Thank you for your replies to my question. A couple more if you don’t mind?
1. Even if the QuarkX is not working normally with the battery, is it working at all (even if less efficient)?
2. You say that the electrical production from the QuarkX is alternating current (AC) — has this always been the case?
3. Have you had to modify your control system for the battery powered experiment?
It’s interesting to hear you are experimenting running the quarkX with a battery.
1. So far, does the QuarkX act normally with the battery as a power source?
2. What is the power rating for the battery you are using?
3. What advantages do you see in running the QuarkX from a battery?
Step forward for DTT, Divertor Tokamak Test Facility, the 500 million-euro project to build a strategic nuclear research fusion infrastructure in Italy. After the resolution approved by the X Chamber Commission (Production Activities, Trade and Tourism), which engages the Government to take initiatives for the implementation of the project in Italy, EUROfusion has also begun the final phase to fund the project.
Eva:
Also, it helps us to measure with precision the alternate current directly generated by the reactor. It is a very interesting experiment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JJ:
We are confident of the evidence we have deposited in Court.
Everything that has to be said will be said by my Attorneys in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
If you are thinking to use a battery as a power source, this means you are reaching COP values really high: is what is written on the white board of the “clandestine” photo something close to reality?
Cheers
Prof
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Very interesting your test with batteries. This will surely make easier the measurement of the COP: direct current is much easier to measure.
Cheers,
Eva
JPR:
This morning we are making an experiment, testing the device to allow the QuarkX to be able to work either with battery or with AC power source, like a computer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, WWF April 19 at 7:18AM
Your reply, “could be,” was too modest.
You should have said the truth, the, whole truth. and nothing but the truth.
I really believe it will.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
USA
Stephen:
1. combined and not counting the interruptions, we are close to one year, during which many events happened and many corrections have been made
2. yes
3. n.a.
4. no
The real duration of a charge will be told only by experience. We’ll go on until we will know.
Thank you for your kind sustain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
It seems that the QuarkX has been running for tests for a very while now which is remarkable for such a small device.
Would you be able to let us know:
1. how long the three quarks have been in operation?
2. If it with the same initial fuel charge.
3. If not the initial fuel how long with the current fuel charge
4. If there is any sign of degrading in performance?
I’m curious if you have found a clever way to extend the life of these kinds of devices from a fueling / catalyst point of view.
Thanks for all your continued work in these days. We can all learn something about strong composure and resilience and persistence in what’s important when it’s needed from someone like you.
I’m really glad to hear that your theoretical work with Oscar and Norman continues. They are really interesting and important approaches to understanding LENR. They work really well in synergy I think. Looking forward to see what comes up.
I’m curious about what happens to the Helium and if it is used in the process some how. Perhaps this theory synergy gives some insights someday… I wonder perhaps it’s useful from ion bombardment / charge carrying or other mechanical points of view… But I look forward to seeing how it works out
Best Regards and wish you continued strength in the months ahead
We understand you’re not responding to questions to your blog as sometimes, not saying anything is the best answer. As, silence can never be – misquoted.
Svein Henrik:
I do not know, because it will depend on the peer reviewing period. Our theoretical and experimental work will take about 30 more days.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for your care. I am well. You have nothing to apologize about.
Answers:
1- The COP is lower, but in the same order of magnitude
2- Yes
3- Our paper speaks for itself and I prefer not to add anything, pending a substantial review of it
4- I have enormous esteem for Norman Cook, whose book has inspired my work since the day it has been published ( I bought a copy of the first edition several days after its publication, same thing I did after the publication of the second edition ). Of course our collaboration will continue and we have agreed upon the next starting point, when I will be able to give him data that now I cannot supply. As you have seen in the documents published of the litigation, IH has accused me to have violated the NDA with the publication of the paper Cook-Rossi: while this accusation is ridiculous, since they had approved the draft before the publication on Arxiv Physics, this fact explains to you how mined is the field I have to walk through.The theoretical work on course with Carl-Oscar Gullstroem is perfectly conciliable with the atomic structure theorized by Prof Norman Cook.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
C.:
No. The Court decisions are based upon facts and evidence, not upon opinions and chatters. This is what makes us confident of the strength of our case.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1. no
2. yes
3. yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your replies to my question. A couple more if you don’t mind?
1. Even if the QuarkX is not working normally with the battery, is it working at all (even if less efficient)?
2. You say that the electrical production from the QuarkX is alternating current (AC) — has this always been the case?
3. Have you had to modify your control system for the battery powered experiment?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Jasmine:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1. no
2. we are testing different sizes
3. just more options and portability
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It’s interesting to hear you are experimenting running the quarkX with a battery.
1. So far, does the QuarkX act normally with the battery as a power source?
2. What is the power rating for the battery you are using?
3. What advantages do you see in running the QuarkX from a battery?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Step forward for DTT, Divertor Tokamak Test Facility, the 500 million-euro project to build a strategic nuclear research fusion infrastructure in Italy. After the resolution approved by the X Chamber Commission (Production Activities, Trade and Tourism), which engages the Government to take initiatives for the implementation of the project in Italy, EUROfusion has also begun the final phase to fund the project.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fC69IgR1wxc&feature=share
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6ckXRbwCsU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cohv10E0th0
Dr. Rossi, do you convert che battery DC to AC before powering che QuarkX?
Best Regards
Italo R.
Dear Andrea:
Your experiment with batteries is great!
Congratulations,
J.
Eva:
Also, it helps us to measure with precision the alternate current directly generated by the reactor. It is a very interesting experiment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JJ:
We are confident of the evidence we have deposited in Court.
Everything that has to be said will be said by my Attorneys in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Weleda:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
I want not to comment the photo whose publication has not been authorized.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
If you are thinking to use a battery as a power source, this means you are reaching COP values really high: is what is written on the white board of the “clandestine” photo something close to reality?
Cheers
Prof
Dear Andrea:
Do you still think that the basic module of the QuarkX will be rated 20 W?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Today very important hearing in Court.
Have you any comment about it?
Jajo
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Very interesting your test with batteries. This will surely make easier the measurement of the COP: direct current is much easier to measure.
Cheers,
Eva
JPR:
This morning we are making an experiment, testing the device to allow the QuarkX to be able to work either with battery or with AC power source, like a computer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Mario Alexander:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sammie Burgdorfer:
Partially.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Louis:
There is a thing that is most important of my life: it is the scope of my life. Everything must be in function of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Was it worth to make all the work you made with the E-Cat and eventually compromise your health for it?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The robots that will be used to manufactire the E-Cats will be of the humanoid kind?
Cheers,
Sammie
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think that it will be possible to use a battery as the power source of the QuarkX?
God bless you,
Mario
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Here is the EGO OUT- LENR isssue for today;
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-19-2017-lenr-and-low-art-of-techno.html
Cheers,
Peter
Robert Curto:
Thank you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, WWF April 19 at 7:18AM
Your reply, “could be,” was too modest.
You should have said the truth, the, whole truth. and nothing but the truth.
I really believe it will.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
USA
Stephen:
1. combined and not counting the interruptions, we are close to one year, during which many events happened and many corrections have been made
2. yes
3. n.a.
4. no
The real duration of a charge will be told only by experience. We’ll go on until we will know.
Thank you for your kind sustain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rudy:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
WWF:
Could be.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
I am here with the QuarkX. It’s all right.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
It seems that the QuarkX has been running for tests for a very while now which is remarkable for such a small device.
Would you be able to let us know:
1. how long the three quarks have been in operation?
2. If it with the same initial fuel charge.
3. If not the initial fuel how long with the current fuel charge
4. If there is any sign of degrading in performance?
I’m curious if you have found a clever way to extend the life of these kinds of devices from a fueling / catalyst point of view.
Thanks for all your continued work in these days. We can all learn something about strong composure and resilience and persistence in what’s important when it’s needed from someone like you.
I’m really glad to hear that your theoretical work with Oscar and Norman continues. They are really interesting and important approaches to understanding LENR. They work really well in synergy I think. Looking forward to see what comes up.
I’m curious about what happens to the Helium and if it is used in the process some how. Perhaps this theory synergy gives some insights someday… I wonder perhaps it’s useful from ion bombardment / charge carrying or other mechanical points of view… But I look forward to seeing how it works out
Best Regards and wish you continued strength in the months ahead
Stephen
Dr Rossi:
Do you think the E-Cat family will be a game changer for the environmental protection ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
In the update you are making of the Gullstrom-Rossi paper will be described also a calorimetric test?
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
This issue of EGO OUT is an intermediary between the one day peace of yesterday and what will start soon- on technical level:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-18-2017-lenr-info-learning-from.html
Cheers,
peter
ANONYMOUS:
Two cathegories of things I do not respond to:
1- stupidities
2- issues related to the litigation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
We understand you’re not responding to questions to your blog as sometimes, not saying anything is the best answer. As, silence can never be – misquoted.
Anonymous:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I love your answer to Newt.
Cheers,
A.
Newt:
Chatters. Not worth to be answered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
I am right now with “her” and she is marching well toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Svein Henrik:
I do not know, because it will depend on the peer reviewing period. Our theoretical and experimental work will take about 30 more days.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for your care. I am well. You have nothing to apologize about.
Answers:
1- The COP is lower, but in the same order of magnitude
2- Yes
3- Our paper speaks for itself and I prefer not to add anything, pending a substantial review of it
4- I have enormous esteem for Norman Cook, whose book has inspired my work since the day it has been published ( I bought a copy of the first edition several days after its publication, same thing I did after the publication of the second edition ). Of course our collaboration will continue and we have agreed upon the next starting point, when I will be able to give him data that now I cannot supply. As you have seen in the documents published of the litigation, IH has accused me to have violated the NDA with the publication of the paper Cook-Rossi: while this accusation is ridiculous, since they had approved the draft before the publication on Arxiv Physics, this fact explains to you how mined is the field I have to walk through.The theoretical work on course with Carl-Oscar Gullstroem is perfectly conciliable with the atomic structure theorized by Prof Norman Cook.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
C.:
No. The Court decisions are based upon facts and evidence, not upon opinions and chatters. This is what makes us confident of the strength of our case.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can the negative comments against you organized in the blogs by your foe influence negatively the Court?