United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

12,437 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Christen:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Christen

    Something is moving when an article like this https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/its-not-cold-fusion-but-its-something/ appears in the blogs of Scientific American

  • Dear Andrea,

    I composed a new blog-post for today and this stays at:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-17-2016-extending-list-of-lenr.html

    Cheers,
    Peter

  • Eldridge

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    About the defense of your intellectual property: you are totally right. I have never seen an important technology given graciously away; this also could be a breach of contract toward all your investors.
    Godspeed,
    Eldridge

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mr Leonard Weinstein:
    You are not allowed to sell apparatuses that copy in all or in part our patents.
    You are obviously allowed to make replications in laboratory, for scientific purposes, but you will not be allowed or licensed from us to produce, manufacture and/or sell or put in commerce, in any form and quantity, products in violation of our Intellectual Property.
    Regards,
    Dr Andrea Rossi, CEO of Leonardo Corporation

  • Leonard Weinstein

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    I am building an e-cat based on the published work of Parkhomov and Rossi, as a proof of concept model. If it works as I hope, I would be willing to sell modules (for a reasonable price), and if desired, accessory equipment to verify this technology. However, due to the patent, I would be liable to penalty if I sold these without a license or specific permission. I am only considering selling a modest number at most, of crude proof-of-concept models, and thus not worth getting a license that would cost too much. My question is: could I sell these modules without a license? I only expect about a kW of output in the form of boiling of water at ambient pressure.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readres:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments in other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Shayne:
    No comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Wes:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Also today is a good day, we are working well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Wes

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    You said yesterday in a comment that the “classic” E-Cat has not been abandoned: does this mean the sales of that generation of E-Cats have not been suspended?

  • Shayne

    Dear Andrea,
    From what we can see reading the papers in the “Pacemaker” of the litigation, it appears that all your points are substantiated with solid evidence, while the complaints of Cherokee Fund and IH are based on assumption without any evidence. Can you comment on this?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kip:
    maybe you are right.
    Thanks for your opinion.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Zycka:
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    still on our way to 5Sigma,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Michel:
    Nothing has been abandoned.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frederick Maillard:
    The two things are not contradictory.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Issue of my blog for today:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-16-starting-list-of-lenr-mysteries.html

    Perhaps mainly interrogative, but some info.

    Wish you an readers all well,
    Peter

  • Frederic Maillard

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    Why did you plan (in February 2017) a public demonstration / presentation as you said several times a while ago that the next step for you is not another demo but the product launch on the market (“In mercato veritas”, as you said) ?
    Sorry for asking if you have already answered this question.
    Best wishes
    FM

  • Michel

    Dr Rossi,

    I do not understand why the very first version of the e-cat (single 10kW reactor) is abandoned, at least you do not mention it anymore. From my point of view it would have been easier for you to consolidate the results of this old version that could have been on the market for a while.

    I hope you will succeed where all others have failed: making a product that can be bought instead of a laboratory curiosity.

    Regards,

    Michel

  • Zycka

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I too agree that if you put a dummy in parallel with the QuarkX powered with the same amount of energy as the QuarkX the test is more convincing, also concerning the calibration of the measurement system.

  • Kip

    Mr Andrea Rossi:
    You know what? The more time goes on, the more I am convincing myself the E-Cat will never enter the real market.
    Thank you for spamming,
    Kip

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bruce:
    I think it will be interesting enough.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gary:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gary

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Is the engineer that made the independent test on the QuarkX a US citizen?

  • Bruce

    Dear Andrea;

    When you do your demonstration for invited guests will you do anything spectacular for them, such as run the QuarkX in SSM without any power input?

  • Henrik

    Tom Boonen:
    A short analogy makes clear what Dr Rossi is implying:
    When the Wright brothers made their public displays at Ft. Myers and Le Mans (France) respectively, they did not have spare copies standing on the runway missing different parts, say engines, propellers or flaps. While not useless, no one (maybe certain journalists) in the crowd would have taken notice, nor seen comparison fruitful.
    Please compare this to the “Versio Vulgata” needed concerning the real revelations during the Lugano test (I fondly dubbed this event The Lugano Tea Party, hope You appreciate that as a compliment):
    “A test was performed without fuel. The second test, where fuel was present, meant we had to open all windows in the middle of swiss (the swiss knows) winter, to be able to remain in facilities”.
    Henrik

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Boonen:
    Thank you for your opinion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Boonen

    Andrea,

    So you did try using a dummy in your apparatus. As you saw, it did have a purpose as it satisfied your curiosity and added a level of confirmation to your results.

    I am sure some of your future business partners and all scientists will have the same curiosity…

    dummy= not so dummy after all!

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mario Lorenzi:
    Yes, considered the margin of error and the dissipations outside the heat exchange surface, that are supposed to be not important.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Mario Lorenzi

    Dott. Andrea Rossi and others,
    If a flux calorimeter is used even a simple resistance (COP=1 by definition) works as dummy. Agree?
    Regards, Mario

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Not during the test with the independent engineer, but we made last week a dummy, just for curiosity: obviously a dummy has COP < 1, using the same instrumentation and methodology. Warm Regards, A.R.

  • Anonymous

    Again about the measurements of the QuarkX: did you make also a dummy to compare the data with the real thing?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Edward:
    The R&D made by scientists that work seriously must always be respected. Hot Fusion is an R&D branch that merits to be exploited in the context of the integration of all the possible energy sources.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Of course: in any test where measurements have to be made all the measurement instrumentation has to be calibrated just before the measurements are performed.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Was the instrumentation used in the test made by the third party engineer on the QuarkX calibrated? I mean: has it been calibrated on site with a known energy source before making the measurements on the QuarkX?
    Cheers,
    Anonymous

  • Edward

    What do you think about the hot fusion R&D that ENEA will make in Piemonte, Italy?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    1- does not exist
    2- I do not know.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    On our way toward 5Sigma.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    1 – Would you be willing to publish the original Rossi-Cook paper in unedited form, the way you intended it to be published all along?

    2 – The EM Drive seems to be picking up steam — the Chinese already have one in space and they are committed to developing the technology rapidly over the next five years to use it in all of their satellites. Once further developed, what do you think about using the Quark as a power source for this type of reactionless drive?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Here is the link to my newest edition of EGO OUT blog
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-14-2016-lenr-info-mini-again.html

    My best wishes of success,
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing Michelangelo De Meo:
    Interesting.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bernie Koppenhofer:
    This does not depend only on me.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>