United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

12,442 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    a. obviously yes
    b. and c.: what is the blue light from will be explained together with the theory connected with the so called Rossi Effect after we will have made all the becessary verifications. As I said, this short report is just the beginning of a hard work of verification.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gunnar Lindberg:
    Thank you for the information.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gunnar Lindberg

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Torkel ”Sifferkoll” Nyberg is a great contributor on ecatnews.com. Below are some of his eminent posts. Enjoy!

    Then why all these foul words and anger Freddie? Have a look in the mirror maybe? If there is any laughter it has a distinct smell of panic to it

    You’re completely lost in emotions and hatred and lack any sign of objectivity in your analysis. You should do some anger management … I know … Bring the Zeopfl along and do som group therapy.

    BTW! I dont care about the outdated education of yours. Only thing certain is that you are not qualified to comment on the nuclear physics as you did above.

    You really need to be more creative with your wording Freddie!!! Your supposed to to be the native english speaker, or? You sound like a retard

    If it makes you so depressed little Frankie, why don’t you dispose of you pathetic handle to the /dev/null gods and go play somewhere else.

    I can feel the angst and shortage of lithium here girls and boys. Stop panicing! ECN is closing down; you can safely dissapear into the binary space where you came from and no one will ever know you existed. Especially you Frankie …

    Best Regards
    Gunnar Lindberg

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Thanks for providing some information on the newest eCat. A few questions/observations:

    a. The natural convective and radiative losses for a 1mm diameter by 30mm horizontal tube at 1500C in a surrounding of 20C is about 50 Watts. Yet you device apparently outputs 100W. Do you have additional heat transfer through conduction? Please clarify
    b. The blue light reported cannot come from Blackbody radiation with a surface temperature of 1500C. Do you have some type of electrical to photon emission occurring?
    c. May I assume the blue light is not Cerinkov radiation (rapid deceleration of fast moving beta particles temporarily exceeding the speed of light in a specific media)?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for the link.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Here is a very simple issue of EGO OUT for today:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-15-2016-lenr.html

    Best wishes to you and all the readers,
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco Serra:
    Thank you.
    1- The two are both possible
    2- We can have either AC or DC
    3- there is room for improvements
    4- no
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DrD:
    You are right.
    We did not yet measure the Lumens, but it must be done.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Marco Serra

    Dear Andrea
    I’d like to congratulate with you for this extraordinary achievement. The few data in your (toooo) short report means we are really at the beginnning of a new era. And that you are entered in the history. Thank you from the whole world for devoting your entire life to this enterprise.
    I’d have a lot of questions as usual but I’ll force myself to be short:
    1 – You always say you will sell QuarkX but some months ago, in a short phrase, you also said that you was planning to produce and sell energy. Which one is the case now ?
    2 – Is the produced electicity AC or DC ?
    3 – At the end, I think that all that heat produced in the reaction will be an obstacle that will prevent some kind of usage of the QuarkX (in altre parole: Troppa grazia Sant’Antonio). I’m thinking at small portable battery and other applications. Is there place for improvements in this, I mean, will you be able to “cool” the reaction ? (No need for crystall ball here, I’m only asking if there is some place for improvements)
    4 – Since I follow you it always happens at the end that your estimates was very prudent and conservative. Is it the case also this time ?

    Thank you again.

    God bless you
    Marco Serra

  • DrD

    Dear Andrea,
    Lumens as you say are not a constant but more importantly they depend upon the frequency content (colour) and it’s match to the human eyes response curve which means that 100W might be only 100 Lumens or it might be much greater than the 1600. Because it is Lumens that matter for lighting, not watts, I wondered if you had actually measured the Lumens.
    It’s a minor issue of curiosity given the great strides you have made, amazing.
    Kind Regards and Best wishes
    David

  • Andrea Rossi

    Neri Accornero:
    Thank you for your attention.
    I prefer to hold on this: it is leading to the solution of the theoretical dilemma.
    I hope.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    The electricity is collected with any classic and well known technology,not necessarily one in particular.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    Any product we will make will not generate radiations outside.
    Too soon to answer to the other questions.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Malcom Lear:
    No, Quark comes from the fact that the dimension is foundamental, X comes from the fact that a name has not been decided yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DrD:
    The ratio between Lumens and Watts is not a constant, it is an integral and the value of the derivatives depend not linearly on the amount of Watts. For example: 40 W correspond to about 450 L, 100 W correspond to 1600 L.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard MkEk:
    1- yes, I have a Partner
    2- it will
    3- premature to say
    4- yes
    5- wrong
    6- maybe
    7- the work on patents is dynamic, not static
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Greg Leonard:
    Thank you for your insight. I can only repeat that I am not expert of electric cars.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    MISTERO:
    We have understood what the blue halo is and I think we have resolved the theoretical issue. To be checked, obviously, with further study, probably in collaboration with Norman Cook.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jimmy:
    Thank you for reminding the disclaimer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steve Breyer:
    Yes, we know.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steve Breyer

    Dr Rossi –

    New Information and any attempted theft of Andrea Rossi’s ECAT IP could be costly .. “egregious cases of misconduct.”

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-makes-it-easier-to-win-big-damages-for-severe-patent-violations-1465830509

  • Jimmy

    Dear Andrea,
    Congratulations for your tremendous achievement with the QuarkX. Intelligent persons have understood that you also put a disclaimer, saying that, obviously, the results must be confirmed by further R&D.
    Cheers,
    Jimmy

  • MISTERO

    Hi Andrea, the blu light from E-CatQX is Čerenkov effect?

  • Greg Leonard

    Dear AR
    Brilliant work on the part of you and your team. The QuarkX looks to be a real game changer – a COP of 200 at 1500 deg C means that nearly every application requiring heat can now be satisfied by your invention.

    I share your caution over the idea of electric cars powered by the Quark. Current IC engines might run at 40% efficiency, which means the waste heat at 60% is 1.5 times the useful power. QuarkX electricity at 10% would mean dealing with 9 times the waste heat. Even if you manage to get the electric output up to 20%, it would still require dealing with 4 times the waste heat.
    Newer batteries coupled with recharging via Rossi powered power stations, as part of an integrated system …

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Your revelation of the QuarkX details has obviously lead to a lot of speculation as of how it might work and also to many wrong assumptions, because nobody knows exactly how it works, except you. I hope you will forgive for us asking you ‘stupid’ questions, based on wrong assumptions. Just to check some assumptions, I hope you can confirm these for us:
    1. Yes, I have a new Partner in Europe with whom I am going to produce QuarkX in the future.
    2. QuarkX’s can be switched on and off in seconds.
    3. QuarkX’s are very suitable for jets.
    4. The tested 1x30mm Quarks will work for months on one charge.
    5. QuarkX’s cannot be recharged.
    6. QuarkX’s outperform E-cats in many aspects
    7. QuarkX’s differ so much from E-cats that they can hardly be compared and require new patents.
    Thank you for answering our questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • DrD

    Dear Andrea,
    Do you know what the light output was in Lumens?
    Best wishes
    David

  • Malcolm Lear

    Hi Andrea,
    I guess its a play on words and has little to do with Quark’s and more to do with Quantum arc :-)

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea.
    The new Quark looks to me like a wire string. I have the following questions:
    1. May it be produced in longer lengths? If so:
    2. May 60cm length provide 2kW heat with 10W electricity consumption?
    3. May it be spun in a open spiral?
    4. May a 2kW spiral with on-off regulation be suitable for water heating purposes?
    5. Do such a insolated water heater represent a risk for radiation?
    6. May the shift of a complete heating element represent a such risk?
    Best regards: Svein Henrik

  • Astonishing !, last year we were excited for a COP 6, in April this year, after the 1MW test there was talk of COP 50, and COP 200 now, it looks like an exponential trend, the more (if not I’m wrong) if the 10% of the QUARK X electric energy output is stored in super capacitors or batteries, and a small part of this is used to control the system, the COP becomes … infinite (at least as long as the “charge” of components vanishes). Now anxiety is divided between two issues: the explanation of ” Rossi effect ” and the expectation of mass production. About the first, may I ask if the blue light can be considered Cerenkov light?
    Congratulations !!
    Neri Accornero

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    How do you collect the electricity from the reactor?

    Is it as simple as X amount of power flowing through the wire leading up to the reactor and a greater amount of power flowing through the wire leading out of the reactor?

    Sincerely,
    Hank Mills

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Yes, 1 cubic meter can be correct. Maybe less.
    I love the million quarks vs the thousands bigger: the Nature is based on quarks, I love this model.
    I will not miniaturize further, I promise.
    Thank you also from our Team: they worked hard and now the tension is increasing.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Thank you for your intelligent approach. Again, let me repeat that we published this brief report because wanted to share our enthusiasm for what we saw, but these results must be confirmed by a long and meticulous work that is waiting for us. I personally am extremely glad for what I saw in the blue cloud: I saw the very possible theoretical solution. I am working on the mathematics of this event.
    Yes, apart the reactors there is the control system.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    The thing that has surprised me the most about the E-Cat QuarkX reactors you tested is the size. What you describe is smaller than a toothpick! Is the tiny reactor all that is required to produce the 10 W of electricity you report, or are there additional components needed for electricity generation?

    Thank you very much,

    Frank Acland

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I’m not sure (my own uncertainty principle) of the approx. volume of a 1 MW reactor based on the recently described QuarkX modules.

    Considering the QuarkX size/shape, with about 10,000+ cores, what is the best way to organize these multiple elements into a larger system? No need to tell me now, just curious.

    I think you said a 1 MW system would occupy about 1+ cubic meter. Is this correct?

    Would a 1000 MW (1 GW) system therefore occupy 1000+ cubic meters, or a cube of about 10 meters on a side? Would you ever consider building a 1 GW systems with 10 million+ cores?

    Does it make more sense to build millions of smaller systems (e.g. 100+ kW), or thousands of larger systems (e.g. 100 MW and above)? The answer would seem to be yes if you were trying to build a more robust and distributed system.

    But the market will decide. :)

    Congratulations on the dedication and determination of you and your team to bring forward these amazing advances. (In multiple technologies.)

    Please don’t make the QuarkX cores any smaller! I wouldn’t want to be the person carrying a box of 500-1000 QuarkXes who accidentally spilled them out on the factory floor. Of course, robotic assembly lines would help to avoid that problem. (Assuming zero software errors.)

    Thermal regards,

    Joseph Fine

  • Andrea Rossi

    Oystein Lande:
    Three different types, for different specter ranges.
    The three combined had a complete specter starting from IR.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    Thank you: this is a preliminar short report, now there will be a huge follow up made by work, work, work.
    You are intelligent and you understand that I cannot answer, now, to all the questions.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    Thank you for the answers you could provide. I understand the irony – our questions often must seem silly and far off base. I’m simply trying to wrap my brain around this reactor based on relatively little information. Without being able to study a formal report with much more detail, I can still summize that, if verified by the further rigorous testing, the Quark is another giant leap forward in the evolution of the E-Cat.
    Hank Mills

  • Andrea Rossi

    Toulmin:
    Hydrofusion always works in parallel with us.
    Nobody of the great Team that made the 1 year long test to the 1 MW E-Cat is working with me anymore. They were men of IH and, for obvious reasons, cannot work with us.
    But all of them are professionally very good.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint Francois:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Msprize:
    When you talk of power to weight ratio you must consider the system, not just the mere reactor. I am not able to answer now.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Engineer48:
    No, is less. Still enough, though!
    Thank you for your kind words,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    No, I mean we have to deepen our tests in a new phase, this time finalized to make a product: obviously all the results must be put in discussion.Customers wouldn’t forgive a failure.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hurley:
    1- yes
    2- light can be used to illuminate a path ( but I am not sure it is still useful).
    Thnks for the kind words,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    1- confidential
    2- audiometric ( electrocuting, boiling and blinding a vociferous guinea pig)
    3- zero seconds. Always fed half Wh/h
    4- nada
    5- just make the math
    6- equivalence principle: the COP is always the same, does not depend on the eventual efficiency
    7- any load
    8- nonsense
    9- nonsense
    10- nonsense
    11- yes
    12- yes
    13- can’t answer in positive or in negative
    14- no
    15- confidential, patent processing
    Sorry for some irony, but I am laughing with you, not at you.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ulrich W.A.Kranz:
    Yes, we can imagine and practically it is an application fit for our technology. But there is to climb the Everest of the authorizations, that in this field dwarfs the Himalaya.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    I am not expert of cars, so I cannot comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel De caluwe’:
    Thank you.
    Outside.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter metz:
    It is valid the principle of equivalence ( by analogy).
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>