Hello dr . Rossi , I send you a very interesting paper:
On the Nuclear Coupling of Proton and Electron
Volodymyr Krasnoholovets Institute of physics, Natl. Acad. Sci., 46 Nauky St., UA-03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
Yuriy Zabulonov, Ihor Zolkin
Institute of Environmental Geochemistry under Natl. Acad. Sci. and Ministry for Emergencies and Affairs of Population Protection from
the Consequences of Chornobyl Catastrophe, 34-a Acad. Palladin Ave., UA-03680, Kyiv, Ukraine
Dear Andrea,
I appreciate most customers need 50 – 60Hz but some customers such as the aviaton industry use higher eg 400Hz (and also DC).
Obviously, both can be produced from 50/60Hz but if the Quark can be stimulated to operate directly at higher frequencies, it avoids extra complexity and cost to those users.
The % electric output will probably vary with frequency which could be +ve or -Ve.
I appreciate you can’t and shouldn’t try to do everything all at once; you must concentrate on those important issues.
It’s just a thought for the future.
So thank you very much for your time and all you are doing for us.
God speed!
Best wishes
Dave
The Florida Southern District Court has now established a timeline for Leonardo Corporation’s legal dispute with Industrial Heat. The trial itself will begin Sept. 18th 2017.
While this is certainly an important result, it is a relatively long time from now. May I ask – if I am not being too indiscrete – if you foresee any chance that the interested parties move in the direction of an early settlement out of court?
With my very warmest regards,
Henry E.
Dear Andrea,
We know that Quark AC output can be 50-60Hz.
As you may be aware, the size, efficiency and associated costs of components handling AC power reduce significantly with increasing frequency.
Is it possble for a first generation Quark AC output to reach as high as 400 Hz?
Best Wishes
David
Patrick Ellul:
I am working in my factory in the USA and most of my time goes with the QuarK and with my Team in the USA and in Sweden to organize everything. Our future. The future of the E-Cat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Please excuse my curiosity, but may I ask if this is correct?
Assuming that you can build 15 QuarkX systems of 100 QuarkX per system, and take readings once per second for each of the 15 systems for a period of 27 days you would achieve 3.5 billion readings, all of which must be the same to succeed with 5 sigma testing.
It is not simple, but arduous.
Thank you,
Tom
————————-
Details, details, details, the devil is in the details… Using this math … (3.5 billion / 3600 seconds per hour readings / 24 hours per day / 100 Quarks per Test Unit (10×10) / 15 test units)
5 Sigma
3,500,000,000
Hours Needed @ 1 reading per second
972222
Days Needed
40509
Days using of a single QuarkX(n=100)
405
Test Days using 15 QuarkX(100) units above…
27
Theory: it would take 27 Days to achieve 5 Sigma if all readings were the same …
I am hoping for you that the certification process will not be as difficult as in the past, especially since you are able to submit the ERV report in full to the certification experts. No accidents, injuries, fires, radiation, or deaths helps. Can you clarify three things please?
1) Is the certification process that has already been agreed upon (4/23/16) still valid?
2) Is the certification process for the QuarkX also agreed upon?
3) Does the certification process for the QuarkX include the domestic version too?
Thank you,
Tom
Ref: April 23, 2016
“The certification process has already been agreed upon and this time I think the certification, also thanks to the data obtained from the 1 year test, will be not as difficult as in the past. I hope.”
You have just replied this to a question by Kenko:
“The process of certification is in progress for all our products. We obtained already the safety certification for the industrial low temperature E-Cat and for the industrial Hot Cat.”
Does this mean that the industrial hot cat is in production for sale to interested clients? If the hot cat is in production, is it designed to produce high pressure steam for a Carnot cycle?
Kenko:
The process of certification is in progress for all our products. We obtained already the safety certification for the industrial low temperature E-Cat and for the industrial Hot Cat.
The certification for the domestic version of both is on course.
About the QuarkX, the safety certification is beginning now.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Louis:
No. LENR are still in a too immature stage for what concerns the theory and all the theories published so far are all but convincing. Besides, there are too many controversies about the LENR that will be overcome only with a solid diffusion in the market, that still is not actual. I strongly suggest that a student specializes in a branch of Physics well consolidated and shared by all the scientific community. After the doctorate, he will have all the possibilities to make the war for the LENR, if he still will want to do it. Before that he has to study the consolidated program. Like Picasso: before painting Guernica he learnt to paint like a Raphael.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I appreciated your position, the Ecat is a new technology that will have to interface with many existing technologies and you have to commercially protect yourself by means of patents against all variants.
Keith Thomson:
I am sorry, I cannot publish your comment because contains issues that are part of patents in preparation and the publication of my comments on such issues could make prior art disclosure and compromise the patents in preparation, but not yet pending.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
My comment: IH again tries to escape from the litigation. If 1/100 of the slanders and the lies deposited in the blogs by the mad dogs of IH were true, IH would be eager to go in court…the fact that they are trying to delay and to suffocate the litigation makes clear that they are afraid of it.
Evidently they know that you have evidence that will defeat them in Court, where what counts is not the chattering of the mad dogs, but the real evidence.
In fact it appears that you are fighting to go in Court, they are trying to run away.
Godspeed,
David
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
This i my blog for today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/07/jul-01-2016-andrea-rossis-lenr-r-plans.html
it is about putting things in orde and at their place and size.
All the best,
Peter
Dr Andrea Rossi,
How are going on the tests on the QuarkX today?
Jed:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you still working on the theory together with Norman Cook ?
Regards,
Jed
Ing. Michelangelo De meo:
Thank you for the information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello dr . Rossi , I send you a very interesting paper:
On the Nuclear Coupling of Proton and Electron
Volodymyr Krasnoholovets Institute of physics, Natl. Acad. Sci., 46 Nauky St., UA-03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
Yuriy Zabulonov, Ihor Zolkin
Institute of Environmental Geochemistry under Natl. Acad. Sci. and Ministry for Emergencies and Affairs of Population Protection from
the Consequences of Chornobyl Catastrophe, 34-a Acad. Palladin Ave., UA-03680, Kyiv, Ukraine
http://www.hrpub.org/download/20160530/UJPA6-18406680.pdf
Isabel:
yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DrD:
To modulate the frequency is possible.
Thanks to you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
None.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What effect does delaying the start of the trial until September 2017 have upon your plans to commercialize the E-Cats?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
I appreciate most customers need 50 – 60Hz but some customers such as the aviaton industry use higher eg 400Hz (and also DC).
Obviously, both can be produced from 50/60Hz but if the Quark can be stimulated to operate directly at higher frequencies, it avoids extra complexity and cost to those users.
The % electric output will probably vary with frequency which could be +ve or -Ve.
I appreciate you can’t and shouldn’t try to do everything all at once; you must concentrate on those important issues.
It’s just a thought for the future.
So thank you very much for your time and all you are doing for us.
God speed!
Best wishes
Dave
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you confirm that you are manufacturing industrial plants in the USA ?
Isabel
DrD:
The Customers need 60 or 50 Hz.
Warm Regards.
A.R.
Henry Ethancourt:
I already answered this question.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,,
Today this issue of my blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/jun-30-2016-shock-of-present-and.html
While confronting the shocks of the present we should remember Alvin Toffler’s “Future Shock”
Peter
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Read on Sifferkoll:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/new-court-documents-on-pacemonitor/
The Florida Southern District Court has now established a timeline for Leonardo Corporation’s legal dispute with Industrial Heat. The trial itself will begin Sept. 18th 2017.
While this is certainly an important result, it is a relatively long time from now. May I ask – if I am not being too indiscrete – if you foresee any chance that the interested parties move in the direction of an early settlement out of court?
With my very warmest regards,
Henry E.
Dear Andrea,
We know that Quark AC output can be 50-60Hz.
As you may be aware, the size, efficiency and associated costs of components handling AC power reduce significantly with increasing frequency.
Is it possble for a first generation Quark AC output to reach as high as 400 Hz?
Best Wishes
David
Albert Ellul:
No: we did not yet sell industrial Hot Cat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Tom Conover:
Thank you for the insight.
It is not so because the duration of the events is longer. We have integrals, not numbers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Patrick Ellul:
I am working in my factory in the USA and most of my time goes with the QuarK and with my Team in the USA and in Sweden to organize everything. Our future. The future of the E-Cat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Which country are you in at the moment and how do you spend most of your days?
Best regards,
Patrick
Dear Andrea,
Please excuse my curiosity, but may I ask if this is correct?
Assuming that you can build 15 QuarkX systems of 100 QuarkX per system, and take readings once per second for each of the 15 systems for a period of 27 days you would achieve 3.5 billion readings, all of which must be the same to succeed with 5 sigma testing.
It is not simple, but arduous.
Thank you,
Tom
————————-
Details, details, details, the devil is in the details… Using this math … (3.5 billion / 3600 seconds per hour readings / 24 hours per day / 100 Quarks per Test Unit (10×10) / 15 test units)
5 Sigma
3,500,000,000
Hours Needed @ 1 reading per second
972222
Days Needed
40509
Days using of a single QuarkX(n=100)
405
Test Days using 15 QuarkX(100) units above…
27
Theory: it would take 27 Days to achieve 5 Sigma if all readings were the same …
Dear Andrea,
I am hoping for you that the certification process will not be as difficult as in the past, especially since you are able to submit the ERV report in full to the certification experts. No accidents, injuries, fires, radiation, or deaths helps. Can you clarify three things please?
1) Is the certification process that has already been agreed upon (4/23/16) still valid?
2) Is the certification process for the QuarkX also agreed upon?
3) Does the certification process for the QuarkX include the domestic version too?
Thank you,
Tom
Ref: April 23, 2016
“The certification process has already been agreed upon and this time I think the certification, also thanks to the data obtained from the 1 year test, will be not as difficult as in the past. I hope.”
Dear Ing. Rossi,
You have just replied this to a question by Kenko:
“The process of certification is in progress for all our products. We obtained already the safety certification for the industrial low temperature E-Cat and for the industrial Hot Cat.”
Does this mean that the industrial hot cat is in production for sale to interested clients? If the hot cat is in production, is it designed to produce high pressure steam for a Carnot cycle?
Kenko:
The process of certification is in progress for all our products. We obtained already the safety certification for the industrial low temperature E-Cat and for the industrial Hot Cat.
The certification for the domestic version of both is on course.
About the QuarkX, the safety certification is beginning now.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Oystein Lande:
1- yes
2- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear mr Rossi,
The test report said the ecat-X is a 1mm ‘cylinder’
1. Do you mean it is hollow ?
2. Or is it a rod and all of it an active reactive material?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
We haven’t heard much lately about progress of safety certification. Could we get an update?
Are you seeking safety certifications for the E-cat, Hot-cat, and Quark-x separately or all together as one?
TIA
kenko
Dear Andrea
the daily issue of my blog- about battling the absurd:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-29-2016-in-lenr-you-cannot-learn.html
it will continue!
peter
Louis:
No. LENR are still in a too immature stage for what concerns the theory and all the theories published so far are all but convincing. Besides, there are too many controversies about the LENR that will be overcome only with a solid diffusion in the market, that still is not actual. I strongly suggest that a student specializes in a branch of Physics well consolidated and shared by all the scientific community. After the doctorate, he will have all the possibilities to make the war for the LENR, if he still will want to do it. Before that he has to study the consolidated program. Like Picasso: before painting Guernica he learnt to paint like a Raphael.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alex:
Still very promosing in the process of the advanced R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Germain:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Here is the link to the last article on Sifferkoll:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/did-jed-rothwell-admit-being-an-ih-contracted-spin-doctor-with-a-freudian-spin
By the way: the mad dog is not a doctor, he didn’t even complete the high school. His profession is to make translations from and to English…
Germain
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the work with the QuarkX ?
Cheers,
Alex
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments placed today on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Would you suggest to a freshman of a Physics institute to specialize in LENR ?
Thanks for the suggestion, if you can,
Louis
KeithT:
Thank you for your sympathy!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I appreciated your position, the Ecat is a new technology that will have to interface with many existing technologies and you have to commercially protect yourself by means of patents against all variants.
Best regards,
Keith Thomson.
Selma:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
I agree with David. Here is the most recent article of Sifferkoll on the matter:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/is-clueless-jed-rothwell-paid-or-played-to-slander-penon-and-the-erv-reports-on-the-mw-cop50-e-cat-plant
Cheers,
Selma
Gerard McEk:
1. yes
2. yes
3. no
4. yes
5. I do not know yet
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Keith Thomson:
I am sorry, I cannot publish your comment because contains issues that are part of patents in preparation and the publication of my comments on such issues could make prior art disclosure and compromise the patents in preparation, but not yet pending.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Paul:
Thank you for the suggestion, but I prefer to be very conservative, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
David:
Thank you for the link.
I cannot comment issues that will have to be disclosed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I think it is useful to inform your readers of this article of today on Sifferkoll:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/jones-day-lawyer-drones-on-repeat-in-another-mtd-however-again-showing-the-malicious-intent-of-ih/
My comment: IH again tries to escape from the litigation. If 1/100 of the slanders and the lies deposited in the blogs by the mad dogs of IH were true, IH would be eager to go in court…the fact that they are trying to delay and to suffocate the litigation makes clear that they are afraid of it.
Evidently they know that you have evidence that will defeat them in Court, where what counts is not the chattering of the mad dogs, but the real evidence.
In fact it appears that you are fighting to go in Court, they are trying to run away.
Godspeed,
David