Dear Andrea Rossi,
Just a curiosity about the “archeology”: after the patent you got approved in the USA in the May 2000, has some plant been made based on such patent?
All the best,
Vanni
Your optimism is contagious, but I am both excited and worried about how events will unfold. Your work inspires me greatly, but the possible chaos that the New Fire may bring scares me. I am certain you have contemplated this subject more than most; do you have any comforting thoughts you can share?
Can you confirm or deny that the US military have been in contact with you relative to the May/2016 directive to the Secretary of Defense by the House Committee on Armed Services? The LENR briefing was due to the Committee on Sept 22; is the tardiness of the public release of the briefing attributed to waiting for you to achieve 5 Sigma?
Tom Conover:
He,he,he…Yoda apart, yes, I can see in our horizon important developments related to the incoming New Fire.
I cannot disclose yet what is maturing, but I am very optimistic ( albeit some friend of mine will think “as usual” ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I’m sure we are all exited about your comment on testing arrays of QuarkX units recently. Might you elaborate on one of the quotes below you made a couple weeks ago for us today?
David:
Not easy to explain intuitively, but let’s try with this model: Boson fields can have any value, while Fermions vibrational frequency is given once and for all. A Boson field, for example the electromagnetic field, has a really large value, that corresponds to many elementary particles, and this possibility replicates for every particle. This possibility is barred for Fermions, because each particle of the Fermions family has to be in that particular state, or nothing, therefore no Fermion can be in the same state as another one. To define the “state” of a particle it is necessary to define the position, the energy, the spin and maybe other characteristic of it and it is impossible for two or more Fermions to share all these same quanta.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you try to explain with your usual divulgative style how is possible that bosons do not respect the exclusion principle of Pauli, which is difficult to digest, while, on the contrary, fermions do, which is easier to understand?
Thank you if you can answer,
David
Dear Readers:
Yesterday this blog has been unaccessible for several hours during the afternoon for a hacking attack. Our IP guy has repristinated all well in short time.
Sorry for the gap of accessibility.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jordan:
This morning we will make a simulation of large scale production in the factory of Miami, Florida. We are resolving problems.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Demsey:
Yes, correct. The patent has been applied for in 1998 and allowed by the USPTO in 2000. The technology has been applied in a plant to dispose of wood wastes turning them into liquid, solid and gaseous fuel. This makes me remember the wonderful period of my life I spent in New Hampshire in the nineties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
The paper Gullstroem-Rossi is not in contrast with the Cook-Rossi paper.
About 4He, we are still studying on it.
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I’ve been continuing to look at your recent paper from time to time and still find it intriguing. I really appreciate the theoretical walk through as it helped me with the understanding quite a bit. Especially after re reading it a couple of times.
I’m quite curious how the 3N nucleon configurations line up with Norman Cooks models now but it seems to me there is an interesting link there.
Do you also have an explanation for what happens with the Helium 4 that is produced? Is it out gassed or is it also accounted for in the theory somehow.
After seeing the link of Ing. Michelangelo De Meo with your book of 1984, I compared itd content with the patent allowed by the US Patent Office in the year 2000 (patent N. 6,051,110) and discovered that you made in the USA a patent that was the development of your Italian patent of 1978 on the same subject. Correct?
Dear Andrea,
congratulation for the ArXiv publication of your article. It is indeed too complex to understand and appreciate for me and the majority here but some simple deductions are still possible. Output/Input power, alias COP, seems to be really astonishing.
We was very impressed in knowing the mean COP near 100 of the ECat used in the 1 year long test. And you stated that QuarkX COP overcomes the ECat one.
I also remember the barely retained excitement in your words when describing the performance of the first prototype of QuarkX.
I will not ask you the COP because we all know Rossi style to not give away numbers so easily.
So I’d like to ask you:
Dima Redko:
Presentation of the product.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Vanni Mastel:
Yes, in Manchester, NH.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today we are working well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Echo:
Thank you for the link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
A very interesting list of names under LENR – NDA – has been disclosed, maybe you could recognize some of the names listed here:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/why-is-it-important-for-dardenindustrial-heat-to-take-control-of-the-lenr-forum/
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you already have full time employee in your factory in the USA?
Cheers
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Just a curiosity about the “archeology”: after the patent you got approved in the USA in the May 2000, has some plant been made based on such patent?
All the best,
Vanni
Dear Andrea!
Once sigma 5 is achieved, what is next?
Arthur Lautner:
I do not even know what you are talking about.
Thank you anyway for your sympathy and your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea:
Your optimism is contagious, but I am both excited and worried about how events will unfold. Your work inspires me greatly, but the possible chaos that the New Fire may bring scares me. I am certain you have contemplated this subject more than most; do you have any comforting thoughts you can share?
Can you confirm or deny that the US military have been in contact with you relative to the May/2016 directive to the Secretary of Defense by the House Committee on Armed Services? The LENR briefing was due to the Committee on Sept 22; is the tardiness of the public release of the briefing attributed to waiting for you to achieve 5 Sigma?
Best,
Arthur
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for important paper Gullstrom-Rossi. It is a milestone.
Cheers,
R.S.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
How is your health? There are strange rumers around. Take care of yourself,
N
Tom Conover:
He,he,he…Yoda apart, yes, I can see in our horizon important developments related to the incoming New Fire.
I cannot disclose yet what is maturing, but I am very optimistic ( albeit some friend of mine will think “as usual” ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I’m sure we are all exited about your comment on testing arrays of QuarkX units recently. Might you elaborate on one of the quotes below you made a couple weeks ago for us today?
Andrea Rossi
March 6, 2017 at 4:30 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=214#comment-1270667
“Important events I can see in the horizon.” It reminded me a bit of yoda …
Thank you again for your efforts and progress,
Tom
ps: otherwise we may have to take it for granted that the truth is the force:
http://www.yodaquotes.net/in-a-dark-place-we-find-ourselves-and-a-little-more-knowledge-lights-our-way/
http://www.yodaquotes.net/many-of-the-truths-that-we-cling-to-depend-on-our-point-of-view/
Dear Andrea,
EGO OUT’s posting for this day is:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-28-2107-lenr-problem-solving-info.html
Warm greetings,
Peter
JPR:
Also this morning we are on our way toward the Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
David:
Not easy to explain intuitively, but let’s try with this model: Boson fields can have any value, while Fermions vibrational frequency is given once and for all. A Boson field, for example the electromagnetic field, has a really large value, that corresponds to many elementary particles, and this possibility replicates for every particle. This possibility is barred for Fermions, because each particle of the Fermions family has to be in that particular state, or nothing, therefore no Fermion can be in the same state as another one. To define the “state” of a particle it is necessary to define the position, the energy, the spin and maybe other characteristic of it and it is impossible for two or more Fermions to share all these same quanta.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you try to explain with your usual divulgative style how is possible that bosons do not respect the exclusion principle of Pauli, which is difficult to digest, while, on the contrary, fermions do, which is easier to understand?
Thank you if you can answer,
David
Mikhail:
No comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The ventriloquist was effectively banned for 2 weeks on LENR for insulting behavior despite frequent warnings. He finally got his wish.
Watt:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Danielle:
Not yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
dear Andrea,
The link to my posting of today is at:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-27-2017-lenr-scandal-some-info.html
Cheers,
Peter
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Gullstrom-Rossi paper published in Arxiv Physics is extremely interesting.
It is a totally new approach.
Godspeed,
Watt
Frank Acland:
We are working in this very moment on both issues.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You mention making a simulation of large scale production of QuarkXes.
Is this a software simulation, or actually combining QuarkXes in an industrial-size unit?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Did you receive a complete report about the replication of the Rossi Effect made by Nissan?
Godspeed,
Danielle
Dear Readers:
Yesterday this blog has been unaccessible for several hours during the afternoon for a hacking attack. Our IP guy has repristinated all well in short time.
Sorry for the gap of accessibility.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco Serra:
Enough.
Thank you for your kind attention!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jordan:
This morning we will make a simulation of large scale production in the factory of Miami, Florida. We are resolving problems.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Demsey:
Yes, correct. The patent has been applied for in 1998 and allowed by the USPTO in 2000. The technology has been applied in a plant to dispose of wood wastes turning them into liquid, solid and gaseous fuel. This makes me remember the wonderful period of my life I spent in New Hampshire in the nineties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
We continue to be in good standing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
The paper Gullstroem-Rossi is not in contrast with the Cook-Rossi paper.
About 4He, we are still studying on it.
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I’ve been continuing to look at your recent paper from time to time and still find it intriguing. I really appreciate the theoretical walk through as it helped me with the understanding quite a bit. Especially after re reading it a couple of times.
I’m quite curious how the 3N nucleon configurations line up with Norman Cooks models now but it seems to me there is an interesting link there.
Do you also have an explanation for what happens with the Helium 4 that is produced? Is it out gassed or is it also accounted for in the theory somehow.
Best Regards
Stephen
Update?
After seeing the link of Ing. Michelangelo De Meo with your book of 1984, I compared itd content with the patent allowed by the US Patent Office in the year 2000 (patent N. 6,051,110) and discovered that you made in the USA a patent that was the development of your Italian patent of 1978 on the same subject. Correct?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going on the preparation of the industrial production in this litigation-filled period of time?
Cheers,
Jordan
Dear Andrea,
congratulation for the ArXiv publication of your article. It is indeed too complex to understand and appreciate for me and the majority here but some simple deductions are still possible. Output/Input power, alias COP, seems to be really astonishing.
We was very impressed in knowing the mean COP near 100 of the ECat used in the 1 year long test. And you stated that QuarkX COP overcomes the ECat one.
I also remember the barely retained excitement in your words when describing the performance of the first prototype of QuarkX.
I will not ask you the COP because we all know Rossi style to not give away numbers so easily.
So I’d like to ask you:
Is the COP of the QuarkX really that awesome ?
Thank you and God bless you
Marco Serra
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jim:
Documents speak for themselves.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Javier:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today we are on our way toward Sigma 5,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Maudie Brownwood:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
Updated available information about our IP, if any, is on
http://www.leonardocorporation.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.