Dr Andrea Rossi:
Nissan has replicated your effect and wants to use your technology for their electric engines:
The 17th Meeting of Japan CF-Research Society
JCF17 ABSTRACTS
March 19-20, 2017
Japan CF-Research Society
National Institute of Technology, Tokyo College
Expectations on the new heat-generation-reaction between metal and hydrogen
M. Nakamura*, M. Uchimura, H. Takahashi, S. Sumitomo
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
*mas-nakamura@mail.nissan.co.jp
The development of technologies friendly to the global environment is a major theme in the
automotive industry today. Especially, to reduce CO2 emission and to achieve cleaner exhaust
emissions, Electrical Vehicle, EV, has received a lot of attention in recent years. The sales numbers
of 100%-EV was around 6 times higher for the past 5 years. 100%-EV means that it does not have
any other power source except motors. Nissan launched it, named LEAF, in 2010 and the total
number of sales exceeded 250,000. But some customers complains the mileage per 1 charge, around
200km. In particular, the mileage in winter season could decrease by half due to using of heater, this
should be solved.
In 2010, A. Rossi reported E-cat, Energy Catalyzer. This equipment can generate heat energy
from Ni and H2 reaction and the energy is larger than input one. This experiment was replicated by
A Parkhomov but the reaction mechanism has NOT been clarified [1-2]. If we can use this heat
energy as a heater application into EV, the problem of short mileage caused by using heater will be
solved, the EV with this equipment will be a candidate for customers who have a sense of
dissatisfaction that they should charge very often.
In this report we will report 2 things. The first one is the experimental results regarding to
reproducing Parkhomov’s experiment with some disclosing experimental conditions using
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (STA-PT1600, Linseis Inc.). This DSC can measure generated
heat within a tolerance of 2%. The second one is our expectation on this reaction for automotive
potential.
[1] A.G. Parkhomov; International Journal of Unconventional Science issue 7(3), pp. 68-72, 2015
[2] A.G. Parkhomov; International Journal of Unconventional Science issue 8(3), pp. 34-38, 2015
As I think on the future applications of eCat technology, I am drawn to electricity generation in dense urban environments. Considerer Manhattan. It uses more electricity than the whole country of Kenya. Yet the electric source feeds (power lines) to the island are limited and costly to add.
If instead, an eCat-powered electricity generation plant, run on current avaiable electrical power, but with an effective COP of 10 or higher could produce the necessary power for an entire building (not feed it back into the electrical grid, just use it for the building it is on) and this was duplicated for all the major sized buildings, the extewrnally supplied electricity requirements for the island would be significantly reduced. This would result in cost savings, increased economic growth, etc.
This would solve the current problem of limited power availability going into Manhattan island. Conceptually, the eCat power unit could be located on top of the building to dissapate excess heat, where the building’s envnironmental units are located. Conceptually, heat could also be generated to supply thermal heating requirements for the building.
By limiting the electrical distribution to only the building, through a transfer switch, the output of the eCat system will be totally isolated from the electrical grid, other than as the input to the eCat system. This would eliminate the issue of an eCat generated power conflicting with grid power (i.e., phasing, load stability), etc. Thoughts?
Electric field and magnetic field are two different manifestations of a single field. A model of the mechanism of this single field could be this: think to a tsunami ( electrons ) that causes around itself a mass of waves ( magnetic waves ) and viceversa.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S. Your comment is the N. 36 000 of this blog
Dr Andrea Rossi,
In the last documents published by your attorneys in the litigation file we read that Tom Darden offered “big money” to professor Giuseppe Levi in change of a report: obviously this is bribery, but also confusing, because for one year now the ventriloquist Tom Darden has made his paid puppets repeat that Levi is wrong, unable, erroneous, and so on, but now he offers to Levi big money for a report.
Odd, isn’t it?
Cheers,
Jonas
Dear Andrea Rossi
I sent you my email address. Please send me all the information you have about IH that cannot be disclosed in court, we can organize something with wikileaks
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Looking at the story of the last five years of your work, it appears you made a stunning progress, notwithstanding the hurdles you met.
We all have great expectation about the QuarkX presentation.
Continue your good job,
Prof
In the litigation documents, one of your “former friends” (lol) wrote on march 7, 2014:
“We are building tiny glass reactors for rapid testing purposes. Our cost per test has dropped from thousands of dollars to
about $25. We have been seeing flashes of energy in the fuel when it is heated. Our goal is to be able to see and record
the intensity of reactions occurring with different fuel materials.”
1. Those “tiny glass reactors”, is that moreless the concept of QuarkX ?
2. Is the goal to achieve 5 sigma on the number of flashes per reactor ?
3. 25$ Yessssss !!! could be 2,5$ if robotized ?
INTERESTING THIS COURT DOC – The Defendants and their agents repeatedly harassed and attempted to bribe the Professors with respect to the Lugano Report.
Tod:
Let me suggest you that the theory that today is considered the most “solid and convincing” in Physics is Quantum Mechanics: well, actually this theory is used because helps to construct a useful structure of understanding, but leaves enormous space to conjectures and unresolved problems. When a theory does a good job at making coherent a moltitude of phenomena, you adopt it, albeit you don’t think you understood as well as you should.
We are in an analogous position.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Today I read on NASA Tech Briefs ( issue of March 2017, pag 50 ) about a new patent of them searching for a licensee: it is very important and intelligent: “Algae Bioreactor Using Submerged Enclosures with Semi-Permeable Membranes”, whose applications include Diesel fuel production and renewable energy. It is very interesting.
I have not time for this issue, because my focus is 100% on my job, but, if somebody is interested to new technologies development, my opinion is that this is a great opportunity.
Here is the contact: http://technology.nasa.gov/patent/TB2016/TOP2-219
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brittany:
1- I want not to comment anything related to the litigation. Actions must be done in Court, not in the blogs. Chatters are useless
2- documents speak for themselves
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
What do you think of the last complaints deposited in Court by your attorneys?
Can you comment, since they already are public?
Cheers,
Brittany
Dear Andrea,
When you reach sigma 5 and introduce the quarkX, will you also explain how you arrived to the conclusion that sigma 5 was achieved?
Regards
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The replication made by Nissan is very important: are you in contact with them ?
Cheers,
Shanda
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for the replication made by Nissan: great !
S.E.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you still working also on the direct production of electricity from the Rossi Effect?
Thank you if you can answer,
Tom
Patrick Ellul:
Yes.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Who are you working with for the theoretical work?
Is Norman D. Cook still helping out?
Best regards,
Patrick
JPR:
Solid progress for the theoretical ground, based on the experiment on course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the interesting information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
EGO OUT for today, structure superficiall changed content as usual:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-15-2017-creation-of-true-lenr.html
Very best regards,
Peter
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Nissan has replicated your effect and wants to use your technology for their electric engines:
The 17th Meeting of Japan CF-Research Society
JCF17 ABSTRACTS
March 19-20, 2017
Japan CF-Research Society
National Institute of Technology, Tokyo College
http://jcfrs.org/JCF17/jcf17-abstracts.pdf
Expectations on the new heat-generation-reaction between metal and hydrogen
M. Nakamura*, M. Uchimura, H. Takahashi, S. Sumitomo
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
*mas-nakamura@mail.nissan.co.jp
The development of technologies friendly to the global environment is a major theme in the
automotive industry today. Especially, to reduce CO2 emission and to achieve cleaner exhaust
emissions, Electrical Vehicle, EV, has received a lot of attention in recent years. The sales numbers
of 100%-EV was around 6 times higher for the past 5 years. 100%-EV means that it does not have
any other power source except motors. Nissan launched it, named LEAF, in 2010 and the total
number of sales exceeded 250,000. But some customers complains the mileage per 1 charge, around
200km. In particular, the mileage in winter season could decrease by half due to using of heater, this
should be solved.
In 2010, A. Rossi reported E-cat, Energy Catalyzer. This equipment can generate heat energy
from Ni and H2 reaction and the energy is larger than input one. This experiment was replicated by
A Parkhomov but the reaction mechanism has NOT been clarified [1-2]. If we can use this heat
energy as a heater application into EV, the problem of short mileage caused by using heater will be
solved, the EV with this equipment will be a candidate for customers who have a sense of
dissatisfaction that they should charge very often.
In this report we will report 2 things. The first one is the experimental results regarding to
reproducing Parkhomov’s experiment with some disclosing experimental conditions using
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (STA-PT1600, Linseis Inc.). This DSC can measure generated
heat within a tolerance of 2%. The second one is our expectation on this reaction for automotive
potential.
[1] A.G. Parkhomov; International Journal of Unconventional Science issue 7(3), pp. 68-72, 2015
[2] A.G. Parkhomov; International Journal of Unconventional Science issue 8(3), pp. 34-38, 2015
Update?
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
My pleasure to send you & Readers this new edition of EGO OUT:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-14-2017-lenrlenr-false.html
Best wishes,
Peter
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
As I think on the future applications of eCat technology, I am drawn to electricity generation in dense urban environments. Considerer Manhattan. It uses more electricity than the whole country of Kenya. Yet the electric source feeds (power lines) to the island are limited and costly to add.
If instead, an eCat-powered electricity generation plant, run on current avaiable electrical power, but with an effective COP of 10 or higher could produce the necessary power for an entire building (not feed it back into the electrical grid, just use it for the building it is on) and this was duplicated for all the major sized buildings, the extewrnally supplied electricity requirements for the island would be significantly reduced. This would result in cost savings, increased economic growth, etc.
This would solve the current problem of limited power availability going into Manhattan island. Conceptually, the eCat power unit could be located on top of the building to dissapate excess heat, where the building’s envnironmental units are located. Conceptually, heat could also be generated to supply thermal heating requirements for the building.
By limiting the electrical distribution to only the building, through a transfer switch, the output of the eCat system will be totally isolated from the electrical grid, other than as the input to the eCat system. This would eliminate the issue of an eCat generated power conflicting with grid power (i.e., phasing, load stability), etc. Thoughts?
Electric field and magnetic field are two different manifestations of a single field. A model of the mechanism of this single field could be this: think to a tsunami ( electrons ) that causes around itself a mass of waves ( magnetic waves ) and viceversa.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S. Your comment is the N. 36 000 of this blog
Prof:
Thank you for your sympathy,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
All we have to say about the litigation is put in documents by my Attorneys and disclosed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jonas:
I cannot comment issues to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
We are going well also today,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
In the last documents published by your attorneys in the litigation file we read that Tom Darden offered “big money” to professor Giuseppe Levi in change of a report: obviously this is bribery, but also confusing, because for one year now the ventriloquist Tom Darden has made his paid puppets repeat that Levi is wrong, unable, erroneous, and so on, but now he offers to Levi big money for a report.
Odd, isn’t it?
Cheers,
Jonas
Dear Andrea Rossi
I sent you my email address. Please send me all the information you have about IH that cannot be disclosed in court, we can organize something with wikileaks
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How do interact electric field and magnetic field? Which is exactly the mechanism?
Thank you if you can answer,
Pierre
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Looking at the story of the last five years of your work, it appears you made a stunning progress, notwithstanding the hurdles you met.
We all have great expectation about the QuarkX presentation.
Continue your good job,
Prof
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
A week-start edition, when the new week is slowly waking up:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-13-2017-lenr-evil-normality-toxic.html
Better things to come, I hope.
All the best,
Peter
Tom S,:
I cannot comment in the blogs issues to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still on our way toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
1- No
2- No
3- Premature
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear dr. Andrea Rossi,
In the litigation documents, one of your “former friends” (lol) wrote on march 7, 2014:
“We are building tiny glass reactors for rapid testing purposes. Our cost per test has dropped from thousands of dollars to
about $25. We have been seeing flashes of energy in the fuel when it is heated. Our goal is to be able to see and record
the intensity of reactions occurring with different fuel materials.”
1. Those “tiny glass reactors”, is that moreless the concept of QuarkX ?
2. Is the goal to achieve 5 sigma on the number of flashes per reactor ?
3. 25$ Yessssss !!! could be 2,5$ if robotized ?
Kind Regards
Koen
Update?
INTERESTING THIS COURT DOC – The Defendants and their agents repeatedly harassed and attempted to bribe the Professors with respect to the Lugano Report.
https://thenewfire.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/167_plaintiffs_motion_for_sanctions_incl_prop_order_and_3_exhibits.pdf
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The blog edition now is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-12-2017-lenr-sad-story-of-retarded.html
I dare to say, aproof for the richness of metaphors,
all the best,
peter
Tod:
Let me suggest you that the theory that today is considered the most “solid and convincing” in Physics is Quantum Mechanics: well, actually this theory is used because helps to construct a useful structure of understanding, but leaves enormous space to conjectures and unresolved problems. When a theory does a good job at making coherent a moltitude of phenomena, you adopt it, albeit you don’t think you understood as well as you should.
We are in an analogous position.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still in good standing, we have learnt to tame the heat made by these temperatures in a so small volume.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The theory related to your effect you are studying upon will be solid and convincing?
Thank yu if you can answer,
Tod
Dear Readers:
Today I read on NASA Tech Briefs ( issue of March 2017, pag 50 ) about a new patent of them searching for a licensee: it is very important and intelligent: “Algae Bioreactor Using Submerged Enclosures with Semi-Permeable Membranes”, whose applications include Diesel fuel production and renewable energy. It is very interesting.
I have not time for this issue, because my focus is 100% on my job, but, if somebody is interested to new technologies development, my opinion is that this is a great opportunity.
Here is the contact: http://technology.nasa.gov/patent/TB2016/TOP2-219
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brittany:
1- I want not to comment anything related to the litigation. Actions must be done in Court, not in the blogs. Chatters are useless
2- documents speak for themselves
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
What do you think of the last complaints deposited in Court by your attorneys?
Can you comment, since they already are public?
Cheers,
Brittany
Patrick Ellul:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When you reach sigma 5 and introduce the quarkX, will you also explain how you arrived to the conclusion that sigma 5 was achieved?
Regards
Frank Acland:
The QuarkX will be introduced.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What do you expect to happen when you reach Sigma 5?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
JPR:
Good standing, Sigma 5 in view.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.