United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

20,098 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • D.T.

    Dear Andrea:
    As you probably have seen, Brillouin has published their demo at the ICCF of Japan: congratulations, you have got another replication of your effect: their reactor is a true copy of your old Hot Cat. After their agreement with Cherokee-IH, they have got from Darden your technology and replicated it. Probably you noticed that since their agreement with IH, Brillouin has just repeated as a parrot every move of you…even the reactor that resambles a pencil.
    You must really be ready to invade the world with a strongly competitive, economy scale based product before disclosing your QuarkX. Cherokee-IH-Brillouin will try to copy the QuarkX immediately and will say that their is “original”. Darden has to make his investors bite the toilet papers he filled with IH, that remained an empty box after your departure from Cherokee-IH. They made the money disappear and substituted it with the toilet papers of things that never worked and never will work. Now they, together with Woodford, must convince all the investors of Cherokee and Woodford that IH has a value of IP worth the money that disappeared from IH. They know that they can replicate you in laboratory, but cannot violate your patents in the real market…Beware, Andrea and remember here you have big friends.
    From Russia, with love,
    D.T.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    When I made my last comment, I was still stuck in concept of LENR stimulation from power (heat, amperage), instead of LENR stimulation by PWM or frequency. Electromagnetic field stimulation has been discussed within the blog here, though, so sorry to admit it is only now that I be catching up. The QuarkX is indeed a completely new animal. Adorable!

    Based on “unlimited Quarks operating in parallel”, a possible hypothesis is:

    ————–
    Since voltage appears to be the factor that triggers the QuarkX, then an “unlimited number” or perhaps thousands of the Quarks would indeed be able to operate in parallel, and it also implies that the frequency, wave form, or other, unknown functions of the application voltage would be the variable that allows control of the QuarkX’s. Voltage does not drop based on the number of circuits formed in parallel. Direct application of amperage per circuit does drop based on the number of units, so it appears unlikely that large numbers of QuarkX’s can be functional to operate an “unlimited number” of parallel units using amperage for each QuarkX.
    ————–

    Question: (1) Are your results consistent with this hypothesis (Y/N)?

    Thank you very much for your kindness in this forum, and for putting up with me. You have the patience of a saint, kind sir.

    Warm Regards,

    Tom

  • Dear Andrea,
    Thank you for the answer, but sorry, I don’t understand what is meant by the “delay of the presentation”?
    r:/pekka

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pekka Janhunen:
    I partially do not agree: redundancy alone can raise the costs uselessly. Therefore the answer is more complex: it depends also on the calculation of the damages caused by the delay of the presentation respect the economy scale of the item. By my calculation, it is worth to aim to Sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,
    Instead of asking whether sigma five has been reached or not, shouldn’t the question rather be: how much component redundancy is needed to get sigma five, and is such redundancy economical?
    regards, /pekka

  • Andrea Rossi

    Justin:
    7.50 of October 18th, from Leonardo’s factory: good standing, all well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint:
    We made a different series of tests on the low temperature E-Cat.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Oops…sorry for the typo, of course it was liver!
    Thanks for the correction.
    Yes, it is really interesting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • toussaint

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Is your Low Temp E-CAT has reached the SIGMA 5 ?

    Warm Regards,

    Toussaint françois

  • Justin

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Update ?
    Thank you,
    Justin

  • Joseph Fine

    Dr. Rossi,

    Probably you meant ….’Liver’ Surgery Hospitals. If this alcohol goes into automotive vehicles, but not their drivers, that would be a good result.

    From their paper:

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.201601169/full

    “This means that under the best conditions, the overall selectivity of the reduction mechanism for conversion of CO2 to ethanol is 84 %.”

    Best regards,

    Joseph Fine

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    I am afraid that using this ethanol to make beverages we would only make happy the owners of the liver surgery hospitals.
    Thank you for the link, though, very interesting: maybe useful for beverages for engines.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    The following link is rather interesting, but difficult to believe. Researchers at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory have developed a nano-catalyst that can convert Carbon Dioxide into Ethanol. Yields of up to 63% are mentioned in the article. And this is their initial effort at conversion. It uses an electrical input, but it might be possible to optimize it further using some both electrical and heat inputs.

    http://newatlas.com/co2-ethanol-nanoparticle-conversion-ornl/45920/

    Perhaps at higher temperatures, other chemicals may also be synthesized.

    If you could produce wine or alcoholic beverages using some of this Ethanol, it might be called the ‘New Firewater’.

    Sober Regards,

    Joseph Fine

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bernie Koppenhofer:
    As soon as possible.
    It does not depend totally on me.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Bernie Koppenhofer

    Dr. Rossi: I assume by this time you have manufactured several low temp E-Cats and they are now being used by selected companies. When will you or these companies release the economic benefits of using their E-Cats?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Craig:
    Thank you for your sustain,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jean:
    Thank you
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alexey Marchenko:
    I never comment about our competitors.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raphael:
    No. It will be necessary the presence in the factory of a certified operator.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Len Ferrante:
    Rhe characteristics of the QuarkX will be published at the presentation. It is much lighter than the E-Cat.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Very good standing.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    This will be disclosed in due time.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    No, and the best efficiency is reached making only heat.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint Francois:
    No, so far they are manufactured one by one.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    slower week start for my Blog:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-18-2016-lenr-about-info-bit-about.html

    Tomorrow we will offer 5 times more info than here

    cheers
    Peter

  • toussaint

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    One question please, is your low TEMP ECAT industrial plant ready to be mass produced, and

    do you have a facility ready ?

    Warm regards,

    Toussaint françois

  • Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    there is any possibility for the Quark-X to generate only electricity and not heat, i mean also a little quantity.
    Regards, Giuseppe

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    You mention that you are planning for a demonstration and presentation of the QuarkX, perhaps early in 2017. What will be the purpose of the presentation, and who will be able to see it?

    Thank you,

    Frank Acland

  • anonymous

    Andrea:
    Update?

  • Len Ferrante

    Dr Rossi
    Is the Quarkx module heavy? How much is its weight?

  • Raphael

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The industrial plant based on the Quarks will need an operator during its production?
    Regards
    Raphael

  • Alexey Marchenko

    Dear Andrea Rossi
    Did you know that the Piantelli patent of Europe (EPO) has been revoked and the application of the same he made in the USA has been rejected?

  • Jean

    I am sure that we will see the QuarkX in February: we of the silent majority trust you.
    Godspeed,
    Jean

  • Craig

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
    How many stupidities are writing your enemies about your work! The more they say, the more we understand how difficult is your work.
    Never give up,
    Craig

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giovanni:
    The QuarkX is very easy to be integrated in a heat exchange system, due to its dimensions and characteristics.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giovanni:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giovanni

    Related to my previous question: have you thought to an interface to the interfaces? I mean to a scalable system that could allow an user to add, for instance, an additional 3 kW system to an already installed one.
    Ciao
    Giovanni

  • Giovanni

    Dear Andrea

    I suppose the main utilization of your Quark(x) will be as a heath generator. How do you think to connect a multiple configuration of quark(x) (100, 1000, etc) to a usable system (a steam generator and than an electricity generator)?. Have you already engineered an interface of some sort? Possibly a flexible and MODULAR interface, capable of connecting different amount of Quark(x) devices. An interface that should also act as a screen to the high temperatures developed by the Quark(x) system.

    Looking forward to hearing great news from you!

    Ciao
    Giovanni

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,,

    Link to my blog issue today
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-17-2016-lenr-info-do-not-use-rossi.html

    I hope we started a very good week

    peter

    akk the best,

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    I suppose that with “N” you mean the number of QuarkX that can be put in parallel. Honestly, the number is infinite. It is like to ask how many fuses I can put in parallel. There is not a limit for what concerns the QuarkX, while, obviously, there is a limit put by the confined system of the plant the Quarks are referred to. For example, to put in parallel one million QuarkX with a robotized line could take several weeks.
    Thank you for your sustain and good luck for your replication attempts,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Hi Andrea,

    I am wondering today if you will share your “N” with us today as it is in QuarkX(N). I am hoping your testing has started to study integration of multiple units. How many can you connect as of today, please?

    I also want to thank you for your personal encouragement to me on July 17th, 2016 to continue testing (possibly using Li7). It’s taken me three months since then, but I did get a flicker using Ni/LAH/Li7 for fuel, inconclusive at best, but inspiring never the less. Some graphs are shown below, 9 pages, the last 5 pages are the graphs:

    http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/October-11-2016-Hydrogenation-Fuel-Mixture-Test-Results2.pdf

    You blog is respected by all of your readers, Andrea. Even the fools who try to distort your image fear your footprints.

    Thank you! Especially if you can share your “N” with us today!

    Tom

  • Andrea Rossi

    Wilson:
    We are working also on that issue.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mia McMullin:
    I agree.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Coppi:
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Wam Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Max:
    The QuarkX is continuing her fantastic path, so far, F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Max

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Daily update?
    All the best
    Max

  • Alessandro Coppi

    Hi Andrea,
    the shape of the quarkX suggests that you resolved the issue of the heater, I’m confident that the body of the quarkX is itself an heater, probably supplied with a very low voltage, congratulations for the vision, in this manner the reliability is certainly improved dramatically.

    Best regards
    Alessandro Coppi

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>