Dear Andrea,
we know that the production of the Quark-X is linked to the achievement of 5 sigma.
At now what is your goal, did you fix a date you don’t want exceed?
Regards, Giuseppe
Mr Andrea Rossi:
Brillouin has replicated your effect and there are rumors that more important replications are arriving: congratulations to you and to the replicators.
Cheers,
Rheba
I meant to ask whether over time, each event measurement will lead you to a conclusion about whether Sigma 5 has been reached or not. From your other answers it sounds like the answer is yes.
Daniel:
No, we had different shifts: I have been in the plant during the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat from 5 p.m. to 10 a.m. of the following day, covering the night.
The 2 guys of IH have been there covering in total from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Therefore, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. they were in the plant without me.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Do you and your team real testing with real machines under load, wherein the first arrays of QuarkX capture the cold gas flow, and the farther in the machine, the more this gas stream is warmed up, and the QuarkX’s have to be tuned differently, or are you still in the phase of laboratory tests on the QuarkX, which radiate their heat in the environment, in order to find the best tuning-system and/or QuarkX configuration ?
From some of your previous answers, I derive that you have a myriad of applications under construction. Anyway, I hope so.
DEAR READERS, ANOTHER URGENT MESSAGE:
The same source, of the hacking attempt I gave warning of several days ago, is sending around another fake email, signed “Fabio Penon” containing an attachment that leads to the hacking of your computer.
If you receive an email signed Fabio Penon, obviously it is a fake, and it is dangerous, therefore delete it immediately from your mail and from your trash.
This anyway is the sign of the level of desperation our foes are arrived to.
Warm Regards,
Dr Andrea Rossi, CEO of Leonardo Corporation
P.S. ALSO: PROBABLY YOU WILL RECEIVE MORE OF SUCH EMAILS IN THE NEXT FUTURE: PLEASE ALWAYS NEVER, EVER, OPEN ATTACHMENTS COMING FROM ANYWHERE IF YOU ARE NOT ABSOLUTELY SURE OF THE SENDER. I SUGGEST YOU TO EMAIL TO THE SENDER EVEN IF YOU THINK IS NOT A FAKE AND ASK CONFIRMATION THAT SHE OR HE SENT AN ATTACHMENT !!!
The ‘events’ you speak of in connection with obtaining the 5 sigma goal:
1) Are they distinct occurrences that take place within a single QuarkX unit?
2) If so, are you able to measure each occurrence separately?
3) So far have you measured millions of data points?
4) If you are can measure each occurrence separately, is that the data you need to evaluate whether 5 sigma level has been obtained?
5) Do you anticipate the time required to reach the 5 sigma level (if successful) to be in days, weeks, months or years?
I’m used to seeing reliability information given as Availability, Mean-time-to-fail (MTTF) and Mean-time-to-repair (MTTR). {Where Availability = MTTF/(MTTF+MTTR) }
For example, a high availability, “five nines” system, might have a MTTF of 20 years, MTTR of 1.5 hours and an availability of 99.999%. {Similarly, a light bulb that has a MTTF of 2 years and a MTTR of 9 minutes would also have a 99.999% availability.}
Question: Do you think that once you achieve 5 sigma, that you’ll also have the information to calculate the Availability, or possibly MTTF of your QuarkX devices? (Probably not yet the entire system, but the devices themselves.)
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
His actions have been discovered and investigated by his own colleagues and this fact gives evidence of the greatness of the Institution he belonged to.
No further comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Here is the verdict against the Gen. Emilio Spaziante, the general who caused with his prosecution your arrest and the bankrupcy of your industry in the nineties, as described in the website http://www.ingandrearossi.com:
Dear Andrea,
Your latest response to a question of Frank Ackland triggered a few other questions:
Assume all 3 QuarkX’s will continue and reach the 5 Sigma requirements, would you:
1. Stop testing these and autopsy them and
A. choose the version with the best (mix of performance and durability) for starting production
B. Chose the version with the best performance (COP) for production
C. Chose the version with the best durability for production
2. Continue testing, but start production on either (A. B. C. Question 1)
If things go well, how long do you estimate it will take before 5 sigma is reached?
Thank you for answering our questions. I keep my fingers crossed for a successful 5 Sigma test.
Kind regards, Gerard
I understand the value of 5 sigma, in the context of probability.
Explain the 5 sigma, in the context Quark X.
How can we reach the 5 sigma if you have one perspective (five pieces)?
Drew G.:
Thank you for the interesting link from the Russian scientists. That’s serious. I really hope our work will help: that’s the reason we are working for.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: Who will be the judge on whether you have reached Sigma 5. Thanks again for answering our questions.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
yesterday I watched the movie “The Concert”: yuo were right, is a masterpiece. Thank you for suggesting.
Cheers,
Mattias
Pascal Dupuis:
Still in good standing, aiming to Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giuseppe:
Only the QuarkX can fix that date, but I hope February 2017.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
we know that the production of the Quark-X is linked to the achievement of 5 sigma.
At now what is your goal, did you fix a date you don’t want exceed?
Regards, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea,
The first EGO OUT issue for this week is this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-24-2016-short-note-from-andrea.html
UI hope it will be a good week for us.
greetings,
Peter
Sandra:
Yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Mike:
To make a fair settlement two parties are necessary.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Mr Andrea Rossi,
Update?
Orson:
We are working on it.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Mary:
Fifty-Fifty
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
In this period how much is the time you dedicate to the litigation and how much to the QuarkX, as an average percantage?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
At which point is the study for a QuarkX operated jet engine?
Thanks,
O.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you open to a settlement for the litigation?
Regards,
Mike
Dr Rossi:
Are there women in your team?
Cheers,
Sandra
Rheba:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Thank you for the rephrasing, now I understand.
The answer is yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr Andrea Rossi:
Brillouin has replicated your effect and there are rumors that more important replications are arriving: congratulations to you and to the replicators.
Cheers,
Rheba
Dear Andrea,
Sorry for the confusion in question 4.
I meant to ask whether over time, each event measurement will lead you to a conclusion about whether Sigma 5 has been reached or not. From your other answers it sounds like the answer is yes.
Could you know about 5 sigma in early 2017?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Daniel:
No, we had different shifts: I have been in the plant during the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat from 5 p.m. to 10 a.m. of the following day, covering the night.
The 2 guys of IH have been there covering in total from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Therefore, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. they were in the plant without me.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
WaltC:
I think so. F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
4- please rephrase, I do not understand exactly
5- months
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Who the heck is Rainer ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
We are producing heat. Pretty much of it. F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you and your team real testing with real machines under load, wherein the first arrays of QuarkX capture the cold gas flow, and the farther in the machine, the more this gas stream is warmed up, and the QuarkX’s have to be tuned differently, or are you still in the phase of laboratory tests on the QuarkX, which radiate their heat in the environment, in order to find the best tuning-system and/or QuarkX configuration ?
From some of your previous answers, I derive that you have a myriad of applications under construction. Anyway, I hope so.
Kind Regards
Koen
Dear Andrea,,
Here is the link to my EGO OUT issues forthis SUNDAY
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-23-2016-revolutions-lenr-greg-goble.html
greetings,
Peter
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is it true that you are Rainer?
DEAR READERS, ANOTHER URGENT MESSAGE:
The same source, of the hacking attempt I gave warning of several days ago, is sending around another fake email, signed “Fabio Penon” containing an attachment that leads to the hacking of your computer.
If you receive an email signed Fabio Penon, obviously it is a fake, and it is dangerous, therefore delete it immediately from your mail and from your trash.
This anyway is the sign of the level of desperation our foes are arrived to.
Warm Regards,
Dr Andrea Rossi, CEO of Leonardo Corporation
P.S. ALSO: PROBABLY YOU WILL RECEIVE MORE OF SUCH EMAILS IN THE NEXT FUTURE: PLEASE ALWAYS NEVER, EVER, OPEN ATTACHMENTS COMING FROM ANYWHERE IF YOU ARE NOT ABSOLUTELY SURE OF THE SENDER. I SUGGEST YOU TO EMAIL TO THE SENDER EVEN IF YOU THINK IS NOT A FAKE AND ASK CONFIRMATION THAT SHE OR HE SENT AN ATTACHMENT !!!
Dear Andrea,
The ‘events’ you speak of in connection with obtaining the 5 sigma goal:
1) Are they distinct occurrences that take place within a single QuarkX unit?
2) If so, are you able to measure each occurrence separately?
3) So far have you measured millions of data points?
4) If you are can measure each occurrence separately, is that the data you need to evaluate whether 5 sigma level has been obtained?
5) Do you anticipate the time required to reach the 5 sigma level (if successful) to be in days, weeks, months or years?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
I’m used to seeing reliability information given as Availability, Mean-time-to-fail (MTTF) and Mean-time-to-repair (MTTR). {Where Availability = MTTF/(MTTF+MTTR) }
For example, a high availability, “five nines” system, might have a MTTF of 20 years, MTTR of 1.5 hours and an availability of 99.999%. {Similarly, a light bulb that has a MTTF of 2 years and a MTTR of 9 minutes would also have a 99.999% availability.}
Question: Do you think that once you achieve 5 sigma, that you’ll also have the information to calculate the Availability, or possibly MTTF of your QuarkX devices? (Probably not yet the entire system, but the devices themselves.)
Thanks,
WaltC
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Have you always been in the 1 MW Ecat plant when the IH guys were there?
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
My pleasure to send this link to my Blog, today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-22-2016-lenr-with-help-from-axil.html
Cheers,
Peter
Ing. Michelamgelo De Meo:
Congratulations,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi:
Please find these bridge emotions, upon which I have worked hard: I hope your E-Cat will be operating also here!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G6fI4BJt_c
Sebastian:
No, it does not work that way: the probabilities are related to events, not to items.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It is still unclear to me what you are testing for when aiming for 5 Sigma.
5 Sigma implies that a specific event will occur with a very high probability.
1) Is it that out of 3.5 million QuarkX produced, only 1 will be expected to be defective?
2) How do you calculate that probablity if you only work with 3 prototypes?
Thanks for clarifying
Yrka:
Sorry, I am not sure I have been able to understand your question. Can you rephrase it?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
2+A
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Herbert:
Also today, Saturday October 22, the QuarkX os working well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
His actions have been discovered and investigated by his own colleagues and this fact gives evidence of the greatness of the Institution he belonged to.
No further comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
In this period, yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The three QuarkXs that you now have running, are they made with different specifications?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Here is the verdict against the Gen. Emilio Spaziante, the general who caused with his prosecution your arrest and the bankrupcy of your industry in the nineties, as described in the website http://www.ingandrearossi.com:
http://direttanfo.blogspot.it/2016/10/barca-di-lusso-villa-contanti-e-bella.html
See also this link of 2014, where is explained the beginning of his end:
http://www.matesenews.it/?p=14591
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Update!
Dear Andrea,
Your latest response to a question of Frank Ackland triggered a few other questions:
Assume all 3 QuarkX’s will continue and reach the 5 Sigma requirements, would you:
1. Stop testing these and autopsy them and
A. choose the version with the best (mix of performance and durability) for starting production
B. Chose the version with the best performance (COP) for production
C. Chose the version with the best durability for production
2. Continue testing, but start production on either (A. B. C. Question 1)
If things go well, how long do you estimate it will take before 5 sigma is reached?
Thank you for answering our questions. I keep my fingers crossed for a successful 5 Sigma test.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi.
I understand the value of 5 sigma, in the context of probability.
Explain the 5 sigma, in the context Quark X.
How can we reach the 5 sigma if you have one perspective (five pieces)?
Thank you,
Yury Isaev
Engineer
Tyumen, Russia
Drew G.:
Thank you for the interesting link from the Russian scientists. That’s serious. I really hope our work will help: that’s the reason we are working for.
Warm Regards,
A.R.