United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

12,437 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pietro F.:
    Thank you for your great sustain to our Team.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Yes, we have a backup ( genset ).
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Can you continue work on the QuarkX if you lose utility-supplied electrical power (power outages are predicted for Florida due to the hurricane).

    Stay safe! Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  • Pietro F.

    Buongiorno Andrea,

    sei anni che la seguo. Ho seguito la sua passione e tenacia durante il test di un anno dell’impianto da 1Mw. Ho temuto per la sua salute. Questi eventi mi hanno convinto della sua onestà. Sinceramente ritengo che esistano due alternative possibili: o effettivamente ha qualcosa di valido o é profondamente convinto di avere qualcosa di valido. Nella speranza che il mercato sentenzi le porgo i miei migliori auguri.

    It’s six years that I follow your work. I followed your passion and tenacity during the one-year test of the 1 MW plant. I feared for your health. These events have convinced me of your honesty. I honestly believe that there are two possible alternatives: either effectively you have something valuable or you are deeply convinced that you have something valuable. Waiting for the market verdict, I send you and your Team my best wishes.

    Buon lavoro
    Pietro F.

  • niklas hjalmarsson

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    So, not even the hurricane can stop you, ha ha !
    I wish you the success your work merits, I am sure that with the QuarkX you will complete your enormous job.
    Godspeed,
    Niclas

  • Patrick

    Mr Andrea Rossi:
    After today and tomorrow we will be able to say that the QuarkX is “hurricane proof”, correct ?
    Cheers,
    Patrick

  • Richard

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Is it confirmed that the basic module of the QuarkX will be rated 20 W ? How difficult will it be to assemble 50 thousand modules to make a 1 MW plant ?

  • tyler toffoli

    Mr Andrea Rossi,
    The fact that the QuarkX module has a power of 20 W opens enormous sectors of market also in the households. Am I correct?
    Cheers
    T.F.

  • bartolo

    Dear Andrea
    Is now the QuarkX stable, without any risk ?
    Thank you,
    Bartolo

  • Andrea Rossi

    Paul:
    I am more hurricane than him.
    I am working in my factory.
    Just reinforced windows and closed all the doors.
    We expect to be hit tomorrow, I’ll be here working anyway.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Paul

    Andrea,

    Is hurricane Matthew affecting your progress?

    Paul

  • Andrea Rossi

    James:
    Ethan Siegel is a Prof of Physics, specialized in String theory. A Physicist of our Team is a student of his and I know he is an excellent Professor. I think from his point of view he maybe right. He will change his attitude toward LENR when he will see plants in operation, because he is intellectually honest.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Debra:
    I know of some interesting work on course.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Philip:
    Based on my experiments, yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Duncan:
    Possibly.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kris:
    No, electron capture happens only in atoms with excess of protons. To say that in LENR happens electron capture means either to fool naif audiences or not to have understood what LENR are.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Here is the issue of EGO OUT for this cold October Day:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-05-2016-lenr-one-comment-some-info.html

    wishing tyhe best to you and Readers,

    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you for your insight.
    My answer is: no, I didn’t even know about the existence of these virtual particles.
    Interesting, though.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    Please view the information at these two sites first, then consider my inquiry if possible:
    http://phys.org/news/2016-07-physicists-family-tetraquarks.html
    and also at
    https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-07/su-pdf070716.php

    Are your formulas and data relating more to simple quarks or exotic quarks?
    Does your 5 sigma point to exotic quarks?

    Thank you!

    Tom

    Warning: The following includes a hidden {OPTIONAL QUESTION}.

    my notes, followed by extracts from the article above …
    [Are your Quark(x) family members related to the heavy tetraquarks that Skwarnikik and Britton are researching, or are they just the run of the mill configurations of two or three quarks? I can appreciate the up/down and top/bottom kinds, as I once isolated math in a motion software program that I wrote that purified for me the need for “UP” (or “DOWN”) and “LEFT” (or “RIGHT”), but the charm/strange quarks eluded me in this mathematical journey. I suspect that if I had continued this journey, that the charm/strange quark components would have defined the speed and vectors of my equations, which I built separately for the model I created by incorporating these concepts for speed and vector (ie: energy, or motion, or [MeV]) in formulated constructs not related to the primary equation I found for up/down and right/left. My math journey mentioned above begs me to ask you to consider this inquiry below, but I would be very happy with just a simple answer to the questions above [THANK YOU!!] …

    Optional Question: Does your quark(x) theory stick to the simple quarks in the standard model (up/down, charm/strange and top/bottom) or are you chasing the exotic quarks, referred to in the link above as X(4140), X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700)?]

    ———————————-
    PUBLIC RELEASE: 8-JUL-2016
    Physicists discover family of tetraquarks
    Syracuse University Professor Tomasz Skwarnicki and Ph.D. student Thomas Britton confirm existence of rare ‘exotic’ particle, find evidence of 3 others

    https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-07/su-pdf070716.php)

    Professor Tomasz Skwarnicki and Ph.D. student Thomas Britton G’16, both members of the Experimental High-Energy Physics Group at Syracuse and the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) collaboration at CERN, have confirmed the existence of a tetraquark candidate known as X(4140). They also have detected three other exotic particles with higher masses, called X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700).

    All four particles were the subject of Britton’s Ph.D. dissertation, which he defended in May and then submitted, on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, as a journal article to Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society, 2016).

    A tetraquark is a particle made of four quarks: two quarks and two antiquarks.

    Tetraquarks–and, by extension, pentaquarks, containing five quarks–are considered exotic because they have more than the usual allotment of two or three quarks.

    According to the Standard Model of particle physics, there are six kinds of quarks, whose intrinsic properties cause them to be grouped into pairs with unusual names: up/down, charm/strange and top/bottom.

    The particles that Skwarnicki and Britton study have two charm quarks and two strange quarks. Charm and strange quarks are the third- and fourth-most massive of all quarks.

    That all four quarks in the new family are “heavy” is noteworthy.

    “The heavier the quark, the smaller the corresponding particle it creates,” says Skwarnicki, adding that the names of the particles reflect their masses. “The names are denoted by mega-electron volts [MeV], referring to the amount of energy an electron gains after being accelerated by a volt of electricity. … This information, along with each particle’s quantum numbers, enhances our understanding of the formation of particles and the fundamental structures of matter.”

  • kris

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Did you change idea about the electron capture in LENR, after the recent troves on the matter?
    Thanks,
    Kris

  • duncan

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    When you will introduce the quarkx, you will also introduce your theory about it ?
    Cheers,
    D.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Enea:
    He, he, he…
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ulrike:
    Substantially yes.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jim:
    Not yet, but we are approaching it.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the info and the link.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel:
    Maybe you are right too.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    Thank you for the information, but I am not able to answer since I am not a biologist. I prefer not to talk of matters I do not know.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Philip

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    You wrote that by means of electrolysis it is impossible to reach LENR: are you sure of this lemma ?

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    I am not sure if this question has been asked to you before, but are you familiar with the work of Ukrain professor Vladimir Vysottski? Recently he has investigated the much higher than expected reduction of Caesium137 in the bottom around Tjernobil. In laboratory tests he found that bacteria are able to transmute Ce137 to Ba137 with a factor 30 higher than the natural half-time rate (30.2 Y). It will be presented in the ICCF20 this week. With your existing knowledge of LENR, would you be able to explain that also? Would you think bacteria can play this role?
    Thank you for answering our questions
    I hope that sigma 5 will be reached very soon.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Debra

    Dear Andrea
    Do you think that more replications of your effect are arriving to a positive conclusion?
    Regards,
    Debra

  • James

    Dr Rossi,
    Did you read the comment of Ethan Siegel on the LENR ? What tdo you think ?
    James

  • Daniel

    Dr Andra Rossi:
    I share the opinion of Umbi.
    Cheers,
    Daniel

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Director forced to step down after Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory reactor fails

    The world’s most powerful spherical tokamak will be off-line for a year while new magnets are built.

    http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.1092%3Bjsessionid%3DKZz1kfASM9LOtEihx-dDY2kl.x-aip-live-03

  • Jim

    Andrea:
    Did you reach the 5 Sigma with the QuarkX ?
    Jim

  • Ulrike

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    So basically you said that the QuarkX will produce heat, with which, where electric power and not heat is wanted, electric power will be produced by means of the Carnot cycle, since the efficiency of the direct electricity production is too low. Is this correct ?

  • Enea Romagnoli

    Caro Andrea è dal 1980 che seguo le tue ricerche sulla produzione di energia.
    Oggi è apparsa questa pubblicità sul mio desktop mentre leggevo notizie su e-Cat World.
    ENEL (Ente Nazionale Energia Elettrica) sta già presentando in Italia il Quark-x annunciando che: “Basta tanto così per ridurre i consumi della tua impresa”

    Coraggio, la competizione è agguerrita, prego non bisogna perdere tempo! (Risata)

    La meta è vicina, con incoraggiamento

    Enea

    https://goo.gl/photos/8F7WYehnVD8tbgxu9

    Dear Andrea is from 1980 that I follow your research on energy production.
    Today appeared this advertisement on my desktop as I read news about E-Cat World.
    ENEL (National Electric Energy Agency) is already presenting in Italy Quark-x announcing that: “Just so much to reduce consumption of your business”

    Courage, the competition is fierce, please do not waste time! (Laugh)

    The goal is near, with encouragement

    Enea

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    TodayI wrote two bog issues:
    A DOCUMENT

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/special-issue-relevant-document-with.html

    The second is the usual daily info plus a comment for Rossi zeroers
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-04-2016-lenr-challenge-to-rossi.html

    zmy best wishes.

    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    1- no
    2- yes
    3- ask him
    Thank you for the links!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Koen Vandewalle:
    Thank you for the suggestion.
    To be studied.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Keith Ketelsen:
    We are working very well and now we are really close to Sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    HV:
    No comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Umbi:
    Maybe you are right.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    3 questions, please:
    1) I am thinking that your 5 sigma results relate to condensed matter physics.
    Am I incorrect in this observation?

    2) I think it likely (> 89%) that you will achieve 5 sigma in the next 90 days.
    Am I possibly correct in this observation?

    3) I think it possible that Dr. Cook would publish after 5 sigma. Likely?

    Thank you for your answers! You are very kind.

    ********

    My gift to you:
    Please google “new york times Unusual Matter 2016”. (or a link is provided below).
    2 hours ago this article was published.

    New Your Times magazine honored the three Nobel Prize winners in Physics:
    “3 Who Studied Unusual States of Matter Win Nobel Prize in Physics”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/05/science/nobel-prize-physics-topology.html

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 2016
    David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane and J. Michael Kosterlitz
    “for theoretical discoveries of topological phase transitions and topological phases of matter”

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 2015
    Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B. McDonald
    “for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass”

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 2014
    Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano and Shuji Nakamura
    “for the invention of efficient blue light-emitting diodes which has enabled bright and energy-saving white light sources”

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 2013
    François Englert and Peter W. Higgs
    “for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider”

  • umbi

    Domestic E-CAT ? We will never see … I think

  • Koen Vandewalle

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    You often refer to the Carnot cycle, mostly to generate electricity with turbines etc…

    Do you think small direct heat into mechanical energy applications are possible? I am thinking of a thermal chainsaw or lawnmower. These are applications where there is an electrical equivalent, but which are a lot less convenient than the models with a portable internal combustion engine in the 25 tot 100 cc-range.

    Kind Regards,
    Koen

  • Keith Ketelsen

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Can you update us about the Quarkx tests ?

  • HV

    Dr Rossi:
    IH has filed for a patent that is a copycat of your Ecat in May 2016, while at the same time they were saying everywhere that your plant does not work.
    Odd, isn’t it?
    Besides, their new partner Brillouin, who before the agreement with IH worked only with electrolysis, now declares that reached a COP of 5 with a device that is a copycat of your “old” Hot Cat: another oddity, isn’t it?
    HV

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    Most of the energy is turned into heat. The efficiency in lm/W is low.
    We will give exact numbers when we will have decided the final configuration, but we’ ll prefer heat because is the way to get the maximum of efficiency also to make electricity (Carnot).
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>