Dr Andrea Rossi,
Did I understand well that you want to produce only one very small module in massive quantity to allow to pile it up to any limit of desired power ?
Cheers,
Edmund
Hi, Dr Rossi:
Find here a link to the report of the US Navy expert Louis F. DeChiaro , Ph.D. : he has published the C.O.P. the 23/09/2016:
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) Phenomena and Potential Applications
Louis F. DeChiaro, Ph.D.
Physicist
September 23, 2015
Rossi 1 Megawatt LENR Plant
Original version ~100 10 kW. Ecats in std. 20 ft. ship container.
More recent version uses 4 250 kW reactors.
Completed >200 days of 400 day test @ US customer factory.
Heat is now being used by customer for mfg. operations.
Performance report expected around Feb-Mar., 2016.
C.O.P. (Pout /Pin) typically varies between 20 and 80.
Lead-ion collisions: the LHC achieves a new energy record
After the Bevatron (Berkeley, 1954) – which broke the energy barrier of billions of electronvolts – and the Tevatron (Fermilab, 1987) – which reached a trillion electronvolts – the LHC is now reaching the peta- (quadrillion) electronvolt level with its heavy-ion collisions (see here). However, one should remember that the average energy per colliding nucleon pair, within the 1 PeV “fireball”, is 5 TeV (compared to 13 TeV in the recent proton-proton collisions).
In this year’s one-month run, the first week was devoted to colliding protons at 2.51 TeV per beam to provide reference data for the subsequent collisions of lead nuclei (the atomic number of lead is Z=82, compared to Z=1 for protons) at the unprecedented energy of 5.02 TeV in the centre of mass per nucleon.
And, anyway (“de toute facon”):
“Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come.”
“Rien n’est plus fort qu’une idée dont l’heure est venue.”
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the link.
I am positively surprised, because this is a tremendous improvement of the LHC, that with the discovery of the Higgs field had reached “only” 250 GeV.
It must be added, though, that we are still far from the “sigma 5” that could allow the confirmation of the discovery, albeit the “sigma 2” that has been reached is of statistical importance, also because reached in concomitance with a “sigma 1.5” reached from another team working in parallel on the same subject.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the very interesting link. I am very surprised ( positively surprised ) because the LHC has been fantastically improved after the finding of the Higgs field, for which an energy of about 250 GeV had been reached.
This discovery is very important.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco Serra:
1- both
2- the report of the 1 year test will be published as soon as it will have been dosclosed in Court: so I have been instructed to do by my attorney.
3- I think this year will bring some good surprise.
4- I sympathize with you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, Google:
GREENSTONE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Click on:
Engineers develop cement with 97% smaller carbon dioxide.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
1100MW reactor has 18 million pellets,1cm dia x 1cm long,
In 50,000 tubes in 193 assemblies to produce heat for 18 months.
They replace1/3 assemblies after 18 months. Obviously diff designs vary but point is, your small QuarkX at 100w would take only 11,000 for a MW.
Small things add up
God Speed
Hurley
Dear Andrea,
will June presentation focus on the thermal energy production capability of QuarkX, on its electric capability or both of them?
Before the greetings I’ve just a request.
Please Andrea give us a few crumbs of news. We were waiting for more than a year the results of the previous long test, the knowing of which was repeatedly postponed and now we know that they probably cannot be disclosed until years.
In June you will present the QuarkX but in a closed doors conference. Ma uffa. Am I remembering bad or you were talking about a public presentation of QuarkX in June ?
Also in the last weeks it looks like your secrecy is further increasing.
Please understand our feelings and my request. We love ECat almost like you do, and we suffer for not being able to give even a slightest peek.
Obviously this is not intended to be a criticism against you. We all understand the hard and dangerous situation you are involved in and, as always, we are with you.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Some blogs are populated by persons that, even id they do not have any specific professional qualification, want to explain how calorimetry must be done. I find this ridiculous.
What do you think ?
Regards,
Augustus
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The LHC of CERN has found a new elementary particle at energies around 750 GeV. This is a particle that was not supposed to exist and couls revolutionize the Standard Model.
Do you have an opinion about this?
Cheers,
Ingeborg
Frank Acland:
What is involved is stability, safety, start/stop procedures, efficiency and its stability.
Yes, I think by the end of June could be completed, but remember: F8 !!!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Assuming positive results from the non-public partner/customer presentation and test, will an E-Cat QX press announcement be made soon afterwards? Will it be possible, if customer permits, comments or data be provided from the test? Like the weatherman, what percentage chance would you give that an announcement will be made in June? Will the winds be strong?
With much regained respect,
Brokeeper
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
What do you think about the possibility to use the industrial E-Cats to produce heat in cement production plants ?
Thank you,
David
You write that the private demonstration of the QuarkX in june will be with the production of heat.
Can you write something about the direct production of electricity and about the SSM of the QuarkX ? Mainly if the basic principles are the same of the SSM in the 1MW container version.
I hope this is outside the area which you cannot talk about with the litigation.
There has been a discussion by some people on an enemy blog that the factory in which you performed the year long test is not large enough to house the equipment that would need 1MW of steam. Is it possible to explain (i think it has already been mentioned what the factory produced) what type of equipment was in place and how it used the steam?
It’s tiring to read all the negative feedback and sometimes it’s nice to be able to throw some mud back 🙂
You have always pointed out that pricing will be a cornerstone of your market policy. Basically so cheap that no competition can/wants to enter the LENR market.
If you manufacturer 1.000.000 units next year and from there you double the production capacity every year. You will reach something like 500.000.000 units (output) after 10 years?? ..a breath taking growth.
However, considering that the LENR market will be far larger,… is your pricing policy effective? Seems that as long as you can not supply enough with LENR products there will always be room for more expensive LENR products.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The usual puppets of Cherokee Partners are writing that it is impossible you make 1 MWh/h in the factory of your customer because the factory is too small. As always do they who lie, they do not add the numbers. If they do not know the dimensions of the plant of the customer, nor what it does, nor how it works, nor know is the dumping system in case of excess of heat, how can they say this ?
Godspeed, Andrea: if IH and Cherokee Partners have to disseminate these clowneries, you already won the litigation.
Beware, though: their corruptive apparatus has been well illustrated in the blog of David Nygren.
Mozell
Andrea,
With the new QuarkX eCat being developed, would you consider the professionals at Lugano evaluating its performance?
Dear Andrea,
My blog today
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-14-2016-lenr-some-info-too-many.html
An other smallish issue grafted on a nasty, big quarrel
peter
Sheba Malacara:
Yes, we are getting 10 W/cc, obviously not counting the heat exchanger.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Did I understand well that you want to produce only one very small module in massive quantity to allow to pile it up to any limit of desired power ?
Cheers,
Edmund
Dear Andrea,
Do you think the hot fusion has a future ?
Thank you,
Tamar
Dear Andrea Rossi,
About the QuarkX Cat: do you confirm that in a volume of 100 liters you can put a power of 1 MW ?
Godspeed,
Sheba
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the information !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jenny:
Still good.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi, Dr Rossi:
Find here a link to the report of the US Navy expert Louis F. DeChiaro , Ph.D. : he has published the C.O.P. the 23/09/2016:
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) Phenomena and Potential Applications
Louis F. DeChiaro, Ph.D.
Physicist
September 23, 2015
Rossi 1 Megawatt LENR Plant
Original version ~100 10 kW. Ecats in std. 20 ft. ship container.
More recent version uses 4 250 kW reactors.
Completed >200 days of 400 day test @ US customer factory.
Heat is now being used by customer for mfg. operations.
Performance report expected around Feb-Mar., 2016.
C.O.P. (Pout /Pin) typically varies between 20 and 80.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/386-IEEE-brief-DeChiaro-9-2015-pdf/
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the E- Cat QuarkX today ?
Cheers,
Jenny
Andrea Rossi,
LHC beam energy:
https://cds.cern.ch/journal/CERNBulletin/2015/49/News%20Articles/2105084?ln=en
A lot of kinetic energy here…..
Lead-ion collisions: the LHC achieves a new energy record
After the Bevatron (Berkeley, 1954) – which broke the energy barrier of billions of electronvolts – and the Tevatron (Fermilab, 1987) – which reached a trillion electronvolts – the LHC is now reaching the peta- (quadrillion) electronvolt level with its heavy-ion collisions (see here). However, one should remember that the average energy per colliding nucleon pair, within the 1 PeV “fireball”, is 5 TeV (compared to 13 TeV in the recent proton-proton collisions).
https://cds.cern.ch/journal/CERNBulletin/2015/49/News%20Articles/2108943?ln=en
In this year’s one-month run, the first week was devoted to colliding protons at 2.51 TeV per beam to provide reference data for the subsequent collisions of lead nuclei (the atomic number of lead is Z=82, compared to Z=1 for protons) at the unprecedented energy of 5.02 TeV in the centre of mass per nucleon.
And, anyway (“de toute facon”):
“Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come.”
“Rien n’est plus fort qu’une idée dont l’heure est venue.”
– Victor Hugo
Powerful regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the link.
I am positively surprised, because this is a tremendous improvement of the LHC, that with the discovery of the Higgs field had reached “only” 250 GeV.
It must be added, though, that we are still far from the “sigma 5” that could allow the confirmation of the discovery, albeit the “sigma 2” that has been reached is of statistical importance, also because reached in concomitance with a “sigma 1.5” reached from another team working in parallel on the same subject.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the very interesting link. I am very surprised ( positively surprised ) because the LHC has been fantastically improved after the finding of the Higgs field, for which an energy of about 250 GeV had been reached.
This discovery is very important.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi, Inge Warnken,
Here is information on the LHC experiments that show an excess of photon pairs that may indicate a new particle.
( See link to the 750 GeV ‘bump’.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/apr/19/theorizing-about-the-lhcs-750-gev-bump
Supersymmetric regards,
Joseph Fine
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Inge Warnken:
I am surprised: I did not know the LHC is able to reach that level of energy.
Are you sure they got 5 Sigma ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Augustus:
I totally agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco Serra:
1- both
2- the report of the 1 year test will be published as soon as it will have been dosclosed in Court: so I have been instructed to do by my attorney.
3- I think this year will bring some good surprise.
4- I sympathize with you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hurley:
I am not sure your numbers are right, anyway:
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Very interesting, thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Curto:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, Google:
GREENSTONE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Click on:
Engineers develop cement with 97% smaller carbon dioxide.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dear Andrea,
Todsy EGO OUT issue a bit shorter than usual:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-13-2016-lenr-about-feline-nature-of.html
Inter alia, well written Russian paper about replications everywhere.
All the best,
Peter
Mr. Rossi,
Comparisons to PWR Nuclear Plant:
1100MW reactor has 18 million pellets,1cm dia x 1cm long,
In 50,000 tubes in 193 assemblies to produce heat for 18 months.
They replace1/3 assemblies after 18 months. Obviously diff designs vary but point is, your small QuarkX at 100w would take only 11,000 for a MW.
Small things add up
God Speed
Hurley
Dear Andrea,
will June presentation focus on the thermal energy production capability of QuarkX, on its electric capability or both of them?
Before the greetings I’ve just a request.
Please Andrea give us a few crumbs of news. We were waiting for more than a year the results of the previous long test, the knowing of which was repeatedly postponed and now we know that they probably cannot be disclosed until years.
In June you will present the QuarkX but in a closed doors conference. Ma uffa. Am I remembering bad or you were talking about a public presentation of QuarkX in June ?
Also in the last weeks it looks like your secrecy is further increasing.
Please understand our feelings and my request. We love ECat almost like you do, and we suffer for not being able to give even a slightest peek.
Obviously this is not intended to be a criticism against you. We all understand the hard and dangerous situation you are involved in and, as always, we are with you.
God bless you
Marco Serra
Dr Andrea Rossi
Some blogs are populated by persons that, even id they do not have any specific professional qualification, want to explain how calorimetry must be done. I find this ridiculous.
What do you think ?
Regards,
Augustus
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The LHC of CERN has found a new elementary particle at energies around 750 GeV. This is a particle that was not supposed to exist and couls revolutionize the Standard Model.
Do you have an opinion about this?
Cheers,
Ingeborg
Dear Andrea,
A very interesting article by http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/lenr-ecat-saga-the-weaver-confirms-main-issue-is-ip-transfer-not-the-cop50-1mw-test/
posted 13/5/2016.
Best regards
Luis
David:
Yes, that is a possible application.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
I am sorry, but now I am not able to answer this question.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wade:
I am positive about that.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
What is involved is stability, safety, start/stop procedures, efficiency and its stability.
Yes, I think by the end of June could be completed, but remember: F8 !!!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mario Marini:
Also today is a good day.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Cheers,
M.M.
Dear Andrea,
Can you explain a little more about what is involved in the preliminary R&D period of the E-Cat QuarkX?
Will it be over before the important test with the potential customer/partner in June?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think the “important presentation” to your new partner will be made within this year ?
Godspeed,
Wade
Dear Andrea,
Assuming positive results from the non-public partner/customer presentation and test, will an E-Cat QX press announcement be made soon afterwards? Will it be possible, if customer permits, comments or data be provided from the test? Like the weatherman, what percentage chance would you give that an announcement will be made in June? Will the winds be strong?
With much regained respect,
Brokeeper
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
What do you think about the possibility to use the industrial E-Cats to produce heat in cement production plants ?
Thank you,
David
LookMoo:
Our economy scale and the quality of our products will defend our leadership.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mozell Cammon:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mark Saker:
Please read the comment of Mozell Cammon.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
I will give the characteristics of the QuarkX when we will have completed the preliminar R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
You write that the private demonstration of the QuarkX in june will be with the production of heat.
Can you write something about the direct production of electricity and about the SSM of the QuarkX ? Mainly if the basic principles are the same of the SSM in the 1MW container version.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Dear Andrea,,
This is EGO OUT’s issue for today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-12-2016-lenr-info-andthe-art-of.html
Best wishes,
Peter
Dear Andrea,
I hope this is outside the area which you cannot talk about with the litigation.
There has been a discussion by some people on an enemy blog that the factory in which you performed the year long test is not large enough to house the equipment that would need 1MW of steam. Is it possible to explain (i think it has already been mentioned what the factory produced) what type of equipment was in place and how it used the steam?
It’s tiring to read all the negative feedback and sometimes it’s nice to be able to throw some mud back 🙂
Dear Mr Rossi,
You have always pointed out that pricing will be a cornerstone of your market policy. Basically so cheap that no competition can/wants to enter the LENR market.
If you manufacturer 1.000.000 units next year and from there you double the production capacity every year. You will reach something like 500.000.000 units (output) after 10 years?? ..a breath taking growth.
However, considering that the LENR market will be far larger,… is your pricing policy effective? Seems that as long as you can not supply enough with LENR products there will always be room for more expensive LENR products.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The usual puppets of Cherokee Partners are writing that it is impossible you make 1 MWh/h in the factory of your customer because the factory is too small. As always do they who lie, they do not add the numbers. If they do not know the dimensions of the plant of the customer, nor what it does, nor how it works, nor know is the dumping system in case of excess of heat, how can they say this ?
Godspeed, Andrea: if IH and Cherokee Partners have to disseminate these clowneries, you already won the litigation.
Beware, though: their corruptive apparatus has been well illustrated in the blog of David Nygren.
Mozell
Peter Gluck:
thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.