United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

13,859 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Irina Uzikova:
    You are so kind… You will be very precious in Russia.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Orsobubu:
    Permanently grateful for your kindness,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Carlo:
    You bet,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jim:
    Thank you: Wes Moore has raised waves of sympathy in the field of the dear Followers of our great Team.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Adam:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Adam

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    I totally share the comment of Wes.
    Godspeed,
    Adam

  • Jim

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I stand by Wes Moore. We all are with you aned will remain with you: we understand what you are doing.
    Cheers,
    Jim

  • Carlo

    Caro Andrea:
    Wes Moore has spoken for many of us, the silent majority that has understood your courage and infinite force and skill against foes much bigger than you.
    Non mollare!
    Carlo

  • orsobubu

    My total support to Wes Moore, who in turn supports Andrea.

  • Irina Uzikova

    Dear Andrea!
    We are waiting for the end of the test QuarkX and presentation of the product with a huge interest. We are confident that in spite of all the last obstacles which were created for you, people will soon have access to clean energy. And now the main thing is that you take care of yourself!
    Sincerely yours,
    Irina and Vitaly Uzikov

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    You say at the end of May you will start a confined test with the QuarkX that will last a week. Is this the test you mentioned that will take place with a potential partner/customer?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Can you clarify what you mean by a “confined test” that will last a week? By this do you mean an enclosed test methodology where the System input energy and output energy are precisely measured with the test run continuously over a week duration?

  • Wes Moore

    Hi Andre:
    Our last direct communication was in 2012. I have been following your progress since then.
    I am excited about the successes you have enjoyed.
    This is a quick note to offer moral support.
    I am sure your days are filled with concerns, it seems IH and Tom Darden have shown an unfortunate greed that is so common among sociopathic corporations.
    I believe along with your world changing invention, we are about to witness a new world where underhanded politics and greed are penalized instead of rewarded.
    Just know the silent majority is with you !
    Kind Regards,
    Wes Moore
    Source Energy Mechanical

  • Giovanni

    Dear Dr. Rossi

    You recently said that the ECAT Quark-x as well as heat and light and electricity could also produce THRUST.
    Can you confirm it at this stage of R&D?

    How did you notice this ability? The quark-x has moved itself? Has it moved something ?

    Two more question on the subject, please:

    – can the detected thrust effect in some way be connected to some kind of gravitational effect?
    – have you already an idea about how to exploit selectively the generated power? A switch that will be
    operated on the device? or different interfaces that will capture the power and convert it to the final output?

    With my best regards, incitements and best wishes of success for the Quark-X and you.

    Giovanni

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rudy:
    1- I am not a metheorologist
    2- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giovanni:
    As I said, At the end of May we will have a confined test that will close the preliminary R&D of the QuarkX. It will last a further week.
    After that, we will prepare consequently.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Rudy

    Dear Andrea:
    1- what do you foresee about the evolution of the storm around you ?
    2- is such storm yeopardizing your work on the E-Cat ?
    Rudy

  • Giovanni

    Dear Dr. Rossi
    can you plese update us about your intention of making a public presentation/conference/disclosure, or wathever other public event, in June (the date is coming in few days…!!)?
    Many hopefully regards
    Giovanni

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bern:
    Thank you for your support.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Bern

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Thank you for the coolness with which in the middle of the storm you are continuing your work with the QuarkX without losing focus.
    Have a wonderful Memorial Day
    Bern

  • Dear Andrea,

    My blog issue for today, in part inspired by art:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-28-2016-lenr-perspective-of.html

    all the best,
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Soraya:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hillerud:
    I studied it and discussed it with Prof Norman Cook: we think it is an unexpected effect as many happen to be observed in nuclear physics, but not yet enough substantiated to talk of a ” fifth force “.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hillerud

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    What is your opinion about the publication on Nature of the “fifth force” discovered in Hungary related to the reaction Li7 and p ?

  • Soraya

    Dear Andrea
    Still good our QuarkX ?
    Soraya

  • Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    Thank you for replying, understood and very clear.
    Best
    Luis

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    The matter of fact is that when I asked for a proposal ( a real proposal. we are ready to buy ), we received an offer for a 3D unit that costed 1.5 million $ with a production capacity of 1 piece per day.
    My opinion is that 3 D is valid to make prototypes, because it makes very easy to correct them and the production of a prototype in one day is very competitive, but when you have to make a massive production at low cost, a 3D production system will never be paid back before its obsolescence. Obviously, what I am saying is based with the real offer that today the market is able to make to me: you must make a distinction between papers publications, conferences and chatters in the blogs, from one side, and real guarantees given in serious proposals, from the other. Obviously I am ready to change opinion if I receive a proposal that fits with the economy scale of a massive production.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    The reason I posted the link for you on the 3D printing by Hp is that in said article they state that the new process ‘The Multi Jet Fusion Technology allows 3D printing at half the cost and ten times the speed’.
    Best
    Luis

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bjorn Gunnarsson:
    We are still a too high risk to invest savings of people in our company. F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    NB:
    Thank you for your sustain,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rod:
    Good and still very promising,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Too expensive. I studied carefully the possibility to adopt the 3D tech for the production of the E-Cats, but I discovered that it is not competitive with a robotized line. 3D is fit to make prototypes, not massive production. So far.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    New 3D printing from HP. For parts of the E-CAT QuarkX?
    Best
    Luis

  • Rod

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    News about the QuarkX today ?
    Cheers,
    Rod

  • NB

    Sustain the excellent work !! Lovin’ it!

  • Bjorn Gunnarsson

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I strongly appreciate your honesty toward the investors and your suggestion not to invest in your company until a product is massively in the market. Impeccable.
    Thank you for your hard work .
    Regards,
    B.G.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    This is my blog issue for this Friday sent- with thanks to you.

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-27-2016-lenr-confronting.html

    Better things to come, I hope!
    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jose’:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Reik:
    Yes, F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giovanni:
    I agree.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giovanni

    Caro Andrea Rossi:
    Ho letto il bellissimo libro di Vessela Nikolova ( Ecat il nuovo fuoco ) e mi ha emozionato.
    Bellissimo.
    Giovanni

  • Reik

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    June is an important month for the QuarkX, am I correct ?
    Cheers,
    R.

  • Jose'

    Dr Rossi
    Is any of the team that worked with you in the plant during the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat still working with you in the QuarkX R&D ?
    Thanks,
    Jose’

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kevin:
    In common language “speed” and “velocity” are deemed to be the same thing, but in Physics they are two completely different things, albeit related.
    Speed is Distance on Time, indicates how much meters per second you have run through. It does not matter in which direction you are running, it cannot have a positive or negative direction.
    If you run at 10 km/h around a football, you will make 10 km of distance per hour, independently if you run clockwise or backwise.
    This is Speed.
    Velocity is a different thing: it indicates “displacement” of the body from the starting point. Here the situation is more complicated, it can be positive ( if you are going away from the starting point) of negative ( if you return to the starting point). Velocity is Displacement on Time. Put the case you are a patient guy and instead of getting bored and nervous, kicking away that ball after running around it for one hour, you still have it sitting on the ground where you are.
    Now you run for 30 minutes north of that ball, making 5 km, then, without interrupting the action, return in 30 miinutes to the position of the ball: during this 1 hour your v has been equal to zero.
    More precisely: during the first 5 km your v has been +10 km/h, but in the second half hour your v has been -10 km/h, therefore the resulting v is: +10 -10 = 0 km/h.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>