1. Is the current test for direct electricity from the E-Cat being done by you personally, or is a third party doing it?
2. Will a report be published if it is a success?
Dear Dr Rossi
Are you anticipating excess heat as well as electricity out of the new experimental Ecat. Would it be possible to generate hot water as well as electricity (Co-generation).
Dr Rossi,
Today your paper on Researchgate http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has reached 24000 full readings: I checked the global statistics and discovered your publication is in the most read of the 99.5% publications in all the history of Researchgate and you reached this achievement in 5 months. Your paper is making history. The unbelievable is that you reached this with a paper dedicated to the LENR, a matter that was supposed not to be taken seriously from the scientific echelons.
Unbelievable.
Prof
I recall during the 1+ year of the 1MW eCat testing you reported some control issues toward the end of the test and that this was likely due to fuel depletion.
1. Is this correct?
2. Have you changed your design or implementation to address the fuel depletion issues?
3. Do you anticipate similar effects on the eCat-SK variant?
It is reasonable to believe that you have a high degree of confidence in the eCat-SK Electric to place it in a location of independent testing in California. Obviously, it must have correctly functioned at your location before you would have allowed it to go to California. Any update(s) would be appreciated.
On today’s New York Times there is an article by Jon Gertner, author of the incoming book “The ice at the end of the world”, sustains that technology could resolve the global warming and that it is will we lack of, not solutions. As an example, he sustains wind power could be used to pump cold ocean water to the surface to thicken sea ice.
Hello A. Rossi
I wish you a good stay in California and a return to Miami with lots of positive tests and a huge production of electric power produced by an E-Cat.
All my support for the whole team
cordially
Raffaele
Dear Andrea,
You said to Lars that if the test succeeds, you will sell electricity.
My interpretation is that you aim for an E-cat SK-E that produces mainly electricity or at least more than 30% of the produced energy will be directly in electricity, the rest heat. I that a right assumption?
Thanks for answering our questions.
Kind regards, Gerard
Google: “Mathematicians used ‘magic functions’ to prove that two highly symmetric lattices solve a myriad of problems in 8- and 24- dimensional space” ( from Quanta Letters )
Karl Poehlmann
Dear Andrea,
I apologize, but I’m still missing something (and still out of my depth), but in the “long-range particle interactions” paper, I’m seeing: “this is how we achieve dense electron-proton clusters (condition-A)” but I’m not seeing a part that says “Given (condition-A), then this is how nucleon transfers occur”. (I’ve read and re-read Section-4 many times, as you’ve suggested, but still missing that part.)
Did I miss something obvious in the “LRPI” paper, or is nucleon transfer discussed in one of the referenced papers?
Sorry, to be so blind to something that’s probably hidden in plain sight!
WaltC: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Not easy to read, though, but our matter is not easy. By the way: electrons do not enter the nucleus…electron capture can happen only in atoms that have an excess of protons, which is not the case of LENR, where the energy necessary to make an electron capture process does not exist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
if the current test is successful the field of application of the Ecat grows up exponentially !
We are holding our collective breath in anticipation of success !
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
I’m a non-physicist, so please forgive my inexact wording–
In terms of the Rossi-effect, which paper(s) best describe the current theory of how things (electrons, protons, neutrons (…?)) cross the coulomb barrier (into and out of the nucleus)?
Dear Andrea,
I wish you all the success of this weeks test and it would be a tremendous achievement if the E-cat SK can run without the need of additional power. However, I will be equally happy when a report of one of your customers comes that shows an undeniable high COP of the delivered heat.
Great success to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
Frank Acland:
This particular test is made in California, because there we have the right technological support for this particular test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
This test, particularly important, will endure through all the next week. It will tell us if if it is really gonna work.
I think at the end of the next week we will have some ides of what is going on.
Hopes are many.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cecilia:
Yes, the paper on Researchgate is conciliable with the Cook-Rossi publication on Arxive and from my point of view can be considered a continuation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On the idea of emitting a proton beam and striking lithium, your previous paper (Cook and Rossi) states the alpha particles emitted energy should be 17.26MeV. If caused by a single accelerated proton from the hydrogen atom excited by a 4,000V potential, the input energy should be 4,000 eV. Therefore, a maximum COP would be 17.26 MeV / 4keV or about 4,000. If only one in a thousand protons effect a fusion, the COP would drop to 4. Since I do not know the efficacy of the proton – 7Li3 interaction, this idea may not work well.
I am wondering if your paper “E-Cat SK and long-range particle interactions” is to be seen as a complement to or replacement of your previous paper “On the Nuclear Mechanisms Underlying the Heat Production by the E-Cat”? For example, in the latter there is some speculation that the excess heat and the isotopic shifts seen in the E-CAT fuel could be due to a Li+p reaction but that it is not known where the energy to induce such a reaction comes from. Does your recent paper present an explanation on how energy to start such an Li+p reaction is made available or does it present a completely new explanation for the heat generation? I am not a physicist so please forgive me if this question does not make sense.
When you say you are in the ‘making phase’ of the E-Cat SK direct electric production experiment — do you mean you are still getting the apparatus set up, and have not run the test yet, or have you already started the test?
Dear Andrea,
1. Is the current test for direct electricity from the E-Cat being done by you personally, or is a third party doing it?
2. Will a report be published if it is a success?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Prof:
To be added: on Researchgate millions of papers have been published.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Manuel Cilia:
We expect it and we are working for it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi
Are you anticipating excess heat as well as electricity out of the new experimental Ecat. Would it be possible to generate hot water as well as electricity (Co-generation).
Thank you
Prof:
Unbelievably true.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Today your paper on Researchgate
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has reached 24000 full readings: I checked the global statistics and discovered your publication is in the most read of the 99.5% publications in all the history of Researchgate and you reached this achievement in 5 months. Your paper is making history. The unbelievable is that you reached this with a paper dedicated to the LENR, a matter that was supposed not to be taken seriously from the scientific echelons.
Unbelievable.
Prof
Steven N. Karels:
1- yes
2- yes
3- to be experimented
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering June 11 2019: Why coal fired generation still matters: their need in Asia and elsewhere.
Rod Walton
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I recall during the 1+ year of the 1MW eCat testing you reported some control issues toward the end of the test and that this was likely due to fuel depletion.
1. Is this correct?
2. Have you changed your design or implementation to address the fuel depletion issues?
3. Do you anticipate similar effects on the eCat-SK variant?
Antonio:
Premature,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jeff:
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Your publication on Researchgate has reached 23600 full readings…and counting. More than CERN publications.
Ad majora,
Jeff
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How is goinf the test with the Ecat SK Leonardo?
Many thanks
Mats Lewan:
He,he,he..
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Since I’m curious to get a picture of what the opinion is today about you and about your claims, I have published this poll that I invite your readers to answer:
https://animpossibleinvention.com/2019/06/10/poll-does-andrea-rossi-have-what-he-claims/
Kind Regards,
Mats Lewan
Steven N. Karels:
No, we are making tests in the context of an R&D
Any assumption is premature.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Gino:
It is the wave length of a photon whose energy is the same as the mass of that particle
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi
In your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions you cite ‘Compton wave length’: can you explain what is it ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
It is reasonable to believe that you have a high degree of confidence in the eCat-SK Electric to place it in a location of independent testing in California. Obviously, it must have correctly functioned at your location before you would have allowed it to go to California. Any update(s) would be appreciated.
Ken:
Sea water contains salt. Salt melts ice.
Warm Regards
A.R.
On today’s New York Times there is an article by Jon Gertner, author of the incoming book “The ice at the end of the world”, sustains that technology could resolve the global warming and that it is will we lack of, not solutions. As an example, he sustains wind power could be used to pump cold ocean water to the surface to thicken sea ice.
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for your support to our Team,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
I wish you a good stay in California and a return to Miami with lots of positive tests and a huge production of electric power produced by an E-Cat.
All my support for the whole team
cordially
Raffaele
WaltC:
More you can find in ref 14 and in the paper Cook-Rossi published on Arxiv.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Grerad McEk:
It is premature to make any assumption. It could work, but it could also not work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You said to Lars that if the test succeeds, you will sell electricity.
My interpretation is that you aim for an E-cat SK-E that produces mainly electricity or at least more than 30% of the produced energy will be directly in electricity, the rest heat. I that a right assumption?
Thanks for answering our questions.
Kind regards, Gerard
Karl Poehlmann:
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Google: “Mathematicians used ‘magic functions’ to prove that two highly symmetric lattices solve a myriad of problems in 8- and 24- dimensional space” ( from Quanta Letters )
Karl Poehlmann
Dear Andrea,
I apologize, but I’m still missing something (and still out of my depth), but in the “long-range particle interactions” paper, I’m seeing: “this is how we achieve dense electron-proton clusters (condition-A)” but I’m not seeing a part that says “Given (condition-A), then this is how nucleon transfers occur”. (I’ve read and re-read Section-4 many times, as you’ve suggested, but still missing that part.)
Did I miss something obvious in the “LRPI” paper, or is nucleon transfer discussed in one of the referenced papers?
Sorry, to be so blind to something that’s probably hidden in plain sight!
Thanks,
WaltC
WaltC:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Not easy to read, though, but our matter is not easy. By the way: electrons do not enter the nucleus…electron capture can happen only in atoms that have an excess of protons, which is not the case of LENR, where the energy necessary to make an electron capture process does not exist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
We are working very hard on it, but you try to breath, now and again !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
if the current test is successful the field of application of the Ecat grows up exponentially !
We are holding our collective breath in anticipation of success !
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
I’m a non-physicist, so please forgive my inexact wording–
In terms of the Rossi-effect, which paper(s) best describe the current theory of how things (electrons, protons, neutrons (…?)) cross the coulomb barrier (into and out of the nucleus)?
Thanks,
WaltC
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I wish you all the success of this weeks test and it would be a tremendous achievement if the E-cat SK can run without the need of additional power. However, I will be equally happy when a report of one of your customers comes that shows an undeniable high COP of the delivered heat.
Great success to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
Frank Acland:
This particular test is made in California, because there we have the right technological support for this particular test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
This test, particularly important, will endure through all the next week. It will tell us if if it is really gonna work.
I think at the end of the next week we will have some ides of what is going on.
Hopes are many.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You posted “The test has been started yesterday in California.” What test duration is planned? When will the results be known?
Dear Andrea,
Best of luck with your test! Can I ask, why are you in California, not Miami?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Dear Readers,
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cheryl Garelick:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
The test has been started yesterday in California.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cecilia:
Yes, the paper on Researchgate is conciliable with the Cook-Rossi publication on Arxive and from my point of view can be considered a continuation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The view of the plasma on http://www.ecatskdemo.com is inspiring.
Cheers
Cheryl
Dear Andrea Rossi,
On the idea of emitting a proton beam and striking lithium, your previous paper (Cook and Rossi) states the alpha particles emitted energy should be 17.26MeV. If caused by a single accelerated proton from the hydrogen atom excited by a 4,000V potential, the input energy should be 4,000 eV. Therefore, a maximum COP would be 17.26 MeV / 4keV or about 4,000. If only one in a thousand protons effect a fusion, the COP would drop to 4. Since I do not know the efficacy of the proton – 7Li3 interaction, this idea may not work well.
Dear Andrea,
I am wondering if your paper “E-Cat SK and long-range particle interactions” is to be seen as a complement to or replacement of your previous paper “On the Nuclear Mechanisms Underlying the Heat Production by the E-Cat”? For example, in the latter there is some speculation that the excess heat and the isotopic shifts seen in the E-CAT fuel could be due to a Li+p reaction but that it is not known where the energy to induce such a reaction comes from. Does your recent paper present an explanation on how energy to start such an Li+p reaction is made available or does it present a completely new explanation for the heat generation? I am not a physicist so please forgive me if this question does not make sense.
Kind regards,
Cecilia
Dear Andrea,
When you say you are in the ‘making phase’ of the E-Cat SK direct electric production experiment — do you mean you are still getting the apparatus set up, and have not run the test yet, or have you already started the test?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Steven N. Karels:
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.