We are making long term plans: to rent is an expense, to buy is an investment.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the links.
Thank you for the link,
One comment about the British 1956 patent mentioned by Greg Leonard. It uses O16, P31, Co59, Cd112 (O16 is not mentioned, but it’s there). What is common to these isotopes? They all have a number of neutrons which is a power of two: 8,16,32,64. The same holds for He4 (2), Li7 (4), Ni60 (32) and Pd110 (64). Such power-of-two neutron isotopes are rather rare, there are only a few others, namely N15 (8), Si30 (16), S32 (16), Fe58 (32), In113 (64), Sn114 (64). Some of these are very minor isotopes while some are common, like S32 which is 96% of natural sulfur.
That said, I don’t know of any theoretical reason why a power of two neutron number would imply anything special in a nucleus.
100 W/cc, on the other hand, is 100 kW/Liter, or 10 MW/100 Liters.
So, at the risk of being wrong, the answer should be 10 W/cc or 10 W/mL.
Thank you for making me think about this.
I hope I have clarified this to you.
But how did you reduce the volume to 100 Liters?!! (y) (y)
I assume the ‘very important event’ relates to your June test.
I hope your preparations are going well.
A second issue: what do you think of this 1956 British patent which claims to get 1kW electric output from a mixture of Cadmium, Phosphorus and Cobalt when subject to magnetic and RF stimulation,
Best link is http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for your fantastic work and your courage,
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Do you confirm that with the QuarkX you can theoretically have a density of power of 1 MW/100 liters of volume ?
“Jag bara undrar”:
I agree, but, probably, before the suit will arrive to the verdict, a very important event will happen in the market, independently from the civil suit. I am dedicating the 90% of my working time to make this event possible.
Thank you: it is true.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Still good our QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea Rossi:
The more IH pays puppets, the more you gain followers after the blatant falsity of their statements. They are spending their money to your advantage.
Am I right in assuming that it is essential for the Leonardo Corporation to the upcoming trial really goes to the “bottom” of this civil suit . It is so important that it does not matter how long the trial will be. Gladly few extra months just to get a good job done ….
Warm regards “Jag bara undrar?”
Inside the computer container we had a 3 kW air conditioner. Keeping the doors closed we could work well ( the computer container is m. 9 x 2.5 x 2.5 ).
Of course some heat was lost inside the factory, but the ceiling of the factory had many air exhausts and the warm air, being lighter, goes toward the ceiling and the factory has a good height.
Sorry, I wrote a typo, tacitally corrected by Dr Joseph Fine: I wrote erroneously cl insread of cc.
I corrected the typo after reading your comment.
Yes, today I worked with the QuarkX: as a matter of fact, I am working with her right now too. Is good, still very promising.
Sorry, but I cannot deal in this blog with these issues.
Which assertion are you referring to ?
Thank you for your link,
Thank you for the link,
Thank you for your sympathy. Our great team is continuing peacefully my job, independently from all the other issues.
2. they every month delivered a report restricted to the amount of steam they received and it has always been coherent with our production data
3. yes, we have copy of all of them
very strange indeed. By the way: that patent application, where they put abusively their chief engineer as a co-inventor, while he has invented absolutely nothing, has been made without I knew anything about it. I knew of it only when it has been published.
2016 IH patent application is basically a copy of 2014 Ecat Lugano report. Note image 18D showing claimed COP > 3.6.
So IH now claim no excess heat from the reactor they designed, manufactured & had tested by the Lugano team, yet claimed excess heat in their patent application.
Bit strange that.
Regarding the 1-year 1MW E-Cat test:
1. Is production data from the E-Cat customer recorded ?
1-bis. if yes, is it available to you?
2. If so, does the production data harmonize with the ERV report that apparently states that circa 1MW of steam was produced by the plant for the duration the test?
3. Are the electricity bills paid by the customer retained, and are they available to you?
4. If so, do these electricity bills harmonize with the data from the ERV report that (according to court documents) the plant operated at a COP of over 50 for the duration of the test?
I’m tired of the mud slinging, the fog machine, the missinformation, the misdirection and school playground manipulation. Honestly it’s like being 14 again. And I feel like that just as an observer. I can only begin to imagine how you must feel. I try to be open minded and I know I am ignorant of many things but I have not forgotten the detailed posts you have made this past year and seen there how they slowly developed and your confidence with the plant grew through careful care. After seeing all this mud and the direction it comes from I understand you more than before though and I am clear where the truth lies. A few weeks or a month of mud can’t undo what you have achieved. I hope you get your chance for justice and the due apologies you deserve and most of all I hope are able to continue peacefully your work with e-cat.
The most instructive is at the end- cobra managemenT
>As everyone knows,
classic absolutely generic assertion tending to let people think that it is true. But this assertion isn’t valid, it’s a fake and hasn’t the minimum credibility!
I look forward each day to reading your comments. You are an inspiring person.
I have been following your work since 2011 and I am dismayed by how you have been treated by IH.
Does IH have a date by which to respond to your law-suite? Do you have any idea of when the trial will begin?
Thank you for taking the time from a busy schedule to let us know what is happening in your life.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Today, Sunday, did you work with the QuarkX ? We know you on Sunday play tennis with your wife, but do you also have an update of our QuaekX ?
Dear Sheba Malacara Joseph Fine
As Dr Rossi said (May 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM) he gain the power density in Quark X = 10 W/cL, then theoretical extrapolation of that power density to the power 1 MW gives volume of 1000 L. (one thousand Liters). Of course not counting the volume of the heat exchanger.
Dear mr. Rossi,
what size of HVAC system did you use to keep the working conditions cool inside the 1MW container?
I assume a few percent of the 1MW was lost as heat inside the container, which you would need to remove.
Thank you for your insight.
Unfortunately, in the blogosphere any imbecile can sell himself as a guru of any matter, so long his readers know nothing about the same matter: for example, a low level informatic can pass himself as a Physicist with the capital “P”: it is a sort of a masturbatory blogopopulism, an opportunity for an insignificant guy to crop a group celebration of his own narcissism, with the plus to get money from his puppeteer: guess who the puppeteer is in this case.
interesting post on EgoOut:
“This is about calorimetry. As everyone knows, Rossi did bad calorimetry in previous tests.”
I am very curious, I understand that it is even for specialists difficult to make an exact calorimetry on a single test devices in a laboratory, but is it really possible to incorrectly analyze a COP greater 50 using calorimetry on a device that (claimed) is producing 1MW/h thermal heat and is running 352 days in mostly self sustain mode?
And if yes, could you please explain to me how do you think could such an incorrect measurement occur, is it a fundamental error out of unintentional ignorance and lack of professionalism, or are the data simply manipulated or falsified. So my question is, can someone incorrectly ‘measure’ a COP 50 on a device running 352 days in self sustain mode and how?”
I like to add: can a team of paid puppets of Tom Darden, unable to make basic mathematics, continue to insult a nuclear engineer, expert of nuclear power plants, expert certificator, to be unable to measure a COP of a very small ( respect a nuclear power plant ) steam generator in 352 days of test of a plant working 24/7 ? How much are the chances that a bunch of semi-analphabete puppets can teach him to make a calorimetric measurement ? By the way: I made a search and in all the life of Dr Penon, the ERV, there has been not a silgle flaw related to his profession and his honesty. His professional record is immaculate.
Dear Andrea Rossi, Sheba Malacara,
Since 1 MW per 100 L is 10 kW/Liter, (or 10^4 W/L)
The equivalent for 10 Watts should be 10 W/milliliter or 100 W/centiliter.
Of course, I make mistakes too. Once I thought I made a mistake, but I was wrong.
😉 😀 B|
As a business yes.
As an energy generation system is not easy.
We are Cats, but you are a veritable Lion !
Steven N. Karels:
When the product will be ready it will be put in the market.
Thank you for your help and your attention to the work of my Team.
For the Readers that do not speak Italian: in a nutshell, you have asked me which blogs I suggest to read to get informed about my activity.
My suggestion is just follow all the blogs, the friendly ones and the hostile as well and make up your mind.
Caro Andrea Rossi
Saluti dall’Italia! (quella sana)
Ho creato un gruppo su FB che conta quasi 500 sostenitori.
Cerco di tenere sempre aggiornata la pagina con le notizie che riesco a reperire.
Purtroppo in Italia credo ci sia una vera e propria censura, quindi sono costretto a navigare su siti di tutto il mondo (che disgrazia).
Conosco Salvo Mandarà e aspetto con gioia che Lei conceda un’altra intervista dandoci belle notizie.
Volevo solo chiederle di indicarmi se ci sono altre fonti accreditate dove posso seguire i suoi sviluppi o se mi consiglia di seguire solamente questo forum.