Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The dimensions you indicared for a 20 W retaed QuarkX give a power density enouth to be useful for jet engines: did you know this?
On your way to sigma 5, does it mean you still have to change the dimensions of the Quark X:
i) from time to time?
ii) every time?
So, referring to the tale of the sculptor in a recent message of Italo R., he wrote: ‘…One day the sculptor went to his laboratory and didn’t find the statue’… because it became too small? 😉 (Just a joke). I wish you all good luck in finding the right dimensions and/or solving all remaining problems.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Marco has an interesting point – working with a device so small presents difficulties! I am really looking forward to seeing how you have dealt with this. Are the Quarkx units to be strung like beads, screwed into a fixture or mounted on a board, or just piled in a heap in a fancy high-tech bucket?
Most of your engineering challenges are well beyond me, but this one I might understand!
So, two questions, if you don’t mind.
1. Does each Quarkx unit require a physical connection to the control system?
2. When it comes time to recycle the spent units, will this require undoing that physical connection (cutting wires, desoldering or unscrewing from a fixture)?
I wish you the best of luck with your court case, and look forward to seeing the presentation of the Quarkx!
Ron Stringer
According to the QuarkX dimensions of D = 5 mm and L = 10 mm, the volume of each unit is approximately 196.35 cubic millimeters. For a rating of 20 W, power density is about 0.102 W/cubic millimeter (Or ~0.1 W/cu. mm).
There are 10^9 cubic millimeters in a cubic meter, so a volume of 1 cubic meter might (ideally) enclose a system with a rating of about 10^8 Watts or 100 MW.
Obviously, other components (Heat transfer, structural, instrumentation/control) must be incorporated into a system of 1000 modules or any other large scale system of systems.
At this time, can you mention/estimate the volume of, for example, a complete 10 kW or 20 kW system?
If better is the enemy of the good, you may have reached the best.
Congratulations to you and your team for your/their achievements.
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the dimensions of the QuarkX 20W reactor, that is so incredibly small. Smaller than the smallest batteries you’d find in commercial gadgets and toys.
What is the input power that it requires?
Best regards
Patrick
you shared the current size of the QuarkX. It seems similar to wood pellets. Is there a way to use them as wood pellets? I was thinking of a big coil, used as an oven/stove in which those “pellets” will be put, maybe with some type of conductive sand to avoid air voids, and then the reaction is triggered. Maybe with my idea of strong magnetic fields and calibrated RF pulse, the ignition temperature can be reduced and so single coils around one (or few) quarkX will not be needed anymore…
A.Ashfield:
Now the dimensions are length 10 mm, diameter 5 mm, the rating is 20 W. It is the one that will be exposed in the demonstration that should happen this year.
Thank you for your kind words,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
As the QuarkX has changed over the last year, can you tell us the current approximate size and power of the QuarkX that is undergoing the Sigma 5 test?
Is it the one you will be demonstrating this year?
I wish you all the best for your endeavors,
A. Ashfield
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Still a question about 5-sigma…
Which scenario describes best QuarkX reality?
A) QuarkX is under a long test which progression is a march toward 5-sigma
B) QuarkX is under development and at each stage you reach a better sigma but you have to solve problems in order to reach 5-sigma
Regards
Giorgio:
Let me humbly remind you that “some good result” of our work has already been published. You can go to http://www.leonardocorporation.com
to find publications, tests, demonstrations and replications.
If you refer to the QuarkX, as I suppose since you cite the Sigma, I still think it will be presented within the current year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr.Rossi
You have not reached yet sigma 5 and this is your usual reply but the question is: do you see the finishing line and how much time it’s need to wait for watching some good result of your work ?
Warm Regards
Giorgio
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I follow every day your comments and I want to testimony how I admire your efforts to reach a perfect result with your magnificent invention, so important for all of us.
God bless you,
Prof
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are you still making improvements on the QuarkX, or is the design now stable, so you just have to make tests and measurements?
Warm Regards,
A.G.
Dear AR
Your answer to Dima Redko leads me to ask after the jet engine research. I believe you have quoted 2700C as a core temperature of the QuarkX – that would surely work well in powering a jet.
How is that project proceeding?
With many thanks for your inspiration and perspiration,
Greg Leonard
Dima Redko:
Probably you refer to the Stirling Engine.
There is no reason why the E-Cat could not fuel an external combustion engine, since what this kind of engines need is just enough heat to expand a fluid. We did not proceed with this kind of R&D, though, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Abram:
Magnetic monopoles do not exist: if you cut from a magnet the N pole or a S pole of it, the two pieces you obtain still will have N and S pole. Easy to experiment. There are around hypotheses about the existence of magnetic monopoles, but never they have been really observed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tracy:
I cannot yet give the exact numbers, but I can assure that the maintenance costs are not higher than the maintenance costs of the most common heat generators.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I read today the book “Ecat the New Fire” of the psychologist Vessela Nikolova and I found it very interesting and rich of events I didn’t read about before. A veritable page turner.
Do you confirm all the events narrated by the author?
C.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Yo have recently dismissed such “rumors”, but in the highest echelons of the scientific world they are talking of an extremely important replication of the Rossi Effect that has been financed by a giant of the industrial world: are you sure you know nothing about this fact? Are you expecting the publication of a very important replication?
Thank you if you can answer,
Samuel
Dr. Rossi, WHAT A WONDERFUL WORLD
ONLY IN THE LAST 100 YEARS WE HAVE HAD THE BENEFIT OF:
Air Travel, at Jet speed.
Auto, we can travel anywhere there is a road.
Trucks, of all types, that we use for a great benefit.
Electricity, make a list of all the things you use that need electricity.
Phone, we can call anyone anywhere in the World that has a phone.
Central Air-Conditioning for the Home.
Home computer.
Super computer
Electron Microscope.
Radar.
Internet.
Video, that you can make, or view.
Radio.
Television.
Movies, you can make yourself or watch Made in Hollywood at your local Theater.
Helicopter 1939 used in many ways, to our great benefit.
Does this mean we live in a perfect World ? Far from it.
Ask anyone that has a computer.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale florida
USA
Ron Stringer:
1- yes
2- no
Thank you for your kindness,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daniel De Caluwe’:
I do not think the dimensions will change anymore, but I like the joke ( he,he,he…)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes. The power density of the QuarkX appears to be very high.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The dimensions you indicared for a 20 W retaed QuarkX give a power density enouth to be useful for jet engines: did you know this?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
On your way to sigma 5, does it mean you still have to change the dimensions of the Quark X:
i) from time to time?
ii) every time?
So, referring to the tale of the sculptor in a recent message of Italo R., he wrote: ‘…One day the sculptor went to his laboratory and didn’t find the statue’… because it became too small? 😉 (Just a joke). I wish you all good luck in finding the right dimensions and/or solving all remaining problems.
Kind Regards,
Daniel
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Marco has an interesting point – working with a device so small presents difficulties! I am really looking forward to seeing how you have dealt with this. Are the Quarkx units to be strung like beads, screwed into a fixture or mounted on a board, or just piled in a heap in a fancy high-tech bucket?
Most of your engineering challenges are well beyond me, but this one I might understand!
So, two questions, if you don’t mind.
1. Does each Quarkx unit require a physical connection to the control system?
2. When it comes time to recycle the spent units, will this require undoing that physical connection (cutting wires, desoldering or unscrewing from a fixture)?
I wish you the best of luck with your court case, and look forward to seeing the presentation of the Quarkx!
Ron Stringer
Dear Andrea Rossi,
According to the QuarkX dimensions of D = 5 mm and L = 10 mm, the volume of each unit is approximately 196.35 cubic millimeters. For a rating of 20 W, power density is about 0.102 W/cubic millimeter (Or ~0.1 W/cu. mm).
There are 10^9 cubic millimeters in a cubic meter, so a volume of 1 cubic meter might (ideally) enclose a system with a rating of about 10^8 Watts or 100 MW.
Obviously, other components (Heat transfer, structural, instrumentation/control) must be incorporated into a system of 1000 modules or any other large scale system of systems.
At this time, can you mention/estimate the volume of, for example, a complete 10 kW or 20 kW system?
If better is the enemy of the good, you may have reached the best.
Congratulations to you and your team for your/their achievements.
Per aspera ad astra.
Joseph Fine
Marco:
I am not able to answer, but for many reasons it appears to be very difficult.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
We are continuing to perform well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Patrick Ellul:
The technical characteristics will be given when the QuarkX will be presented.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the dimensions of the QuarkX 20W reactor, that is so incredibly small. Smaller than the smallest batteries you’d find in commercial gadgets and toys.
What is the input power that it requires?
Best regards
Patrick
Update?
Dear Andrea,
you shared the current size of the QuarkX. It seems similar to wood pellets. Is there a way to use them as wood pellets? I was thinking of a big coil, used as an oven/stove in which those “pellets” will be put, maybe with some type of conductive sand to avoid air voids, and then the reaction is triggered. Maybe with my idea of strong magnetic fields and calibrated RF pulse, the ignition temperature can be reduced and so single coils around one (or few) quarkX will not be needed anymore…
Regards,
Marco.
Tom Conover:
Substantially, yes.
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Silvio Caggia:
A)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A.Ashfield:
Now the dimensions are length 10 mm, diameter 5 mm, the rating is 20 W. It is the one that will be exposed in the demonstration that should happen this year.
Thank you for your kind words,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ping:
Yes.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Ing Andrea Rossi:
QuarkX is fantastic! Do you have any potential customers yet?
Cheers, Godspeed, God bless you and Regards,
Ping
Dr Rossi:
As the QuarkX has changed over the last year, can you tell us the current approximate size and power of the QuarkX that is undergoing the Sigma 5 test?
Is it the one you will be demonstrating this year?
I wish you all the best for your endeavors,
A. Ashfield
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Still a question about 5-sigma…
Which scenario describes best QuarkX reality?
A) QuarkX is under a long test which progression is a march toward 5-sigma
B) QuarkX is under development and at each stage you reach a better sigma but you have to solve problems in order to reach 5-sigma
Regards
Hi Andrea,
I found this site:
http://sixsigmastudyguide.com/process-capability-cp-cpk/
using this google query:
https://www.google.com/search?q=calculating+sigma+values+using+integratation+formula&oq=calculating+sigma+values+using+integratation+formula&aqs=chrome..69i57.20153j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=calculation+product+stability+using+sigma+values+based+on+integration+formula
… which in almost English asks google how to calculate sigma values using integration formulas.
I think this site may have helped me to understand your methods better, but …
Does this site describe the methods you are using to measure the QuarkX performance?
Warmest regards to you AND your team,
Tom
Prof:
Thank you also from my Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giorgio:
Let me humbly remind you that “some good result” of our work has already been published. You can go to
http://www.leonardocorporation.com
to find publications, tests, demonstrations and replications.
If you refer to the QuarkX, as I suppose since you cite the Sigma, I still think it will be presented within the current year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr.Rossi
You have not reached yet sigma 5 and this is your usual reply but the question is: do you see the finishing line and how much time it’s need to wait for watching some good result of your work ?
Warm Regards
Giorgio
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I follow every day your comments and I want to testimony how I admire your efforts to reach a perfect result with your magnificent invention, so important for all of us.
God bless you,
Prof
Domenico Canino:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
A simple question; Is the light of Quark-X sonoluminescence?
Thanks if you can answer.
Warm (and luminous) Regards
Greg Leonard:
Good point, that is an R&D thread we have to go through.
Warm Regards
A.R.
A Goumy:
We have not yet reached Sigma 5.
Warm Regards
A.R.
M.Sc. Enrico Billi:
I am not able to answer so far.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Fidel Skillman:
The oscilloscope with the QuarkX is useless, because it works with direct current.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
this german team developed a magnet-plasma engine for future jet planes… but they need a lot of electric power… your QuarkX could help?
https://avampostostellarelojano.wordpress.com/2017/05/22/propulsore-magneto-plasma-per-jet-stratosferici/
Best Regards, lavoLale lavoLale
Enrico Billi
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are you still making improvements on the QuarkX, or is the design now stable, so you just have to make tests and measurements?
Warm Regards,
A.G.
Dear AR
Your answer to Dima Redko leads me to ask after the jet engine research. I believe you have quoted 2700C as a core temperature of the QuarkX – that would surely work well in powering a jet.
How is that project proceeding?
With many thanks for your inspiration and perspiration,
Greg Leonard
JPR:
Today a long series of measurements. So far so good.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dima Redko:
Probably you refer to the Stirling Engine.
There is no reason why the E-Cat could not fuel an external combustion engine, since what this kind of engines need is just enough heat to expand a fluid. We did not proceed with this kind of R&D, though, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Abram:
Magnetic monopoles do not exist: if you cut from a magnet the N pole or a S pole of it, the two pieces you obtain still will have N and S pole. Easy to experiment. There are around hypotheses about the existence of magnetic monopoles, but never they have been really observed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you use the oscilloscope to control the behavior of the QuarkX?
Dear Andrea Rossi!
In the past you were also interested in coupling E-cat with external combustion engine. Can you please update us about this issue?
Dr Rossi,
Could you comment on this:
Axil Axil: IMHO, LENR is produced with the aid of monopole magnetic field lines.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-05/au-doa051717.php
Tracy:
I cannot yet give the exact numbers, but I can assure that the maintenance costs are not higher than the maintenance costs of the most common heat generators.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Samuel:
I did not receive any report related to recent replications.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Curiosone:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I read today the book “Ecat the New Fire” of the psychologist Vessela Nikolova and I found it very interesting and rich of events I didn’t read about before. A veritable page turner.
Do you confirm all the events narrated by the author?
C.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Yo have recently dismissed such “rumors”, but in the highest echelons of the scientific world they are talking of an extremely important replication of the Rossi Effect that has been financed by a giant of the industrial world: are you sure you know nothing about this fact? Are you expecting the publication of a very important replication?
Thank you if you can answer,
Samuel
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Which is the maintenance cost per kWh of the energy produced by means of the QuarkX?
Robert Curto:
Don’t forget the medical science: today the life expectancy of a human is ninety years, a century ago was seventy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, WHAT A WONDERFUL WORLD
ONLY IN THE LAST 100 YEARS WE HAVE HAD THE BENEFIT OF:
Air Travel, at Jet speed.
Auto, we can travel anywhere there is a road.
Trucks, of all types, that we use for a great benefit.
Electricity, make a list of all the things you use that need electricity.
Phone, we can call anyone anywhere in the World that has a phone.
Central Air-Conditioning for the Home.
Home computer.
Super computer
Electron Microscope.
Radar.
Internet.
Video, that you can make, or view.
Radio.
Television.
Movies, you can make yourself or watch Made in Hollywood at your local Theater.
Helicopter 1939 used in many ways, to our great benefit.
Does this mean we live in a perfect World ? Far from it.
Ask anyone that has a computer.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale florida
USA