes, because it should eliminate the autonomy issue. Besides, I am baffled about the fact that electric cars that use batteries charged with fossil fuels generated electricity are considered madia to make us free from fossil fuels.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Yes, it was necessary to be more precise about this link.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Prof

    I noticed that you have updated your paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    with more precise reference to the continuity between your theoretical evolution and the atomic nucleus model of Norman Cook

  • Aki

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    If your direct production of electricity from the plasma will succeed, do you think it will be useful also for cars ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Buck:
    Thank you for your insight.
    The answer to all your questions is Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Buck

    Dear Andrea,
    Your exchange with Ruby on 9/12 came as a very pleasant surprise. A surprise arising from your clear statement that “these modifications derived not from experimental phases, but directly from theoretical considerations . . .”. I could only wonder “why?” and “how?”, especially as you are in the middle of a ~7-week R&D testing of the SK Leonardo.

    As a starting point, I thought to keep in mind how you focused upon integrating Husserl, with his method for distinguishing the “Natural Attitude” and “Phenomenological Attitude”, into the discipline of physics. This led me to a presumption: you were looking to nurture intuition, a phenomena for leaping beyond “knowing” to “understanding” as Richard Feynman would describe it.
    Link>> https://youtu.be/NM-zWTU7X-k

    A few weeks before you began this ~7-week R&D testing of the SK-Leonardo, you shared that you had assembled the “best possible Team in this matter in the whole world”. In addition, you and presumably your mysterious global partner are clear on the importance of attaining SSM as described in your exchanges here. As such, a possible way of triggering intuition is by infusing “ignorance”, not “stupidity”, in the guise of experts unfamiliar with the details of the Ecat plasma phenomenon, but experts in the physics at play in the Ecat. Right or wrong, these experts such as Oscar Gullstrom or experts from companies like ABB, would bring challenging questions, followed by clarifying questions. Experts who would be entirely comfortable at “jumping down” to the scale (femto- and picoseconds) of quantum level physics as described in your key paper. These questions would be a powerful driver in a collegial, professional, and friendly environment, pushing you to clarify the ideas presented in your paper “Long Range Particle Interaction”.

    If my intuition is pointing me in the right direction about these major modifications and with you holding SSM as the paramount goal of this ~7-week testing, then do these modifications make it
    • easier to attain/maintain a 5-6 Sigma SSM?
    • easier to increase the rated power of each Ecat SK and SK Leonardo?
    • easier to harvest electricity?
    • possible to extend the life of the “fuel”?
    • possible to see the “fuel” as a 100% efficient catalyst and no longer a “fuel”?
    • extend the life of the hardware encasing the plasma phenomenon?
    • possible to clarify on potential new fruitful control parameters?
    • possible to further refine the existing control parameters?

    Further, is it fair to say that, as these modifications “reinforced the theoretical bases”, then the “soup” of energies, forces, and conditions described in your paper are now being “mapped” or “sequenced” into relative priority or importance? Where the “soup” is now closer to being a manageable “framework” that has discrete “handles”?

    Finally, I like Einstein’s view on the difference between intuition and rationalization as paraphrased here: “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift. The rational mind is a faithful servant.” It seems entirely appropriate to share this quote given your rapid progress for unfolding this plasma phenomenon within these 7 weeks.

    As always, my best to you, your team, and your wife

    Sincerely and respectfully,

    Buck/Mason Ainsworth

    ps. Will you now call your updated paper “Stable Long Range Particle Interactions”? “SLRPI”?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karen’s:
    1- yes
    2- yes
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    We are doing very well, I still am optimist about launching the Ecat SK Leonardo with permanent ssm this year.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    How is the progress of your testing going these days?
    What do you think will be the end result of all the testing you are doing, and do you expect to demonstrate the E-Cat SK Leonardo in 2019?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Regarding the revision to the theoretical understanding, has this:

    1. Improved the electrical generation conversion efficiency?
    2. Is there any impact on control stability?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Carroll Sachar:
    I think it is more probable an integration of all of them.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rod Walton:
    Thank you for the info
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Rod Walton

    US gas production more than match for rising generation demand
    Rod Walton

  • Carroll Sachar

    Dr Rossi
    Is there a preferential thread in the theoretical sources described in
    http://Www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    Thanks if you can answer
    Carroll

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>