Mr Rossi:
1- Did you request copies of all the energy and water bills paid by the customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat ?
2- are those bills coherent with the COP indicated in the Report ?
Just a curiosity, if you can answer.
Regards,
Travis
Rod:
Thank you for your suggestion, but I do not think that aerospace applications will be made for the first years of diffusion of the E-Cat. We are still far from those applications.
I think that the diffusion of the E-Cat for terrestrial uses will be more than enough to give public evidence of its merit.
By the way, strong congratulations to the Team of Solar Impulse and to their sponsors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The Opera ballet dancers are saying they do not need your technology because they have bought other much better technologies.
Ha,ha,ha
Cheers,
Giovanni
Is the geometry of the face centered cubic crystal (FCC) structure a necessary condition for LENR? I am intrigued by zirconium, but it has a hexagonal closest packing (HCP) structure. Does that or anything else negate zirconium as a catalyst?
The Solar Impulse 2 plane and its two pilots are currently attempting to circumvent the globe by using only solar power to promote clean technologies.
Theoretically, if you remove the solar panels from the plane and retrofit it with several lightweight E-Cat QuarkX reactors to power its electric engines, you could easily demonstrate the tremendous capabilities of your E-Cat QuarkX to the world. With no solar panels on the plane, and with no heavy fuel or batteries stored onboard (with maybe the exception of a single emergency battery), no one could dispute that the E-Cat QuarkX was indeed providing the only power to the plane’s electric engines.
If the LENR community were to get several sponsors to fund this demonstration (circumvent the world in record time), and if you would provide the necessary E-Cat QuarkXs, would you consider this a valid and dramatic way to show the E-Cat QuarkX to the rest of the world? I and your legions of fans want you win this battle against those that are trying to steal from you, and drag your good name through the mud. Let’s shut up the skeptics with a dramatic demo that would leave no doubt that your E-Cat QuarkX will change the world!
Menico:
Let’s try this:
Imagine a transparent tank inside which a strong vacuum is made and there is no gravity. Imagine that inside this tank you can see small sail boats, some with bigger sails, some with very smaller sails. In this situation local symmetry is respected and you can see all the sails move randomly at he same velocity.
They are all bosons, then, travelling at the speed of light.
Now imagine that you from a valve let the air enter the tank: now you will have no more vacuum. The air is comparable to the Higgs field ( the Higgs boson is just a wave of the Higgs field). When the air is inside, the sails that have very small dimensions still continue to move with easiness in the tank: they, we could say, remain bosons; the bigger sails move now with much more difficulty, get swamped in the air mass: this is how bosons become fermions, they “feel” tha mass because their sails get impeded in the air mass. This is a possible model how the Higgs field works to turn bosons into fermions.
Attention: these models are intrinsecally misleading, they can be useful just to give a model for the brain to start to get the idea. The real situation is represantable only via mathematical models. For example, if you are young, or if you have a young daughter or son, studying seriously Physics in a university you can understand what really stands behind the concept of the Higgs field and the non zero value field in vacuum.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I tried to figure out how the Higgs boson works. A firend of mine told me you are able to make easier difficult concepts.
Can you make me able to figure out how the Higgs boson works?
Thank you
Menico
Dear Maurice,
It would be difficult for a single emission photon to be decreased by as much as would take the photon down to the KeV level by recoil effects. But if the process involved a cascading resonance process where there were multiple resonances, perhaps the accumulated recoil losses could take the initial photon down to this level, similar to the process found in fluorescence.
Energy level regards.
Dear Andrea,
Like many,many of your followers I know your technology works. My own thoughts are that IH are not stealing your technology but stopping you from bringing it into the world at this present time because one day it will have to be used. I do not know whether you can use it with a pending court case but if you can, maybe you should investigate the cement manufacturing industry, one of the oldest manufactured product in high demand but what it requires is lots of heat which contributes to most of its expense. If you could partner with people in the cement business or those who would like to get into the cement business I am sure your technology would propel you to be a world leader in both cement and LENR technology (not that you already not) and if you became a public company you would be inundated with prospective shareholders. I for one would be one. All the best Eric
Hank Mills:
Your comment contains a big mistake: Johnson Matthey has nothing to do with us. We bought from them some materials but that is all. Please do not diffuse false information.
No further comments.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Oeystein Lande:
Thank you for the link.
Interesting.
The opera ballet dancers getting more hysterical by the day. Their Etoile ( Tom Darden, aka NCHawk) is arrived to the “spaccata”.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Hank Mills:
1- No flowmeter has ever been installed by IH in the 1MW E-Cat delivered to the factory of the Customer
2- Only the ERV has installed his flowmeter and sealed it
3- when the flowmeter has been installed by the ERV the technicians of IH and of Leonardo were there to assist
4- for one year, I repeat for one year, IH guys, included Tom Darden, JT Vaughn and all their investors from UK (Woodford) and China have seen all the instrumentation of the ERV and they saw what the flowmeter was as well as they have seen it was sealed as well as they saw its trade mark and model. They had their technicians inside the plant for 352 days and they never noticed anything wrong
5- The ERV is a nuclear engineer who worked in a nuclear power plant and I can assure you he has not to learn from anybody how to make these kinds of measurements.
All what I am saying will be given evidence of in due site and in due time.
A blog is not a proper place to make a legal litigation.
Warm Regards
A.R.
“Argon – how do you know so much about Rossi? Perhaps you should ask him about the flow meters that he replaced instead of the ones that IH spec’d and installed when the 1MW was built. That one is going to hurt when the truth comes out in court. The gig is up – the world is not going to wait for any more demos. The Lucy Peanuts football trick is played out.”
Mr. Weaver alleges that you removed meters that IH had installed and replaced them with your own. This is the boldest accusation ever made so far by anyone from or in contact with I.H.
Maurice:
No, I am not sure, but I propend to think so. I have worked with advanced mathematical models on the well known formula of the Mossbauer Effect, that contains like in a nutshell all the following development that is at the base of my theoretical percourse. Now I have a problem: from one side, I am not ready for a publication, but from the other side I would like to publish it to receive massive critics to check if I am wrong.
I am convinced that the reverse Mossbauer Effect integrated with the lattice theory of Prof Norman Cook is the right direction, but I am not sure that my convinction is correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andy Stokes:
Yes, you are correct: the ERV gave to IH one year of time, during the test, to get all the information they wanted about all his instrumentation; the men of IH, who attended the test every day for one year, has all the possibiliries to get all the data they wanted related to any instrument, flowmeter included.
Nobody of IH, ever, had anything negative to say of the flowmeter ( that was sealed: I remember perfectly the opera ballet dancers of IH chant that all the instrumentation was of the ERV, made their investors of Woodford notice that the flowmeter was sealed, when Woodford’s specialists came to the plant ). When the ERV disassembled the instrumentation all the guys of IH were around, getting photos and any possible information; the ERV told us that he was getting back his instrumentation to certify with the manufacturers that their margin of error had not been modified during the year test, AT THE SAME CONDITIONS OF FLUID AND TEMPERATURE OF THE TEST).
Obviously, evidence of all this will be requested in due time, in due place. The report is a short resume necessarily reduced: the 12 600 000 data taken by the ERV cannot be printed: 66 000 pages could be necessary.
P.S. UPDATE AFTER 30 MINUTES:
I SAW NOW THE GIGANTIC LIE OF THIS PUPPET: HE WROTE THAT THE ERV DELIVERED IN A FIRST MOMENT A DRAFT OF THE REPORT WITH DATA ABOUT THE FLOWMETER, BUT EVENTUALLY RETRIEVED SUCH DATA FROM THE REPORT: THIS IS A TITANIC LIE !!! NO DRAFT OF THE REPORT HAS EVER DELIVERED TO EITHER PARTY FROM THE ERV !!!
HE GAVE THE DATA OF THE FLOWMETER TO US
1- WHEN HE INSTALLED THE FLOWMETER
2- WHEN HE DISASSEMBLED IT TO SEND IT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR TO CHECK THAT THE MARGIN OF ERROR HAD NOT BEEN CHANGED DURING THE TEST
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Industrial Heat is slandering you beyond any possible imagination, but all they say is in evident contrast with the reality we can read in the facts. The more their puppets attack your character, the more we are convinced of the fact that they are not able to give to their investors a valid reason not to pay you and to lose your license.
There is only one explication for their behavior: they really have made disappear all the money the investors gave them and now they have not the money to pay you. This is the sole logic explication of what is going on.
The last attack made by NVHawk ( obviously a puppet of Tom Darden, probably the same that with an empty shell has has collected millions to be put in IH from investors) is that the flowmeter has been removed from the ERV and they could not have information of it; but you said repeatedly that all the instrumentation was property of the ERV and that the ERV has disassembled it at the end of the test to send it to the manufacturers to check the status of every instrument. This behavior of the ERV has been perfectly correct. Obviously, when he removed the instrumentation, included the flowmeter, all the guys of IH and Leonardo were around to control and take picture of everything, am I correct ?
Be careful , Andrea: that kind of people are ready to do anything to eliminate a person they have a debt of 89 millions with. Now they are saying slanders and lies…
Be careful.
Cheers,
Andy Stokes
Gene:
True. Then talks with Cherokee began in spring 2012, they were very serious and I changed strategy, because at those times I was convinced that Cherokee was really intentioned to make a big production concern, not a financial speculation. I was wrong.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
About the “reverse Mossbauer Effect”: are you sure the recoil energy is enough to subtract energy from the gamma rays to the point to reduce them to 50-100 keVs ?
Thank you,
Maurice
Dr Andrea Rossi,
In past you already had written in this blog that you were working to make a massive production factory. It was more than three years ago.
Cheers,
Gene
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The new QuarkX is clerly something substantially different from what we know about the E-Cat described so far.
Please accept two questions:
1- do the electronics make the difference ?
2- do electronic or electric engineers of the team that worked with you during the 1 year test participate to this R&D ?
Cheers,
O.B.
Mr “H”:
You promised last week that you were going to give us fun about the “PhD”, but you disappointed us all, no comments, no fun.
You are a veritable cheater ! Your disappointing silence gives us evidence that the “PhD” is an honest man, that merits the money he earns to the last cent and that he is an inspiring model of deontology for all of us. On the contrary, you are a very bad guy, my dear Mr “H”.
Disappointed Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Terrible.
This gives evidence of the fact that they can’t fight with lawful means, because they have no ground for that, and must try to cheat.
The opera ballet dancers are getting hysterical. Anyway, these are peanuts compared to what we are going to put in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
in your answer to LL you made a statement about certification.
Speaking about that agreed upon certification process – is that process for the QuarkX itself as a machine, or is it related to industrial or domestic certification?
Thanks for clearing up any misunderstandings.
Best regards and all the best to you and your team,
Dear Dr Rossi:
It is confirmed: a puppet of Tom Darden (Weaver) has seriously hacked the blog of Sifferkoll because he was fighting to find the truth about IH stealing your IP.
Dear Andrea,
You answered to “LL” that in June you will have a closed doors official test. This sounds very good. My only advice is a trivial one: make sure that you have understood the testing protocol exactly in the same way as those who will be observing it. How to do it? By repeating to them in own words everything that they require you to do, and requiring them to do the same to those requirements that you have.
As an example, just very recently I was part of an episode (unrelated to LENR, of course) where one person had misread one sentence in a slightly sloppily written official document. As a result, 100 emails were exchanged between five people, until it was realised that all was just much ado about nothing. (No problem since this is government: we are even supposed to be inefficient:-)
LL:
I am working with the “QuarkX” right now.
The preliminar R&D will be comleted by June, if she geos on as she did so far.
I am positive about what I saw until now. We are designing a very small module to obtain any power just assembling and the design is robot-oriented.
In June there will be an extremely important meeting with due persons with a closed doors official test. The certification process has already been agreed upon and this time I think the certification, also thanks to the data obtained from the 1 year test, will be not as difficult as in the past. I hope.
The sun is rising.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Travis Fondow:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr Rossi:
1- Did you request copies of all the energy and water bills paid by the customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat ?
2- are those bills coherent with the COP indicated in the Report ?
Just a curiosity, if you can answer.
Regards,
Travis
Rod:
Thank you for your suggestion, but I do not think that aerospace applications will be made for the first years of diffusion of the E-Cat. We are still far from those applications.
I think that the diffusion of the E-Cat for terrestrial uses will be more than enough to give public evidence of its merit.
By the way, strong congratulations to the Team of Solar Impulse and to their sponsors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mike Henderson:
The reason why I use nickel, not zirconium , as a catalyst are not those.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The Opera ballet dancers are saying they do not need your technology because they have bought other much better technologies.
Ha,ha,ha
Cheers,
Giovanni
Dear Andrea Rossi
Thank you for the model you gave us to understand how the Higgs field works: very nice.
Darrin
Is the geometry of the face centered cubic crystal (FCC) structure a necessary condition for LENR? I am intrigued by zirconium, but it has a hexagonal closest packing (HCP) structure. Does that or anything else negate zirconium as a catalyst?
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
The Solar Impulse 2 plane and its two pilots are currently attempting to circumvent the globe by using only solar power to promote clean technologies.
Theoretically, if you remove the solar panels from the plane and retrofit it with several lightweight E-Cat QuarkX reactors to power its electric engines, you could easily demonstrate the tremendous capabilities of your E-Cat QuarkX to the world. With no solar panels on the plane, and with no heavy fuel or batteries stored onboard (with maybe the exception of a single emergency battery), no one could dispute that the E-Cat QuarkX was indeed providing the only power to the plane’s electric engines.
If the LENR community were to get several sponsors to fund this demonstration (circumvent the world in record time), and if you would provide the necessary E-Cat QuarkXs, would you consider this a valid and dramatic way to show the E-Cat QuarkX to the rest of the world? I and your legions of fans want you win this battle against those that are trying to steal from you, and drag your good name through the mud. Let’s shut up the skeptics with a dramatic demo that would leave no doubt that your E-Cat QuarkX will change the world!
Here’s a link to the Solar Impulse website: http://www.solarimpulse.com/.
BTW, the Solar Impulse 2 effort is sponsored by Google, watchmaker Omega and robotics-focused ABB, among others.
With warm regards,
–Rod
Menico:
Let’s try this:
Imagine a transparent tank inside which a strong vacuum is made and there is no gravity. Imagine that inside this tank you can see small sail boats, some with bigger sails, some with very smaller sails. In this situation local symmetry is respected and you can see all the sails move randomly at he same velocity.
They are all bosons, then, travelling at the speed of light.
Now imagine that you from a valve let the air enter the tank: now you will have no more vacuum. The air is comparable to the Higgs field ( the Higgs boson is just a wave of the Higgs field). When the air is inside, the sails that have very small dimensions still continue to move with easiness in the tank: they, we could say, remain bosons; the bigger sails move now with much more difficulty, get swamped in the air mass: this is how bosons become fermions, they “feel” tha mass because their sails get impeded in the air mass. This is a possible model how the Higgs field works to turn bosons into fermions.
Attention: these models are intrinsecally misleading, they can be useful just to give a model for the brain to start to get the idea. The real situation is represantable only via mathematical models. For example, if you are young, or if you have a young daughter or son, studying seriously Physics in a university you can understand what really stands behind the concept of the Higgs field and the non zero value field in vacuum.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I tried to figure out how the Higgs boson works. A firend of mine told me you are able to make easier difficult concepts.
Can you make me able to figure out how the Higgs boson works?
Thank you
Menico
Dear Maurice,
It would be difficult for a single emission photon to be decreased by as much as would take the photon down to the KeV level by recoil effects. But if the process involved a cascading resonance process where there were multiple resonances, perhaps the accumulated recoil losses could take the initial photon down to this level, similar to the process found in fluorescence.
Energy level regards.
Eric Ainsworth:
Thank you for your sustain and your suggestions.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Like many,many of your followers I know your technology works. My own thoughts are that IH are not stealing your technology but stopping you from bringing it into the world at this present time because one day it will have to be used. I do not know whether you can use it with a pending court case but if you can, maybe you should investigate the cement manufacturing industry, one of the oldest manufactured product in high demand but what it requires is lots of heat which contributes to most of its expense. If you could partner with people in the cement business or those who would like to get into the cement business I am sure your technology would propel you to be a world leader in both cement and LENR technology (not that you already not) and if you became a public company you would be inundated with prospective shareholders. I for one would be one. All the best Eric
Hank Mills:
Your comment contains a big mistake: Johnson Matthey has nothing to do with us. We bought from them some materials but that is all. Please do not diffuse false information.
No further comments.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Oeystein Lande:
Thank you for the link.
Interesting.
The opera ballet dancers getting more hysterical by the day. Their Etoile ( Tom Darden, aka NCHawk) is arrived to the “spaccata”.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Hank Mills:
1- No flowmeter has ever been installed by IH in the 1MW E-Cat delivered to the factory of the Customer
2- Only the ERV has installed his flowmeter and sealed it
3- when the flowmeter has been installed by the ERV the technicians of IH and of Leonardo were there to assist
4- for one year, I repeat for one year, IH guys, included Tom Darden, JT Vaughn and all their investors from UK (Woodford) and China have seen all the instrumentation of the ERV and they saw what the flowmeter was as well as they have seen it was sealed as well as they saw its trade mark and model. They had their technicians inside the plant for 352 days and they never noticed anything wrong
5- The ERV is a nuclear engineer who worked in a nuclear power plant and I can assure you he has not to learn from anybody how to make these kinds of measurements.
All what I am saying will be given evidence of in due site and in due time.
A blog is not a proper place to make a legal litigation.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Here is another accusation from Mr. Weaver.
“Argon – how do you know so much about Rossi? Perhaps you should ask him about the flow meters that he replaced instead of the ones that IH spec’d and installed when the 1MW was built. That one is going to hurt when the truth comes out in court. The gig is up – the world is not going to wait for any more demos. The Lucy Peanuts football trick is played out.”
Mr. Weaver alleges that you removed meters that IH had installed and replaced them with your own. This is the boldest accusation ever made so far by anyone from or in contact with I.H.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Any comments to the latest blog from Sifferkoll?
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/the-lenr-ecat-saga-dawey-weaver-goes-ballistic-after/
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Today’s issue of my Blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/04/apr-24-2016-lenr-great-paper-by-ed.html
All the best,
Peter
Maurice:
No, I am not sure, but I propend to think so. I have worked with advanced mathematical models on the well known formula of the Mossbauer Effect, that contains like in a nutshell all the following development that is at the base of my theoretical percourse. Now I have a problem: from one side, I am not ready for a publication, but from the other side I would like to publish it to receive massive critics to check if I am wrong.
I am convinced that the reverse Mossbauer Effect integrated with the lattice theory of Prof Norman Cook is the right direction, but I am not sure that my convinction is correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hatti: please see the answer I just gave to Andy Stokes a minute ago.
The same I answer to you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andy Stokes:
Yes, you are correct: the ERV gave to IH one year of time, during the test, to get all the information they wanted about all his instrumentation; the men of IH, who attended the test every day for one year, has all the possibiliries to get all the data they wanted related to any instrument, flowmeter included.
Nobody of IH, ever, had anything negative to say of the flowmeter ( that was sealed: I remember perfectly the opera ballet dancers of IH chant that all the instrumentation was of the ERV, made their investors of Woodford notice that the flowmeter was sealed, when Woodford’s specialists came to the plant ). When the ERV disassembled the instrumentation all the guys of IH were around, getting photos and any possible information; the ERV told us that he was getting back his instrumentation to certify with the manufacturers that their margin of error had not been modified during the year test, AT THE SAME CONDITIONS OF FLUID AND TEMPERATURE OF THE TEST).
Obviously, evidence of all this will be requested in due time, in due place. The report is a short resume necessarily reduced: the 12 600 000 data taken by the ERV cannot be printed: 66 000 pages could be necessary.
P.S. UPDATE AFTER 30 MINUTES:
I SAW NOW THE GIGANTIC LIE OF THIS PUPPET: HE WROTE THAT THE ERV DELIVERED IN A FIRST MOMENT A DRAFT OF THE REPORT WITH DATA ABOUT THE FLOWMETER, BUT EVENTUALLY RETRIEVED SUCH DATA FROM THE REPORT: THIS IS A TITANIC LIE !!! NO DRAFT OF THE REPORT HAS EVER DELIVERED TO EITHER PARTY FROM THE ERV !!!
HE GAVE THE DATA OF THE FLOWMETER TO US
1- WHEN HE INSTALLED THE FLOWMETER
2- WHEN HE DISASSEMBLED IT TO SEND IT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR TO CHECK THAT THE MARGIN OF ERROR HAD NOT BEEN CHANGED DURING THE TEST
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Industrial Heat is slandering you beyond any possible imagination, but all they say is in evident contrast with the reality we can read in the facts. The more their puppets attack your character, the more we are convinced of the fact that they are not able to give to their investors a valid reason not to pay you and to lose your license.
There is only one explication for their behavior: they really have made disappear all the money the investors gave them and now they have not the money to pay you. This is the sole logic explication of what is going on.
The last attack made by NVHawk ( obviously a puppet of Tom Darden, probably the same that with an empty shell has has collected millions to be put in IH from investors) is that the flowmeter has been removed from the ERV and they could not have information of it; but you said repeatedly that all the instrumentation was property of the ERV and that the ERV has disassembled it at the end of the test to send it to the manufacturers to check the status of every instrument. This behavior of the ERV has been perfectly correct. Obviously, when he removed the instrumentation, included the flowmeter, all the guys of IH and Leonardo were around to control and take picture of everything, am I correct ?
Be careful , Andrea: that kind of people are ready to do anything to eliminate a person they have a debt of 89 millions with. Now they are saying slanders and lies…
Be careful.
Cheers,
Andy Stokes
O.B.:
1- yes
2- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gene:
True. Then talks with Cherokee began in spring 2012, they were very serious and I changed strategy, because at those times I was convinced that Cherokee was really intentioned to make a big production concern, not a financial speculation. I was wrong.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
He,he,he…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Did the ERV make the certification of his instruments? Where is such instrumentation now?
Cheers
Hatti
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
J.O.N.P. has become the new “Comentarii de bello Gallico”.
Have a good fight!
Koen
Dr Andrea Rossi:
About the “reverse Mossbauer Effect”: are you sure the recoil energy is enough to subtract energy from the gamma rays to the point to reduce them to 50-100 keVs ?
Thank you,
Maurice
Dr Andrea Rossi,
In past you already had written in this blog that you were working to make a massive production factory. It was more than three years ago.
Cheers,
Gene
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The new QuarkX is clerly something substantially different from what we know about the E-Cat described so far.
Please accept two questions:
1- do the electronics make the difference ?
2- do electronic or electric engineers of the team that worked with you during the 1 year test participate to this R&D ?
Cheers,
O.B.
Manuel Cilia:
I am on the side of them who work to achieve what they think to be right.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi
My thoughts are with you, you are on the right side of history
Dear Andrea,
Interesting news on Sifferkoll attack,!
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/a-coincidence-the-namecheap-hosting-dewey-weaver-hacker-connection/#comments
Even better news your announcement of meeting in June!!!! Great!!!!
All the very best
Luis
Mr “H”:
You promised last week that you were going to give us fun about the “PhD”, but you disappointed us all, no comments, no fun.
You are a veritable cheater ! Your disappointing silence gives us evidence that the “PhD” is an honest man, that merits the money he earns to the last cent and that he is an inspiring model of deontology for all of us. On the contrary, you are a very bad guy, my dear Mr “H”.
Disappointed Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Terrible.
This gives evidence of the fact that they can’t fight with lawful means, because they have no ground for that, and must try to cheat.
The opera ballet dancers are getting hysterical. Anyway, these are peanuts compared to what we are going to put in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roger:
Both. F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- both (F8)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your inspiring link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
See please
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/04/apr-23-2016-r-problem-as-lenr-dragon.html
What you say here is Ok, however I have to confess that my story is too tragic
and I regret that I had to write it.
But, in a sense I had to do it.
peter
Dear Andrea,
You wrote: “In June there will be an extremely important meeting with due persons with a closed doors official test.”
1. Is this going to be an extended test over days?
2. Will it be in connection with a) product sales, or b) certification?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Hello Dr Rossi,
in your answer to LL you made a statement about certification.
Speaking about that agreed upon certification process – is that process for the QuarkX itself as a machine, or is it related to industrial or domestic certification?
Thanks for clearing up any misunderstandings.
Best regards and all the best to you and your team,
Roger
Dear Dr Rossi:
It is confirmed: a puppet of Tom Darden (Weaver) has seriously hacked the blog of Sifferkoll because he was fighting to find the truth about IH stealing your IP.
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
I hope so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
>The sun is rising
and the day will be beautiful!
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Andrea,
You answered to “LL” that in June you will have a closed doors official test. This sounds very good. My only advice is a trivial one: make sure that you have understood the testing protocol exactly in the same way as those who will be observing it. How to do it? By repeating to them in own words everything that they require you to do, and requiring them to do the same to those requirements that you have.
As an example, just very recently I was part of an episode (unrelated to LENR, of course) where one person had misread one sentence in a slightly sloppily written official document. As a result, 100 emails were exchanged between five people, until it was realised that all was just much ado about nothing. (No problem since this is government: we are even supposed to be inefficient:-)
Cross-checking regards, /pekka
Hank Mills:
Thank you for the link and the insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
LL:
I am working with the “QuarkX” right now.
The preliminar R&D will be comleted by June, if she geos on as she did so far.
I am positive about what I saw until now. We are designing a very small module to obtain any power just assembling and the design is robot-oriented.
In June there will be an extremely important meeting with due persons with a closed doors official test. The certification process has already been agreed upon and this time I think the certification, also thanks to the data obtained from the 1 year test, will be not as difficult as in the past. I hope.
The sun is rising.
Warm Regards,
A.R.