Re-your reply which goes like this:
>>
Albert Ellul:
Thank you for your kind words.
1- yes
2- I hope by 2017
Warm Regards,
A.R.
<<
2017 is, in industrial terms, tomorrow. Let's say it will be by the end of 2017, would that mean that industries would be able to purchase heat-generating Quark-x e-Cats to produce process hot water, steam, power steam turbines-alternators and generate electricity at 1 cent a kWh?
That would be fantastic, a game changer, a massive energy paradigm shift equivalent to the invention of fire itself.
“The industrial application is close to obtain the safety certification, the domestic not yet.”
My questions are:
1-Does this highly successful development mean that you are close to commence the industrial set-up (that is a factory) for the roll out of the industrial Quark-x e-Cat?
2- How long would it take, from start to finish, to complete such a factory?
May I wish you total success of, and satisfaction from your great work.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
When Leonardo Corporation will start the massive distribution of the QuarkX will you continue to serve as the CEO of it?
Cheers,
George
Mr Andrea Rossi,
1- did the circuit of the steam of the 1 MW plant have a “steam trap”?
2- did the test protocol foresee the installation of a steam trap?
3- has IH ever complained the lack of a steam trap during the test?
4- was a steam trap installed initially in the plant and has it eventually been removed by you?
5- has anybody proposed you to install a steam trap before or during the test?
6- have you ever seen a steam trap installed to calculate the performance of a steam generator?
Cheers,
Deb
From you answer #3 to Gerard McEk below, is it correct to understand that you have not yet invented materials to achieve 5 sigma? Or have you solved this problem?
Dear Andrea,
You are trying to achieve 5 Sigma for the QuarkX.
1. Are you still developing this QuarkX
2. or have you chosen the most promising version and are you just testing?
3. Can you tell us what the most challenging aspect is of achieving the 5 Sigma for the QuarkX?
4. Do you expect that the 1MW e-cat plant under construction can be delivered this year to your customer?
5. Are there other plants under construction?
6. If 5 is yes, do these have the same power rating?
Thank you for answering our questions and good luck with everything!
Kind regards, Gerard
Stephen:
Thank you for your kind notes.
1- there are not storage constraints, if the design is properly finalized to this use
2- I don’t think so
3- no
4- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I hope everything continues to go well with you and your team. I’m quite excited about the prospects of the QuarkX. It seems it opens up all kinds of possibilities. And I hope in it self will open up all kinds of new engineering breakthroughs.
I really wish you well with both the 1MW e-cat plants continued production and distribution where it can really help and also the E-Cat QuarkX progressing development.
I have a question if I may that I’m not sure if it has been asked before:
1. Do the QuarkX have storage life time constraints.
That is would it be possible to have say ten QuarkX’s in storage and use one at a time over 10 years.
I’m thinking this could be useful in remote or hard to reach locations. An obvious one is space applications or deeps sea but could also be in a remote light house or radio transponder location, or in a hazardous location such as monitoring equipment for a vulcano or inside sensitive or dangerous equipment where human interference is not desired in a regular basis.
If it is possible to store a QuarkX:
2. is there a theoretical upper life time for storage?
3. Is it robust to a wide range of storage conditions such as temperature or pressure (for example can it be kept unused in space applications until needed?
4. Or are particular storage environments required. Such as particular temperature range, inert environment,EM shielded environment?
If you prefer to answer these questions later I understand but if you can it would be interesting I think.
Robert Dorr:
Yes, I too discovered you are right. Anyway, my Attorneys strongly demanded to me to ignore any provocation on the matter and never, for any reason, talk in the blogs of issues that have to be discussed in Court. I will comply.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think the report that Rupert was referring to was the court document that was released regarding the “Plant Test Plan” of Fabio Penon. This is just a guess.
Greg Leonard:
The litigation is very onerous, but still I am working very hard on the QuarkX.
About the charge recycling: we will recover it for our reactors entirely.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear AR
I do hope that the litigation is not too onerous. We need your brain and energy to be in top condition, so that you can bring us the QuarkX as soon as possible.
One question related to the recycling of the QuarkX: will you be able to recycle all the spent charge, and if so – will you be able to divert the spent Lithium for battery manufacture?
I would hope that your spent Lithium might make safer batteries!
Mr Rossi,
All the papers deposited in Court so far speak clearly in your favour if studied by law experts. Your attorneys are making a good job, but clearly you have evidence against the assumptions that seem to be Cherokee’ s arms.
Regards
Gustav
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
If you win the litigation against Cherokee and IH, how much will be the quote in percentage you will have to pay in federal taxes to the USA and in State taxes to the Florida State?
Can you tell this?
Thanks
Patrick
LookMoo:
The replacement process on the site of the Customers will be very easy, like to change fuses in an electric panel. We will change the reactors, not the charges. Then the reactors will be sent back to our factories to be recharged and eventually recycled.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How complex will the fuel replacement process be for the “home” system??
For most toner printers, you purchase a new toner cassette (toner cartridge), put the the old toner cassette in the same box and use the return label (pre-paid return shipping). The Toner cassette is recycled by the printer manufacturer.
Or will the fuel replacement process require a trained professional with a separate return chain (like due to toxic substances)?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I think everybody has understood that, so far, there is one only person that can bring to the world the LENR.
May God bless you,
Katherine
Gennady:
1- yes
2- the QuarkX would be about one liter of volume
3- we’ll change the whole thing and recharge in our factory
4- enough
5- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Re-your reply which goes like this:
>>
Albert Ellul:
Thank you for your kind words.
1- yes
2- I hope by 2017
Warm Regards,
A.R.
<<
2017 is, in industrial terms, tomorrow. Let's say it will be by the end of 2017, would that mean that industries would be able to purchase heat-generating Quark-x e-Cats to produce process hot water, steam, power steam turbines-alternators and generate electricity at 1 cent a kWh?
That would be fantastic, a game changer, a massive energy paradigm shift equivalent to the invention of fire itself.
Good luck and ad multos annos.
Dear Andrea,
The Sunday edition of EGO OUT can be read here
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-30-2016-lenr-info.html
I hope a better week is coming for readers and you
(I am also a reader here)
Cheers,
Peter
Albert Ellul:
Thank you for your kind words.
1- yes
2- I hope by 2017
Warm Regards,
A.R.
George:
I hope so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Today you replied thus to Jeremy:
“The industrial application is close to obtain the safety certification, the domestic not yet.”
My questions are:
1-Does this highly successful development mean that you are close to commence the industrial set-up (that is a factory) for the roll out of the industrial Quark-x e-Cat?
2- How long would it take, from start to finish, to complete such a factory?
May I wish you total success of, and satisfaction from your great work.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
When Leonardo Corporation will start the massive distribution of the QuarkX will you continue to serve as the CEO of it?
Cheers,
George
Deb:
1- no
2- no
3- no
4- no
5- no
6- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yuppy:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Now at 12.48 P.M. of Sunday October 30 the situation is good and stable. Still in good standing to approach Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jeremy:
The industrial application is close to obtain the safety certification, the domestic not yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can the QuarkX be considered substantially safe?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Update?
Mr Andrea Rossi,
1- did the circuit of the steam of the 1 MW plant have a “steam trap”?
2- did the test protocol foresee the installation of a steam trap?
3- has IH ever complained the lack of a steam trap during the test?
4- was a steam trap installed initially in the plant and has it eventually been removed by you?
5- has anybody proposed you to install a steam trap before or during the test?
6- have you ever seen a steam trap installed to calculate the performance of a steam generator?
Cheers,
Deb
Dear Andrea:
Is your new Partner glad with the QuarkX as it is developing?
Yuppy
Frank Acland:
I meant that we had to invent materials.
Problem resolved.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
From you answer #3 to Gerard McEk below, is it correct to understand that you have not yet invented materials to achieve 5 sigma? Or have you solved this problem?
Thank you very much,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
My blog for this weekend day is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-29-2016-lenr-info.html
Friendliest greetings Evviva LENR+
Peter
Gerard McEk:
1- yes
2- no
3- materials to be invented
4- n.a.
5- yes
6- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You are trying to achieve 5 Sigma for the QuarkX.
1. Are you still developing this QuarkX
2. or have you chosen the most promising version and are you just testing?
3. Can you tell us what the most challenging aspect is of achieving the 5 Sigma for the QuarkX?
4. Do you expect that the 1MW e-cat plant under construction can be delivered this year to your customer?
5. Are there other plants under construction?
6. If 5 is yes, do these have the same power rating?
Thank you for answering our questions and good luck with everything!
Kind regards, Gerard
JPR:
Right now ( 09.00 A.M. of October 29 ) the situation is good and stable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Niklas Hjalmarsson:
yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
Thank you for your kind notes.
1- there are not storage constraints, if the design is properly finalized to this use
2- I don’t think so
3- no
4- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Seymour:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,Is it confirmed that the QuarkX module will have a rating of 20W?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I hope everything continues to go well with you and your team. I’m quite excited about the prospects of the QuarkX. It seems it opens up all kinds of possibilities. And I hope in it self will open up all kinds of new engineering breakthroughs.
I really wish you well with both the 1MW e-cat plants continued production and distribution where it can really help and also the E-Cat QuarkX progressing development.
I have a question if I may that I’m not sure if it has been asked before:
1. Do the QuarkX have storage life time constraints.
That is would it be possible to have say ten QuarkX’s in storage and use one at a time over 10 years.
I’m thinking this could be useful in remote or hard to reach locations. An obvious one is space applications or deeps sea but could also be in a remote light house or radio transponder location, or in a hazardous location such as monitoring equipment for a vulcano or inside sensitive or dangerous equipment where human interference is not desired in a regular basis.
If it is possible to store a QuarkX:
2. is there a theoretical upper life time for storage?
3. Is it robust to a wide range of storage conditions such as temperature or pressure (for example can it be kept unused in space applications until needed?
4. Or are particular storage environments required. Such as particular temperature range, inert environment,EM shielded environment?
If you prefer to answer these questions later I understand but if you can it would be interesting I think.
Best Regards
Stephen
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you measuring the electromagnetic fields outside the QuarkX?
Thanks,
Niklas
Mr Rossi,
Update?
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Dorr:
Yes, I too discovered you are right. Anyway, my Attorneys strongly demanded to me to ignore any provocation on the matter and never, for any reason, talk in the blogs of issues that have to be discussed in Court. I will comply.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
I think the report that Rupert was referring to was the court document that was released regarding the “Plant Test Plan” of Fabio Penon. This is just a guess.
Keep up your great work.
Sincerely,
Robert Dorr
Dear Andrea,
Today I wrote this issue of EGO OUT
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-28-2016-lenr-fighting-anti.html
All the best to you ad readers- I sincerely hope they will join the fight against the evil destroyers.
Peter
Patrick:
In total the percentage is about the 40% of the net income.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Gustav:
I cannot comment in the blogs anything that has to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Oscar:
We are wrrking very well also today, still approaching Sigma5.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Greg Leonard:
The litigation is very onerous, but still I am working very hard on the QuarkX.
About the charge recycling: we will recover it for our reactors entirely.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear AR
I do hope that the litigation is not too onerous. We need your brain and energy to be in top condition, so that you can bring us the QuarkX as soon as possible.
One question related to the recycling of the QuarkX: will you be able to recycle all the spent charge, and if so – will you be able to divert the spent Lithium for battery manufacture?
I would hope that your spent Lithium might make safer batteries!
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Update?
Mr Rossi,
All the papers deposited in Court so far speak clearly in your favour if studied by law experts. Your attorneys are making a good job, but clearly you have evidence against the assumptions that seem to be Cherokee’ s arms.
Regards
Gustav
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
If you win the litigation against Cherokee and IH, how much will be the quote in percentage you will have to pay in federal taxes to the USA and in State taxes to the Florida State?
Can you tell this?
Thanks
Patrick
LookMoo:
The replacement process on the site of the Customers will be very easy, like to change fuses in an electric panel. We will change the reactors, not the charges. Then the reactors will be sent back to our factories to be recharged and eventually recycled.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Katherine:
Thank you for your encouragement to our Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi,
How complex will the fuel replacement process be for the “home” system??
For most toner printers, you purchase a new toner cassette (toner cartridge), put the the old toner cassette in the same box and use the return label (pre-paid return shipping). The Toner cassette is recycled by the printer manufacturer.
Or will the fuel replacement process require a trained professional with a separate return chain (like due to toxic substances)?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I think everybody has understood that, so far, there is one only person that can bring to the world the LENR.
May God bless you,
Katherine
Eugene:
With exception of them who fall in love.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giuseppe:
Substantially, what you say is correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gennady:
1- yes
2- the QuarkX would be about one liter of volume
3- we’ll change the whole thing and recharge in our factory
4- enough
5- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr Andrea Rossi,
A question of Physics, a challenge, if you want: is gravitation responsible for everything that falls?
All the best,
Eugene