Dear Andrea:
I am impressed of the comment yesterday made Mr William Bell ( 7.40 a.m.) after the comment of Woodford.
Very impressed.
Fortunately you have the guts to fight, otherwise thay’d have already buried you.
MQ
Dear Andrea:
I loved today the comments of William Bell and of Loris.
At the beginning of this feud I believed that IH was right, because I thought that a so big giant could not be wrong. Now I understand that you are a hard worker that wants to realize his invention, they are dishonest sharks.
I became a follower of yours.
Cheers,
Malcom
Sebastian:
In the agreement signed between IH and the Customer it had been agreed by the parties that nobody of IH was allowed to enter in JM area and nobody of JM was allowed to enter the area in which the plant was in operation. This had been agreed upon to defend the IP of both. This agreement has been signed by IH and JM, plus also me.
The text of the agreement has been written by IH and accepted by JM.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R:
I repeat what I already said: the infinite wisdom of the Great People of the USA, that are the sole sovereign of this Country, surely will choose the best possible President.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It is good to read that you and your team are progressing well on the QuarkX and I hope with you that F8 will be equally to ‘excellent’. Good luck with it!
I have some questions that may interest all of you followers:
In reading your blog I’ve got the impression that you also seem to have made big steps in the theory.
1. Is that due to the test you said you were going to do with professor Cook?
2. Were the results of that test in line with the assumptions?
3. Did you find behaviour that is new and still must be explained?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
Did you ever figured out so far how much could be an “electrical” cop of the quarkx ecat I mean the ratio of electrical output power/electrical input power. Even a general idea would be appreciated.
Robert Dorr:
Now I have not my records at hand, but, if I remember correctly, we lost about 4-5 days of production during the test period.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I read what the officer of Woodford wrote about the litigation between you and IH in a financial blog. They became now shareholders of IH LTD, so obviously they defend IH, but what is disgusting in that comment is that clearly they used your name and your technology to get enormous money from their investors, visited the 1 MW plant that IH made under your direction, collected further money after their technicians visited the 1 MW plant in operation in the customer’s factory and, after collecting all this money from their investors thanks to your work, they deliberately started an action to collect other technologies of the field – that never produced anything- to prepare their investors to the fact that they were going to lose your licence not paying you. Now: since they paid nuts in real cash to buy all that ridiculous “intellectual property” of your competitors, made by revoked patents, useless patent applications, unauthorized patent applications that are copies of your work, etc etc: where is in reality gone the money they got from we investors? From the available information it appears that now the sole asset of IH is a lot of sheres to which has been conferred a value of millions by very, very friendly fair value auditing, but this value is totally fake and such shares are unsellable in the real market, while the real money is disappeared and the license for the sole thing working, which is your E-Cat, is gone. Question: did ever Woodford give you money, or did you ask money from them ?
God bless you for your work and for your fight against the fire you received from your front and from your back.
William Bell
P.S.
What strongly surprises me is that they made business and gave more than 50 millions to Tom Darden, surely well knowing what is in the following links: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/nyregion/anatomy-of-a-deal-new-jersey-style.html http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/federal_subpoenas_are_issued_f.html http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20160208/PC05/160209426
And this bankrupcy, related to EnCap, owned by Cherokee Investment Partners: http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/topstories/index.ssf/2008/07/encaps_bankrupcy_filing_risks.html
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The quarkX will be employed initially for domestic use or for industrial use, with many QuarkX piled up together ?
Cheers,
Pamela
JP Renoir:
Thank you for the citation.
The title of the paper published today is:
Understanding the discrete nature of angular momentum of electron in hydrogen atom with (3G, 2e) model of final unification.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dewey Weaver just admitted on Lenr-Forum that IH’s strategy was to hedge their investment from the start. In other words: buy up your competitors and file patents. That shows bad faith. Why would Dewey admit to this?
“Woodford was aware of all possibilities with Rossi early on. The failure by Rossi to keep his side of the agreement was hedged by IH from the onset. Full speed ahead.”
Dewey needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that there is a problem here. A very large, blockish, base-minded problem. To end on a more positive note: The confluence of nativism and tribalism in Mr. Dewey Weaver’s snow jobs ensures a swirling river of discontent upon which he so peremptorily rides.
What have you learned on the fuel lifetime for eCats? It seems they can go longer than 6 months with some additional demands on their control system. Is this correct?
Is there a “poison” generated as the fuel is consumed and that degrades the efficiency or is it merely fuel depletion and geometry effects?
Dear Andrea:
Today has been published on the JONP a very interesting paper of Prof UVS Seshavatharam and Prof. S. Lakshminarayana of the university of Andra ( India ).
Congratilations to the Journal Of Nuclear Physics for his international reach.
Regards,
JPR
you have written at http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=114#comment-1186667
——————————-
Andrea Rossi
May 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM
LookMoo:
IH has filed applications for patents putting as a co-inventor their engineer T.Barker, who invented absolutely nothing, also because these patent applications copy slavely my patents.[…]
——————————-
fyi. the Industrial Heat patent application US2016/0051957A1 with the Pub.Date: Feb.25,2016 is more or less a full plagiarism of the Levi et.al Lugano Report from October 6, 2014.
LookMoo:
IH has filed applications for patents putting as a co-inventor their engineer T.Barker, who invented absolutely nothing, also because these patent applications copy slavely my patents. Thomas Barker is the engineer to whom I teached many things. I knew of these patent applications only after their publication on the internet and I never authorized IH to make such applications, let alone to ” invent the co-inventor”. What is interesting is the fact that they give evidence in these applications of their replications.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
IH claims that your ECAT shows no COP. Meanwhile they have filed a patent application where you stands as co-inventor on a device that have a COP of 11.
Dear Andrea:
I am impressed of the comment yesterday made Mr William Bell ( 7.40 a.m.) after the comment of Woodford.
Very impressed.
Fortunately you have the guts to fight, otherwise thay’d have already buried you.
MQ
Malcom Abrantes:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
I loved today the comments of William Bell and of Loris.
At the beginning of this feud I believed that IH was right, because I thought that a so big giant could not be wrong. Now I understand that you are a hard worker that wants to realize his invention, they are dishonest sharks.
I became a follower of yours.
Cheers,
Malcom
Loris:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Your answer to Sebastian shows one more time how mendacious is Tom Darden .
You will win, Andrea.
Godspeed,
Loris
Sebastian:
In the agreement signed between IH and the Customer it had been agreed by the parties that nobody of IH was allowed to enter in JM area and nobody of JM was allowed to enter the area in which the plant was in operation. This had been agreed upon to defend the IP of both. This agreement has been signed by IH and JM, plus also me.
The text of the agreement has been written by IH and accepted by JM.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
William Bell:
Thank you for your insight.
I cannot comment, being issues to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nibbius:
The performance data of the QuarkX will be delivered after the completion of the preliminar R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
1- the work between Prof Cook and me is on course.
2- N.A.
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R:
I repeat what I already said: the infinite wisdom of the Great People of the USA, that are the sole sovereign of this Country, surely will choose the best possible President.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Why you were not able to show to Darden the Customers’ area ?
Sebastian
Dear Andrea,,
EGO OUT for today, LENR cultural history- a first issue:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-20-2016-toward-cultural-history-of.html
All the best,
Peter
Dear dr. Rossi
What do you think about how are going the polls in the USA for the election of the new President of the USA ?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Andrea,
It is good to read that you and your team are progressing well on the QuarkX and I hope with you that F8 will be equally to ‘excellent’. Good luck with it!
I have some questions that may interest all of you followers:
In reading your blog I’ve got the impression that you also seem to have made big steps in the theory.
1. Is that due to the test you said you were going to do with professor Cook?
2. Were the results of that test in line with the assumptions?
3. Did you find behaviour that is new and still must be explained?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
Hi Andrea Rossi
Did you ever figured out so far how much could be an “electrical” cop of the quarkx ecat I mean the ratio of electrical output power/electrical input power. Even a general idea would be appreciated.
Kind Regards
Nibbius
Zenobia Malleck:
Thanks to you for your sustain to the work of our great Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tony Dinnen:
We are working well on it, could be within a couple of months.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pamela Demian:
The first application will be industrial.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Curiosone:
She is in good standing also today,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Dorr:
Now I have not my records at hand, but, if I remember correctly, we lost about 4-5 days of production during the test period.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I read what the officer of Woodford wrote about the litigation between you and IH in a financial blog. They became now shareholders of IH LTD, so obviously they defend IH, but what is disgusting in that comment is that clearly they used your name and your technology to get enormous money from their investors, visited the 1 MW plant that IH made under your direction, collected further money after their technicians visited the 1 MW plant in operation in the customer’s factory and, after collecting all this money from their investors thanks to your work, they deliberately started an action to collect other technologies of the field – that never produced anything- to prepare their investors to the fact that they were going to lose your licence not paying you. Now: since they paid nuts in real cash to buy all that ridiculous “intellectual property” of your competitors, made by revoked patents, useless patent applications, unauthorized patent applications that are copies of your work, etc etc: where is in reality gone the money they got from we investors? From the available information it appears that now the sole asset of IH is a lot of sheres to which has been conferred a value of millions by very, very friendly fair value auditing, but this value is totally fake and such shares are unsellable in the real market, while the real money is disappeared and the license for the sole thing working, which is your E-Cat, is gone. Question: did ever Woodford give you money, or did you ask money from them ?
God bless you for your work and for your fight against the fire you received from your front and from your back.
William Bell
P.S.
What strongly surprises me is that they made business and gave more than 50 millions to Tom Darden, surely well knowing what is in the following links:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/nyregion/anatomy-of-a-deal-new-jersey-style.html
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/federal_subpoenas_are_issued_f.html
http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20160208/PC05/160209426
And this bankrupcy, related to EnCap, owned by Cherokee Investment Partners:
http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/topstories/index.ssf/2008/07/encaps_bankrupcy_filing_risks.html
Andrea,
Was there anytime during the 350 – 400 day 1MW reactor test where all 4 of the 250KW Tigers were completely off line at the same time?
Thank you for your hard work.
Dr Rossi:
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Thank you,
W.G.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The quarkX will be employed initially for domestic use or for industrial use, with many QuarkX piled up together ?
Cheers,
Pamela
Dr Andrea Rossi,
When do you think we’ll read again a paper from Prof. Cook and you ?
Thank you,
Tony
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for the guts you are fighting with to realize for us the E-Cat.
God bless you,
Zenobia
JP Renoir:
Thank you for the citation.
The title of the paper published today is:
Understanding the discrete nature of angular momentum of electron in hydrogen atom with (3G, 2e) model of final unification.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
Yes, I think that the real endurance can be one year. The other questions are related to patents in preparation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the interesting link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ad Astra:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Der Andrea,,
my blog today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-19-2016-lenr-needs-productive.html
all the best,
Peter
Dear Dr. Rossi
Dewey Weaver just admitted on Lenr-Forum that IH’s strategy was to hedge their investment from the start. In other words: buy up your competitors and file patents. That shows bad faith. Why would Dewey admit to this?
“Woodford was aware of all possibilities with Rossi early on. The failure by Rossi to keep his side of the agreement was hedged by IH from the onset. Full speed ahead.”
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3267-Citywire-UK-covers-Woodford-hitting-fraud-case/?postID=20454#post20454
Dewey needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that there is a problem here. A very large, blockish, base-minded problem. To end on a more positive note: The confluence of nativism and tribalism in Mr. Dewey Weaver’s snow jobs ensures a swirling river of discontent upon which he so peremptorily rides.
Dear Andrea,
Latest from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mindmap.png
Best regards
Luis
Dear Andrea Rossi,
What have you learned on the fuel lifetime for eCats? It seems they can go longer than 6 months with some additional demands on their control system. Is this correct?
Is there a “poison” generated as the fuel is consumed and that degrades the efficiency or is it merely fuel depletion and geometry effects?
Dear Andrea:
Today has been published on the JONP a very interesting paper of Prof UVS Seshavatharam and Prof. S. Lakshminarayana of the university of Andra ( India ).
Congratilations to the Journal Of Nuclear Physics for his international reach.
Regards,
JPR
Uwe Doms:
Thank you for the information: it is true.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
you have written at http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=114#comment-1186667
——————————-
Andrea Rossi
May 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM
LookMoo:
IH has filed applications for patents putting as a co-inventor their engineer T.Barker, who invented absolutely nothing, also because these patent applications copy slavely my patents.[…]
——————————-
fyi. the Industrial Heat patent application US2016/0051957A1 with the Pub.Date: Feb.25,2016 is more or less a full plagiarism of the Levi et.al Lugano Report from October 6, 2014.
https://thenewfire.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/lenr_ecat_industrial_heat_patent_2016_us20160051957a1.pdf
https://thenewfire.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/lenr_ecat_rossi_lugano_report.pdf
All the best
Uwe Doms
Domenico Canino:
Not necessarily, but tendentially yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Smaller cats are more stable cats?
JR:
Stable in good standing and long SSM periods.
Still very promising.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Can we have an update of the QuarkX:
LookMoo:
IH has filed applications for patents putting as a co-inventor their engineer T.Barker, who invented absolutely nothing, also because these patent applications copy slavely my patents. Thomas Barker is the engineer to whom I teached many things. I knew of these patent applications only after their publication on the internet and I never authorized IH to make such applications, let alone to ” invent the co-inventor”. What is interesting is the fact that they give evidence in these applications of their replications.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dimitry:
Thanks to you for your kind sympathy,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
IH claims that your ECAT shows no COP. Meanwhile they have filed a patent application where you stands as co-inventor on a device that have a COP of 11.
Can you tell us a little bit more about this??
Mike Bowman:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Metz:
It will surely be heated by the E-Cats. For the rest, F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
It is working stable and in good standing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.