United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

12,437 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ron Stringer:
    1- yes
    2- no
    Thank you for your kindness,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel De Caluwe’:
    I do not think the dimensions will change anymore, but I like the joke ( he,he,he…)
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Yes. The power density of the QuarkX appears to be very high.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Prof

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The dimensions you indicared for a 20 W retaed QuarkX give a power density enouth to be useful for jet engines: did you know this?

  • Daniel De Caluwé

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    On your way to sigma 5, does it mean you still have to change the dimensions of the Quark X:
    i) from time to time?
    ii) every time?

    So, referring to the tale of the sculptor in a recent message of Italo R., he wrote: ‘…One day the sculptor went to his laboratory and didn’t find the statue’… because it became too small? 😉 (Just a joke). I wish you all good luck in finding the right dimensions and/or solving all remaining problems.

    Kind Regards,
    Daniel

  • Ron Stringer

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    Marco has an interesting point – working with a device so small presents difficulties! I am really looking forward to seeing how you have dealt with this. Are the Quarkx units to be strung like beads, screwed into a fixture or mounted on a board, or just piled in a heap in a fancy high-tech bucket?
    Most of your engineering challenges are well beyond me, but this one I might understand!
    So, two questions, if you don’t mind.
    1. Does each Quarkx unit require a physical connection to the control system?
    2. When it comes time to recycle the spent units, will this require undoing that physical connection (cutting wires, desoldering or unscrewing from a fixture)?
    I wish you the best of luck with your court case, and look forward to seeing the presentation of the Quarkx!
    Ron Stringer

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    According to the QuarkX dimensions of D = 5 mm and L = 10 mm, the volume of each unit is approximately 196.35 cubic millimeters. For a rating of 20 W, power density is about 0.102 W/cubic millimeter (Or ~0.1 W/cu. mm).

    There are 10^9 cubic millimeters in a cubic meter, so a volume of 1 cubic meter might (ideally) enclose a system with a rating of about 10^8 Watts or 100 MW.

    Obviously, other components (Heat transfer, structural, instrumentation/control) must be incorporated into a system of 1000 modules or any other large scale system of systems.

    At this time, can you mention/estimate the volume of, for example, a complete 10 kW or 20 kW system?

    If better is the enemy of the good, you may have reached the best.

    Congratulations to you and your team for your/their achievements.

    Per aspera ad astra.

    Joseph Fine

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    I am not able to answer, but for many reasons it appears to be very difficult.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    We are continuing to perform well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Patrick Ellul:
    The technical characteristics will be given when the QuarkX will be presented.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Patrick Ellul

    Dear Andrea,
    Regarding the dimensions of the QuarkX 20W reactor, that is so incredibly small. Smaller than the smallest batteries you’d find in commercial gadgets and toys.
    What is the input power that it requires?
    Best regards
    Patrick

  • Marco

    Dear Andrea,

    you shared the current size of the QuarkX. It seems similar to wood pellets. Is there a way to use them as wood pellets? I was thinking of a big coil, used as an oven/stove in which those “pellets” will be put, maybe with some type of conductive sand to avoid air voids, and then the reaction is triggered. Maybe with my idea of strong magnetic fields and calibrated RF pulse, the ignition temperature can be reduced and so single coils around one (or few) quarkX will not be needed anymore…

    Regards,
    Marco.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Substantially, yes.
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Silvio Caggia:
    A)
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    A.Ashfield:
    Now the dimensions are length 10 mm, diameter 5 mm, the rating is 20 W. It is the one that will be exposed in the demonstration that should happen this year.
    Thank you for your kind words,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ping:
    Yes.
    Thank you for your kind wishes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ping

    Dear Dr. Ing Andrea Rossi:
    QuarkX is fantastic! Do you have any potential customers yet?
    Cheers, Godspeed, God bless you and Regards,
    Ping

  • A. Ashfield

    Dr Rossi:
    As the QuarkX has changed over the last year, can you tell us the current approximate size and power of the QuarkX that is undergoing the Sigma 5 test?
    Is it the one you will be demonstrating this year?
    I wish you all the best for your endeavors,
    A. Ashfield

  • Silvio Caggia

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Still a question about 5-sigma…
    Which scenario describes best QuarkX reality?
    A) QuarkX is under a long test which progression is a march toward 5-sigma
    B) QuarkX is under development and at each stage you reach a better sigma but you have to solve problems in order to reach 5-sigma
    Regards

  • Tom Conover

    Hi Andrea,

    I found this site:

    http://sixsigmastudyguide.com/process-capability-cp-cpk/

    using this google query:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=calculating+sigma+values+using+integratation+formula&oq=calculating+sigma+values+using+integratation+formula&aqs=chrome..69i57.20153j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=calculation+product+stability+using+sigma+values+based+on+integration+formula

    … which in almost English asks google how to calculate sigma values using integration formulas.

    I think this site may have helped me to understand your methods better, but …

    Does this site describe the methods you are using to measure the QuarkX performance?

    Warmest regards to you AND your team,

    Tom

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Thank you also from my Team.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giorgio:
    Let me humbly remind you that “some good result” of our work has already been published. You can go to
    http://www.leonardocorporation.com
    to find publications, tests, demonstrations and replications.
    If you refer to the QuarkX, as I suppose since you cite the Sigma, I still think it will be presented within the current year.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dr.Rossi
    You have not reached yet sigma 5 and this is your usual reply but the question is: do you see the finishing line and how much time it’s need to wait for watching some good result of your work ?
    Warm Regards
    Giorgio

  • Prof

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I follow every day your comments and I want to testimony how I admire your efforts to reach a perfect result with your magnificent invention, so important for all of us.
    God bless you,
    Prof

  • Andrea Rossi

    Domenico Canino:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • domenico canino

    Dear Andrea,
    A simple question; Is the light of Quark-X sonoluminescence?
    Thanks if you can answer.
    Warm (and luminous) Regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    Greg Leonard:
    Good point, that is an R&D thread we have to go through.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    A Goumy:
    We have not yet reached Sigma 5.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    M.Sc. Enrico Billi:
    I am not able to answer so far.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Fidel Skillman:
    The oscilloscope with the QuarkX is useless, because it works with direct current.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,
    this german team developed a magnet-plasma engine for future jet planes… but they need a lot of electric power… your QuarkX could help?

    https://avampostostellarelojano.wordpress.com/2017/05/22/propulsore-magneto-plasma-per-jet-stratosferici/

    Best Regards, lavoLale lavoLale
    Enrico Billi

  • A Goumy

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Are you still making improvements on the QuarkX, or is the design now stable, so you just have to make tests and measurements?
    Warm Regards,
    A.G.

  • Greg Leonard

    Dear AR
    Your answer to Dima Redko leads me to ask after the jet engine research. I believe you have quoted 2700C as a core temperature of the QuarkX – that would surely work well in powering a jet.
    How is that project proceeding?
    With many thanks for your inspiration and perspiration,
    Greg Leonard

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Today a long series of measurements. So far so good.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dima Redko:
    Probably you refer to the Stirling Engine.
    There is no reason why the E-Cat could not fuel an external combustion engine, since what this kind of engines need is just enough heat to expand a fluid. We did not proceed with this kind of R&D, though, so far.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Abram:
    Magnetic monopoles do not exist: if you cut from a magnet the N pole or a S pole of it, the two pieces you obtain still will have N and S pole. Easy to experiment. There are around hypotheses about the existence of magnetic monopoles, but never they have been really observed.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Fidel Skillman

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Do you use the oscilloscope to control the behavior of the QuarkX?

  • Dima Redko

    Dear Andrea Rossi!

    In the past you were also interested in coupling E-cat with external combustion engine. Can you please update us about this issue?

  • Abram

    Dr Rossi,

    Could you comment on this:

    Axil Axil: IMHO, LENR is produced with the aid of monopole magnetic field lines.

    https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-05/au-doa051717.php

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tracy:
    I cannot yet give the exact numbers, but I can assure that the maintenance costs are not higher than the maintenance costs of the most common heat generators.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Samuel:
    I did not receive any report related to recent replications.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Curiosone:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Curiosone

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    I read today the book “Ecat the New Fire” of the psychologist Vessela Nikolova and I found it very interesting and rich of events I didn’t read about before. A veritable page turner.
    Do you confirm all the events narrated by the author?
    C.

  • Samuel

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Yo have recently dismissed such “rumors”, but in the highest echelons of the scientific world they are talking of an extremely important replication of the Rossi Effect that has been financed by a giant of the industrial world: are you sure you know nothing about this fact? Are you expecting the publication of a very important replication?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Samuel

  • Tracy

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Which is the maintenance cost per kWh of the energy produced by means of the QuarkX?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    Don’t forget the medical science: today the life expectancy of a human is ninety years, a century ago was seventy.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dr. Rossi, WHAT A WONDERFUL WORLD
    ONLY IN THE LAST 100 YEARS WE HAVE HAD THE BENEFIT OF:
    Air Travel, at Jet speed.
    Auto, we can travel anywhere there is a road.
    Trucks, of all types, that we use for a great benefit.
    Electricity, make a list of all the things you use that need electricity.
    Phone, we can call anyone anywhere in the World that has a phone.
    Central Air-Conditioning for the Home.
    Home computer.
    Super computer
    Electron Microscope.
    Radar.
    Internet.
    Video, that you can make, or view.
    Radio.
    Television.
    Movies, you can make yourself or watch Made in Hollywood at your local Theater.
    Helicopter 1939 used in many ways, to our great benefit.
    Does this mean we live in a perfect World ? Far from it.
    Ask anyone that has a computer.
    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale florida
    USA

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>