It is now officially the Christmas Season, so I can share with you our new Holiday song. The song is called “We’re Doomed, We’re Doomed, We’re Doomed, We’re Doomed”, and it is an attempt to acknowledge that our culture’s widespread fear is illusory, while the joy of Christmas is real.
Perhaps the neutron of fear becomes a proton of joy under the right circumstances. 🙂
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Can you disclose the name of the airoplane manufacturer you are working with directly or indirectly?
Or, at least, the nationality?
Cheers,
J
You posted “I am afraid it has been made obsolete from the E-Cat X.” in regards to a gas-powered version of eCat technology.
I take this to mean that the Ecat X is envisioned to run using electricity as the power source. Your original arguments posted some time ago was that electricity generated by an eCat technology reactor was too expensive compared to a gas-powered version that it made no sense to consume electricity produced by the eCat reactor.
To reconcile this contradiction I can only assume that the heating portion of the input energy is so small compared to the output that a gas-powered Ecat X does not make sense.
a. Is this essentially correct?
b. Non heating related energy (e.g., pumps, controls, excitation) would still come from electricity regardless of whether the heating input was electricity or gas-powered. Is this correct?
a very simple experiment:
Cylinder deviations from cylindricity less than 0,005mm
Cylinder (l=950mm,with plugs on the ends ) with piston(1.7kilo,l=300mm) be reset through a plastic pipe with a vertical height of approximately 5 meters on a hard stop.Piston under the action of inertia forces will compress the gas in about 25 , and the temperature rises to 1900C.If a reaction occurs, I do not know how to stop the process
Alain Co:
I am thinking to open circuit and to a universal engine.
Working on this study also in this very moment. I am getting involved, because the equations fit. 50% of chance of error, though.
Thank you for your permanent attention, I am following all your comments around.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Darrin.
No, A particle does not contain the particles produced by its decay.
The model can be quite simple, thanks to quantum mechanics: a particle is a quantistically defined wave in a specific field; imagine a wave ( the particle) on the sea ( the field). When this wave “decays” it arrives adjacent to , for example, a river and induces a new wave ( the particle produced by the decay) on the river ( the adjacent field ). The wave on the river is not contained in the wave on the sea, but is induced by it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When you talk of “Jet Engine” is is a technology usually engineered for planes, or more generally a “Brayton turbine”, like the gas turbines commonly installed in gas power plants?
Do you plan to exploit open cycle or closed cycle ?
Eernie1:
1- I deem his book on the atom nucleus models one of the most important books written in the last 50 years, and got deep inspiration from it for my work.
I sent him many comments related to his book; he is also expert in nuclear fusion and has taken in serious consideration my work: at that point the fact that we could think together about this effect was written in the stars.
2- he is among the very restrict number of persons invited to visit the plant. He is updated about it.
3- yes
4- I settle for copying your situation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
May I ask a few questions about your relationship with Dr.Cook? First: How did you two decide to work together on formulating a theory about your process of producing energy? Second: Has Dr. Cook ever observed your presently operating unit and has he been given any of the generated long term data? Three: Is the mathematical expert, involved with your formulating a theory for your paper, also schooled in nuclear physics?
Thank you for the wonderful compliment you gave me
. I predict your interest in your work will keep your mind active and healthy as long as you live.
Grateful regards
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you give a simple model of how particles decay?
When a particle decays is because it contains the particles that are emitted during the decaying process?
Thank you for your pationce,
Darrin
Alessandro Coppi, you wrote that wars are regaining momentum due to oil and gas. Let me briefly disagree with this analysis, as the real reason is the clash between rising and declining imperialist powers in the new strategic phase of economic multipolarity. America and old powers must be present at all costs and by any means in some vital areas, to prevent being superseded by the new Asian giants. The capitalist competition on the markets is in itself a war. It would be the same with LENR Cats, solar satellites, hot fusion reactors, gravitons energetic microwaves from Neptune, or alchemical formulas. Also ideologies, like religions, free market dogmas, american exceptionalism, benign europe, green economy, carbon emissions controls, etc etc are instrumentally and dialectically bent to the conflicts between capitalists and to the social struggle between capital and labor.
Pekka Janhunen:
I want not to discuss a paper that has not yet been published: if it will be worth, the publucation will be made and our point will be clear. Otherwise, we cannot talk of something that could abort.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alessandro Coppi:
Our technology has still to complete the tests, after that, if the results will be positive, we will be ready for the market.
By the way, it is ridiculous to think that the E-Cat can make any difference in regard of wars. The roots of wars are different and far deeper. By the way: to say that the wars on course are generated by a lack of energy sources is wrong. Energy, in real terms, has never been cheaper in the last 60 years: the oil price today is about 42 $/barrel: in real value, this price is far less than the price od 2 $/barrel 60 years ago: with 2 $ 60 years ago you could buy three times the things you can buy today with 42 $
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Offer still goes. Fitted on my old 1964 172E, one of your aircraft engines can get me from my home base grass field in Va. to Orly in about a day and a half. You can sell your engines, and I can sell my soap.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In your R&D upon the jet engine, are you connected directly or indirectly with a major aircraft manufacturer?
I understand that you can’t give the name, just want to know this independently from who it is.
Regards,
Barry
Ciao Andrea,
ricominciano ad ammazzarsi per via del petrolio e del gas, questo è il momento, tu non hai colpa, ma se in questo mondo c’è una possibilitĂ per fermarli, questa è l’E-CAT, solo togliendogli il giocattolo (petrolio) dalle mani smetteranno di giocare alla guerra.
Se ora il team è di 20 persone, andrebbe portato a 200, 2000, 20000, 200000 quello che serve, è impensabile che allo sviluppo di una tale tecnologia siano addette poche decine di uomini, mentre centinaia di migliaia siano impiegati per fronteggiarsi a suon di fucilate e bombardamenti, con risorse sottratte ai popoli, praticamente illimitate.
Se il problema sono le risorse basterebbe che tu lanciassi l’allarme, e forse si muoverebbero anche gli stati.
Se come credo fermamente questa tecnologia funziona, è il momento per dare l’annuncio, ora!
Non farlo ora potrebbe essere un tragico errore, motivo di amaro rimpianto tra alcuni anni.
Wikipedia: “The Mössbauer Effect is a process in which a nucleus emits or absorbs gamma rays without loss of energy to a nuclear recoil.”
When you say “reverse Mössbauer effect”, are you referring to the second part of the above sentence, i.e. the part where a nucleus absorbs a gamma ray without recoil?
KD:
Thank you for the information: I know well the issue and doubt that an Na bind allows high temperatures in a thermoelectric alloy. This said, we’ll see the numbers published on Science.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi
On Phys.org is article “Adding sodium produces material that is most efficient at converting heat to electricity.
Details of the sodium-doped tin selenide-the most efficient thermoelectric material to date at producing electricity from waste heat-will be published Nov.26 by the journal “Science”
KD
Albert N.:
The Mossbauer Effect is well described on Wikipedia (Google Wikipedia Mossbauer Effect).
Prof Cook and I are working on a theory that could link the reverse Mossbauer Effect with the Rossi Effect.
It is a very complex work that demands complex mathematical models and we are not ready for a publication.
What Prof Cook will present is a hint of our intuition.
We are curious to see the reactions and to see if there is something to learn.
I must say that we learnt much from the discussions I had with Prof. Suffritti of the University of Sassari (Italy) upon an unpublished paper of him on the same issue.
Our publication is going slow because we agreed upon the fact that this publication is worth to be made only if our theory can be sustained by a consistent mathematical structure.
Warm Regards
A.R.
On Dec. 11 at JCF16 Prof. Norman Cook will be presenting ‘A Hypothesis Concerning the Connection Between the “Mössbauer Effect” and the “Rossi Effect”. Is it possible to summarize what exactly is the “Mössbauer Effect”?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If by engine you mean some kind of reciprocating engine with cylinders, there exists something called “Sanderson mechanism” which is allegedly an efficient (low friction, low bearing forces) way of turning reciprocating motion in rotary motion or vice versa. I mean, something which is supposedly better than a crankshaft. If you google “Sanderson mechanism”, you find descriptions and video. An official website seems to be s-ram.com. I have no experience, but someone recommended about 5 years ago.
best regards, /pekka
James Watt:
Because a US engineer I am working with has given me a detail that has sparked a very good idea. It has been impossible not to work on it. I was very sceptic about engine applications of the E-Cat, now I am far less sceptic. It has been a detail, but a detail that has ignited the New Fire in the engines.
Maybe I am totally wrong, maybe not, but I am going to try.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Clara:
Thank you for your kind words; I was a professional marathonete: I learnt that a race is not lost until the last meters. Many times I won a race after being tempted to give up during a suffering phase halfway.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Forsberg:
He,he,he…now, I want to anticipate the next from Frank, here is the update:
Today is Thanksgiving Day: I wish a happy and peaceful Thanksgiving Day to all the Americans who read this blog. Today we thank God for all He gave us, starting with life;
the time is 09.25
We celebrate Thanksgiving Day in the plant and the situation is calm and stable.
Thanks God!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
It is now officially the Christmas Season, so I can share with you our new Holiday song. The song is called “We’re Doomed, We’re Doomed, We’re Doomed, We’re Doomed”, and it is an attempt to acknowledge that our culture’s widespread fear is illusory, while the joy of Christmas is real.
Perhaps the neutron of fear becomes a proton of joy under the right circumstances. 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDjRn0Ic5rs
-thomas
J:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
a. could be
b. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Can you disclose the name of the airoplane manufacturer you are working with directly or indirectly?
Or, at least, the nationality?
Cheers,
J
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You posted “I am afraid it has been made obsolete from the E-Cat X.” in regards to a gas-powered version of eCat technology.
I take this to mean that the Ecat X is envisioned to run using electricity as the power source. Your original arguments posted some time ago was that electricity generated by an eCat technology reactor was too expensive compared to a gas-powered version that it made no sense to consume electricity produced by the eCat reactor.
To reconcile this contradiction I can only assume that the heating portion of the input energy is so small compared to the output that a gas-powered Ecat X does not make sense.
a. Is this essentially correct?
b. Non heating related energy (e.g., pumps, controls, excitation) would still come from electricity regardless of whether the heating input was electricity or gas-powered. Is this correct?
Alessandro Coppi:
I am afraid it has been made obsolete from the E-Cat X.
But the aituation is still fluid.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Viktor Shipachev:
Thank you for the suggestion.
Warm Regards
A.R.
I can not send you the drawings
a very simple experiment:
Cylinder deviations from cylindricity less than 0,005mm
Cylinder (l=950mm,with plugs on the ends ) with piston(1.7kilo,l=300mm) be reset through a plastic pipe with a vertical height of approximately 5 meters on a hard stop.Piston under the action of inertia forces will compress the gas in about 25 , and the temperature rises to 1900C.If a reaction occurs, I do not know how to stop the process
Hi Andrea,
what news about the gas fueled E-CAt that some time ago seemed the most promising technology?
Alessandro Coppi
Alain Co:
I am thinking to open circuit and to a universal engine.
Working on this study also in this very moment. I am getting involved, because the equations fit. 50% of chance of error, though.
Thank you for your permanent attention, I am following all your comments around.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Darrin.
No, A particle does not contain the particles produced by its decay.
The model can be quite simple, thanks to quantum mechanics: a particle is a quantistically defined wave in a specific field; imagine a wave ( the particle) on the sea ( the field). When this wave “decays” it arrives adjacent to , for example, a river and induces a new wave ( the particle produced by the decay) on the river ( the adjacent field ). The wave on the river is not contained in the wave on the sea, but is induced by it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dot Rossi,
When you talk of “Jet Engine” is is a technology usually engineered for planes, or more generally a “Brayton turbine”, like the gas turbines commonly installed in gas power plants?
Do you plan to exploit open cycle or closed cycle ?
Jack:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Arthur:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eernie1:
1- I deem his book on the atom nucleus models one of the most important books written in the last 50 years, and got deep inspiration from it for my work.
I sent him many comments related to his book; he is also expert in nuclear fusion and has taken in serious consideration my work: at that point the fact that we could think together about this effect was written in the stars.
2- he is among the very restrict number of persons invited to visit the plant. He is updated about it.
3- yes
4- I settle for copying your situation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
May I ask a few questions about your relationship with Dr.Cook? First: How did you two decide to work together on formulating a theory about your process of producing energy? Second: Has Dr. Cook ever observed your presently operating unit and has he been given any of the generated long term data? Three: Is the mathematical expert, involved with your formulating a theory for your paper, also schooled in nuclear physics?
Thank you for the wonderful compliment you gave me
. I predict your interest in your work will keep your mind active and healthy as long as you live.
Grateful regards
Viktor Shipachev:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
It has been a detail, but a detail that has ignited the New Fire in the engines.
Maybe I am totally wrong, maybe not, but I am going to try.
Warm Regards,
I recommend that you become familiar with the work on the creation of free piston engine linear generator, the Japanese or the Germans
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUbBqSu9Hdc
http://www.dailytechinfo.org/auto/4876-novyy-lineynyy-generator-pozvolit-suschestvenno-uvelichit-dalnost-dvizheniya-gibridnyh-avtomobiley.html
It’s almost ready reactor for the pulse of lenr
Barry:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you give a simple model of how particles decay?
When a particle decays is because it contains the particles that are emitted during the decaying process?
Thank you for your pationce,
Darrin
Orsobubu:
As everybody has understood, our friend Orsobubu is NOT ideologically biased ( he,he,he).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Your US Patent is the most important reading I made in the last 10 years.
Thank you,
Arthur
Alessandro Coppi, you wrote that wars are regaining momentum due to oil and gas. Let me briefly disagree with this analysis, as the real reason is the clash between rising and declining imperialist powers in the new strategic phase of economic multipolarity. America and old powers must be present at all costs and by any means in some vital areas, to prevent being superseded by the new Asian giants. The capitalist competition on the markets is in itself a war. It would be the same with LENR Cats, solar satellites, hot fusion reactors, gravitons energetic microwaves from Neptune, or alchemical formulas. Also ideologies, like religions, free market dogmas, american exceptionalism, benign europe, green economy, carbon emissions controls, etc etc are instrumentally and dialectically bent to the conflicts between capitalists and to the social struggle between capital and labor.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for your terrific US Patent. Well done.
Jack
Charlie Sutherland:
You are flying too high: we are flying down at the moment: just studying and making R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
I want not to discuss a paper that has not yet been published: if it will be worth, the publucation will be made and our point will be clear. Otherwise, we cannot talk of something that could abort.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alessandro Coppi:
Our technology has still to complete the tests, after that, if the results will be positive, we will be ready for the market.
By the way, it is ridiculous to think that the E-Cat can make any difference in regard of wars. The roots of wars are different and far deeper. By the way: to say that the wars on course are generated by a lack of energy sources is wrong. Energy, in real terms, has never been cheaper in the last 60 years: the oil price today is about 42 $/barrel: in real value, this price is far less than the price od 2 $/barrel 60 years ago: with 2 $ 60 years ago you could buy three times the things you can buy today with 42 $
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Offer still goes. Fitted on my old 1964 172E, one of your aircraft engines can get me from my home base grass field in Va. to Orly in about a day and a half. You can sell your engines, and I can sell my soap.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In your R&D upon the jet engine, are you connected directly or indirectly with a major aircraft manufacturer?
I understand that you can’t give the name, just want to know this independently from who it is.
Regards,
Barry
Ciao Andrea,
ricominciano ad ammazzarsi per via del petrolio e del gas, questo è il momento, tu non hai colpa, ma se in questo mondo c’è una possibilitĂ per fermarli, questa è l’E-CAT, solo togliendogli il giocattolo (petrolio) dalle mani smetteranno di giocare alla guerra.
Se ora il team è di 20 persone, andrebbe portato a 200, 2000, 20000, 200000 quello che serve, è impensabile che allo sviluppo di una tale tecnologia siano addette poche decine di uomini, mentre centinaia di migliaia siano impiegati per fronteggiarsi a suon di fucilate e bombardamenti, con risorse sottratte ai popoli, praticamente illimitate.
Se il problema sono le risorse basterebbe che tu lanciassi l’allarme, e forse si muoverebbero anche gli stati.
Se come credo fermamente questa tecnologia funziona, è il momento per dare l’annuncio, ora!
Non farlo ora potrebbe essere un tragico errore, motivo di amaro rimpianto tra alcuni anni.
Che Dio ce la mandi buona
Alessandro Coppi
Dear Andrea:
Can we have an update?
Cheers,
Choy
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Wikipedia: “The Mössbauer Effect is a process in which a nucleus emits or absorbs gamma rays without loss of energy to a nuclear recoil.”
When you say “reverse Mössbauer effect”, are you referring to the second part of the above sentence, i.e. the part where a nucleus absorbs a gamma ray without recoil?
regards, /pekka
KD:
Thank you for the information: I know well the issue and doubt that an Na bind allows high temperatures in a thermoelectric alloy. This said, we’ll see the numbers published on Science.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi
On Phys.org is article “Adding sodium produces material that is most efficient at converting heat to electricity.
Details of the sodium-doped tin selenide-the most efficient thermoelectric material to date at producing electricity from waste heat-will be published Nov.26 by the journal “Science”
KD
Schwartz:
Yes, but we are just on the drawing board.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Albert N.:
The Mossbauer Effect is well described on Wikipedia (Google Wikipedia Mossbauer Effect).
Prof Cook and I are working on a theory that could link the reverse Mossbauer Effect with the Rossi Effect.
It is a very complex work that demands complex mathematical models and we are not ready for a publication.
What Prof Cook will present is a hint of our intuition.
We are curious to see the reactions and to see if there is something to learn.
I must say that we learnt much from the discussions I had with Prof. Suffritti of the University of Sassari (Italy) upon an unpublished paper of him on the same issue.
Our publication is going slow because we agreed upon the fact that this publication is worth to be made only if our theory can be sustained by a consistent mathematical structure.
Warm Regards
A.R.
JYD:
Thank you for the information
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea
It seems you could be interested by jet engine, a look upon this steam jet engine useful for boat propulsion could be useful ?
congratulations for your wonderful work and patent.
JYD
Dear Dr. Rossi,
On Dec. 11 at JCF16 Prof. Norman Cook will be presenting ‘A Hypothesis Concerning the Connection Between the “Mössbauer Effect” and the “Rossi Effect”. Is it possible to summarize what exactly is the “Mössbauer Effect”?
Warm Regards,
Albert N
Dear Andrea,
If you get success with the Jet Engine, it might be not to hard to use it to generate electricity. See here: http://www.gereports.com/post/82402621133/this-jet-engine-cannot-fly-but-it-can-help-save/
Happy Thanksgiving to you and your team!
Frank Acland
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for the interesting information, but we are trying to make a completely different toy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If by engine you mean some kind of reciprocating engine with cylinders, there exists something called “Sanderson mechanism” which is allegedly an efficient (low friction, low bearing forces) way of turning reciprocating motion in rotary motion or vice versa. I mean, something which is supposedly better than a crankshaft. If you google “Sanderson mechanism”, you find descriptions and video. An official website seems to be s-ram.com. I have no experience, but someone recommended about 5 years ago.
best regards, /pekka
Dear Andrea
Congratulations for your US Patent! Great!
Godspeed,
Ilary
Dr Rossi:
I understand that you are talking of a jet engine for universal applications.
Am I right?
Schwartz
James Watt:
Because a US engineer I am working with has given me a detail that has sparked a very good idea. It has been impossible not to work on it. I was very sceptic about engine applications of the E-Cat, now I am far less sceptic. It has been a detail, but a detail that has ignited the New Fire in the engines.
Maybe I am totally wrong, maybe not, but I am going to try.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eulalia:
Thank you: the work of all our Team is inspiring, honestly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Clara:
Thank you for your kind words; I was a professional marathonete: I learnt that a race is not lost until the last meters. Many times I won a race after being tempted to give up during a suffering phase halfway.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Herbert:
Yes, of course I am! It looks very interesting.
From Prof. Norman Cook there is always something to learn.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Forsberg:
He,he,he…now, I want to anticipate the next from Frank, here is the update:
Today is Thanksgiving Day: I wish a happy and peaceful Thanksgiving Day to all the Americans who read this blog. Today we thank God for all He gave us, starting with life;
the time is 09.25
We celebrate Thanksgiving Day in the plant and the situation is calm and stable.
Thanks God!
Warm Regards,
A.R.