Dr Andrea Rossi,
I appreciate your answer to Bob Dylan. By the way, we can also observe that the potential to make work of the entropy decreases in time, therefore the probabilities to make order decrease in time.
Cheers
Chris
Thank you for your comments that acknowlage God bringing order to a world of disorder. Your public statement brings glory to God by you proclaiming him as the author. Truly His works are full of wonder, but it is an unusual privelage for you to personally see His creation dominating the outcome of your experiments. He controls the probability of the outcomes, and you can personally can see His works. What a wonderful thing that must be.
Gerd:
Thank you for your kind attention to our work.
Nobody more than me has the insight of the urgency, but a premature attack could be devastating. We are doing well, though and I think very good news are in the horizon.
About my comment: it fits with the view of an objective approach.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Your answer to Dylan Larkin today is, what I admit, very close to my heart.
Did You see and feel, that it fits in with the view of an agnostic position and the view of a humanitarian position more than with the view from the christian or catholic point of view?
I wish You all the best, I support You since years, but what i miss from Your side is the insight of the need of urgency in these times.
Dylan Larkin:
I use to rehearse daily on the foundamentals of Physics, to have them always at hand, and today was dedicated to the concept of entropy, related to the second law of thermodynamics.
For the first time I discovered here another evidence of the work of God. Think to entropy: its concept is based on the fact that the disorder unavoidably tends to increase, if a force does not intervene to put order, because the number of disordered combinations is infinite, while the number of combinations that allow an ordered system are very limited.
This having been said, just follow me: if I get in the Universe random matter and casual forces, the probabilities that it turns out casually a Universe with the harmony of laws that we know are zero, because the probabilities of it, under a mathematical point of view, are not existent as well as it is impossible that the entropy proceeds spontaneously toward a major order than before the initial observation. Let me make an example: if I pour the ink from a glass into a series of paper sheets, the probability that all I get is stained papers is 100% ( second law of thermodynamics-> Entropy ), while the probabilities that the falling ink goes, without any control from outside, to organize itself to form a poem of Shakespeare or a song of Bob Dylan are 0%, or, to be more precise, zero point many, many zeroes before a 1.
To say that some form of Divinity does not exist is not just “wrong”: it is anti-scientific, because it violates the second thermodynamic law.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still in good standing, still approaching Sigma5.
By the way: several Readers are complaining that every day you or others ask about the good standing of the QuarkX: I take adventage of this comment of yours to answer all of them that I don’t see why it should be wrong to ask for a daily update about a so unpredictable issue.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
If I have well understood, you alternate the on and off switch period of the Quarkxes to have a constant power, but, at the same time, a proper cooling period for each Quarkx. Your problem is that you have a too high temperature in a too small volume, so that the heat exchanging surface is not enough to remove the heat on time before the meltdown. Did I get it?
Have a great Thanksgiving Day,
Dennis
Kevin Volland:
For a complete understanding of it, please go to http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Also the books of Mats Lewan ( An Impossible Invention ) and of Vessela Nikolova ( Ecat The New Fire ) give good information about it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi
November 22, 2016 at 8:00 PM
Janne:
I answered “yes” to a possibility, not to something I was certain of.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Be that as it may, we know routinely refer to the “February 2017” date. In that case, how sure are you at this time that you will make the presentation by then? 40%, 50%?
Dear Andrea,
I have read on this blog from you that the use of the direct electricity produced by the reator “remains confined inside the reactor increasing the heat”.
-1 Could you please elaborate more on the reasons of the impossibility of using this electricity outside. For physical, technical o technological reasons?
-2 Can you confirm that actually it is non possible to use this electricity directly (outside the reactor)
Thank you,
All our support from Ecatnews.it Italy.
Regards
Dear Andrea,
Further to Hank Mills, I have some additional questions about the QuarkX:
You once replied to me that it was easier to control a thousand 20W Quarks than one E-cat X of 20 kW.
1. Don’t individual QuarkX’s need an individual electric control connection if used in a cluster?
2. Have you ever tried and succeeded to control a cluster?
3. Have you already produced QuarkX clusters with robots?
4. Is the choice of the new and more robust reactor wall material one of the reasons to put more focus on heat production and not on light and direct production of electricity?
Thank you for answering our questions.
I wish you success with the 5 Sigma test.
Kind regards, Gerard
1) Will a Quark with a continuous 20 watt output require more or less than a one watt constant input?
2) Do you have a rough estimate of the material cost of a single 20 watt Quark — perhaps less than a dollar?
3) Have you ever detected an alpha particle being emitted from the reactions inside the Quark?
4) What is the maximum number of times you have turned a single Quark on and off successfully, without significant degradation of the excess heat? A hundred times? A thousand?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The puppets, not having other arguments, are retrieving the story about the problems you had in Italy 30 years ago…they stink!
Do not care and continue your great job
Kevin
I see a nice side effect of having small 20W subunits that must be assembled by a robotized line: they require that robot line to be economically viable. Another obstacle to wannabe competitors or patent “breakers”. They must have also a robotized line and not only living in a country that does not respect patents or workers… They could have thousand of low wage slaves, but without a robotized line, this is not viable… They can’t beat your price.
Is this one of the reasons to have small 20W units, or is just a nice side effect?
JPR:
Good standing resists.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chris Paul:
It is true.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I appreciate your answer to Bob Dylan. By the way, we can also observe that the potential to make work of the entropy decreases in time, therefore the probabilities to make order decrease in time.
Cheers
Chris
Update?
Dear Andrea:
As of today, how many probabilities are there that within February 2017 important information will be released concerning your work?
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your comments that acknowlage God bringing order to a world of disorder. Your public statement brings glory to God by you proclaiming him as the author. Truly His works are full of wonder, but it is an unusual privelage for you to personally see His creation dominating the outcome of your experiments. He controls the probability of the outcomes, and you can personally can see His works. What a wonderful thing that must be.
Congratulations on your power of observation!
Warm Regards,
Tom
Gerd:
Thank you for your kind attention to our work.
Nobody more than me has the insight of the urgency, but a premature attack could be devastating. We are doing well, though and I think very good news are in the horizon.
About my comment: it fits with the view of an objective approach.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Your answer to Dylan Larkin today is, what I admit, very close to my heart.
Did You see and feel, that it fits in with the view of an agnostic position and the view of a humanitarian position more than with the view from the christian or catholic point of view?
I wish You all the best, I support You since years, but what i miss from Your side is the insight of the need of urgency in these times.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
My blog issue for today
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-24-2016-lenr.html
Happy Thanksgiving to all our US based readers!
Sincerely,
peter
Dylan Larkin:
I use to rehearse daily on the foundamentals of Physics, to have them always at hand, and today was dedicated to the concept of entropy, related to the second law of thermodynamics.
For the first time I discovered here another evidence of the work of God. Think to entropy: its concept is based on the fact that the disorder unavoidably tends to increase, if a force does not intervene to put order, because the number of disordered combinations is infinite, while the number of combinations that allow an ordered system are very limited.
This having been said, just follow me: if I get in the Universe random matter and casual forces, the probabilities that it turns out casually a Universe with the harmony of laws that we know are zero, because the probabilities of it, under a mathematical point of view, are not existent as well as it is impossible that the entropy proceeds spontaneously toward a major order than before the initial observation. Let me make an example: if I pour the ink from a glass into a series of paper sheets, the probability that all I get is stained papers is 100% ( second law of thermodynamics-> Entropy ), while the probabilities that the falling ink goes, without any control from outside, to organize itself to form a poem of Shakespeare or a song of Bob Dylan are 0%, or, to be more precise, zero point many, many zeroes before a 1.
To say that some form of Divinity does not exist is not just “wrong”: it is anti-scientific, because it violates the second thermodynamic law.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Likewise to you and your family!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family and staff.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Which is your meditation for Thanksgiving Day?
JPR:
Still in good standing, still approaching Sigma5.
By the way: several Readers are complaining that every day you or others ask about the good standing of the QuarkX: I take adventage of this comment of yours to answer all of them that I don’t see why it should be wrong to ask for a daily update about a so unpredictable issue.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mike:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Irving:
An atom is about 100 trillionths the size of a brick.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Julie Johnston:
Right now I am with the QuarkX, will remain for several hours, then I will celebrate my Thanksgiving to God.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dennis Smith:
You are correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Vince:
Thank you and again wishes of a Great Thanksgiving to all our American Readers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Happy Thanksgiving Day to you and your Team, from all of us of the silent majority that believe in your work!
Dr Andrea Rossi
If I have well understood, you alternate the on and off switch period of the Quarkxes to have a constant power, but, at the same time, a proper cooling period for each Quarkx. Your problem is that you have a too high temperature in a too small volume, so that the heat exchanging surface is not enough to remove the heat on time before the meltdown. Did I get it?
Have a great Thanksgiving Day,
Dennis
Mr Andrea Rossi
Are you working also today?
Cheers,
Julie
How can a module as small as the Quarkx be combined to reach megawatts of power?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
As you suggested, I navigated through http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Very interesting.
Mike
John Fitzpatrick:
Sure I will!
And I wish with all my heart a peaceful and great Thanksgiving Day to all our American Readers !!!
Andrea Rossi
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
JPR
Still in good standing, thanks God.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco:
That is, as you correctly say, a “nice side effect”.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rupert:
I am working hard for it.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kevin Volland:
For a complete understanding of it, please go to
http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Also the books of Mats Lewan ( An Impossible Invention ) and of Vessela Nikolova ( Ecat The New Fire ) give good information about it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Albert Ellul:
He,he,he…Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hank Mills:
1- this information will be given when the QuarkX will be presented
2- n.a.
3- no
4- many thousands
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Morrissey:
No
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
1- no
2- yes
3- no
4- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Will you celebrate Thanksgiving Day tomorrow?
Cheers
John
Dear Andrea,
I see you qare working hard, so all my crossable parts crosssed for you..
Please receive todays Ego Out link here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-23-2016-lenr-as-source-of.html
Success!!!
Peter
Alessandro Toninelli:
So far it is more economically convenient to turn it into heat inside the QuarkX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Janne:
51%
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You said:
Andrea Rossi
November 22, 2016 at 8:00 PM
Janne:
I answered “yes” to a possibility, not to something I was certain of.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Be that as it may, we know routinely refer to the “February 2017” date. In that case, how sure are you at this time that you will make the presentation by then? 40%, 50%?
Best Regards,
Janne
Dear Andrea,
I have read on this blog from you that the use of the direct electricity produced by the reator “remains confined inside the reactor increasing the heat”.
-1 Could you please elaborate more on the reasons of the impossibility of using this electricity outside. For physical, technical o technological reasons?
-2 Can you confirm that actually it is non possible to use this electricity directly (outside the reactor)
Thank you,
All our support from Ecatnews.it Italy.
Regards
Dear Andrea,
Further to Hank Mills, I have some additional questions about the QuarkX:
You once replied to me that it was easier to control a thousand 20W Quarks than one E-cat X of 20 kW.
1. Don’t individual QuarkX’s need an individual electric control connection if used in a cluster?
2. Have you ever tried and succeeded to control a cluster?
3. Have you already produced QuarkX clusters with robots?
4. Is the choice of the new and more robust reactor wall material one of the reasons to put more focus on heat production and not on light and direct production of electricity?
Thank you for answering our questions.
I wish you success with the 5 Sigma test.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea Rossi
Have any robots arrived at the Factory?
Bernie
Dear Andrea,
1) Will a Quark with a continuous 20 watt output require more or less than a one watt constant input?
2) Do you have a rough estimate of the material cost of a single 20 watt Quark — perhaps less than a dollar?
3) Have you ever detected an alpha particle being emitted from the reactions inside the Quark?
4) What is the maximum number of times you have turned a single Quark on and off successfully, without significant degradation of the excess heat? A hundred times? A thousand?
I hope that one fine day in February 2017, F8 will transform into F1, the Formula 1 of energy production.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The puppets, not having other arguments, are retrieving the story about the problems you had in Italy 30 years ago…they stink!
Do not care and continue your great job
Kevin
Dear Andrea Rossi
We all can’t wait to see the presentation of the QuarkX. Please make it possible in February, not later,
Cheers,
Rupert
Update?
Dear Andrea,
I see a nice side effect of having small 20W subunits that must be assembled by a robotized line: they require that robot line to be economically viable. Another obstacle to wannabe competitors or patent “breakers”. They must have also a robotized line and not only living in a country that does not respect patents or workers… They could have thousand of low wage slaves, but without a robotized line, this is not viable… They can’t beat your price.
Is this one of the reasons to have small 20W units, or is just a nice side effect?
Best regards,
Marco.