Your work and process management are facinating. Congratulations on your recent progress!
Question #1:
Does this mean you will now combine the two tests and present them to the board of directors for review in order to complete 5 Sigma?
Question #2:
Is more testing still needed to achieve 5 Sigma (after you combine and present)?
Thank you for answering the above questions, and all of your hard work! Especially too for your love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, AND faithfulness in your daily activities.
Warm Regards,
Tom
— Relevant Discussion and references —
Regarding your comment: “We go to close for the 5 Sigma”:
If I am correct, this statement means that after both teams’ analyses are complete, the two teams will combine their observations. Although the two experiments are based on similar physical principles, it is not trivial to combine their data in a meaningful way. If your wallet were filled with both U.S. dollars and Euros (or Swiss Francs perhaps), you couldn’t simply add the numbers on the bills to find out how much money you had; you would have to perform some conversions first. The two groups might use something called “collaborative statistical modeling” to combine the results of the two experiments. When complete, these analyses will convey a more accurate sense of the strength of the new evidence and determine whether the observed data is consistent with the phenomena they observe.
Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
Thank you for your continued and very important attention. You will be surely invited to the presentation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
congratulations on the new test passed, now reaching the 5 Sigma there are only small details. At the end of February will not be long time, you have already decided on the size and power of Ecat/QuarkX you’re going to show?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Did the engineer use the same calorimetry technique as yours, or another one? If not confidential, can you tell us more, without going into details, about it?
I recall you once paid Sergio Focardi to find the errors in your measurements for the early E-Cat. Now you hired another expert to do the same — don’t you trust what you see for yourself?
The most sincere congratulations on the successful conclusion of a very important stage of your great work! You’re too much work, so watch out your health! We look forward to the presentation in February
Frank Acland:
End of the test now, at 10.10 P.M. of Saturday December 12th.
The results are confirmed. I was afraid that my results were too good to be true, so I said to the third party engineer that I was paying him to find my measurements’ errors. He is saying my measurements were not wrong, basically, with exception of minor errors, so the results are confirmed. I am very encouraged. We go to close for the 5Sigma.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
There are some discussions going on at the different forums on how LENR exactly works. I would like to know your opinion about this too, so here is my question: Do you think that some form of Hydrogen Rydberg matter plays a role in LENR?
Thank you for answering our questions.
Kind regards, Gerard
Rick:
It is impossible to separate the quarkx. The force that binds them, carried by gluons, increases with the distance you put between them. It is counterintuitive, to make it understandable, let me use this example: think to a spring: the more you pull it, the more force you feel that attracts the two ends; think to the ends as two quarks, bound by the spring and think to the spring as the force carried by the gluons. When you pull, pull, pull, here is what happens: the spring snaps and it turns into two springs, each of them made by two new ends ( quarks) bound by a new spring ( gluon ) each.
Obviously the model I am proposing is trivial, but allows you to understand the concept.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Today we complete the test made by the independent engineer.
We arr going very well, all my data have been confirmed, with minor corrections.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is it possible to separate quarkX? Do you think the LHC of CERN will be able to observe a single quark?
Thank you if you can answer,
Cheers,
Rick
Can you say if the engineer doing third party testing with you works for the US military itself, or for a company that does work with/for the military.
Is the military engineer the same person who came to see you previously, and who helped you solve the problem with the QuarkX reactors overheating? I recall he was from California.
Ron Stringer:
The engineer who is working with us is not a customer, he is a very skilled man from whom I am learning and that is making a fantastic job with the measurements.
I prefer military engineers, because their preparation is superior in average.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hank Mills:
1- yes
2- yes
3- useless: every system with a COP = 1 or less is comparable
4- no
5- thermal
6- no
7- no: it is internal
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, some people might have concerns about being involved with the military, clearly you do not feel this way. Obviously they can contribute enormously to the development of your reactors, though they might introduce complexities such as secrecy. What is your opinion on working with the military? Do you see them as simply customers like any other?
Matt:
The particles that get mass in the Higgs field are distinguishable in two cathegories:
1- the Bosons W and Z: they carry force, as all the Bosons, and affect the weak interactions
2- the electrically charged Fermions: electron, muon, tau and quarks ( all the flavours of them ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- no, he is an engineer from a military concern of the USA
2- is on course a three days test of the COP and the stability, which means reliability
3- so far so good ( hoping this is not a case in analogy with the guy arrived at the height of the 3rd floor after falling from the 10th floor )
4- substantial
Warm Regards,
A.R.
It’s interesting to learn about a third party visit to test the QuarkX.
1. Is this third party a potential customer or partner?
2. What was tested, and how long did the test take?
3. What has been their response to what they have witnessed?
4. What do you think will be impact on commercialization of your technology?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I suspect that the customer that already bought industrial plants is holding the order to get the new products generation made by the QuarkX: does it make sense?
Dear Andrea,
Do you think we will learn more about this engineer’s recent third party testing at the public presentation you are planning?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
Your work and process management are facinating. Congratulations on your recent progress!
Question #1:
Does this mean you will now combine the two tests and present them to the board of directors for review in order to complete 5 Sigma?
Question #2:
Is more testing still needed to achieve 5 Sigma (after you combine and present)?
Thank you for answering the above questions, and all of your hard work! Especially too for your love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, AND faithfulness in your daily activities.
Warm Regards,
Tom
— Relevant Discussion and references —
Regarding your comment: “We go to close for the 5 Sigma”:
If I am correct, this statement means that after both teams’ analyses are complete, the two teams will combine their observations. Although the two experiments are based on similar physical principles, it is not trivial to combine their data in a meaningful way. If your wallet were filled with both U.S. dollars and Euros (or Swiss Francs perhaps), you couldn’t simply add the numbers on the bills to find out how much money you had; you would have to perform some conversions first. The two groups might use something called “collaborative statistical modeling” to combine the results of the two experiments. When complete, these analyses will convey a more accurate sense of the strength of the new evidence and determine whether the observed data is consistent with the phenomena they observe.
(above “harvested” from
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/five-sigmawhats-that/
)
also please see: https://www.stat.tamu.edu/consulting-collaboration-center/
for options on this method ..
Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
Thank you for your continued and very important attention. You will be surely invited to the presentation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
congratulations on the new test passed, now reaching the 5 Sigma there are only small details. At the end of February will not be long time, you have already decided on the size and power of Ecat/QuarkX you’re going to show?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Frank Acland:
You are right, I made the same as with Prof. Focardi. No, I do not trust myself when I am too enthusiastic.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A. Goumy:
Another one, that now I adopt. Datails will be disclosed in the public presentation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Malcom:
You mean a dummy? I already answered to this issue: the dummy is any sistem with COP < 1. Warm Regards, A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I assume calibration was performed using a control reactor as is normal scientific practice.
Regards,
Malcolm
Dear Mr Rossi,
Did the engineer use the same calorimetry technique as yours, or another one? If not confidential, can you tell us more, without going into details, about it?
Warm regards,
A. Goumy
Dear Andrea,
I recall you once paid Sergio Focardi to find the errors in your measurements for the early E-Cat. Now you hired another expert to do the same — don’t you trust what you see for yourself?
Congratulations!
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea!
The most sincere congratulations on the successful conclusion of a very important stage of your great work! You’re too much work, so watch out your health! We look forward to the presentation in February
Frank Acland:
End of the test now, at 10.10 P.M. of Saturday December 12th.
The results are confirmed. I was afraid that my results were too good to be true, so I said to the third party engineer that I was paying him to find my measurements’ errors. He is saying my measurements were not wrong, basically, with exception of minor errors, so the results are confirmed. I am very encouraged. We go to close for the 5Sigma.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
This test was part of the path to the industrial application of the QuarkX.
I feel more safe.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Toussaints:
It helps.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the successfull third party mesurement, can this result will speed up the industrialisation of the QUARK-X ?
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on the successful test with the engineer, you must be very gratified. Can you say what you will do with the results of this test?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
There are some discussions going on at the different forums on how LENR exactly works. I would like to know your opinion about this too, so here is my question: Do you think that some form of Hydrogen Rydberg matter plays a role in LENR?
Thank you for answering our questions.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
My pleasure to send you the daily edition, even if miniatural of my Blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-10-2016-kaleidoscopic-thinking.html
A wonderful weekend to you and readers!
Peter
Rick:
It is impossible to separate the quarkx. The force that binds them, carried by gluons, increases with the distance you put between them. It is counterintuitive, to make it understandable, let me use this example: think to a spring: the more you pull it, the more force you feel that attracts the two ends; think to the ends as two quarks, bound by the spring and think to the spring as the force carried by the gluons. When you pull, pull, pull, here is what happens: the spring snaps and it turns into two springs, each of them made by two new ends ( quarks) bound by a new spring ( gluon ) each.
Obviously the model I am proposing is trivial, but allows you to understand the concept.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Today we complete the test made by the independent engineer.
We arr going very well, all my data have been confirmed, with minor corrections.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is it possible to separate quarkX? Do you think the LHC of CERN will be able to observe a single quark?
Thank you if you can answer,
Cheers,
Rick
Frank Acland:
This information is confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,\
EGO OUT- edition for this Friday:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-09-2016-dangerous-moment-in-lenr.html
Wishing success and all well to you!
Peter
Dear Andrea,
Can you say if the engineer doing third party testing with you works for the US military itself, or for a company that does work with/for the military.
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
No, this one is another and I work with both of them.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is the military engineer the same person who came to see you previously, and who helped you solve the problem with the QuarkX reactors overheating? I recall he was from California.
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Ron Stringer:
The engineer who is working with us is not a customer, he is a very skilled man from whom I am learning and that is making a fantastic job with the measurements.
I prefer military engineers, because their preparation is superior in average.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hank Mills:
1- yes
2- yes
3- useless: every system with a COP = 1 or less is comparable
4- no
5- thermal
6- no
7- no: it is internal
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1 – Do you trust this third party individual implicitly and whole heartedly?
2 – Will this individual witness the construction of the Quark (s) that are too be tested?
3 – Will a control or “dummy” Quark be utilized in the testing as a real time comparison?
4 – Will he be informed as to the fuel composition of the Quark?
5 – Will he only be testing for thermal output or also electrical?
6 – Will the test be recorded from start to finish on video?
7 – Will he be writing a paper about the results of the test, positive or negative?
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your responses — very interesting.
I hope that the military will not seek to have exclusive access to your products. Do you think that is a possibility?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Dr. Rossi, some people might have concerns about being involved with the military, clearly you do not feel this way. Obviously they can contribute enormously to the development of your reactors, though they might introduce complexities such as secrecy. What is your opinion on working with the military? Do you see them as simply customers like any other?
Matt:
The particles that get mass in the Higgs field are distinguishable in two cathegories:
1- the Bosons W and Z: they carry force, as all the Bosons, and affect the weak interactions
2- the electrically charged Fermions: electron, muon, tau and quarks ( all the flavours of them ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- no, he is an engineer from a military concern of the USA
2- is on course a three days test of the COP and the stability, which means reliability
3- so far so good ( hoping this is not a case in analogy with the guy arrived at the height of the 3rd floor after falling from the 10th floor )
4- substantial
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which are the elementary particles that get mass from the Higgs boson?
Thank you,
Matt
Dear Andrea,
It’s interesting to learn about a third party visit to test the QuarkX.
1. Is this third party a potential customer or partner?
2. What was tested, and how long did the test take?
3. What has been their response to what they have witnessed?
4. What do you think will be impact on commercialization of your technology?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
Till now I have succeed to publish my daily issue of LENR information plus my comments- today it is this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-08-2016-lenr-info-event-chizhov.html
Best regards,
Peter
Christian:
It is a measurement made by a third party: it is confirming our data so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you tell us more abut the test on course today with the QuarkX?
Thank you,
Christian
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Fanguy:
I cannot answer to this.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Today important day for a very important test that will complete a cycle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I suspect that the customer that already bought industrial plants is holding the order to get the new products generation made by the QuarkX: does it make sense?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The important examen you are doing on the QUARK-X is it related to the obtention of the SIGMA 5 ?
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois