Hello dr. Rossi:
it seems that even the Boing is working on cold fusion.
Boeing patents laser-powered fusion-fission jet engine (that’s truly impossible)
Lasers fuse hydrogen, causing uranium to fission, which generates electricity.
Boeing has received a patent for, I kid you not, a laser-powered fusion-fission jet propulsion system. Boeing envisions that this system could replace both rocket and turbofan engines, powering everything from spacecraft to missiles to airplanes.
The patent, US 9,068,562, combines inertial confinement fusion, fission, and a turbine that generates electricity. It sounds completely crazy because it is. https://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/07/boeing-patents-laser-powered-fusion-fission-jet-engine-for-airplanes-spacecraft/
Kraig:
I think everybody has noticed that we do not comment issues to be discussed in Court, while IH- Cherokee Fund Partners try to raise mud in the blogs. Any comment on this fact is useless.
In general, let me say that if you measure data with two certified instrumentations on the same thing in the same point or close, obviously the data are the same, unless one of the instruments is nuts.
I am not referring to the specific case, but in general. The specific case will be discussed upon in Court.
As I said, we have plenty of evidence to confirm the data of the report in Court and I am very optimist about what is emerging in evidence in the proper site.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
IH has published reports that say that the data measured by Fabiani are equal to the data measured from the ERV, which gives evidence that the data are fake.
Can you comment?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have watched carefully all the papers that have been published abut the litigation and what I have understood is that IH makes a lot of guessing, but you have produced solid evidence.
That’s it.
All the best,
L.
Kurt:
Please remind that these models in a nutshell must be taken with the due caution, because they are far to be scientifically rigorous…they are just stereotypes that can be useful, like scaffolds to build a house that eventually must be eliminated when the house is built.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Abdul Siebenthal:
It is not easy to give a visual model of concepts that are rigorously mathematics, but let’s try this: consider the Universe like an ocean, initially flat-calm, inside which there are lurking different kinds of currents whose force interacts with different entities. Imagine that when a current appears, it breaks the symmetry that kept the water calm, so that masses of current produce waves in a specific “field”.
We have Currents in the gravitational field of this ocean, that affect all the particles contained in the ocean; we have Currents in the weak force field, that affect all the elementary particles of the Standard Model and the Higgs Boson; we have Currents in the strong force field, that affect gluons and quarks; finally we have Currents in the electromagnetic field, that affect the positive particles one way and the negative the opposite way. The bumps of the waves correspond to the stable elementary particles; when the waves resonate, they generate the virtual particles.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
About “fundamental fields” in Physics, being the electromagnetic field, the weak force field, the strong force field, the gravitational field: can you explain by one of your simple models ho we can visualize these fields and the forces through which they work? Why are they called “fundamental”?
Thank you if you have the time to answer,
Abdul
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Could the energy produced by the QuarkX be measured also with very common tools, for example sold by shops like Home Depot?
Cheers,
Jason
Irka:
All the necessary certifications are on course. Already got for the industrial applications, not yet for the households. The timing does not depend on us.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I’d like to hear the news about the E-Cat.
There is a process of obtaining certification? IN USA? In Europe?
What are the prospects? Months? Years? Or is forgotten?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I love the comment of DT on 2017/02/01 7.31 PM
By the way: reading all the papers published so far it seems you are winning.
Fingers crossed,
Jo
Phil:
1- to the force carrying bosons of the weak interactions ( W^+, W^-, Z^0 )
2- to the electrically charged Fermions ( electron, muon, tau and quark )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Without replying about specific performance of your current or previous ecat reactors, do you consider units operating under your design to have the performance function that the difficulty of control remains the same though out the fuel time of the reactor. Specifically:
a. Control is easier at the beginning of the fuel consumption and then more difficult as fuel is consumed?
b. The difficulty of control remains about constant over the life of the fuel?
c. The difficulty of control is the most at the beginning and end of the fuel life and relatively easier in the middle of the fuel consumption?
d. none of the above?
Dear Andrea Rossi:
After the most recent production of evidence and discovery in Court how would you define your situation?
Ing Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information, but it has nothing to do with lenr.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Hello dr. Rossi:
it seems that even the Boing is working on cold fusion.
Boeing patents laser-powered fusion-fission jet engine (that’s truly impossible)
Lasers fuse hydrogen, causing uranium to fission, which generates electricity.
Boeing has received a patent for, I kid you not, a laser-powered fusion-fission jet propulsion system. Boeing envisions that this system could replace both rocket and turbofan engines, powering everything from spacecraft to missiles to airplanes.
The patent, US 9,068,562, combines inertial confinement fusion, fission, and a turbine that generates electricity. It sounds completely crazy because it is.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/07/boeing-patents-laser-powered-fusion-fission-jet-engine-for-airplanes-spacecraft/
R.:
I cannot comment in the blogs anything related to the litigation on course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
So far so good also this morning.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Norberto Morehouse:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Your answer to Kraig is perfect! Your foes are desperately scratching the bottom of their barrel of arguments.
Godspeed,
Norberto
Update?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Yesterday an important hearing has been made in Court: can you tell us about it?
Thank you if you can answer,
R.
Lindsay:
No comment,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kraig:
I think everybody has noticed that we do not comment issues to be discussed in Court, while IH- Cherokee Fund Partners try to raise mud in the blogs. Any comment on this fact is useless.
In general, let me say that if you measure data with two certified instrumentations on the same thing in the same point or close, obviously the data are the same, unless one of the instruments is nuts.
I am not referring to the specific case, but in general. The specific case will be discussed upon in Court.
As I said, we have plenty of evidence to confirm the data of the report in Court and I am very optimist about what is emerging in evidence in the proper site.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
He,he,he…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Today’s Blog link is accessible via:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-07-2017-lenr-we-need-better-organ.html
cheers,
peter
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
IH has published reports that say that the data measured by Fabiani are equal to the data measured from the ERV, which gives evidence that the data are fake.
Can you comment?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have watched carefully all the papers that have been published abut the litigation and what I have understood is that IH makes a lot of guessing, but you have produced solid evidence.
That’s it.
All the best,
L.
What do you think of these cute photo montages and the dream of an electric motor and cat?
http://www.e-catworld.com/2017/01/11/is-this-photo-a-leak/
Frank Acland:
I cannot comment or anticipate anything that has to be disclosed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kurt:
Please remind that these models in a nutshell must be taken with the due caution, because they are far to be scientifically rigorous…they are just stereotypes that can be useful, like scaffolds to build a house that eventually must be eliminated when the house is built.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Good also today.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I liked your answer to Abdul Siebenthal.
Thank you.
Kurt
Dear Andrea,
Can you say if you have evidence that you will present in court, that supports the COP reported in the document posted in the court records here? http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/128-01-Exhibit-1.pdf
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Abdul Siebenthal:
It is not easy to give a visual model of concepts that are rigorously mathematics, but let’s try this: consider the Universe like an ocean, initially flat-calm, inside which there are lurking different kinds of currents whose force interacts with different entities. Imagine that when a current appears, it breaks the symmetry that kept the water calm, so that masses of current produce waves in a specific “field”.
We have Currents in the gravitational field of this ocean, that affect all the particles contained in the ocean; we have Currents in the weak force field, that affect all the elementary particles of the Standard Model and the Higgs Boson; we have Currents in the strong force field, that affect gluons and quarks; finally we have Currents in the electromagnetic field, that affect the positive particles one way and the negative the opposite way. The bumps of the waves correspond to the stable elementary particles; when the waves resonate, they generate the virtual particles.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jason:
I’d say yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Not considering the recent stop, we are at Sigma4.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
,Dear Andrea,
EGO OUT Blog link for today is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-06-2017-lenr-polemics-moderato.html
Cheers,
peter
Can you say at which Sigma are you now?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
About “fundamental fields” in Physics, being the electromagnetic field, the weak force field, the strong force field, the gravitational field: can you explain by one of your simple models ho we can visualize these fields and the forces through which they work? Why are they called “fundamental”?
Thank you if you have the time to answer,
Abdul
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Could the energy produced by the QuarkX be measured also with very common tools, for example sold by shops like Home Depot?
Cheers,
Jason
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
A special non Sunday edition for this Sunday
of EGO OUT:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-05-2017-lenr-what-happens-when.html
Best wishes,
Peter
Hello dr. Rossi:
in Italy they are planning to reopen a coal plant. Read the query made to the European Union. We wait for your E-Cat!
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FTEXT%2BWQ%2BP-2017-000481%2B0%2BDOC%2BXML%2BV0%2F%2FIT&language=IT
William:
He,he,he…you bet!
Patriots: Boston is a town I owe so much!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi, Andrea!
Will you watch the Super Bowl today? If yes which team do you prefer?
Irka:
All the necessary certifications are on course. Already got for the industrial applications, not yet for the households. The timing does not depend on us.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Janell Thurnes:
My optimism is based on two pillars: truth and evidence.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
On our way toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you optimist of how things are going in the litigation?
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
I’d like to hear the news about the E-Cat.
There is a process of obtaining certification? IN USA? In Europe?
What are the prospects? Months? Years? Or is forgotten?
Yury Isaev
Engineer
Tyumen, Russia.
Jo:
I cannot comment on issues to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I love the comment of DT on 2017/02/01 7.31 PM
By the way: reading all the papers published so far it seems you are winning.
Fingers crossed,
Jo
Dear Andrea,,
This is a Saturday edition of EGO OUT:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-04-2017-lenr-playing-chess-or-poker.html
wish you and Readers a fine weekend,
Peter
Phil:
1- to the force carrying bosons of the weak interactions ( W^+, W^-, Z^0 )
2- to the electrically charged Fermions ( electron, muon, tau and quark )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still good.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
The difficulty of control is intrinsic of the matter, in every phase.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Without replying about specific performance of your current or previous ecat reactors, do you consider units operating under your design to have the performance function that the difficulty of control remains the same though out the fuel time of the reactor. Specifically:
a. Control is easier at the beginning of the fuel consumption and then more difficult as fuel is consumed?
b. The difficulty of control remains about constant over the life of the fuel?
c. The difficulty of control is the most at the beginning and end of the fuel life and relatively easier in the middle of the fuel consumption?
d. none of the above?