Daniel G. Zavela:
It works the opposite way: if a product to be certified is made by components that are all certified, it helps, not the contrary.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On new product consumer product certification versus certification of a component upgrade to an existing product, is there any time savings advantage if the E-Cat products are ADDED to an existing product? For example replacing the gas power for a hot water heater, or a furnace, or a electric generator (such as the Australian WhisperGen). These products have been certified for consumer use as they have built-in safety systems that have been already approved.
Best of luck on your new consumer product certification applications.
Dear Andrea,
For us, your blog followers, progress feels to have slowed down since you have revealed the QuarkX details. I am sure that is not the case, therefore just some questions to update us, which I hope you are able to answer:
1. In the past you mentioned that a new Hot-cat based plant would be constructed for a UK customer. Do you believe that will still happen this year?
2. Are you now producing 1 MW E-cat plants in the US or elsewhere and can you give us an idea how many will be delivered this year?
3. Are you preparing for a multiple QuarkX and how many QuarkX’es will it contain?
4. Can you tell something about the QuarkX driven jet?
I am sure you must be under some pressure due to the law suit. I hope everything will work out fine for you and wish you all the luck and a quick end with this affaire.
Stay healthy! Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Your foes continue to repeat the same things notwithstanding the fact that they received answers giving evidence of their errors. Why do you think they do this ?
Sosby
respected Mr. Andrea Rossi !
Very (very ! ) I am concerned about your health . Please relax and enjoy a treatment ! That’s the main thing. You have a team , have a rest .
Yury Isaev
engineer
Tyumen , Russia
Nickel-Hydrogen Reaction Endurance Tests Using a Flow Calorimeter
A. G. Parkhomov
Experimental Design Laboratory
KIT
English translation by Bob Higgins of Accuiti Science & Engineering
Results:
A flow calorimeter was constructed having a computer acquired flow and temperatures at the inlet and outlet. Calibration measurements showed that the heat measurement error did not exceed 3%.
This calorimeter was used to test six reactors with fuel based on nickel and lithium aluminum hydride. One worked 38 days.
Excess heat was in the range of 20-65 watts. The excess heat versus the electrical consumption varied between 5% and 20%.
The excess energy in the reactor, calculated from integration of excess power over 38 days, was about 100 MJ (30 kWH)
Attempts to increase the excess heat power led to the destruction of the reactors.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read the new replication made by Alexander Parkhomov after your patent: it appears to be very precise. The COP is less than in the former replications he made, but this time he has been very conservative.
Godspeed,
Wayne
Claire Voyant:
Votre vue c’est ne pas tres claire: the 1 MW industrial plants are for sale ( http://www.leonardocorporation.com ) and the reason why the other models are not yet for sale has been written in this blog not less than thousands times.
You look to me “Non Voyant” more than “Claire Voyant”.
Peut etre vous avez necessite’ d’une consultation par un opticist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Thank you for the suggestion: as a matter of fact, I contacted them, but did not receive an offer economically viable for the E-Cat. Our door is still open, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: Suggestion, Leonardo buy Cyclone Power Technologies. It is a perfect fit with your low power E-Cat and it would be an interesting public relations move.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for your consideration and clear statement. There in no more room to speculate that topic. In my head thing is clear an no need to try this path further. I wrote longer comment elsewere, you know were to look if like to.
I understand you had to slightly edit my post, I understand the reason no problem there. Maybe in other occations could be decent to add some marker like ‘part removed by moderator’or something that other readers understands why result might look clumsy.
Since this topic is now clear, I vanish from here for a while. Maybe until I see something concrete proven to ask about. Like Mats Lewan et.al visiting your lab or so. Before that I have no questions about Quark-X or else. I hope you understand such principle.
All the best, what ever is ahead of you both parties
Argon
Ruby Shale:
As usual, the guys of Industrial Heat are ready to sell what they do not own: now they are offering us to buy back our license, the license that they do not have anymore ( see the press release made few weeks ago from our Attorney John Annesser). I wonder if they will try to sell the Colosseum of Rome as well.
IH has no more any license related to out IP and whomever is interested to us in North America, Central America, South America, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and Emirates must contact exclusively: http://www.leonardocorporation.com info@leonardocorporation.com
I have received other comments asking me what I think of the proposal made today by IH and this comment answers also to all the others. I will not comment further issues to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
No connection, I am a Scottish engineer (pressure equipment design for the chemical industry)so I am happy to push other Scottish engineering companies.
Argon:
Thank you for your sympathy, but I think it is not proper I comment further on this issue. This case has to be resolved in Court, based on the situation we have now and, for obvious reasons, I cannot comment on issues that have to be exposed in Court. Also, I have not a crystall ball to know how the situation will be in future. As you see, I have edited your comment, taking off issues connected to arguments to be discussed in Court, not in the blogs.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
If you are still interested in electricity production via steam from your Ecats.
As it is a large step to go from the steam pressure and temperature of your existing thermal 1MW Ecat plant to the high pressure / temperature steam requirements for electricity producing turbines within power stations, a commercial intermediate step could be to use the twin rotary screw expander / electricity generator of the company Heliex Power.
Heliex Power Ltd of Scotland is a spinout company from City University London, who have taken existing compressor technology then mathematically optimised and developed patented new generation “N” profile rotors for use as a screw steam expander, this expander can process wet steam and liquid water having fluctuating mass flow rates and pressures (steam pressure up to 25 barA, temperature 150 to 300 degrees C), the wet process fluid will also lubricate the rotors. The screw expander is then attached to a standard 3-phase 4-pole electrical generator (can be 50 or 60 Hz output).
The rotary screw expander generator is capable of operating with low pressure wet steam conditions where turbine generators are not suitable.
Heliex Power first customer installation was in may 2013, the units are now in production and on sale, units have even been installed in Italy, one at a glass plant near Milan and one at a steel mill.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for reading my previous posts. Since I have plead both parties IH and You here and in lenr-forum to try to open sensitive discussions one more time before Court proceedings starts.
I feel guilty on trying to involve in this even total outsider, but with common goal; save the planet using shortest path.
I feel that I have involved quite much, you both parties are grown up experienced business people and you can act on if there is a point on doing that.
With the hope that everybody does the right thing
Best Regards,
Argon
Dr Rossi,
There is only one thing that really counts for us: the fact that the QuarkX enters in the market, as you hope, by this year 2016, at least in the industrial version.
All the other consideration are a loss of time and you are totally right staying focused on your work.
Cheers,
Greg
Daniel G. Zavela:
It works the opposite way: if a product to be certified is made by components that are all certified, it helps, not the contrary.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
My blog’s newest issue is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-25-2016-lenr-comments-info-more.html
wtth comments and info- this is more than it seems a la prima vista.
Peter
Dear Dr. Rossi,
On new product consumer product certification versus certification of a component upgrade to an existing product, is there any time savings advantage if the E-Cat products are ADDED to an existing product? For example replacing the gas power for a hot water heater, or a furnace, or a electric generator (such as the Australian WhisperGen). These products have been certified for consumer use as they have built-in safety systems that have been already approved.
Best of luck on your new consumer product certification applications.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Dear Andrea,
For us, your blog followers, progress feels to have slowed down since you have revealed the QuarkX details. I am sure that is not the case, therefore just some questions to update us, which I hope you are able to answer:
1. In the past you mentioned that a new Hot-cat based plant would be constructed for a UK customer. Do you believe that will still happen this year?
2. Are you now producing 1 MW E-cat plants in the US or elsewhere and can you give us an idea how many will be delivered this year?
3. Are you preparing for a multiple QuarkX and how many QuarkX’es will it contain?
4. Can you tell something about the QuarkX driven jet?
I am sure you must be under some pressure due to the law suit. I hope everything will work out fine for you and wish you all the luck and a quick end with this affaire.
Stay healthy! Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Your foes continue to repeat the same things notwithstanding the fact that they received answers giving evidence of their errors. Why do you think they do this ?
Sosby
Dr Rossi,
This is an unanswered Question, can you comment ?
** Why if, as Weaver claims, Industrial Heat has never measured any excess heat …
have they collected millions from his investors .. in Deep River Venture Capital, whose CEO is Mr Weaver,
when only your IP was in the portfolio, as well as in the Cherokee fund of Tom Darden ?
Best Regards,
R. Basset
respected Mr. Andrea Rossi !
Very (very ! ) I am concerned about your health . Please relax and enjoy a treatment ! That’s the main thing. You have a team , have a rest .
Yury Isaev
engineer
Tyumen , Russia
Nickel-Hydrogen Reaction Endurance Tests Using a Flow Calorimeter
A. G. Parkhomov
Experimental Design Laboratory
KIT
English translation by Bob Higgins of Accuiti Science & Engineering
Results:
A flow calorimeter was constructed having a computer acquired flow and temperatures at the inlet and outlet. Calibration measurements showed that the heat measurement error did not exceed 3%.
This calorimeter was used to test six reactors with fuel based on nickel and lithium aluminum hydride. One worked 38 days.
Excess heat was in the range of 20-65 watts. The excess heat versus the electrical consumption varied between 5% and 20%.
The excess energy in the reactor, calculated from integration of excess power over 38 days, was about 100 MJ (30 kWH)
Attempts to increase the excess heat power led to the destruction of the reactors.
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2YnpFakRobUE1clE&usp=drive_web
F.:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wayne:
I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marla:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Still working on the development of the QuarkX ?
Thanks,
Marla
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read the new replication made by Alexander Parkhomov after your patent: it appears to be very precise. The COP is less than in the former replications he made, but this time he has been very conservative.
Godspeed,
Wayne
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are the tests on the QuarkX still made by you in collaboration with the engineers of your new partner ?
Cheers,
F.
Argon:
I understand with sincere sympathy your point.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Claire Voyant:
Votre vue c’est ne pas tres claire: the 1 MW industrial plants are for sale ( http://www.leonardocorporation.com ) and the reason why the other models are not yet for sale has been written in this blog not less than thousands times.
You look to me “Non Voyant” more than “Claire Voyant”.
Peut etre vous avez necessite’ d’une consultation par un opticist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chery:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Thank you for the suggestion: as a matter of fact, I contacted them, but did not receive an offer economically viable for the E-Cat. Our door is still open, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for this link: very interesting replication from Russia based on my patent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
A new issue of my blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-24-2016-lenr-news-from-sochi-coming.html
LENR+ will prevail!
peter
Dr. Rossi: Suggestion, Leonardo buy Cyclone Power Technologies. It is a perfect fit with your low power E-Cat and it would be an interesting public relations move.
Dear Andrea:
An A for your answer to Ruby Shale!
Cheers,
Chery
And you are never ready to sell E-Cats.
I wonder why?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for your consideration and clear statement. There in no more room to speculate that topic. In my head thing is clear an no need to try this path further. I wrote longer comment elsewere, you know were to look if like to.
I understand you had to slightly edit my post, I understand the reason no problem there. Maybe in other occations could be decent to add some marker like ‘part removed by moderator’or something that other readers understands why result might look clumsy.
Since this topic is now clear, I vanish from here for a while. Maybe until I see something concrete proven to ask about. Like Mats Lewan et.al visiting your lab or so. Before that I have no questions about Quark-X or else. I hope you understand such principle.
All the best, what ever is ahead of you both parties
Argon
Barbara:
Thank you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
Thank you anyway, I will contact them.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I LOVE your answer to Ruby Shale!
Cheers,
Barbara
Ruby Shale:
As usual, the guys of Industrial Heat are ready to sell what they do not own: now they are offering us to buy back our license, the license that they do not have anymore ( see the press release made few weeks ago from our Attorney John Annesser). I wonder if they will try to sell the Colosseum of Rome as well.
IH has no more any license related to out IP and whomever is interested to us in North America, Central America, South America, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and Emirates must contact exclusively:
http://www.leonardocorporation.com
info@leonardocorporation.com
I have received other comments asking me what I think of the proposal made today by IH and this comment answers also to all the others. I will not comment further issues to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
No connection, I am a Scottish engineer (pressure equipment design for the chemical industry)so I am happy to push other Scottish engineering companies.
Kind Regards,
Keith Thomson
Sam:
Thank you for the information. Nice.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
Have you seen our LENR Testbeds?
A high-temperature heater with swappable cores.
We are just now adding a pressure control module
http://www.lookingforheat.com/lenr-test-kit-upgraded-pressure-control
Do you like it?
KeithT:
Very interesting.
Are you connected with this Company ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Another post today from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/more-deceptions-and-diversions-by-mad-dog-weaver-sauna-fud-and-more-evidence-of-quarkx-ip-to-be-core-of-the-war/
Best
Luis
Argon:
Thank you for your sympathy, but I think it is not proper I comment further on this issue. This case has to be resolved in Court, based on the situation we have now and, for obvious reasons, I cannot comment on issues that have to be exposed in Court. Also, I have not a crystall ball to know how the situation will be in future. As you see, I have edited your comment, taking off issues connected to arguments to be discussed in Court, not in the blogs.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
If you are still interested in electricity production via steam from your Ecats.
As it is a large step to go from the steam pressure and temperature of your existing thermal 1MW Ecat plant to the high pressure / temperature steam requirements for electricity producing turbines within power stations, a commercial intermediate step could be to use the twin rotary screw expander / electricity generator of the company Heliex Power.
Heliex Power Ltd of Scotland is a spinout company from City University London, who have taken existing compressor technology then mathematically optimised and developed patented new generation “N” profile rotors for use as a screw steam expander, this expander can process wet steam and liquid water having fluctuating mass flow rates and pressures (steam pressure up to 25 barA, temperature 150 to 300 degrees C), the wet process fluid will also lubricate the rotors. The screw expander is then attached to a standard 3-phase 4-pole electrical generator (can be 50 or 60 Hz output).
The rotary screw expander generator is capable of operating with low pressure wet steam conditions where turbine generators are not suitable.
Heliex Power first customer installation was in may 2013, the units are now in production and on sale, units have even been installed in Italy, one at a glass plant near Milan and one at a steel mill.
Kind regards,
Keith Thomson.
Judy Forsythe:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is your new partner working with you in these days on the E-Cat QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for reading my previous posts. Since I have plead both parties IH and You here and in lenr-forum to try to open sensitive discussions one more time before Court proceedings starts.
I feel guilty on trying to involve in this even total outsider, but with common goal; save the planet using shortest path.
I feel that I have involved quite much, you both parties are grown up experienced business people and you can act on if there is a point on doing that.
With the hope that everybody does the right thing
Best Regards,
Argon
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Mini-length, maxi sadness edition of EGO OUT today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-23-2016-lenr-answer-to-non-answer.html
Situation will improve…
Best wishes,
Peter
Greg Leonard:
Still very promising. We are working very, very hard on it.
Warm Regards,
Andrea
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Greg Yusak:
Thank you, I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
New post from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/clear-evidence-of-dodge-weaver-deceptions-and-attempts-to-rewrite-history-by-librarian-jed-rothwell/
Best
Luis
Dear AR,
How is the Quark-X performing this week? Is is the same or better than in your report of June 14th? (I hope not worse).
regards
Greg Leonard
Michel:
Thank you for the correction,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
There is only one thing that really counts for us: the fact that the QuarkX enters in the market, as you hope, by this year 2016, at least in the industrial version.
All the other consideration are a loss of time and you are totally right staying focused on your work.
Cheers,
Greg
Dear Dr Rossi,
There is a typo : it is Cadarache (not Caradache)
Good luck for the new Ecat-X, i hope it will become a product as you said.
Regards,
Michel