United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

13,122 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Good standing resists.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chris Paul:
    It is true.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chris Paul

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I appreciate your answer to Bob Dylan. By the way, we can also observe that the potential to make work of the entropy decreases in time, therefore the probabilities to make order decrease in time.
    Cheers
    Chris

  • Joe Klecko

    Dear Andrea:
    As of today, how many probabilities are there that within February 2017 important information will be released concerning your work?

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    Thank you for your comments that acknowlage God bringing order to a world of disorder. Your public statement brings glory to God by you proclaiming him as the author. Truly His works are full of wonder, but it is an unusual privelage for you to personally see His creation dominating the outcome of your experiments. He controls the probability of the outcomes, and you can personally can see His works. What a wonderful thing that must be.

    Congratulations on your power of observation!

    Warm Regards,

    Tom

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerd:
    Thank you for your kind attention to our work.
    Nobody more than me has the insight of the urgency, but a premature attack could be devastating. We are doing well, though and I think very good news are in the horizon.
    About my comment: it fits with the view of an objective approach.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerd

    Your answer to Dylan Larkin today is, what I admit, very close to my heart.

    Did You see and feel, that it fits in with the view of an agnostic position and the view of a humanitarian position more than with the view from the christian or catholic point of view?

    I wish You all the best, I support You since years, but what i miss from Your side is the insight of the need of urgency in these times.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    My blog issue for today
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-24-2016-lenr.html

    Happy Thanksgiving to all our US based readers!

    Sincerely,
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dylan Larkin:
    I use to rehearse daily on the foundamentals of Physics, to have them always at hand, and today was dedicated to the concept of entropy, related to the second law of thermodynamics.
    For the first time I discovered here another evidence of the work of God. Think to entropy: its concept is based on the fact that the disorder unavoidably tends to increase, if a force does not intervene to put order, because the number of disordered combinations is infinite, while the number of combinations that allow an ordered system are very limited.
    This having been said, just follow me: if I get in the Universe random matter and casual forces, the probabilities that it turns out casually a Universe with the harmony of laws that we know are zero, because the probabilities of it, under a mathematical point of view, are not existent as well as it is impossible that the entropy proceeds spontaneously toward a major order than before the initial observation. Let me make an example: if I pour the ink from a glass into a series of paper sheets, the probability that all I get is stained papers is 100% ( second law of thermodynamics-> Entropy ), while the probabilities that the falling ink goes, without any control from outside, to organize itself to form a poem of Shakespeare or a song of Bob Dylan are 0%, or, to be more precise, zero point many, many zeroes before a 1.
    To say that some form of Divinity does not exist is not just “wrong”: it is anti-scientific, because it violates the second thermodynamic law.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bernie Koppenhofer:
    Likewise to you and your family!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Bernie Koppenhofer

    Dr. Rossi: Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family and staff.

  • Dylan Larkin

    Dr Andrea Rossi
    Which is your meditation for Thanksgiving Day?

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Still in good standing, still approaching Sigma5.
    By the way: several Readers are complaining that every day you or others ask about the good standing of the QuarkX: I take adventage of this comment of yours to answer all of them that I don’t see why it should be wrong to ask for a daily update about a so unpredictable issue.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mike:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Irving:
    An atom is about 100 trillionths the size of a brick.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Julie Johnston:
    Right now I am with the QuarkX, will remain for several hours, then I will celebrate my Thanksgiving to God.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dennis Smith:
    You are correct.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Vince:
    Thank you and again wishes of a Great Thanksgiving to all our American Readers.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Vince

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Happy Thanksgiving Day to you and your Team, from all of us of the silent majority that believe in your work!

  • Dennis Smith

    Dr Andrea Rossi
    If I have well understood, you alternate the on and off switch period of the Quarkxes to have a constant power, but, at the same time, a proper cooling period for each Quarkx. Your problem is that you have a too high temperature in a too small volume, so that the heat exchanging surface is not enough to remove the heat on time before the meltdown. Did I get it?
    Have a great Thanksgiving Day,
    Dennis

  • Julie Johnston

    Mr Andrea Rossi
    Are you working also today?
    Cheers,
    Julie

  • Irving

    How can a module as small as the Quarkx be combined to reach megawatts of power?

  • Mike

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    As you suggested, I navigated through http://www.ingandrearossi.com
    Very interesting.
    Mike

  • Andrea Rossi

    John Fitzpatrick:
    Sure I will!
    And I wish with all my heart a peaceful and great Thanksgiving Day to all our American Readers !!!
    Andrea Rossi

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR
    Still in good standing, thanks God.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    That is, as you correctly say, a “nice side effect”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rupert:
    I am working hard for it.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kevin Volland:
    For a complete understanding of it, please go to
    http://www.ingandrearossi.com
    Also the books of Mats Lewan ( An Impossible Invention ) and of Vessela Nikolova ( Ecat The New Fire ) give good information about it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Albert Ellul:
    He,he,he…Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    1- this information will be given when the QuarkX will be presented
    2- n.a.
    3- no
    4- many thousands
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bernie Morrissey:
    No
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- no
    2- yes
    3- no
    4- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • John Fitzpatrick

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Will you celebrate Thanksgiving Day tomorrow?
    Cheers
    John

  • Dear Andrea,

    I see you qare working hard, so all my crossable parts crosssed for you..

    Please receive todays Ego Out link here:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-23-2016-lenr-as-source-of.html

    Success!!!

    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Toninelli:
    So far it is more economically convenient to turn it into heat inside the QuarkX.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Janne:
    51%
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Janne

    Dear Andrea,

    You said:

    Andrea Rossi
    November 22, 2016 at 8:00 PM
    Janne:
    I answered “yes” to a possibility, not to something I was certain of.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

    Be that as it may, we know routinely refer to the “February 2017” date. In that case, how sure are you at this time that you will make the presentation by then? 40%, 50%?

    Best Regards,

    Janne

  • Dear Andrea,
    I have read on this blog from you that the use of the direct electricity produced by the reator “remains confined inside the reactor increasing the heat”.

    -1 Could you please elaborate more on the reasons of the impossibility of using this electricity outside. For physical, technical o technological reasons?

    -2 Can you confirm that actually it is non possible to use this electricity directly (outside the reactor)

    Thank you,
    All our support from Ecatnews.it Italy.
    Regards

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Further to Hank Mills, I have some additional questions about the QuarkX:
    You once replied to me that it was easier to control a thousand 20W Quarks than one E-cat X of 20 kW.
    1. Don’t individual QuarkX’s need an individual electric control connection if used in a cluster?
    2. Have you ever tried and succeeded to control a cluster?
    3. Have you already produced QuarkX clusters with robots?
    4. Is the choice of the new and more robust reactor wall material one of the reasons to put more focus on heat production and not on light and direct production of electricity?
    Thank you for answering our questions.
    I wish you success with the 5 Sigma test.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Bernie Morrissey

    Dear Andrea Rossi
    Have any robots arrived at the Factory?
    Bernie

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    1) Will a Quark with a continuous 20 watt output require more or less than a one watt constant input?

    2) Do you have a rough estimate of the material cost of a single 20 watt Quark — perhaps less than a dollar?

    3) Have you ever detected an alpha particle being emitted from the reactions inside the Quark?

    4) What is the maximum number of times you have turned a single Quark on and off successfully, without significant degradation of the excess heat? A hundred times? A thousand?

  • Albert Ellul

    I hope that one fine day in February 2017, F8 will transform into F1, the Formula 1 of energy production.

  • Kevin Volland

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    The puppets, not having other arguments, are retrieving the story about the problems you had in Italy 30 years ago…they stink!
    Do not care and continue your great job
    Kevin

  • Rupert

    Dear Andrea Rossi
    We all can’t wait to see the presentation of the QuarkX. Please make it possible in February, not later,
    Cheers,
    Rupert

  • Marco

    Dear Andrea,

    I see a nice side effect of having small 20W subunits that must be assembled by a robotized line: they require that robot line to be economically viable. Another obstacle to wannabe competitors or patent “breakers”. They must have also a robotized line and not only living in a country that does not respect patents or workers… They could have thousand of low wage slaves, but without a robotized line, this is not viable… They can’t beat your price.

    Is this one of the reasons to have small 20W units, or is just a nice side effect?

    Best regards,
    Marco.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>