Dr Andrea Rossi,
The links to the Congress and the Army are clearly inspired by your work, the sole that can merit the attribution of a leadership.
The LENR world owes you this immense upgrading of interest in the highest echelons of the USA.
Congratulations,
Janell
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the attention you captured from the Army of the USA. Who do you think could be the best President for the LENR ?
Edmond
Tom Conover:
Clearly this has been moved from the 1 MW 1 year test. They clearly said we have the leadership and this is an honour for our Great Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dott. Rossi:
Please find here a link with an important military doument from the USA:
“The committee is aware of recent positive developments in developing low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), which produce ultra- clean, low-cost renewable energy that have strong national security implications. For example, according to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), if LENR works it will be a ‘‘disruptive technology that could revolutionize energy production and storage.’’ The committee is also aware of the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency’s (DARPA) findings that other countries including China and India are moving forward with LENR programs of their own and that Japan has actually created its own investment fund to promote such technology. DIA has also assessed that Japan and Italy are leaders in the field and that Russia, China, Israel, and India are now devoting significant resources to LENR development. To better understand the national security implications of these de- velopments, the committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing on the military utility of recent U.S. industrial base LENR advancements to the House Committee on Armed Services by September 22, 2016. This briefing should examine the current state of research in the United States, how that compares to work being done internationally, and an assessment of the type of military applications where this technology could potentially be useful.”
Dear Dr. Rossi, what do you think about the following document, as the US Government is strongly entering in the field of LENR in general and in yours in particular ?
Giuseppe:
I said that in June should be made an important presentation to our Partners, not public, and also said F8.
A public presentation will be made only when the product will be ready.
F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
in a previous comments you said that in June will be held the pubblic presentation of the Quarck-X. Will June 3 be a good day?
It will be a good present for your birthday but, also a present you make for all mankind.
Best Regards, Giuseppe
I am encouraged that the domestic ecats are soon to be certified. Will it be months or years from certification to installation of first domestic ecat and will it only be available in the the United States or also in other Countries as well? Particularly in the frigid north country of Canada !
Dr. Rossi: Could you tell us how many 100-120C, similar to the yearlong test E-Cats, you have sold to date and are there more orders than you are able to fill?
Frank Akland:
That is the ballpark projection of the price of power, not of energy: I wrote kW, not kWh.
U was referring to the total power that can be generated by the apparatus in itself.
I am not yet able to publish what will be the cost of energy.
F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Can you tell use something of the eCat Quark in terms of its size, weight, effective COP, and electrical power output? I am wondering whether it might have application in medium to large UAV applications.
Dear Andrea,
I would like to propose an issue that affects me particularly that perhaps you have already answered in previous years but which is always current, seen the remarkable progress achieved by the QuarkX.
The impact on the lives of all of QuarkX days will be sensational. How can the common man, became aware of “Rossi” effect, continue to look at things from all impartially days?
Trivial examples:
I have to buy a new machine that will last the next 10 years. I buy an electric car, a hybrid or diesel?
I would install a photovoltaic system of 20 KW ….. it still makes sense?
I would change the boiler house because she begins to wobble, what do I do?
Dear Dr Andrea,
Please trash my last question, I realise now, it was my mistake. The question was about the cost of the machine? (“power” not “Energy”).
I’m very happy!
Many thanks.
Dave
Dear Andrea,
Related to your (recent, long) answer to Joseph Fine, I’m wondering if one can see from the recorded 1-year data somehow when the normal plant operator is switched to the “abnormal” one and vice versa? If not, maybe Fourier-transforming the data would help make them visible.
Curious regards, /pekka
Dan:
Absolutely wrong. The E-Cat, after the successful test of one year in the factory of the Customer has been of paramount importance and it remains the sole real product we have now for sale.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brenton Yusko:
Very good, congratulations to Me356.
I hope to read soon the report of this interesting replication made by means of my US Patent: so far I cannot comment for lack of information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
LookMoo:
This is why we need to gain a safety certification.
We already got the safety certification for the industrial plants and we are close to obtain the safety certification for the domestic, I think.
The reason is that all the measurements made on out e-Cats during their operation have never detected ionizing radiations outside the E-Cats.
The measurements of the ionizing radiations around our E-Cats have been also made by professional experts of the matter.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You are probably well informed about the many, largely successful,.. replications attempt of your eCat. Some of them claims that they records bursts or lasting radiations.
Your enemies will of course point on these replication attempts and claim that the business needs to be regulated. The first regulations is often a total (LENR) ban. They can’t pick you but by pointing on reckless amateurs work they may gain some acceptance for LENR regulations.
Gavin:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Edmond Dubord:
The best President is the one that the People of the USA will choose with their infinite wisdom.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Janell Bierstedt:
I am honoured of this.
Means my great team is making a useful job.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hugo Rhen:
Very well also today.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The links to the Congress and the Army are clearly inspired by your work, the sole that can merit the attribution of a leadership.
The LENR world owes you this immense upgrading of interest in the highest echelons of the USA.
Congratulations,
Janell
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the attention you captured from the Army of the USA. Who do you think could be the best President for the LENR ?
Edmond
Hello, Andrea
are you preparing new patents for the QuarkX ?
Thanks,
Gavin
Dear Andrea,
Great news, not so great discussion
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-11-2016-lenr-gets-attention-meets.html
Congrats,
Peter
Tom Conover:
Clearly this has been moved from the 1 MW 1 year test. They clearly said we have the leadership and this is an honour for our Great Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dima Redko:
We’ll do as soon as we will have a plant in operation with the authorization to show it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
On the contrary, it is an important recognition of our work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dott. Rossi:
Please find here a link with an important military doument from the USA:
“The committee is aware of recent positive developments in developing low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), which produce ultra- clean, low-cost renewable energy that have strong national security implications. For example, according to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), if LENR works it will be a ‘‘disruptive technology that could revolutionize energy production and storage.’’ The committee is also aware of the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency’s (DARPA) findings that other countries including China and India are moving forward with LENR programs of their own and that Japan has actually created its own investment fund to promote such technology. DIA has also assessed that Japan and Italy are leaders in the field and that Russia, China, Israel, and India are now devoting significant resources to LENR development. To better understand the national security implications of these de- velopments, the committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing on the military utility of recent U.S. industrial base LENR advancements to the House Committee on Armed Services by September 22, 2016. This briefing should examine the current state of research in the United States, how that compares to work being done internationally, and an assessment of the type of military applications where this technology could potentially be useful.”
https://www.congress.gov/114/crpt/hrpt537/CRPT-114hrpt537.pdf
Dear Dr. Rossi, what do you think about the following document, as the US Government is strongly entering in the field of LENR in general and in yours in particular ?
Will it be a brake to its diffusion?
https://www.congress.gov/114/crpt/hrpt537/CRPT-114hrpt537.pdf
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Andrea,
The latest article from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
#LENR #ECAT @ApcoWorldwide Saga: about the usual puppets: ” Transforming Into a Primary IH Spinner or Simply Lost in Emotions?”
Best regards
Luis
Dear Andrea
as I understood the 1Mw plant is a ready product, why you don’t want to make public presentation of it now?
Dear Andrea,
If the results are positive and you start shipping before 9/28 that might solve a problem.
Tom
Please read these references:
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA
(2) http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/05/11/us-secretary-of-defense-directed-to-provide-a-briefing-on-lenr-to-the-us-house-armed-services-committee/
Giuseppe:
I said that in June should be made an important presentation to our Partners, not public, and also said F8.
A public presentation will be made only when the product will be ready.
F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
in a previous comments you said that in June will be held the pubblic presentation of the Quarck-X. Will June 3 be a good day?
It will be a good present for your birthday but, also a present you make for all mankind.
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Uwe:
Very well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
I prefer not to answer now to this question.
Plants have been ordered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Don:
It will take months from the certification. It will be distributed in all the world.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I am encouraged that the domestic ecats are soon to be certified. Will it be months or years from certification to installation of first domestic ecat and will it only be available in the the United States or also in other Countries as well? Particularly in the frigid north country of Canada !
Dear Andrea,
Tuesday- Martedi day of MARS its spirit is manifest in this issue of my Blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-10-2016-lenr-victim-of-scientific.html
All the best- for the good people!
Peter
Dr. Rossi: Could you tell us how many 100-120C, similar to the yearlong test E-Cats, you have sold to date and are there more orders than you are able to fill?
Dr. Rossi:
How is working today the QuarkX:
Regards,
Uwe
Frank Akland:
That is the ballpark projection of the price of power, not of energy: I wrote kW, not kWh.
U was referring to the total power that can be generated by the apparatus in itself.
I am not yet able to publish what will be the cost of energy.
F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
These data will be published after the completion of the preliminar R&D.
F8
Warm Regards
A.R.
Andrea Rossi,
Can you tell use something of the eCat Quark in terms of its size, weight, effective COP, and electrical power output? I am wondering whether it might have application in medium to large UAV applications.
Dear Andrea,
Yesterday you said your ballpark goal for the cost of the QuarkX was $0.2-$1 per Watt. Is this thermal or electrical W?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Pekka Janhunen:
I have taken record of all my interventions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian Luca:
The quarkX is not yet a product.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I would like to propose an issue that affects me particularly that perhaps you have already answered in previous years but which is always current, seen the remarkable progress achieved by the QuarkX.
The impact on the lives of all of QuarkX days will be sensational. How can the common man, became aware of “Rossi” effect, continue to look at things from all impartially days?
Trivial examples:
I have to buy a new machine that will last the next 10 years. I buy an electric car, a hybrid or diesel?
I would install a photovoltaic system of 20 KW ….. it still makes sense?
I would change the boiler house because she begins to wobble, what do I do?
Dear Dr Andrea,
Please trash my last question, I realise now, it was my mistake. The question was about the cost of the machine? (“power” not “Energy”).
I’m very happy!
Many thanks.
Dave
Dear Dr Rossi,
When you said ballpark Quark electricity cost: 20 to 100 $/kWhr did you mean /MWhr?
Interestingly, Solar bids are currently down at $58/MWhr and predicting $20.
Best wishes
Dave
Dear Andrea,
Related to your (recent, long) answer to Joseph Fine, I’m wondering if one can see from the recorded 1-year data somehow when the normal plant operator is switched to the “abnormal” one and vice versa? If not, maybe Fourier-transforming the data would help make them visible.
Curious regards, /pekka
Dan:
Absolutely wrong. The E-Cat, after the successful test of one year in the factory of the Customer has been of paramount importance and it remains the sole real product we have now for sale.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The development of the QuarkX means that yu consider the E-Cat obsolete ? Somebody is saying so.
Thank you for the answer,
Dan
Brenton Yusko:
Very good, congratulations to Me356.
I hope to read soon the report of this interesting replication made by means of my US Patent: so far I cannot comment for lack of information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nolan:
I am delighted anytime I read that my effect has been replicated.
I wait for the report of this experiment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Me 346 of MFMP has replicated your effect in full, reaching COP 3.
What do you think ?
Cheers,
Nolan
Dr Andrea Rossi:
It appears that Me356 has replicated the effect described in your US patent. Comments?
Brenton
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for the link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
LookMoo:
This is why we need to gain a safety certification.
We already got the safety certification for the industrial plants and we are close to obtain the safety certification for the domestic, I think.
The reason is that all the measurements made on out e-Cats during their operation have never detected ionizing radiations outside the E-Cats.
The measurements of the ionizing radiations around our E-Cats have been also made by professional experts of the matter.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi,
You are probably well informed about the many, largely successful,.. replications attempt of your eCat. Some of them claims that they records bursts or lasting radiations.
Your enemies will of course point on these replication attempts and claim that the business needs to be regulated. The first regulations is often a total (LENR) ban. They can’t pick you but by pointing on reckless amateurs work they may gain some acceptance for LENR regulations.
Is that a problem for you??
Dear Andrea,
This is my blog issue for today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-09-2016-lenr-cults-and-desired-and.html
Paper by Frank Acland has an essential subject.
peter
Delorse:
Very well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.