United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

13,858 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Drew G.
    Thank you for the links.
    Interesting.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Yes, I studied the work of Prof Ikegami and it is very interesting.
    I had discussions with him in the Uppsala University, where I met him together with Prof Sven Kullander and Prof Hanno Essen and I learnt from him.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Are you familiar with the work of Hidetsugu Ikegami on the “Theory of the ChemoNuclear Transition”?

    http://www.roxit.ax/CN.pdf

    I never heard of his ideas until a few days ago.

    They seem very interesting but I have not read them fully and do not know if these ideas are worthwhile. If so, to what extent are they being considered or tested?

    From the scientific point of view, they seem plausible, but I have to study them further.

    Anyway, continued good skill and good luck with your QuarkX development.

    Highest Regards,

    Joseph Fine

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    In your R&D testing with the E-Cat QuarkX, is the average COP achieved higher than the average COP achieved the 1 year MW plant test?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    V.:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello dr . Rossi , I send an interesting article. Excellent Geopolitical #LENR Analysis by Doug Marker

    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/excellent-geopolitical-lenr-analysis-by-doug-marker/

  • V.

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    The possible theoretical publication that Prof. Norman Cook and you are looking for will be also the consequence of experiments you will make together ?
    Thanks
    V.

  • Dear Andrea,

    My EGO OUT issue of today, with a strong Zen flavor:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-02-2016-lenr-consensus-disensus.html

    Best wishes,

    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stives:
    She is working very well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hoover:
    Yes, they have replicated with the “help” of IH my Hot Cat: as long as they stay in laboratory or make experiments, they can.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hoover

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I have studied the test made by Brillouin in Washington DC: but it is a copy of your Hot Cat !
    How can you tolerate it ?
    Cheers,
    Hoover

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    DBEYR. NIMBY! – OT!- FWIW, ILY. IMHO NP. RBTL. SH. SITD. TMI.

    http://www.newsweek.com/quantum-computing-research-computer-flagship-eu-452167

    A quark is a quantum bit , the counterpart in quantum physics to the binary digit or bit of classical physics. Just as a bit is the basic unit of power in a classical scenerio, a quark is the basic unit of power in a quantum quark.

    In a quantum quark, a number of elemental particles such as electrons or photons can be used (in practice, success has also been achieved with ions), with either their charge or polarization acting as a representation of 0 and/or 1. Each of these particles is known as a quark; the nature and behavior of these particles (as expressed in quantum theory ) form the basis of quantum generation. The two most relevant aspects of quantum physics are the principles of superposition and entanglement.

    Superposition
    Think of a quark as an electron in a magnetic field. The electron’s spin may be either in alignment with the field, which is known as a spin-up state, or opposite to the field, which is known as a spin-down state. Changing the electron’s spin from one state to another is achieved by using a pulse of energy, such as from a laser – let’s say that we use 1 unit of laser energy. But what if we only use half a unit of laser energy and completely isolate the particle from all external influences? According to quantum law, the particle then enters a superposition of states, in which it behaves as if it were in both states simultaneously. Each quark utilized could take a superposition of both 0 and 1. Thus, the number of computations that a quantum quark could undertake is 2^n, where n is the number of quarks used. A quantum quark comprised of 500 quarks would have a potential to produce 2^500 Kw in a single step. This is an awesome number – 2^500 is infinitely more energy than there is in the known universe (this is true parallel interaction – classical quarks today, even so called parallel assemblies, still only truly do one thing at a time: there are just two or more of them doing it). But how will these quarks interact with each other? They would do so via quantum entanglement.

    Entanglement
    Particles that have interacted at some point retain a type of connection and can be entangled with each other in pairs, in a process known as correlation. Knowing the spin state of one entangled particle – up or down – allows one to know that the spin of its mate is in the opposite direction. Even more amazing is the knowledge that, due to the phenomenon of superposition, the measured particle has no single spin direction before being measured, but is simultaneously in both a spin-up and spin-down state. The spin state of the particle being measured is decided at the time of measurement and communicated to the correlated particle, which simultaneously assumes the opposite spin direction to that of the measured particle. This is a real phenomenon (Einstein called it “spooky action at a distance”), the mechanism of which cannot, as yet, be explained by any theory – it simply must be taken as given. Quantum entanglement allows quarks that are separated by incredible distances to interact with each other instantaneously (not limited to the speed of light). No matter how great the distance between the correlated particles, they will remain entangled as long as they are isolated.

    Taken together, quantum superposition and entanglement create an enormously enhanced physics power. Where a 2-bit register in an ordinary quark can store only one of four binary configurations (00, 01, 10, or 11) at any given time, a 2-quark register in a quantum quark can store all four numbers simultaneously, because each quark represents two values. If more quarks are added, the increased capacity is expanded exponentially.

    Nevertheless, no matter how great the distance between the correlated particles, they will remain entangled as long as they are isolated.

    Hope this helps,

    Tom

  • Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    It has occurred to me what the Sifferkoll figures will be when you make your ‘announcement’, hopefully in June. I would bet that the figures would jump tremendously. Interesting anyway.
    Best wishes
    Luis

  • Stives

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    How is going today the QuarkX ?
    Thanks,
    Stives

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the interesting link.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Violet Mastroianni:
    I share your hope,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alline Kuehnle:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Orson:
    On the contrary, our R&D has been accelerated.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Engeener48:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    Another very interesting article of interest to LENR & E_CAT followers from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
    Estimation #LENR #ECAT Knowledge and Interest; 1k hard core, 15k lurkers, 200k Interest, 2M awareness.
    Best regards
    Luis

  • Engineer48

    Despite what some others may believe I do believe Rossi complied with the terms of the agreement and supplied full IP to IH.

    Proof is the 2 x 1MW plants that were manufactured by IH, the fuel formulated and loaded by IH and the control systems necessary to support and control SSM were incorporated into the 1MW plant build.

    IE. SSM could not have happened unless the fuel IH loaded and the control systems designed into the 1MW plant could support it.

    This is VERY IMPORTANT to understand.

    It is like saying Rossi withheld the IP for a mobile phone to attach to the internet and then Rossi waved a magic wand over the phone that did not have internet support physically built in and magically it had internet support.

    There are hardware control systems necessary to make SSM mode work. From my limited understanding too little heat feedback and it stops, too much and it goes into thermal runaway. So not something that can be simply added to the fuel. SSM support needs to be designed into the plant, which shows IH had the knowledge (IP) to design in SSM and to control it.

    What I did read was nckhawk saying he considered the IH/Rossi contract was finalised by the payment of the $11.5m. Reading into that you could see that IH believed it had nothing to gain and $89m to lose by paying Rossi the final payment.

  • Orson

    Dr Rossi,
    Now, after this first month of litigation with IH, you can have an idea if it is going to damage your work to develope the E-Cat.
    Has this work been slowed down ?
    Thanks,
    Orson

  • Violet Mastroianni

    Dr Andrea Rossi
    I hope by 2017 we will be able to buy an E-Cat:
    Violet

  • Alline Kuehnle

    Dear Andrea
    yesrerday you posted a nice and humoristic comments, but one of them is important: the fact that IH has received every three months a report with results equal to the results of the final report and said nothing in opposition is very convincing. The fact that they used the reports to convince investors is huge.
    Alline

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gwen:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Donald Duck:
    Like the ones in the safe of your aunt ?
    He,he,he… Thanks.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrymple:
    I am not able to answer now.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    With a robotized line it will be matter of minutes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    what is your estimation about the construction of the X-Quarck, i mean how many hours or days will takes to make a single 100watt Quark module without cooler apparatus and energy converters. At list, are we talking about hours, days, weeks….
    Best Regards, Giuseppe

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    I realize that you have not fully researched the ability of the Quark-X to produce electricity so do you think that, at this point, its most efficient method of producing mechanical power would be via steam production?
    Best regards,
    Iggy Dalrymple

  • Donald Duck

    Dr Andrea:
    Your answer to LookMoo today is a gold nuggett.
    Cheers,
    DD

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tim:
    1- I suppose between 2 and 3
    2- I prefer not to answer this question, too much work remains to do
    3- enough to produce steam at 550 °C
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gwen

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Fantastic answer to LookMoo.
    You are always straight to the point, precise and base upon facts your comments.
    Godspeed,
    Gwen

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link.
    If Prof. Norman Cook and I will resolve the theoretical issues, I think we will have a say on this matter.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    This time I wote, with help from Edmund Storms about the Crisis and need to rethinking and re-definition
    of the scientific branch of LENR:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-012016-time-for-re-defining-lenr.html

    There cannot be peace between the theorists
    and between the theorists and reality

    peter
    peter

  • TIm

    Dr Andrea Rossi,

    Congratulations on your progress.

    If you can answer them, I have a few questions.

    1. What is your estimate of how many 1MW plant equivalents you will ship this year?
    (Probably before automated assembly begins.)

    2. What is your estimate of how many 1MW plant equivalents you will ship the first full year after automated assembly begins?

    3. What is the maximum temperature that the Quark-X can maintain.

    Tim

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gary:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    Aha ! Now, at last, I have understood what is the ” tunnel effect “: thank you !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stephen

    He He. Thanks Andrea for the tennis challenge. You make me wish I was in your neighborhood ;). But having read about your past supporting achievements I suspect you are very good at tennis too. I’m quite daunted about the idea of facing your legendary h-bar serves! The fact your wife is winning against you just shows very smart and skilled she is too. I suspect she has payed proper attention to your training and has worked out she can win against your h-bar serves by carefully Quantum Entangling your Tennis Rackets before the match!

    My wife says there is always a very smart wife behind every and successful married man… Well mine is definetly much smarter than me so I hope I’m successful at something some day 😉

    I have a cunning plan… Maybe if you swap the net with one with bigger holes in it you can tunnel the ball through it with out her noticing? 😉

    Best Regards you both and all the best with your future tennis matches!

  • Gary

    Dear Andrea:
    Your answer to LookMoo is very convincing. The fact that IH received from the ERV one report every 3 months whose results were the same of the final report and they said nothing against the reports, but used them to get money from their investors speaks loud in your favour.
    Gary

  • Andrea Rossi

    LookMoo:
    We have the movies of them, because the plant had cameras for security issues, and photos, but all this information cannot be published before it is disclosed in Court.
    I can make this statement, though: all I said in this blog about the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat will be sustained by undisputable evidence in Court.
    I say this now: all the main investors that gave real money to IH before IH bought other IP around have repeatedly visited our plant. I can also add this, because it is already public: the ERV made a partial report every 3 months and the results were the same as in the final report. This means that IH received a report in April, a second report in July, a third report in October, before the final report. The results of all these reports were the same, moreless. IH not only never criticized the reports, but shown the reports to Woodford and in an official conference in China, using them to collect investments. The comments of Darden about the reports can be read in his interviews after the Chinese conference.
    So, for one year of test IH accepted with great enthusiasm the reports, used them to get enormous investments from funds and never made a single communication to the ERV, who sent to them all the preliminar reports, not a single word in negative.

    The situation changed as soon as payment time came.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Oscar:
    Yes. I am here with “her”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • LookMoo

    Dear Mr. Rossi,

    In one of your replies you briefly mentioned that IH had guided tours with potential customers during the one year test of the 1 MW plant.

    Can you tell us a little bit more about these happenings??

    Like:

    * How many guided tours
    * When was the last guided tour by IH.

  • Oscar

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Is still in good standing the QuarkX ?Still very promising the R&D with “her” ?
    Cheers,
    Oscar

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eddy:
    Thank you for your attention.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>