United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

14,636 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea
    What is the luminous flux (lm) of the full light from a Quark-X of 20W of power?
    Regards SH

  • Andrea Rossi

    Manuel Cilia:
    Local recharging facilities is the way to go, proportionally to the distribution’s expansion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jack Gilford:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Dr Rossi
    We might have to create a stockpile of recharged modules here in Australia as the logistics of sending used Ecatx back and forth to Europe to get recharged would take time and costs. Do you forsee any other solutions when your technology goes world wide. Maybe setting up recharge facities in different countries under licence.

    Thank you

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • jack gilford

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Are you still hoping to have an industrial plant based on the QuarkX technology in operation in an industrial concern?
    Cheers,
    Jack

  • Dear Andrea,’

    See please:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-03-2016-lenr-info-iccf20-sendai.html

    A new issue of the EGO OUT Blog- just for today:

    Wish you all. Andrea and Readers a great tomorrow!

    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Absolutely not.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    If the QuarkX and traditional E-Cat are substantially different, and you are spending so much time with the QuarkX, can we assume that the QuarkX has replaced the E-Cat in your commercial plans?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Angelo V.:
    No
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    John C. Evans:
    1 no
    2 no
    3 one
    4 yes
    5 depends on the problem
    6 yes
    7 n.a.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • John C Evans

    Mr Rossi

    Thinking about the thermal peak problem and the clusters of small units:
    1. Is the thermal peak issue your primary safety and operational concern?
    2. Does the peak affect the entire cluster?
    3. Does the peak affect only one unit or a few units in the cluster?
    4. If only a few or one unit, can those be isolated or shut down as peaks occur?
    5. If they can be isolated can they then be returned to operation without an act of physical maintenance?
    6. If only a few or one unit, can the remainder of the cluster maintain safe operation?
    7. If the entire cluster is affected can the unit be returned to operation without an act of physical maintenance?

    Thank You

    John C Evans

  • Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Is the Quarkx substantially equal to the “old” E-Cat?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco Serra:
    I cannot comment leakages.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    We are working on it.
    The particulars can be defined only after the products will have been defined, but the basic components have been already designed.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Marco Serra

    Dear Andrea,
    Always everything under F8 clause, my numbers comes from:
    – the mean COP = 50-60 of the one year test has leaked from the litigation documents which cites the report.
    – You stated that 10-20% of the QuarkX power production can be directly turned into electric energy.
    – You also stated that the COP of the QuarkX is high. Higher than the ECat ones.
    No need to know the QuarkX COP to know the lowerbound of the electric COP of the QuarkX to be 10-12 (under F8 clause)

    Sorry if it looks polemic. It doesn’t want to be. Just in search for truth.
    :)

    God bless you
    Marco Serra

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco Serra:
    I did not publish the COP of the 1 year test yet, because the report has to be disclosed in Court first. I also did not yet publish the COP of the QuarkX, swtill F8 pending.
    About your suggestion to sell energy initially, it makes sense.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    What is the status of the robotized production line that you have mentioned many times?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Marco Serra

    Dear Andrea,
    I remember these numbers:
    – The one year test found a mean COP around 60.
    – QuarkX COP is better than previous ECat COP.
    – The direct electric energy produced by QuarkX can be up to 20% of the total amount.

    Simply math says that the electric COP of QuarkX shoud be better than 12.
    Are my numbers correct ?

    If yes, it’s not so bad result considering that all the hardware for Carnot cycle are not required (maybe a simple coil is enough).
    Let’s take a step further.
    Have you considered to produce and sell green electric energy instead of selling quarkX ? At least in a first time while you are refining the device. This will totally prevent reverse engineer by the competitors.
    Personally, I would not like this way, but I think that the fear to be copied will force you to enter the market only after an advanced optimization process of the product that will require a lot of time. My fear is that it will end up blocking the commercialization for years and even 2017 will result to be too optimistic.
    Does this make sense ?

    God bless you

    Marco Serra

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel G. Zavela:
    We do it.
    Thank you for your sustain,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Dr. Rossi,

    Have you found any containers for your QuarkX that meet both safety and commercial price targets?
    Looking forward to seeing the 21st century “light bulb” in action.

    Best of luck with your R&D efforts.

    Best Regards,

    Daniel G. Zavela

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    Here they talk of the replications of your effect:
    The Satellite Symposium of 20th International
    Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
    September 28-30, 2016, Xiamen, China
    ABSTRACTS
    ORGANIZERS
    Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials (2011-iChEM)
    and State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Xiamen University
    SPONSORS
    National Natural Science Foundation of China
    Huai’An Thinkre Membrane Material Co.,Ltd.
    XMU National University Science Park Development & Construction Co.,Ltd.

    http://ssiccf-20.xmu.edu.cn/files/SSICCF20_Abstracts.pdf

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    1- No
    2- Not yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    1- Are the plans on a factory together with ABB-robots in Sweden postponed due to securityproblems with Quark X?
    2- Dare you mention approximately where in south Sweden the factory is located without risking that we fans are going there for checking?
    Best regards
    Nils Fryklund

  • Dear Andrea,,

    This:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-02-2016-sunday-of-discontent-but.html

    is EGO OUT for the first October Sunday this year.

    Wish you great success in your work!
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Louis:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Charles Wedin:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Charles Wedin

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Practically the QuarkX resembles a small fuse, am I correct?
    Charles

  • Louis

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Does the QuarkX generate electromagnetic fields?
    Thank you id you can answer,
    Louis

  • Andrea Rossi

    Brokeeper:
    Precise data will be given when ready.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Brokeeper

    Dear Andrea,

    Could you give us the dimensions of the new E-Cat QuarkX?
    Thank you,
    Brokeeper

  • Dear Andrea,

    Here comes the issue of EGO OUT for this firdt dsy of October.
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-01-2016-lenr-sort-discussion-news.html

    Let’s hope October will bring good things to LENR
    especially LENR technology

    all the best,
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Sounds reasonable.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DT:
    Of course!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    a) yes
    b) no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    Now I understand, it was not from your hat! You are right.
    I have been rude and disrespectful, not you ( but I was just joking, as you surely have understood).
    Now I have to answer: those data were from a very preliminar test, that needed a lot of work to be confirmed. One thing is to get a result in a provisional test, one thing is to talk of COP of a prospective apparatus.
    At the moment I am not able to say numbers related to the COP. But it is high.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bill Conley:
    No, the maintainance is easy. The modules will be replaced and recharged in our factory. Imagine to substitute fuses in a control panel.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco Serra:
    1- no
    2- no
    3- C
    4- for example, for a 1 MW plant the control system will be 2 m x 2 m x 0.7 m ( 7′ x 7′ x 2’4″ ) circa.
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Piero:
    It is not a problem to combine 50 000 modules with proper manufacturing systems. There are many apparatuses of normal use made by thousands of components. Smaller modules open market sectors in the low power range.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    K:
    Some we had to invent.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- no
    2- n.a.
    3- no, the contrary is true
    4- yes, by sostitution on the site of the Customers and recharge in our robotized line
    5- yes
    6- C.B.N.*
    7- soon
    * C.B.N.= crystal ball needed
    Thank you for your kind wish,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    I think so.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • DT

    Dear Andrea:
    When you will start the commercialization in Europe, will the E-Cats be distributed also in Russia?
    Warm Regards,
    DT

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    He,he,he…that’s kind of hyperbolic.
    But it is true that our team is making a fantastic job.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    A volume of 1 Liter is equivalent to 1000 cm^3, so, if there is space for coolant flow, a liter full of Quarkxes would have a rating of 10 kW of heat.

    Since there are 1000 Liters in a Cubic Meter, that means that one cubic meter of Quarkxes could have a rating up to 10 MW of heat.

    (Or, 1000 Liters * 10 kW/Liter = 10 MW )

    Even if extra space is needed for cooling, control etc., it seems that the Quarkx configuration is capable of producing several kWh/h per liter of volume.

    Is this a reasonable calculation?

    Thermal regards,

    Joseph Fine

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    1 L = 1000 cm^3, therefore we have 10 x 1000 = 10 kW/L, but attention: we need more space for the assembly, so this equation is theoretical.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bernie Koppenhofer:
    Yes, you are right. But safety is first.
    Making modules of 20 W of power, it is much easier to control them. Combining them, we can reach any power rate we want in small space.
    Like Quarks…
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>