United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

13,859 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Claud

    Dear Andrea, you say:”the solar energy is not economically profitable”…”the wind energy is not profitable as well”…
    Many people thinks this way, but the “cost” of a technology is mostly a political choice. Should we ascribe even a minor part of the expenses sustained for the cure of cancer to the fuels that produce pollution, the actual price (the cost) of the oil, coal etc. would change radically.
    This is why we’re also sustaining your work; isn’t it?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Koen Vandewalle:
    Thank you for your insight.
    My birthday is actually today, but erroneously the administration marked my birthdate on June 3rd and this remained my anagraphic date of birth: it has been like a premonition since the day I was born: “…behold, thou will have troubles …”
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Koen Vandewalle

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    First a happy birthday tomorrow.

    You must admit that without the finding of the E-Cat and the underlying science, we were really doomed. As an engineer, I have long suspected that we could make it impossible with our wastefulness and growth-dependent economic structures, with the conventional renewable systems.

    Good references:
    David J. C. Mackay Sustainable Energy – Without the Hot Air
    Vaclav Smile Distinguished Professor Emeritus -Eergy and Civilization: A History

    For me, my worldview has changed immediately after I first read about your nickel powder, your hydrogen gas and your resistance.
    All the rest is evolution, development, optimization and commercialization. No pilgrimage is organized to the birthplace of Thomas Newcomen and Etienne Lenoir. However, they are their inventions that transformed the world from an agricultural society into an industrial society. All the others have talked a lot and written all history books between the fights for land.

    We rely on you to provide the next generations with enough energy to clean up all the rubbish of the previous generations. In any event, the planet will look very different.

    Kind Regards,
    Koen

  • Carlen Young

    Dear Andrea,

    If I read your comment right… Happy Birthday! You have had quite the year and I pray this next begins to show you more fruits for your labors. These are exciting times and I trust that all the hard work will be well worth it!

    As a little aside, what climate statistics do you take issue with? Do you disagree with the numbers that in the last 100 years there has been an increase in carbon and methane into the air due to industry, or that you don’t believe there is evidence that increases in carbon and methain in the atmosphere could effect climate patters?

    Rooting for you,
    Carlen

  • Brokeeper

    Dear Andrea.

    Wish you a very Happy Birthday! Take a little time off for yourself in celebration. In my humble opinion along with many followers here you deserve it as a “good and faithful servant”.
    Brokeeper

  • Andrea Rossi

    John C. Evans:
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • John C Evans

    Dear Andrea Rossi

    Thank you so much for your response to Kevin. These days you rarely see such an honest and I feel unbiased answer.

    Thanks

    John Evans

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kevin:
    There is a lot of hypocrisy and superficiality on this issue.
    I am sure of the fact that the more we research in new environmentally friendly and renewable energies, the better, but:
    1- the solar energy is not economically profitable and is funded exclusively and by the taxpayer
    2- the wind energy ( that indirectly is solar ) is not profitable as well as the solar and it too is economically sustainable only if funded by the taxpayer
    3- both of them are profitable only in restricted areas, where sun and wind are particularly strong all the year around, not relevant in the global energy market: when you read that “30% of the energy is made by solar” it is a lie that takes advantage of the fact that laymen do not know the difference between power and energy: the solar represents 30% of the installed power, but for the 90% the solar plants and the wind towers produce no energy, therefore the energy actually produced is barely the 10% of the power installed
    4- all the jobs created by the alternative energies are funded by the taxpayer, otherwise could not be paid for
    5- the phrase ” all the scientific community is sure that the global warming is generated by human activities” is a lie: no serious statistic has been made on this issue and the phrase ” all the more vociferous guys in the scientific community are sure that the global warming is induced by human activities” would be more proper
    6- the Earth has had dramatic climate changes along its eons, totally independent from humans: the Sahara desert was a gigantic forest, as big as the Amazonic area and the oil is the product of the decomposition of enormous amounts of organic residue degenerated underground during the “global warming” of a precedent era: in this case, not only it has not been oil to cause the global warming, but, on the contrary, it has been the global warming that has generated the oil…
    7- nevertheless, I sustain that R&D in the alternative energies must be done, but without hypocrital opportunism and with serious scientific and economic approach and without the distruction of the patrimony of plants and jobs created by the traditional energies.
    When I read that China and India are lecturing the USA about pollution, I take it seriously, but only as an epiphany of hypocrisy and opportunism.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gigi

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I read “An impossible invention” of Mats Lewan: I too found it very interesting, it is a must for all them who are following your work.
    Godspeed,
    Gigi

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    My birthday gift of today from the QuarkX is that it is working very well, on the way toward sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    IH Fanboy:
    No, it was not.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Kevin

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    So, what do you think of the withdrawal from the Paris pact about the global warming?

  • IH Fanboy

    Mr Rossi:
    Some comments during the recent days have made innuendos about Cherokee’s activity. You did not return on the issue: it was a bluff, wasn’t it?
    Obviously this comment will be spammed.
    IH Fanboy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    I suppose October/November.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Based on your current testing, what month do feel you will reach your goal?

  • Andrea Rossi

    K.:
    Now, with the trial approaching, the work for the litigation is strong. Today I had to write 60 pages of technical issues. I could stay in the factory from 6 to 7 A.M., then all the day writing technological explications for the Attorneys.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please find on
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    comments published today on other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • K.

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Still working a lot for the litigation, or are you more free to use your time for the job?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Claud:
    Green.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Samec:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lago:
    To say “remain” is the an obvious response and it is politically correct too… but the issue is not that simple. The accord has been exploited so far in an unbalanced way, because some Countries have taken advantage of it to increase their competitiveness, by respecting it only formally, others suffered substantial economic sacrifices to actually apply it. I think rhetoric prevailed upon facts, so far. About the theoretical positivity of such agreement, it is obvious, albeit I do not think that climate changes are due to human activities. Climate changes happened also at the same speed when humans didn’t even exist; this having been said, humans can try to do what they can to avoid the situation worsen. More than this, we’d have positive side effects, like less pollution from humans, with obvious advantages for health and beauty of the environment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    The QuarkX is still working well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Lago

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    What do you think about the Paris climate change accord? Do you think is right to remain or to withdraw?

  • Samec

    Dear readers,

    The 65th Bilderberg Meeting to take place from 1 – 4 June 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia, USA

    Although LENR is not published in official agenda (key topics), there is invited also Gianotti, Fabiola (ITA), Director General, CERN. So maybe some spreading words about LENR will happen here.

    incomplete list of attendees (you know one country’s law forbid such meetings for their state officials, so some participants are in secret mode here):

    http://bilderbergmeetings.org/participants.html

    http://bilderbergmeetings.org/press-release.html

  • Claud

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Did you decide the color of the QuarkX, at least for the presentation?
    Cheers
    Claud

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mike Phalen:
    That’s dangerous: somebody could ironize “the roar of the mouse”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DT:
    I am not aware of anything published on the matter.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Richard Hill:
    The uses you are talking of are civil, not military, even if applied to military concerns and the military can fulfill the tasks of those kind with all the existing technologies to make any kind of energy even in mobile modalities ( think to gensets).
    The hypothesys you make never happened and never will happen because totally groundless. Besides, when they will deem our products mature for them, they will buy the E-Cats, as well as they buy gensets.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Thanks.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Prof

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I love your answer to Francesco!
    Cheers,
    Prof

  • Richard Hill

    Earlier you mentioned that you were not interested in explosive applications of the e-cat or related devices.
    However, surely your technology has military applications. If only for supply of hot water and/or steam to military bases and field hospitals. Many soldiers lose their lives bringing fuel closer to the conflict zone for these uses among others. Previously you mentioned advisers who had NATO connections. One has to assume that there is current defense interest in your work. If so, they must be extremely disappointed about delays. Is there a chance that your work will be taken over by defense interests?

  • DT

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    There are insistent voices that say that a top level scientific team has made a reactor copied from your patent and replicated the results of Lugano. Are you aware of this fact? Do you know if it is true?
    Warm Regards,
    DT

  • Hi Dr Rossi,

    It’s been absolutely fascinating watching your story unfold. Thank you for your amazing effort!

    Speaking of names for your device. How about the name “ROAR Reactor”?

    ROAR stands for:

    R eaction
    O f
    A ndrea
    R ossi

    Your name is not as obvious but it is there. And it links to a cat.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    Thank you for your suggestion, but I prefer to make the product independent from my person. I take very seriously my work, not my person.
    The industrial development of our products will abstract from my person: the small warship in the middle of a stormy ocean will leave room to a fleet of carriers.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    i would like to talk about the name of your device.
    At the biginning it was E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer) , i thing because of the secret component able to activate the energy production; than you had the intuition of the Quark-X, because “smaller is better” and the quark was the foundmental size to built bigger plant with any output power you want.
    This names were very good to let us intuite of what we are talking about.
    But, when you will be in the market peoples does not matter of this names, they will think only to the MAN who donate the mankind the way to save the world from pollution and (almost) free infinite energy: ANDREA ROSSI.
    So, on my opinion, your device has to be named “Rossi” or, something like “Rossi Cube” or “Rossi Device” or “Rossi Machine”, or maybe, “The Rossi One”
    This, always in my opinion, will identify immediately You, the device, the LENR and Energy.
    With a lot of symphaty, Giuseppe

  • Andrea Rossi

    Francesco:
    Some blogoholics look down from a considerable altitude on some men who from their scientific rank might be considered by orders of magnitude their superiors.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Francesco

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    What do you think of trolls without scientific background that in the blogs hit the Professors who made the independent tests in Lugano?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Erik:
    Thank you for your sustain.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Erik

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:

    I love your answer to Profs question about you being interested in researching the QuarkX potential for creating explosives:
    “absolutely not. The world needs new energies, not new explosives”

    Bravo! I can’t wait to see all your determination and hard work finally pay off and present to the world this marvel that you and your team have created.

    Wishing you the very best from the Netherlands,

    Erik

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jo Mecardo:
    Your question is too generic: kind of fishing.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alanna:
    Thank you for your concern, albeit I recovered in full!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Keven Penunuri:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Also today on our way toward sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    As I said, it’s not my turf.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Albert Ellul:
    Yes.
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Albert Ellul

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    If all goes well without any bad surprises, will Sigma 5 be achieved during this year?

    Stay healthy.

    Thank you.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Prof,

    Definition: “Explosives are chemical compounds or mixtures that undergo rapid burning or decomposition with the generation of large amounts of gas and heat, leading to sudden pressure effects.”

    My understanding of the Rossi effect is a process characterized by relatively slow changes in output energy. Anything can be made to explode, e.g., air pumped into a balloon until it pops. But the Rossi effect does not produce gas and the energy it releases is done so in a relatively slow manner. So I would predict this is not an effective process relative to explosives.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>