reading the complaint that there is a possibility that Industrial Heat
or Cherokee Investment Partners did not have access to 89 million at the
time of your agreement?
could this have been the lack of interest in their validation ?
Donald Rarang:
No, I do not. Hydro power plant, if obtained from artificial lakes, generate a strong, normally ignored, pollution caused by the bacteria that produce contaminants from substances that exposed to air are innocuous and that are accumulated in centuries in the localities that are submerged. For example methyl mercury, that eventually enter in the food cycle through the fishes.
No energy source among the existing ones is without sin…also in this case we could say “who is without sins cast the first stone”. Obviously, it is a matter of ratio between pros and cons for every one of them. But a cost is always there, also in environmantal terms.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
I agree with you.
The Shroedinger Cat paradox more than a paradox seems to me a probabilistic spectrum.
Born from the EPR paradox, it transfers the linear combination of e.p. into the macro reality, wherein virtualities are not existent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You say you need alternating current– that’s fairly easy to make from DC power & a little bit of electronics. I’m assuming you don’t need a whole lot of power (watts) for a 20w device– is it that you need a relatively high voltage as well?
Dear Andrea,
When I studied physics, I remember that Schrödinger’s cat didn’t feel like a paradox. I remember thinking: OK, the cat is dead and alive to the observer in this seutp, but so what. The professor tried to convince me that it’s a paradox because the cat is such a cute creature, but I still didn’t get it, and still don’t.
I would be curious to know, since you own cats: does the Schrödinger cat feel like a physics paradox to you, or not?
best regards, /pekka
Italo R.:
That’s an interesting interpretation of the Schroedinger paradox.
Anyway remember that in Physics nothing is impossible, everything is associated to a probability number and complacency is always a very dangerous attitude.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I agree with you: the dummy concept is ridiculous. It is like to make a car without engine and compare it with its twin car with engine to give evidence that it is more efficient than a horse.
Godspeed,
Eliseo
Sorry Ron, that is not correct, Clinton has more votes and predictions are that 63.4 million Americans will have voted for Mrs Clinton and 61.2 million for Mr Trump.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
It seems to me that the IH attorneys with their enormously increasing in complexity and quantity of produced pages, are trying to explain the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox, wanting to demonstrate that the E-Cat is dead (or never born) AND alive in the same time. Mission impossible…
Mr. Leonard,
If I may be permitted to answer your question concerning the US electoral college. The writers of the constitution voted to establish the system to protect the smaller states. It was decided to assign each state delegates based on their population. For example, in the 1700’s that amounted to 1 delegate for each 10,000 citizens in that state. In the beginning the president was decided by which candidate got the majority of the delegate vote and the vice president the second number of delegate votes. There was no party’s at that time and the number of candidates was not limited. This process is similar to how the structure is set up in the US Senate and the House of Representatives. Each State is allotted 2 Senators only and the House is allotted by the states population. They both are elected within districts within their states. That is one of the reasons the US census is so important, it determines the population by district and state.
Now that the weather is getting colder, I thought I’d ask:
1) Is the power required by the QuarkX, including control electronics, sufficiently small that a small household rechargeable battery could power it?
2) Would the direct electric output of the QuarkX be sufficient to maintain a charge on that rechargeable battery?
In particular, I was thinking that a 20W QuarkX could (someday) be used to make a wonderful hand warmer. (Suitable even for climates a lot colder than NM! 🙂
Given Trump’s likely 74 elector final majority in the Electoral College – 306 versus 232 – it is inconceivable so many would break their pledge so as to elect Hillary Clinton. If even one did so, it would likely produce a constitutional earthquake.
Greg Leonard:
I approve the answer Dr Andrea Rossi gave you, besides it is not true that Hillary Clinton has got more votes than Donald Trump. It is true the contrary.
Cheers,
Ron
Greg Leonard:
The technology to calculate the votes is already there and works well. The electoral system in the USA is very intelligent, and is studied to make extremely important also the small states that do not have a big population. Otherwise the attention of the candidates would focus only in the highly populated states. With this system also the points born by the small states can decide the result of the election. It is not easy to understand, but it is genial. In any way, these are the rules shared by all the People, therefore must be respected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hermes Atar Trismegistus:
1- I deem this mumbojumbo totally useless, since the dummy is intrinsecally given from any competitive system that has not the same COP
2- yes
3- yes
4- I don’t see the point: for my analysis I use the oscilloscope, for a demo it is useless because gives information we are not supposed to give
5- you bet
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Albert McFan:
Iknow very well the matter and I can get rapidly the essence of a page to make the Attorneys go straight to the point without losing time in repetitions. I am a sort of a “catalyzer”. Surely I returned to work 16 hours per day, due to the litigation on course and the Sigma5 to reach with the Quark.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1- Have you decided to use a dummy reactor without the fuel
and hook both your QuarkX and the dummy to two equal power sources?
2- Is it possible for you
to patent the control circuit?
3- Does a oscilloscope reveal too much of your control circuit?
4- Maybe you can use multimeters instead?
5- If one thouches your QuarkX with his fingers does he get burned?
The cars of the future will be electric.
The battery limit is the length and weight.
Putting quarkx in a car you can overcome these limitations?
thank you
Dear AR,
It is unfortunate that Clinton gains the majority of all the votes cast, but Trump becomes President.
The current system is an accident of history – I don’t think it is actually written into the constitution.
Now we have the technology to calculate the popular vote throughout the USA, perhaps it is time to change the conventions.
It is possible that the Electoral College will vote for Clinton, but highly unlikely.
Update?
Roslyn Abrams:
I cannot comment issues related to the litigation.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Today’s weekstart issue of my blog is this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-14-2016-lenr-info.html
Wish you the best, fast,
peter
Dr Rossi,
reading the complaint that there is a possibility that Industrial Heat
or Cherokee Investment Partners did not have access to 89 million at the
time of your agreement?
could this have been the lack of interest in their validation ?
Patrick Ellul:
No, I did not, I was referring to none in particular.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
But the Ecat does not have sins, does it?
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Have you already chosen the ABB robots able to assemble 50 thousands of Quarkx or more in a plant?
Cheers
Jordan
Mr Rossi,
Did you have any public funding for the E-Cat in the USA?
Thanks
Alfredo
Dear Andrea,
Donald Rarang never mentioned Hydro. Whh did you assume he was talking about Hydro? 😉
Patrick
Donald Rarang:
No, I do not. Hydro power plant, if obtained from artificial lakes, generate a strong, normally ignored, pollution caused by the bacteria that produce contaminants from substances that exposed to air are innocuous and that are accumulated in centuries in the localities that are submerged. For example methyl mercury, that eventually enter in the food cycle through the fishes.
No energy source among the existing ones is without sin…also in this case we could say “who is without sins cast the first stone”. Obviously, it is a matter of ratio between pros and cons for every one of them. But a cost is always there, also in environmantal terms.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you agree on the fact that the most economic and environmentally safe and correct source of energy?
Pekka Janhunen:
I agree with you.
The Shroedinger Cat paradox more than a paradox seems to me a probabilistic spectrum.
Born from the EPR paradox, it transfers the linear combination of e.p. into the macro reality, wherein virtualities are not existent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
WaltC:
It is not that simple.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John Atkinson:
I totally agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Some kind of Sunday edition of EGO OUT
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-13-2016-lenr-says-no-to-dfeatism.html
A fine great coming week!
Peter
Dear Andrea,
Thanks for the answer on the hand warmer idea.
You say you need alternating current– that’s fairly easy to make from DC power & a little bit of electronics. I’m assuming you don’t need a whole lot of power (watts) for a 20w device– is it that you need a relatively high voltage as well?
Thanks,
WaltC
Dear Andrea,
When I studied physics, I remember that Schrödinger’s cat didn’t feel like a paradox. I remember thinking: OK, the cat is dead and alive to the observer in this seutp, but so what. The professor tried to convince me that it’s a paradox because the cat is such a cute creature, but I still didn’t get it, and still don’t.
I would be curious to know, since you own cats: does the Schrödinger cat feel like a physics paradox to you, or not?
best regards, /pekka
WaltC:
1- We need alternate current
2- see above
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
That’s an interesting interpretation of the Schroedinger paradox.
Anyway remember that in Physics nothing is impossible, everything is associated to a probability number and complacency is always a very dangerous attitude.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
The market decides where and when to apply a technology based on its convenience. Competition.
Watm Regards,
A.R.
Eliseo Alperin:
Exactly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I agree with you: the dummy concept is ridiculous. It is like to make a car without engine and compare it with its twin car with engine to give evidence that it is more efficient than a horse.
Godspeed,
Eliseo
Dear dr. Andrea Rossi,
If they want to create jobs by digging out coal or drilling for gas, then your invention will not be popular. I hope that the DNA code of your baby is distributed worldwide. Not for the jobs, but for the world.
Epoché Regards,
Koen
Sorry Ron, that is not correct, Clinton has more votes and predictions are that 63.4 million Americans will have voted for Mrs Clinton and 61.2 million for Mr Trump.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
It seems to me that the IH attorneys with their enormously increasing in complexity and quantity of produced pages, are trying to explain the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox, wanting to demonstrate that the E-Cat is dead (or never born) AND alive in the same time. Mission impossible…
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Mr. Leonard,
If I may be permitted to answer your question concerning the US electoral college. The writers of the constitution voted to establish the system to protect the smaller states. It was decided to assign each state delegates based on their population. For example, in the 1700’s that amounted to 1 delegate for each 10,000 citizens in that state. In the beginning the president was decided by which candidate got the majority of the delegate vote and the vice president the second number of delegate votes. There was no party’s at that time and the number of candidates was not limited. This process is similar to how the structure is set up in the US Senate and the House of Representatives. Each State is allotted 2 Senators only and the House is allotted by the states population. They both are elected within districts within their states. That is one of the reasons the US census is so important, it determines the population by district and state.
Dear RON McCLERTON
CNN Vote Count:
Clinton 60,892.368
Trump – 60,294,775
= 597,593 more votes for Clinton
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale
Dear Andrea,
Now that the weather is getting colder, I thought I’d ask:
1) Is the power required by the QuarkX, including control electronics, sufficiently small that a small household rechargeable battery could power it?
2) Would the direct electric output of the QuarkX be sufficient to maintain a charge on that rechargeable battery?
In particular, I was thinking that a 20W QuarkX could (someday) be used to make a wonderful hand warmer. (Suitable even for climates a lot colder than NM! 🙂
Thanks, WaltC
Rodney Nicholson:
I agree.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Wikipedia on the subject of the Electoral College (which most probably is accurate):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)
Given Trump’s likely 74 elector final majority in the Electoral College – 306 versus 232 – it is inconceivable so many would break their pledge so as to elect Hillary Clinton. If even one did so, it would likely produce a constitutional earthquake.
Rodney.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Greg Leonard:
I approve the answer Dr Andrea Rossi gave you, besides it is not true that Hillary Clinton has got more votes than Donald Trump. It is true the contrary.
Cheers,
Ron
Dear Andrea,
This Saturday edition of my Blog is about our world haunted by and blessed with Big Data.
Let’s use the blessing part.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-12-2016-lenr-big-data-properly.html
A perfect weekend to you and Readers,
yours,
peter
Greg Leonard:
The technology to calculate the votes is already there and works well. The electoral system in the USA is very intelligent, and is studied to make extremely important also the small states that do not have a big population. Otherwise the attention of the candidates would focus only in the highly populated states. With this system also the points born by the small states can decide the result of the election. It is not easy to understand, but it is genial. In any way, these are the rules shared by all the People, therefore must be respected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
MoMo:
I do not know.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hermes Atar Trismegistus:
1- I deem this mumbojumbo totally useless, since the dummy is intrinsecally given from any competitive system that has not the same COP
2- yes
3- yes
4- I don’t see the point: for my analysis I use the oscilloscope, for a demo it is useless because gives information we are not supposed to give
5- you bet
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Albert McFan:
Iknow very well the matter and I can get rapidly the essence of a page to make the Attorneys go straight to the point without losing time in repetitions. I am a sort of a “catalyzer”. Surely I returned to work 16 hours per day, due to the litigation on course and the Sigma5 to reach with the Quark.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today we are glad.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Don Heckerman:
That’s an elementary democratic principle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr Rossi:
I like what you said about the riots to get a “President a’ la carte”!
Cheers,
Don
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How much takes you to go through 700 000 pages from the litigation ????
Cheers,
Albert
Dear Andrea Rossi,
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/11/06/rossi-plans-two-presentations-of-quarkx-sweden-and-usa/
1- Have you decided to use a dummy reactor without the fuel
and hook both your QuarkX and the dummy to two equal power sources?
2- Is it possible for you
to patent the control circuit?
3- Does a oscilloscope reveal too much of your control circuit?
4- Maybe you can use multimeters instead?
5- If one thouches your QuarkX with his fingers does he get burned?
Good Luck with your QuarkX!
The cars of the future will be electric.
The battery limit is the length and weight.
Putting quarkx in a car you can overcome these limitations?
thank you
Dear AR,
It is unfortunate that Clinton gains the majority of all the votes cast, but Trump becomes President.
The current system is an accident of history – I don’t think it is actually written into the constitution.
Now we have the technology to calculate the popular vote throughout the USA, perhaps it is time to change the conventions.
It is possible that the Electoral College will vote for Clinton, but highly unlikely.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rodney Nicholson:
I totally agree with you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.