Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi.
What delays the entry of the E-Cat Household heaters?
The absence of a patent?
The lack of a security certificate?
Unavailability of production?
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Thank you to find the time to answer, even in this period so stressing for you. Please regard your health. Should anything bad happen to you, is your personal IP stored someway to save it?
God bless you,
Yes, you are right and I am sorry.
The problem is that in these days, in particular this week, the activity with my Attorneys is enormous, we are going through thousands of documents and I am working for this most of my time, reserving the night for the QuarkX. This is a period of enormous effort in the context of the litigation. At the same time the work on the QuarkX has to be made: fortunately, my Team is great. Anyway, I answer late, but still answer every day to all, with great pleasure, as soon as I have some free moment.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
We noticed that you are answering with a delay of many hours to the comments of the readers in these days. Any particular reason?
Thank you for the link,
Thank you for reminding F8: sometime I forget…
Thank you for your link,
Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi.
Your religion and Faith in God is impressive.
I am an agnostic, but I envy your Faith.
I believe that reaching 5 sigma is very much time related but possibly also related to the test program you have to perform. I am sure that it may take more time in case things go wrong, but can you tell:
1. Is February the shortest estimated time that you can perform the 5 Sigma test or
If some things take shorter:
2. The 5 Sigma may be reached earlier?
In both cases assuming F8, of course
Thank you for answering our questions and again good luck with the tests!
Kind regards, Gerard
What will be the subject of the publication you hope to produce in 2017?
Dear Dr. Rossi.
Do you consider “quark X” jet engines? For atmospheric and (or) rockets?
Or energy for electric jet or direct heating for atmospheric motors or electric power generation for the rockets?
It’s great to hear that you’re on the way to 5 sigma with the Quark(x). I know you are extremely busy with product development as well as the IH lawsuit. A fascinating read is “The Wright Brothers” by David McCullough,a NY Times best seller. After recently reading this documentary, I was amazed by the Wright brothers unending work ethic and their determination and perseverance to achieve human flight that was deemed impossible after centuries of futile attempts. Their successful journey appears to parallel both your efforts and obstacles incurred to date. If you haven’t read this historical chronicle, it might be something to provide mental relief after another losing tennis match.
The last thing I want is to turn this blog into a political tribune.
Anyway, Italy is beyond any doubt a democratic Country, therefore the choice of the Italian people will have to be respected, YES or NO as it might be.
Congratulations for your approach to Sigma5.
May God help your endeavour,
Janne wrote on November 29, 2016 at 6:43 AM
“It has been confirmed straight from the horse’s mouth that climate change denial will be the official policy of Trump’s administration:”
I believed in dangerous man-made climate change for over 30 years; then I realized it was all a big mistake. “Climate change” is now a powerful bandwagon and lobbying organization fueled by politics and many billions of dollars in profit motive for scientists, reporters writing scare stories, and windmill, solar, and biofuel companies. It has also become a new age nature worshipping religion, a replacement for Christianity in the West to at least some small degree. Man-made localized surface climate change due to land use change is 100% proven. Global dangerous climate change due to atmospheric CO2 levels is a million and one miles from being proven. Real scientists do not rely on wild speculation and they do not brand disbelievers as “heretics” and “traitors”. Those are the common terms of religious intolerance, not proper scientific language. When you dispose of the scientific method, you replace real science with junk science, which is of no use to any honest person. Please watch my compilation YouTube video from beginning to end and you may find good reason to relax a little.
in Italy there is a passionate political campaign for the referendum. The question is to approve the constitutional reforms or not. I do not know if you will be in Italy on Sunday to vote, it would be nice, however what idea you’ve had, it’s time to do some reform and vote YES, or you see them as a problem and then vote NO.
Of course, answer the question only if you want and if you like.
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Thank you for your link.
What I have seen from what has happened today in LENR land is in this issue of EGO OUT:
I also find it opportune at this point to talk about solar. You’ve previously gone on record saying that if solar cannot stand on its own without subsidies, then per the laws of the free market economy it must be useless. Ignoring the massive subsidies already in place for fossil fuels and the unpriced CO2 emissions externalities, even unsubsidized solar is now becoming very competitive. However, this is not to say that solar wouldn’t benefit from an added push from which we could reap the benefits in the years to come. It’s all a question of: “Do we want a cleaner, more sustainable environment sooner or eventually?”
As you can see, in the past 15 years (!) we have gone from 1.4 GW to ~240 GW of global installed photovoltaic capacity–a factor of 170 increase! No other energy form on this planet, sans your E-Cat, has demonstrated the potential for similar exponential growth. However, at the start of this process solar panels were still extremely expensive. Related, there is something called “Swanson’s Law”, which states that for every doubling of cumulative shipped volume, the price of solar photovoltaic modules tends to drop 20 percent. We can infer from this that today’s solar panels cost only a fraction of what they cost in the year 2000. Had there been no subsidies early on, the point where solar is now hyper-competitive in sunny parts of the world–the latest record being the incredibly low bid of 2.42 cents/kwh for solar electricity in Abu Dhabi, which is an unsubsidized price by the way–would have been delayed by possibly decades.
Soon at 1.5% of the world’s electricity production and doubling in capacity every 3 years (actually faster than that for the past 20 years), solar has the potential to be the great engine of prosperity for the 21st century–again, barring your E-Cat–but to reach its unparallelled power we must first manually prime the pump. This is not an inherent negative in the technology, but a normal law of industry and economics of scale, of which I am sure you are intimately familiar with.
May or may not be relevant to your lawsuit. I know you cannot comment on this.
The post (#2838) is captioned
“Antonio LaGatta and John T Vaughn have incorporated HMRI R&D Inc in North Carolina”
Google “lenr-forum 2838” or else click the link below, hopefully both work.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Probably you do not know that Mr La Gatta, of ENEA, Italian taxpayer maintained concern, is now working for IH in Raleigh. They are trying to make up a competition against you, using the information IH gave to La Gatta and ENEA to replicate your technology. This all is finalized to get from Italian Government funds graciously supplied from the taxpayer of Italy, to steal your technology, and, at the same time, to fool the investors of IH, Cherokee Fund Partners and Woodford, making them believe that there is a big team making big things, where big things stand for stealing your IP.
From an insider,
have a great week, Andrea!
Thank you for the information.
This article about direct electricity generation from a man made diamond encapsulating a Ni63 radioactive source might interest you.
Winter starts here but my greetings are constantly warm!
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I too agree upon the comment of Cromwell.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information,
Hello dr. Rossi,
the great Russia is very interested to your effect.
Ni, Nickel, LENR, E-Cat, static theory of atomic structure, cold fusion Dmitry Chukichev
Nickel as cold fusion generator tool Rossi, static theory of atomic structure explains the chemical and physical properties of nickel.