Emeritus Dr. Andrea Rossi, considering whether or not the E-Cat is working, I simply ask for installations even at military centers, because by using an input energy meter and another outbound can not calculate the difference? However, all thanks for his commitment to humanity.
Marco Serra: you are right.
Six years have passed since the experiment in Bologna and reviewing that video reminds us of how much work Andrea Rossi has done and how much energy of hope we have produced.
A deep regret will be reversed for the little farsightedness with which UNIBO has dealt with the issue. Even so, there was the great Prof. Focardi as the guarantor of the experiment.
When it’s all over (let’s say when it all starts) we’ll make a statue to Sergio Focardi, whose stand will be obtained from the fusion … not cold … 🙂 of the graduation medals of the capoccioni.
We will always have to thank those who, with the Gaelic force, pursued a dream without being fooled by the rigidity of maderan science, now standardized by lobbies and multinationals.
thank you all
Yrka:
In the US we already have a factory where we already are manufacturing industrial products.
In Sweden we are not yet ready to start a production, but we are working hard to start it within this year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
I understand your desire to achieve Sigma 5.
I ask to forgive my question. I’m not a learned physicist, I’m an engineering practitioner.
I carefully monitor your work since 2014. I look forward to the products on the market.
If it is possible, tell us in what condition the preparation of plants in the US and Sweden.
Thank you for your attention to our issues.
Good luck to you and good health!
Yuriy Isaev
Engineer,
Tyumen, Russia.
Mamma mia … son giĂ passati 6 anni. Da allora ti seguiamo tutti i giorni sperando in te. Ma io fin da subito ho avuto la certezza che non ci avresti deluso.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
About Prof Sergio Focardi: he said in an interview in 2011 that during the experiments he made with you had been reached a COP around 200. Do you think it is impossible to reach that COP not only experimentally, but also industrially?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said that you are also testing the QuarkX with normal calorimetry: is the COP you obtain with a normal heat exchanger equal to the COP calculated with the Wien’s and Boltzmann’s equations published in the Gullstrom- Rossi paper?
Pekka Janhunen:
Oh, now I understand. I don’t think Prof Focardi was thinking about anything specifically happened 50 years before: probably it was just a conservative statement.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Sorry, I did not express my question clearly. In your reply to “Prof”, you had written that Focardi had said in May 2010 about your E-cat: ” This is the most important thing I saw in the last fifty years “.
So I was just wondering, out of curiosity, what kind of miracle had Focardi seen in 1960 that had been somehow comparable to the E-cat invention.
regards, /pekka
Silvio Caggia:
You are correct. We are considering safety issues too, after my experience as a guinea pig during the nights of the 1 year test in the 1 MW plant. I got an experience about safety that is useful also for the QuarkX, even if it’s a different thing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steve L.:
It is OK so far you have to make prototypes, but the costs are unsustainable if you are looking for an industrial production.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Analysis of all the operating and upcoming heat recovery steam generators and heat recovery steam generator incorporated power plant projects across the globe, based on application and rated capacity
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I understand that you want a Sigma 5 because you want to be sure not to commit errors when introducing the QuarkX in the market: am I correct?
Prof
Dear Andrea Rossi,
From your answer about 5 sigma it looks to me that events you are monitoring are about the device affidability.
5 sigma e-cat tell us something about mean time between failures of the device?
Do these failures affect only performance or safety too?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is the QuarkX used to make the experiment cited in the paper Gullstrom- Rossi the same under test on its way toward the Sigma 5 target?
Warm Regards,
DT
I looked up these dates in the blog:
————————
March 9, 2016; First reference to “quark-x”
December 20, 2016; Blog entry: sigma 3.5
February 06, 2017; Blog entry: sigma 4.0
————————
and extrapolated that you might soon
have something important to share with us.
sometimes I have to admit that I extrapolate
myself until I turn blue…
May I ask what is the current sigma as of today please?
Silvio Caggia:
To the integrals of the events that compose the operation of the QuarkX. A complex probabilistic procedure that I designed for it on the base of the Sigma scheme.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
It’s not clear for me why are you looking for 5 sigma.
In particle physics significance is set at 5 sigma, a p value of 3 × 10–7 or 1 in 3.5 million (if the result is not true, this is the probability that the data would have been as they are by pure chance).
But what does it means for you? Is it related to theory, to the effect or to the device affidability?
Prof:
May 2010, for the first time we set up a consistently reactor rated 1 kW, at the end of the day he said: ” This is the most important thing I saw in the last fifty years “.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Emeritus Dr. Andrea Rossi, considering whether or not the E-Cat is working, I simply ask for installations even at military centers, because by using an input energy meter and another outbound can not calculate the difference? However, all thanks for his commitment to humanity.
Marco Serra: you are right.
Six years have passed since the experiment in Bologna and reviewing that video reminds us of how much work Andrea Rossi has done and how much energy of hope we have produced.
A deep regret will be reversed for the little farsightedness with which UNIBO has dealt with the issue. Even so, there was the great Prof. Focardi as the guarantor of the experiment.
When it’s all over (let’s say when it all starts) we’ll make a statue to Sergio Focardi, whose stand will be obtained from the fusion … not cold … 🙂 of the graduation medals of the capoccioni.
We will always have to thank those who, with the Gaelic force, pursued a dream without being fooled by the rigidity of maderan science, now standardized by lobbies and multinationals.
thank you all
Yrka:
In the US we already have a factory where we already are manufacturing industrial products.
In Sweden we are not yet ready to start a production, but we are working hard to start it within this year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
I understand your desire to achieve Sigma 5.
I ask to forgive my question. I’m not a learned physicist, I’m an engineering practitioner.
I carefully monitor your work since 2014. I look forward to the products on the market.
If it is possible, tell us in what condition the preparation of plants in the US and Sweden.
Thank you for your attention to our issues.
Good luck to you and good health!
Yuriy Isaev
Engineer,
Tyumen, Russia.
Ron:
My health now is very good.
During these days the activity for the litigation is intense.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Leslee:
Moreless yes.
Warm Regards
A.R.
JJ:
No.
Warm Regards
A.R.
H:
4 hours with the Attorneys, 8 hours in the factories.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Prof:
yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Marco Serra:
Thank you for the citation.
Surely in these years we made enormous progress.
Thank you also for your sustain.
Warm Regards
A.R.
JPR:
Good standing
Warm Regards
A.R.
Update?
Dear Andrea,
Prof Focardi said in 2011 in a TV interview : “This result is the most important discovery of human history !!!”.
Here (in italian) the interview of Focardi and a younger Rossi inside the ECat-Container.
http://orizzontenergia.it/video.php?id_video=93
Mamma mia … son giĂ passati 6 anni. Da allora ti seguiamo tutti i giorni sperando in te. Ma io fin da subito ho avuto la certezza che non ci avresti deluso.
God Bless You
Marco Serra
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The experiments with the calorimetry and the test to get Sigma5 are made in different factories in the USA?
Cheers
Prof
Dr Rossi,
Percentage ot your time dedicated to the QuarkX and to the litigation in this period?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
About Prof Sergio Focardi: he said in an interview in 2011 that during the experiments he made with you had been reached a COP around 200. Do you think it is impossible to reach that COP not only experimentally, but also industrially?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said that you are also testing the QuarkX with normal calorimetry: is the COP you obtain with a normal heat exchanger equal to the COP calculated with the Wien’s and Boltzmann’s equations published in the Gullstrom- Rossi paper?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How is your health? Is the engagement for the litigation still as much time consuming as before?
Cheers,
Ron
Pekka Janhunen:
Oh, now I understand. I don’t think Prof Focardi was thinking about anything specifically happened 50 years before: probably it was just a conservative statement.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Sorry, I did not express my question clearly. In your reply to “Prof”, you had written that Focardi had said in May 2010 about your E-cat: ” This is the most important thing I saw in the last fifty years “.
So I was just wondering, out of curiosity, what kind of miracle had Focardi seen in 1960 that had been somehow comparable to the E-cat invention.
regards, /pekka
Tom Conover:
We are close to 5 and I think by September we will have reached the target.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Sorry, I do not understand your question: can you explain what you mean?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DT:
No, it was ( and is ) another installation that I am using for more pushed limits of operation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Silvio Caggia:
You are correct. We are considering safety issues too, after my experience as a guinea pig during the nights of the 1 year test in the 1 MW plant. I got an experience about safety that is useful also for the QuarkX, even if it’s a different thing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today we are working very well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steve L.:
It is OK so far you have to make prototypes, but the costs are unsustainable if you are looking for an industrial production.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Benedetto:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi
* Heat Recovery Steam Generator Market Report *
Analysis of all the operating and upcoming heat recovery steam generators and heat recovery steam generator incorporated power plant projects across the globe, based on application and rated capacity
http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/heat-recovery-steam-generator-market-177042936.html
Dr Rossi,
3D METAL printing is here now – Google funded – Desktop Metal –
Video – How Metal 3D Printing Works
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=da5IsmZZ-tw
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I understand that you want a Sigma 5 because you want to be sure not to commit errors when introducing the QuarkX in the market: am I correct?
Prof
Dear Andrea Rossi,
From your answer about 5 sigma it looks to me that events you are monitoring are about the device affidability.
5 sigma e-cat tell us something about mean time between failures of the device?
Do these failures affect only performance or safety too?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is the QuarkX used to make the experiment cited in the paper Gullstrom- Rossi the same under test on its way toward the Sigma 5 target?
Warm Regards,
DT
Dear Andrea,
Do you know what had Focardi seen 50 years earlier, in 1960?
r:/p.
Greetings Andrea,
I looked up these dates in the blog:
————————
March 9, 2016; First reference to “quark-x”
December 20, 2016; Blog entry: sigma 3.5
February 06, 2017; Blog entry: sigma 4.0
————————
and extrapolated that you might soon
have something important to share with us.
sometimes I have to admit that I extrapolate
myself until I turn blue…
May I ask what is the current sigma as of today please?
Thank you for your kindness,
Tom
Lars Lindberg:
No, but it is possible to integrate the grid.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Silvio Caggia:
To the integrals of the events that compose the operation of the QuarkX. A complex probabilistic procedure that I designed for it on the base of the Sigma scheme.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
It’s not clear for me why are you looking for 5 sigma.
In particle physics significance is set at 5 sigma, a p value of 3 × 10–7 or 1 in 3.5 million (if the result is not true, this is the probability that the data would have been as they are by pure chance).
But what does it means for you? Is it related to theory, to the effect or to the device affidability?
Dear Mr Rossi,
do you think it will be possible to be free of grid with solarcells charging the quarkx batteries?
Saju Abraham:
I’d settle for a Sigma 5 !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Most Respected Dr Andrea Rossi:
How close are you to Sigma 6? Which below figures is closer to it:
A 5.2
B 5.4
C 5.6
D Above it
Thanking you,
Abraham
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for your links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thomas Florek:
He,he,he…very nice, thank you! I am dancing it in the factory with my Team, a short break.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
May 2010, for the first time we set up a consistently reactor rated 1 kW, at the end of the day he said: ” This is the most important thing I saw in the last fifty years “.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which is the most moving episode you remember about your work with Prof Sergio Focardi?
Thanks,
Prof
Hi Andrea,
It occurred to me that the effort to achieve Sigma 5 might deserve a pop-song.
https://youtu.be/Fjmw9XyBO1U
Hello, Doctor Rossi:
A “World First” Hot Fusion Reactor Just Created Its First Plasma:
https://futurism.com/a-world-first-fusion-reactor-just-created-its-first-plasma/
And here is a song by Thomas Florek dedicated to the Sigma 5 of the QuarkX:
Sigma 5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fjmw9XyBO1U
Itali R.:
Thank you,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, I think that it could be interesting for the readers the following page of wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma
where it is explained the concept of Sigma.
Best Regards,
Italo R.