You are so kind… You will be very precious in Russia.
Permanently grateful for your kindness,
Thank you: Wes Moore has raised waves of sympathy in the field of the dear Followers of our great Team.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I totally share the comment of Wes.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I stand by Wes Moore. We all are with you aned will remain with you: we understand what you are doing.
Wes Moore has spoken for many of us, the silent majority that has understood your courage and infinite force and skill against foes much bigger than you.
My total support to Wes Moore, who in turn supports Andrea.
We are waiting for the end of the test QuarkX and presentation of the product with a huge interest. We are confident that in spite of all the last obstacles which were created for you, people will soon have access to clean energy. And now the main thing is that you take care of yourself!
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
You say at the end of May you will start a confined test with the QuarkX that will last a week. Is this the test you mentioned that will take place with a potential partner/customer?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you clarify what you mean by a “confined test” that will last a week? By this do you mean an enclosed test methodology where the System input energy and output energy are precisely measured with the test run continuously over a week duration?
Our last direct communication was in 2012. I have been following your progress since then.
I am excited about the successes you have enjoyed.
This is a quick note to offer moral support.
I am sure your days are filled with concerns, it seems IH and Tom Darden have shown an unfortunate greed that is so common among sociopathic corporations.
I believe along with your world changing invention, we are about to witness a new world where underhanded politics and greed are penalized instead of rewarded.
Just know the silent majority is with you !
Source Energy Mechanical
Dear Dr. Rossi
You recently said that the ECAT Quark-x as well as heat and light and electricity could also produce THRUST.
Can you confirm it at this stage of R&D?
How did you notice this ability? The quark-x has moved itself? Has it moved something ?
Two more question on the subject, please:
– can the detected thrust effect in some way be connected to some kind of gravitational effect?
– have you already an idea about how to exploit selectively the generated power? A switch that will be
operated on the device? or different interfaces that will capture the power and convert it to the final output?
With my best regards, incitements and best wishes of success for the Quark-X and you.
1- I am not a metheorologist
As I said, At the end of May we will have a confined test that will close the preliminary R&D of the QuarkX. It will last a further week.
After that, we will prepare consequently.
1- what do you foresee about the evolution of the storm around you ?
2- is such storm yeopardizing your work on the E-Cat ?
Dear Dr. Rossi
can you plese update us about your intention of making a public presentation/conference/disclosure, or wathever other public event, in June (the date is coming in few days…!!)?
Many hopefully regards
Thank you for your link,
Thank you for your support.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the coolness with which in the middle of the storm you are continuing your work with the QuarkX without losing focus.
Have a wonderful Memorial Day
I studied it and discussed it with Prof Norman Cook: we think it is an unexpected effect as many happen to be observed in nuclear physics, but not yet enough substantiated to talk of a ” fifth force “.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
What is your opinion about the publication on Nature of the “fifth force” discovered in Hungary related to the reaction Li7 and p ?
Still good our QuarkX ?
Thank you for replying, understood and very clear.
The matter of fact is that when I asked for a proposal ( a real proposal. we are ready to buy ), we received an offer for a 3D unit that costed 1.5 million $ with a production capacity of 1 piece per day.
My opinion is that 3 D is valid to make prototypes, because it makes very easy to correct them and the production of a prototype in one day is very competitive, but when you have to make a massive production at low cost, a 3D production system will never be paid back before its obsolescence. Obviously, what I am saying is based with the real offer that today the market is able to make to me: you must make a distinction between papers publications, conferences and chatters in the blogs, from one side, and real guarantees given in serious proposals, from the other. Obviously I am ready to change opinion if I receive a proposal that fits with the economy scale of a massive production.
The reason I posted the link for you on the 3D printing by Hp is that in said article they state that the new process ‘The Multi Jet Fusion Technology allows 3D printing at half the cost and ten times the speed’.
We are still a too high risk to invest savings of people in our company. F8.
Thank you for your sustain,
Good and still very promising,
Too expensive. I studied carefully the possibility to adopt the 3D tech for the production of the E-Cats, but I discovered that it is not competitive with a robotized line. 3D is fit to make prototypes, not massive production. So far.
New 3D printing from HP. For parts of the E-CAT QuarkX?
Dear Dr Rossi,
News about the QuarkX today ?
Sustain the excellent work !! Lovin’ it!
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I strongly appreciate your honesty toward the investors and your suggestion not to invest in your company until a product is massively in the market. Impeccable.
Thank you for your hard work .
Thank you for the link,
Caro Andrea Rossi:
Ho letto il bellissimo libro di Vessela Nikolova ( Ecat il nuovo fuoco ) e mi ha emozionato.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
June is an important month for the QuarkX, am I correct ?
Is any of the team that worked with you in the plant during the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat still working with you in the QuarkX R&D ?
In common language “speed” and “velocity” are deemed to be the same thing, but in Physics they are two completely different things, albeit related.
Speed is Distance on Time, indicates how much meters per second you have run through. It does not matter in which direction you are running, it cannot have a positive or negative direction.
If you run at 10 km/h around a football, you will make 10 km of distance per hour, independently if you run clockwise or backwise.
This is Speed.
Velocity is a different thing: it indicates “displacement” of the body from the starting point. Here the situation is more complicated, it can be positive ( if you are going away from the starting point) of negative ( if you return to the starting point). Velocity is Displacement on Time. Put the case you are a patient guy and instead of getting bored and nervous, kicking away that ball after running around it for one hour, you still have it sitting on the ground where you are.
Now you run for 30 minutes north of that ball, making 5 km, then, without interrupting the action, return in 30 miinutes to the position of the ball: during this 1 hour your v has been equal to zero.
More precisely: during the first 5 km your v has been +10 km/h, but in the second half hour your v has been -10 km/h, therefore the resulting v is: +10 -10 = 0 km/h.