Dear Andrea,
I have some questions about the testing of the QuarkX, which I hope you can answer:
1. For this 5 Sigma test: How many different QuarkX’es did you test till now: 10’s, 100’ds or 1000’ds of QuarkX’es?
2. Do you make them all yourself?
3. Are the tests (occasionally) being witnessed by others?
4. When you speek of ‘Good standing’ or similar words, do you then refer to one of the three QuarkX’es in operation (e.g. The one in duty test) or to your progress towards 5 Sigma?
Thank you for answering our questions!
2017 Is quickly approaching now. Let that year be the year of the breakthrough for you and your team. All the best, Gerard.
hello dr. Rossi this is a great discovery for enhancing your E CATx, you have easy access to temperatures higher than the current ones.
Imperial College of London makes world’s most heat resistant material at 4232 kelvin
Researchers have discovered that tantalum carbide and hafnium carbide materials can withstand scorching temperatures of nearly 4000 degrees Celsius.
Being able to withstand temperatures of nearly 4000°C could pave the way for both materials to be used in ever more extreme environments, such as in heat resistant shielding for the next generation of hypersonic space vehicles.
Tantalum carbide (TaC) and hafnium carbide (HfC) are refractory ceramics, meaning they are extraordinarily resistant to heat. Their ability to withstand extremely harsh environments means that refractory ceramics could be used in thermal protection systems on high-speed vehicles and as fuel cladding in the super-heated environments of nuclear reactors. However, there hasn’t been the technology available to test the melting point of TaC and HfC in the lab to determine how truly extreme an environment they could function in.
First of all, cheers again on your ongoing progress. Rephrased, my second question is: Are you testing (a) a hand made QuarkX or (b) a machine made QuarkX.
Now permit me to ask similar requirements before production of the QuarkX?
1. Sigma5 reached?
2. Modules required to continue operate at least 1 year (February) without refueling?
3. COP > 40 achieved?
4. Theory finalized?
5. Reliability?
6. Partner’s concurrence?
7. Others?
Thank you.
Wish your hopes, dreams and hard work realized in this coming New Year. We share your hopes and dreams.
Warm Regards,
Brokeeper
Who is XXX?
To suppress all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the XXX. Especially targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments currently being scorned and ridiculed by the XXX and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch would blow the XXX’s conception of “limited natural resources” right out of the window. A fusion torch, properly used, could create unlimited and as yet untapped natural resources, even from the most ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion, and would benefit mankind in a manner which, as yet, is not even remotely comprehended by the public.
Carlen Young:
Thank you for your sympathetic feeling, it is very encouraging and, as such, useful.
To work for persons like you is what gives worth to the job of our Team.
Merry Christmas and a Wonderful 2017, full of came-true-dreams.
A.R.
I’ve been following your posts and news about your discoveries for a few years now. Thank you for all of your hard work, kind responses to those who are short and unkind to you, efforts to explain all sorts of physics questions, and commitment to finding real solutions for this world.
This day in age people are used to instantaneous change and simple solutions. You see right past their impatience. You have been working hard and keeping to your work challenge after challenge. Your devotion to science, and belief in your ideas and vision could offer a very needed disruptive technology. Thank you for the creativity, and steadfast determinism. It is important to science if you reach sigma 5 or not, make this product or not, for you are pushing the boundaries of what can be done. This is the spirit that has defined the better aspects of our humanity. It is an example for all of the brilliant minds out there to follow.
Can we conclude from your answer to Brokeeper below, that it is possible that you will hold the event for the presentation of the QuarkX before you reach your 5 Sigma goal?
Thank you — and Merry Christmas to you and your team!
Dear Dr Rossi,
Today is Christmas, the day in which peace should be triumphant: do you think a settlement is possible, in theory, between Cherokee-IH and Leonardo Corporation?
Merry Christmas,
Ron
Dear Andrea:
Merry Christmas to you and all the readers of this blog.
I am on my way to reach you with a working Quarkx, ready to be manufactured.
S.C.
This may seem elementary but could you clarify as to what is required before the presentation of the QuarkX?
1. Sigma5 reached?
2. Modules required to continue operate 1 year (February) without refueling?
3. Minimum COP achieved?
4. Theory finalized?
5. Other?
Will production be ready soon afterwards?
Wish you and your amazing team a Very Merry Christmas.
Warm Regards,
Brokeeper
Happy Christmas, Dr. Rossi. I hope you can take a little time to rest and eat a nice dinner with some family and friends, go to midnight Mass. Quarkx may not need time to recharge, but humans do!
Then, get back to work! We are all looking forward to February with fingers crossed!
Dear Andrea,
I think that you may already be aware of it, but new reseach has found that Hafnium carbonate and Tantalum carbonate are most suitable for high temperature applications: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37962
Do you seen any bright QuarkX light in the near future?
Happy Christmas!
Kind regards, Gerard
Hello, Mr. Rossi. Apparently the test of quark is near completion. For converting thermal energy into electrical energy for smaller plants with a capacity of tens to hundreds of kilowatts can be applied by Otto’s closed cycle. The plant will consist of a conventional spark ignition engine in an electrical generator set. Exhaust gases are directed to a chemical reactor consisting of several thousand x quark coated on their external surface with thermal and photo catalyst that convert carbon dioxide with water vapor in the gaseous mixture of hydrocarbons with oxygen. The resulting mixture of fuel and oxidizer is sent to the cooler where it gives excess heat for heating and water supply needs. Cooled mixture of fuel with the oxidant directed into the intake manifold of the engine.
The engine starts by a propane cylinder with an exhaust into the atmosphere. Initial battery heating quark’s made from a battery or from the power grid. Gradually closing the exhaust cycle translate Quark’s power to it’s own generator. Using this method, the conversion of thermal energy into electric quark x has the following advantages: the working fluid is used at low pressure, simple equipment used included a standard – the spark ignition gas engine, an electric generator, a heat exchanger exhaust-water. It applies only to new equipment chemical reactor with battery quark’s and the installation control system. The disadvantage of this method is the low coefficient of conversion of heat into electricity. Such installations may be interested manufacturers of autonomous generators and automakers.
I wish you a Merry Christmas!
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The spin in three words: “Degree Of Freedom”.
I love your skill to go with simplicity to the core of difficult concepts of Physics. You could be a great teacher.
Merry Christmas,
Chris
1. When individual Quark X’s are joined together to make a larger module, will the individual Quark X’s share a common heat sink?
2. Are the individual Quark X very uniform in their characteristics from one to another.
3. Will each individual Quark X have its own heating element?
Dear Andrea,
I have some questions about the testing of the QuarkX, which I hope you can answer:
1. For this 5 Sigma test: How many different QuarkX’es did you test till now: 10’s, 100’ds or 1000’ds of QuarkX’es?
2. Do you make them all yourself?
3. Are the tests (occasionally) being witnessed by others?
4. When you speek of ‘Good standing’ or similar words, do you then refer to one of the three QuarkX’es in operation (e.g. The one in duty test) or to your progress towards 5 Sigma?
Thank you for answering our questions!
2017 Is quickly approaching now. Let that year be the year of the breakthrough for you and your team. All the best, Gerard.
hello dr. Rossi this is a great discovery for enhancing your E CATx, you have easy access to temperatures higher than the current ones.
Imperial College of London makes world’s most heat resistant material at 4232 kelvin
Researchers have discovered that tantalum carbide and hafnium carbide materials can withstand scorching temperatures of nearly 4000 degrees Celsius.
Being able to withstand temperatures of nearly 4000°C could pave the way for both materials to be used in ever more extreme environments, such as in heat resistant shielding for the next generation of hypersonic space vehicles.
Tantalum carbide (TaC) and hafnium carbide (HfC) are refractory ceramics, meaning they are extraordinarily resistant to heat. Their ability to withstand extremely harsh environments means that refractory ceramics could be used in thermal protection systems on high-speed vehicles and as fuel cladding in the super-heated environments of nuclear reactors. However, there hasn’t been the technology available to test the melting point of TaC and HfC in the lab to determine how truly extreme an environment they could function in.
http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/imperial-college-of-london-makes-worlds.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2Fadvancednano+%28nextbigfuture%29&utm_content=FaceBook
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_22-12-2016-10-21-10
Tom Conover:
OK, understood: I am testing a series of hand made QuarkXes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
First of all, cheers again on your ongoing progress. Rephrased, my second question is: Are you testing (a) a hand made QuarkX or (b) a machine made QuarkX.
Thank you for your kind reply earlier.
Warm regards,
Tom
Ton Conover:
1- yes
2- I do not understand the question: can you rephrase it ?
Thanks to you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It is my pleasure to send you a new, half-festive edition of the EGO OUT blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-26-2016-lenr-dispute-and-some-info.html
warmest regards,
peter
Dear Andrea,
1) Are you currently making test runs of QuarkX cores in the hope of achieving the manufacturing quality sufficient to produce millions of pieces?
2) If you are, is the sample size for your run >= 1000 QuarkX cores per run?
Thank you and your team for all of your hard work. May the upcoming year bring joy to the world.
Warm Regards,
Tom
Brokeeper:
1- yes
2- no
3- confidential
4- no
5- yes
6- not necessarily
7- price to defeat the competition
Warm regards,
A.R.
Domenico Canino:
Thank you for the old link. That’s archeology.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
i don’t know if this leak it’s true; but some american organization in 2008, talks about you; Andrea Rossi, il nuovo Meucci, Refluopetrolio.
I would like you to take a look:
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/12/1252928_-analytical-and-intelligence-comments-postopec-age-cold.html
Dear Andrea,
Now permit me to ask similar requirements before production of the QuarkX?
1. Sigma5 reached?
2. Modules required to continue operate at least 1 year (February) without refueling?
3. COP > 40 achieved?
4. Theory finalized?
5. Reliability?
6. Partner’s concurrence?
7. Others?
Thank you.
Wish your hopes, dreams and hard work realized in this coming New Year. We share your hopes and dreams.
Warm Regards,
Brokeeper
Drew G.:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today seems a good day.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Domenico Canino:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Who is XXX?
To suppress all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the XXX. Especially targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments currently being scorned and ridiculed by the XXX and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch would blow the XXX’s conception of “limited natural resources” right out of the window. A fusion torch, properly used, could create unlimited and as yet untapped natural resources, even from the most ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion, and would benefit mankind in a manner which, as yet, is not even remotely comprehended by the public.
Update?
Dr. Rossi:
Another possible future solution:
See:https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/12/161222130528.htm
Merry Christmas and agreat new year.
Jouni Toumela:
Very interesting, thanks for this information. But it’s a future solution, not yet available for industrial use.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Carlen Young:
Thank you for your sympathetic feeling, it is very encouraging and, as such, useful.
To work for persons like you is what gives worth to the job of our Team.
Merry Christmas and a Wonderful 2017, full of came-true-dreams.
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
I’ve been following your posts and news about your discoveries for a few years now. Thank you for all of your hard work, kind responses to those who are short and unkind to you, efforts to explain all sorts of physics questions, and commitment to finding real solutions for this world.
This day in age people are used to instantaneous change and simple solutions. You see right past their impatience. You have been working hard and keeping to your work challenge after challenge. Your devotion to science, and belief in your ideas and vision could offer a very needed disruptive technology. Thank you for the creativity, and steadfast determinism. It is important to science if you reach sigma 5 or not, make this product or not, for you are pushing the boundaries of what can be done. This is the spirit that has defined the better aspects of our humanity. It is an example for all of the brilliant minds out there to follow.
Merry Christmas and good luck for an amazing 2017
Carlen
Dear Andrea,
Here is some news about heat resistant materials:
(they reach over 4000 deg C)
http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/imperial-college-of-london-makes-worlds.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2Fadvancednano+%28nextbigfuture%29&utm_content=FaceBook
All the best for the coming year,
BR Jouni
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Merry Christmas to you,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,,
A condensed festive isssue of EGO OUT:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-25-2016-lenr-peace-via-new.html
It is about PEACE, ergo about JOY.
Merry Christmas!
Peter
Ron:
I hope so, but, as the ancient Romans used to say, ” si vis pacem, para bellum”.
Merry Christmas,
A.R.
Aficionado:
Thank you for your very appreciated sustain.
Merry Christmas to you!
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes.
Merry Christmas to you and all our Readers,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can we conclude from your answer to Brokeeper below, that it is possible that you will hold the event for the presentation of the QuarkX before you reach your 5 Sigma goal?
Thank you — and Merry Christmas to you and your team!
Frank Acland
Dear Dr Rossi,
May God bless you with all the success and happiness that you deserve.
Merry Christmas !!
Dear Dr Rossi,
Today is Christmas, the day in which peace should be triumphant: do you think a settlement is possible, in theory, between Cherokee-IH and Leonardo Corporation?
Merry Christmas,
Ron
Giuseppe:
Merry Christmas to you!
A.R.
Merry Christmas Dr. Andrea Rossi!
Giuseppe
Santa Klaus:
Ho, Ho, Ho… now, that’s some gift!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
1- not necessarily
2- not necessarily
3- yes
4- no
5- reliability: this module will be produced in million pieces
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Merry Christmas to you!
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Merry Christmas to you and all the readers of this blog.
I am on my way to reach you with a working Quarkx, ready to be manufactured.
S.C.
Dear Andrea,
This may seem elementary but could you clarify as to what is required before the presentation of the QuarkX?
1. Sigma5 reached?
2. Modules required to continue operate 1 year (February) without refueling?
3. Minimum COP achieved?
4. Theory finalized?
5. Other?
Will production be ready soon afterwards?
Wish you and your amazing team a Very Merry Christmas.
Warm Regards,
Brokeeper
Dear Andrea,
My blog issue today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-24-2016-tao-way-to-lenr.html
Merry Christmas,
Peter
Ron Stringer:
Thank you, I will do all that, plus a tennis match with my wife: I wish you too Happy Christmas!
A.R.
Chris:
Thank you and merry Christmas to you,
A.R.
Happy Christmas, Dr. Rossi. I hope you can take a little time to rest and eat a nice dinner with some family and friends, go to midnight Mass. Quarkx may not need time to recharge, but humans do!
Then, get back to work! We are all looking forward to February with fingers crossed!
JPR:
Still good standing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ferdir Mykhaylov:
Thyank you for your insight and suggestions.
Merry Christmas to you,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I think that you may already be aware of it, but new reseach has found that Hafnium carbonate and Tantalum carbonate are most suitable for high temperature applications:
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37962
Do you seen any bright QuarkX light in the near future?
Happy Christmas!
Kind regards, Gerard
Hello, Mr. Rossi. Apparently the test of quark is near completion. For converting thermal energy into electrical energy for smaller plants with a capacity of tens to hundreds of kilowatts can be applied by Otto’s closed cycle. The plant will consist of a conventional spark ignition engine in an electrical generator set. Exhaust gases are directed to a chemical reactor consisting of several thousand x quark coated on their external surface with thermal and photo catalyst that convert carbon dioxide with water vapor in the gaseous mixture of hydrocarbons with oxygen. The resulting mixture of fuel and oxidizer is sent to the cooler where it gives excess heat for heating and water supply needs. Cooled mixture of fuel with the oxidant directed into the intake manifold of the engine.
The engine starts by a propane cylinder with an exhaust into the atmosphere. Initial battery heating quark’s made from a battery or from the power grid. Gradually closing the exhaust cycle translate Quark’s power to it’s own generator. Using this method, the conversion of thermal energy into electric quark x has the following advantages: the working fluid is used at low pressure, simple equipment used included a standard – the spark ignition gas engine, an electric generator, a heat exchanger exhaust-water. It applies only to new equipment chemical reactor with battery quark’s and the installation control system. The disadvantage of this method is the low coefficient of conversion of heat into electricity. Such installations may be interested manufacturers of autonomous generators and automakers.
I wish you a Merry Christmas!
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The spin in three words: “Degree Of Freedom”.
I love your skill to go with simplicity to the core of difficult concepts of Physics. You could be a great teacher.
Merry Christmas,
Chris
Hugh DeVries:
1- Yes
2- yes
3- depends
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea
I have a few questions on the E_cat Quark X.
1. When individual Quark X’s are joined together to make a larger module, will the individual Quark X’s share a common heat sink?
2. Are the individual Quark X very uniform in their characteristics from one to another.
3. Will each individual Quark X have its own heating element?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Hugh