You stated, “I am sure you are able to give yourself my answer to your questions…”
Are you telling me that I’m more or less correct with the thoughts/assumptions I provided with each question?
The more I learn in the field of science/physics the more profoundly I realize I can be very wrong in my thinking. Oh how I wish an E-Cat University had already opened with you as the Dean!
Michel:
V/ Ohm = A: it’s obvious. But I admit that the way we wrote it can be confusing, albeit the meaning is obvious: the input of direct current ( obviously A) is given by a voltage of .105 over 1 Ohm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
M.Sc. Enrico Billi:
No, but surely the system will be found after having resolved the problem how to make a human colony on the moon. If your innuendo is a blink to the E-Cat…why not?
Lavolale! Lavolale!
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read the paper Gullstrom-Rossi on Arxiv Physics and clearly it shows an anomalous effect. I am impressed by the numbers, but the announcement of the preliminar theory is very interesting, I would say revolutionary, like the measured effect. To obtain such effect with a so low energy is not possible with any known system.
I understand the difficulty of measuring 2600 K with thermometers ( I do not think it is possible) and therefore I understand the use of a spectrometer and the Wien’s euation. Clearly there are issues you are not ready to disclose, for obvious reasons, but I think we are in front of something really momentous. Probably the presentation will be made by normal calorimetry using a heat exchanger, am I correct?
I hope we will have more information when the product will be introduced.
Godspeed,
Prof
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the paper Gullstrom-Rossi and the replication of Nissan: evidently the litigation is not relenting your great work!
Cheers,
Teo
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Find here an interesting comment of Bob Cook:
“Finally a theory coupling electron orbital energy states with nuclear energy
states involving magnetic fields and isotopic shifts to lower potential energy.
It fits the LENR multibody reaction model and explains the lack of energetic
particles associated with two- body nuclear reactions. I give it a thumbs up!
And it may be in time for consideration by the distinguished Swedish Committee
that evaluates scientific advances for 2017.
Dear Andrea. Congratulations to Carl and your self on your new paper. I think you have alluded to some of the concepts in this theory now and then in past posts over the last year or so and now after reading the theory in the paper it puts them all in to context. I was really intrigued by the ideas in the paper although much of it is above my level I can see it’s a very smart theory going from fundamental nuclear/electron properties in a very clever intelegent way to explain how they can be coupled and ultimately applied in a device. I was quite impressed how those ideas from different domains of knowledge were put together in to a complete theory.
I think Carl is quite a unique thinker. this and his previous publications are always interesting. i have often heard there is no low lying fruit left in particle physics but I think he has the ability to look across the thorny tree to different unexplored branches. Your journal header picture seems more and more appropriate.
Congratulations on the stunning progress you have made with the Quark! This device is a magnificent achievement. I’ve studied the paper, and I have several questions.
1) Should the plasma witnessed going across the cell be defined as an arc discharge or a glow discharge? I’m thinking it likely an arc discharge due to the low voltage being applied to the reactor, because an arc discharge requires a far lower voltage (but a much higher amperage) than a glow discharge.
2) To initiate the discharge (arc?) was a brief higher voltage pulse applied (possibly for only milliseconds) during start up before it was reduced?
3) A high temperature quartz or sapphire tube could withstand the high temperature of the plasma, but it seems like the nickel cathode/anode would not endure for as long due to having a lower melting point. What allows the nickel cathode/anode to survive? Is the spatial positioning of the plasma (between the electrodes) responsible for sparing the nickel?
4) Do the nuclear reactions in the cathode (which is being bombarded by ionized hydrogen in the form of positively charged bare protons) heat it up and generate electrons via thermionic emission? This would be an extremely elegant setup: the nuclear derived heat from the Rossi Effect powering a thermionic cathode!
5) Did the cathode go through any special pre-treatment?
6) The paper specifically mentions Manganese (Mn) as being a source of possible nucleons. This element is a deoxidizer of steel and other elements. Is this a component of the fuel?
7) When direct electrical production is achieved, does this mean that the current OUTPUT of the device is higher than the current INPUT? If the Quark is potentially a source of high amperage and low voltage, I have an idea for an awesome application you should consider: a power source for electromagnetic actuators for robotics!
8) It is mentioned that LiAlH4 supplied the hydrogen. How much LiAlH4 was utilized? My thinking is that probably very little was used.
Right now, the number one limitation when it comes to robotics is power. I could imagine these Quark devices (especially if they can activate in very short time periods) being built into all all of the electromagnetic actuators of a robot. The high current and low voltage would be perfect for producing the maximum magnetic field strength.
The Quark X could potentially herald a new age of robotics.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I am stunned by the publication of Nissan, that has replicated your effect based of the work of Dr Parkhomov and now is studying the application of the E-Cat to their electric cars. This is huge!
Godspeed,
A.
Dear dr. Andrea Rossi,
Yes do that. If you apply this technique, your wife will feel more attractive. And depending on the field where you play, everything starts to move.
Kind Regards,
Koen
I enjoyed reading (not really understanding all about it) Carl-Oscar Gullström- Andrea Rossi’s publication on https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.05249.pdf … Great job!
Question for you please.
Is Carl-Oscar Gullström on your team full or part time now with you?
Thank your team for me please, and thanks to you to again for your endurance and perseverance.
UK Simon:
Honestly, I don’t give a damn of the new and old attempts to delegitimaze my E-Cats.
That are shooting tennis balls to a tank.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
I am honoured from your attention.
I think I have to learn from you in many issues.
My health is not bad, I can work well and this is what counts.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
Can I understand your recently published report as follows:
A proton moving in an electric field, acts somewhat like a pointed arrow, and not as a tennis ball. Even if it is very hot.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Dear Andrea,
You stated, “I am sure you are able to give yourself my answer to your questions…”
Are you telling me that I’m more or less correct with the thoughts/assumptions I provided with each question?
The more I learn in the field of science/physics the more profoundly I realize I can be very wrong in my thinking. Oh how I wish an E-Cat University had already opened with you as the Dean!
Thank you,
Hank
Michel:
V/ Ohm = A: it’s obvious. But I admit that the way we wrote it can be confusing, albeit the meaning is obvious: the input of direct current ( obviously A) is given by a voltage of .105 over 1 Ohm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Paul:
A combination of both.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Congratulations for the stunning paper Gullstrom-Rossi.
Cheers,
Alfred
Dear Andrea,
We read the documents of IH and their lies are evident. When will be produced the amswers from yor party?
Andrea,
In your recently described experiment, is the one ohm resistance the ballast resistance, the steady-state plasma resistance, or a combination of both?
V/R,
Paul
Dear Andrea,
Today an Anniversary issue of EGO OUT:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-23-2017-28-years-of-lenr-history.html
Cheers!
Peter
Dera Dr Rossi,
There is a typo in the report published on Arxiv : current in Amps not Volts …
“Input: 0.105 V of direct current over a 1 Ohm resistance”
Regards,
Michel
Prof:
Yes, the pesentation will be made by plain calorimetry. The system described in the paper is only for R&D purposes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
M.Sc. Enrico Billi:
No, but surely the system will be found after having resolved the problem how to make a human colony on the moon. If your innuendo is a blink to the E-Cat…why not?
Lavolale! Lavolale!
A.R.
Teo:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
have you got any idea how to heat a possible Lunar base for 14 days with temperatures below -170C?
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Engineering_Technology/Surviving_the_long_dark_night_of_the_Moon
LavoLale LavoLale
Enrico Billi
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read the paper Gullstrom-Rossi on Arxiv Physics and clearly it shows an anomalous effect. I am impressed by the numbers, but the announcement of the preliminar theory is very interesting, I would say revolutionary, like the measured effect. To obtain such effect with a so low energy is not possible with any known system.
I understand the difficulty of measuring 2600 K with thermometers ( I do not think it is possible) and therefore I understand the use of a spectrometer and the Wien’s euation. Clearly there are issues you are not ready to disclose, for obvious reasons, but I think we are in front of something really momentous. Probably the presentation will be made by normal calorimetry using a heat exchanger, am I correct?
I hope we will have more information when the product will be introduced.
Godspeed,
Prof
Anonymous:
I am following with strong interest the work of Nissan.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hank Mills:
I am sure you are able to give yourself my answer to your questions…
Thanks anyway for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still on our way toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the paper Gullstrom-Rossi and the replication of Nissan: evidently the litigation is not relenting your great work!
Cheers,
Teo
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Find here an interesting comment of Bob Cook:
“Finally a theory coupling electron orbital energy states with nuclear energy
states involving magnetic fields and isotopic shifts to lower potential energy.
It fits the LENR multibody reaction model and explains the lack of energetic
particles associated with two- body nuclear reactions. I give it a thumbs up!
And it may be in time for consideration by the distinguished Swedish Committee
that evaluates scientific advances for 2017.
Bob Cook”
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg113860.html
Update?
Dear Andrea. Congratulations to Carl and your self on your new paper. I think you have alluded to some of the concepts in this theory now and then in past posts over the last year or so and now after reading the theory in the paper it puts them all in to context. I was really intrigued by the ideas in the paper although much of it is above my level I can see it’s a very smart theory going from fundamental nuclear/electron properties in a very clever intelegent way to explain how they can be coupled and ultimately applied in a device. I was quite impressed how those ideas from different domains of knowledge were put together in to a complete theory.
I think Carl is quite a unique thinker. this and his previous publications are always interesting. i have often heard there is no low lying fruit left in particle physics but I think he has the ability to look across the thorny tree to different unexplored branches. Your journal header picture seems more and more appropriate.
All the best to all your team.
Stephen
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on the stunning progress you have made with the Quark! This device is a magnificent achievement. I’ve studied the paper, and I have several questions.
1) Should the plasma witnessed going across the cell be defined as an arc discharge or a glow discharge? I’m thinking it likely an arc discharge due to the low voltage being applied to the reactor, because an arc discharge requires a far lower voltage (but a much higher amperage) than a glow discharge.
2) To initiate the discharge (arc?) was a brief higher voltage pulse applied (possibly for only milliseconds) during start up before it was reduced?
3) A high temperature quartz or sapphire tube could withstand the high temperature of the plasma, but it seems like the nickel cathode/anode would not endure for as long due to having a lower melting point. What allows the nickel cathode/anode to survive? Is the spatial positioning of the plasma (between the electrodes) responsible for sparing the nickel?
4) Do the nuclear reactions in the cathode (which is being bombarded by ionized hydrogen in the form of positively charged bare protons) heat it up and generate electrons via thermionic emission? This would be an extremely elegant setup: the nuclear derived heat from the Rossi Effect powering a thermionic cathode!
5) Did the cathode go through any special pre-treatment?
6) The paper specifically mentions Manganese (Mn) as being a source of possible nucleons. This element is a deoxidizer of steel and other elements. Is this a component of the fuel?
7) When direct electrical production is achieved, does this mean that the current OUTPUT of the device is higher than the current INPUT? If the Quark is potentially a source of high amperage and low voltage, I have an idea for an awesome application you should consider: a power source for electromagnetic actuators for robotics!
8) It is mentioned that LiAlH4 supplied the hydrogen. How much LiAlH4 was utilized? My thinking is that probably very little was used.
Right now, the number one limitation when it comes to robotics is power. I could imagine these Quark devices (especially if they can activate in very short time periods) being built into all all of the electromagnetic actuators of a robot. The high current and low voltage would be perfect for producing the maximum magnetic field strength.
The Quark X could potentially herald a new age of robotics.
Sincerely,
Hank
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I am stunned by the publication of Nissan, that has replicated your effect based of the work of Dr Parkhomov and now is studying the application of the E-Cat to their electric cars. This is huge!
Godspeed,
A.
Dear dr. Andrea Rossi,
Yes do that. If you apply this technique, your wife will feel more attractive. And depending on the field where you play, everything starts to move.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
This issue is dedicated to the important Gullstrom Rossi paper but there are
other issues too.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-22-2017-lenr-day-of-gullstrom-rossi.html
Congrats for the Paer, and the new direction in LENR and wishes of Success!
Peter
Dan C.:
Substantially, the nutshell is that, but through the math of statistic calculations.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When you speak of 5 sigma, are you using that in terms such as this…
Continuous efforts to achieve stable and predictable process results (e.g. by reducing process variation)
Regards
Dan C.
Tom Conover:
Thanks.
He is in our Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I enjoyed reading (not really understanding all about it) Carl-Oscar Gullström- Andrea Rossi’s publication on https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.05249.pdf … Great job!
Question for you please.
Is Carl-Oscar Gullström on your team full or part time now with you?
Thank your team for me please, and thanks to you to again for your endurance and perseverance.
God bless,
Tom
Cornelius:
Thank you!
Warm Regards
A.R.
UK Simon:
Honestly, I don’t give a damn of the new and old attempts to delegitimaze my E-Cats.
That are shooting tennis balls to a tank.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
I am honoured from your attention.
I think I have to learn from you in many issues.
My health is not bad, I can work well and this is what counts.
Warm Regards
A.R.
C. Meridian:
No.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi, would this be an accurate statement describing the QuarkX?
“We are building tiny glass reactors for rapid testing purposes. Our cost per test has dropped from thousands of dollars to about $25”
Dear Andrea! Your achievements are fantastic! And please take care of your health!
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Brilliant .. Rossi preempts new attempts to delegitimize his eCats. )
Giuliano Bettini:
Panta rei ( Heraclitus).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yayo:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian Luca:
Not now, but do not forget Prof. Sergio Focardi.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
I must recall this when I try to improve my tennis playing with my wife.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Strong comgratulations to you and Gullstrom for your paper.
You made an enormous progress.
All the best
C.
JPR:
Still in good standing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
I see.
( Per aspera )
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Probably p.g. sharrow was talking about this article and your arXiv paper:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2017/03/21/new-paper-by-rossi-and-gullstrom-reports-quarkx-experiment-calculated-cop-22000/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.05249.pdf
Ad astra!
Best regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
Can I understand your recently published report as follows:
A proton moving in an electric field, acts somewhat like a pointed arrow, and not as a tennis ball. Even if it is very hot.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Dear Andrea
…. so missing a chef (Italian) on his staff. 🙂
Is there Italian staff who work with you on Qx?
Thanks
Update?