Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Did you measure with the spectrometer the light inside the QuarkX? If yes can you disclose the wavelengths of the specter?
Thank you if you can answer,
Cheers,
Prof
Anch’io come ogni anno Ti faccio i migliori auguri ,,, e attendo ,,,,,, ciao Giannino di Udin !!!!!
Best wishes also from me, as every year…I am waiting…
@ Pekka Janhunen
An important issue with the hydrogen cycle is its efficiency. The cycle to make ammonia requires gaseous hydrogen. At this moment in time that is made of fossile fuels as an left-over for other products. The vast quantities that are needed for the energy industry can only be made of water and at this moment there is no efficient process to separate water into hydrogen and oxigen, although scientist are fiercely trying to find a better method than hydrolysis.
Also the amount of wind and solar power required would be vast, much more than the ‘environmentalists’ often often say.
Using ammonia would lead to vast world-wide transports of this poisonous liquid and I doubt that it would be really a solution, although I admit ammonia is probably better than hydrogen under high pressure.
I know you know all this and that you would prefer the way Andrea is seeing the future, so let us just hope that Andrea can bring the E-cat and QuarkX on the market soon.
@Andrea: a very happy birthday. I believe you have finally reached my age. Keep on doing that for many, many healty and prosper years.
For any difficult but necessary adjustment, any child or country or group of interests can make an excuse for not having to participate.
However, it is important that we stop wasting and polluting. We are with more and more people on this planet, and we have more and more technical means to produce, exploit and break things. Anyone looking good around can see that everyone else has to change something.
Due to geographical location or natural resources, some may be favored and, therefore, prefer not to participate. For the time being.
The system of a worldwide binding agreement, with controllable and non-fraudulent parameters, was a whole achievement. Financial fraudsters can not be controlled with satellites. But a country that uses too many ships filled with oil, coal, LNG…, can be hampered by a small military operation in international waters, or something equivalent. Immediately it is clear where the biggest problem is with the most recent turn.
Thus, such agreements are both well-controllable and reasonably enforceable if there is a global agreement.
The reason for all this need not be called “climate change”. “Common sense” has always been good enough for me. Most people need something visible and tangible to understand. That’s why I think climate change is a very good incentive.
Keeping discussions and doubting the truth have always been a fantastic retardants. For example, in case of litigations, which are a waste of time and energy.
Deb:
In the last 20 years the installations of solar and wind apparatuses has been multiplicated by at least 1000 folds. The global warming in the same period is increased.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I just wanted to describe an alternative way how fossil fuels could be eliminated, which one could call ammonia economy. It has four parts:
1) Production of hydrogen from water, using solar electric power or solar heat.
2) Production of NH3 from hydrogen and atmospheric nitrogen by the Haber-Bosch process, using solar heat. This happens in the same site as the hydrogen production so hydrogen need not be transported and not much stored either.
3) Transportation of the obtained liquid NH3 to any location where energy is needed. One transports liquid NH3 in the same way as we now transport oil, gasoline, diesel and natural gas, that is, by trucks, railroads, tanker ships and pipelines. Ammonia is poisonous, but it is already now transported in large amounts for the fertilizer industry. It might be possible to further reduce the potential danger of NH3 by some type of gelling agent, perhaps nanocellulose fibre gelling.
4) Burning of ammonia in internal combustion engines. This can be done by minor modification to the engine; this has been known for at least half a century. Alternatively, burn NH3 in a fuel cell to obtain electricity for an electric car.
Ammonia is made of water and atmospheric nitrogen, and when combusted, it returns to water and nitrogen. No carbon is involved so the process does not interfere with the biosphere (no CO2 into atmosphere, no need to kill and burn plants). I believe that it would be possible to run the world using this process. Energy would be somewhat more expensive than it is today and there might be occasional ammonia accidents, but it would keep the world running. The required amount of solar electric power and heat would be large, but it could be done in places and times where there is optimal sunshine since ammonia would put the gathered energy is easily storable and transportable form.
Needless to say, the E-cat would be a more elegant and more cheap solution. But I think it’s good to have some alternatives, even if only at conceptual level.
Steven N. Karels:
If we will reach the necessary industrialization level, the intergration of the E-Cat tech with other technologies will produce positive effects.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco:
There are contrasting theories about the fact that changes are exponential. Changes happens along eras whose modifications are not aritmetically increasing, but exponentially increasing and I didn’ see convincing mathematical models. But again, I agree upon the fact that anyway we have to do what we can to increase what we can do, albeit without opportunistic and superficial considerations.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
Thank you for your wishes and for the wishes from Eng Peter Gluck: I always appreciated his intellectual honesty and independence.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Please accept my best birthday wishes too. I thought you migh like to know Peter passed on his birthday wishes to you in his always remarkable “ego out” blog too.
I hope when you are both ready you two can meet you can meet some day. In my view you are both remarkable people.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Sahara desert was an amazon like area and this is an example about the fact that climate change is substantially independent from human activity: ” …it has been the global warming to make oil, not oil to make global warming”…point taken.
Shawn
Dear Andrea,
If the E-cat wouldn’t work, one can replace fossil fuels by NH3 and make it using solar energy in sunny regions. Like the proposed “hydrogen economy”, but with ammonia replacing hydrogen as the energy carrier because ammonia is much easier to store.
regards, pekka
Regarding global warming.
You are right that in the past we already had these temperatures or even higher, that is that mean temperature of today is not the history record.
But the variations were very slow, with a period of 22000 years given from the tilt of the earth axis and small variation given by natural phenomenon.
This comic ( https://xkcd.com/1732/ ) shows this very well, along with an exponential acceleration of the warming in the last century, a phenomenon that is not happened before…
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you, I strongly appreciate your wishes. Yes, the coming years will not be easy, but I never had easy times in my life, honestly. As I said, I was just born, and already had problems with my birth date… ( he,he,he)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Claud:
Solar energy can exist thanks to the funding that comes from the bills from the energy produced with traditional sources. Without those funds nobody could sustain the real costs of alternative energies, that are circa three times the costs of traditional energies. About the costs for the cure of cancer, that is a hypothesys that needs a much more profound analysis. Obviously, as I said, I still think that alternative energies must be funded and must be object of R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
Thank you!
In our Team there are not servants, though…if one has to exist, that has to be me, since all this mess has been born by me.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Carlen Young:
What I do not believe is that the climate change depends in a relevant measure from human activity. Please read again what I wrote.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jackie:
We are confident in the strength of our case.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Great!
Dear Andrea Rossi:
What is your position at the eve of the trial?
Prof:
Yes, we measure the wavelength specter and it is between 700 and 1000 nm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes, I received 1247 pages related to the activity of Cherokee from 2002 to today.
We are studying.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today, Sunday, the QuarkX is performing well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Drew G.:
You can find any information available on the Pacemaker.
I cannot talk about issues related to the trial.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
Has a final date and place for the trial been set? Also, will the proceedings be open to the public and the press?
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Did you receive the papers that Leanne and Tuffy promised you regarding Cherokee?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Did you measure with the spectrometer the light inside the QuarkX? If yes can you disclose the wavelengths of the specter?
Thank you if you can answer,
Cheers,
Prof
Giannino Lodovico Ferro Casagrande:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anch’io come ogni anno Ti faccio i migliori auguri ,,, e attendo ,,,,,, ciao Giannino di Udin !!!!!
Best wishes also from me, as every year…I am waiting…
Gianvico:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buon compleanno
Gianvico
Gerard McEk:
Thank you, likewise,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ Pekka Janhunen
An important issue with the hydrogen cycle is its efficiency. The cycle to make ammonia requires gaseous hydrogen. At this moment in time that is made of fossile fuels as an left-over for other products. The vast quantities that are needed for the energy industry can only be made of water and at this moment there is no efficient process to separate water into hydrogen and oxigen, although scientist are fiercely trying to find a better method than hydrolysis.
Also the amount of wind and solar power required would be vast, much more than the ‘environmentalists’ often often say.
Using ammonia would lead to vast world-wide transports of this poisonous liquid and I doubt that it would be really a solution, although I admit ammonia is probably better than hydrogen under high pressure.
I know you know all this and that you would prefer the way Andrea is seeing the future, so let us just hope that Andrea can bring the E-cat and QuarkX on the market soon.
@Andrea: a very happy birthday. I believe you have finally reached my age. Keep on doing that for many, many healty and prosper years.
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
For any difficult but necessary adjustment, any child or country or group of interests can make an excuse for not having to participate.
However, it is important that we stop wasting and polluting. We are with more and more people on this planet, and we have more and more technical means to produce, exploit and break things. Anyone looking good around can see that everyone else has to change something.
Due to geographical location or natural resources, some may be favored and, therefore, prefer not to participate. For the time being.
The system of a worldwide binding agreement, with controllable and non-fraudulent parameters, was a whole achievement. Financial fraudsters can not be controlled with satellites. But a country that uses too many ships filled with oil, coal, LNG…, can be hampered by a small military operation in international waters, or something equivalent. Immediately it is clear where the biggest problem is with the most recent turn.
Thus, such agreements are both well-controllable and reasonably enforceable if there is a global agreement.
The reason for all this need not be called “climate change”. “Common sense” has always been good enough for me. Most people need something visible and tangible to understand. That’s why I think climate change is a very good incentive.
Keeping discussions and doubting the truth have always been a fantastic retardants. For example, in case of litigations, which are a waste of time and energy.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you, very nice ( he,he,he): thanks to all your and my Friends for their delighting wishes!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Many happy birthday wishes for your 67 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsX8PjZ5sOg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx8heZmMpLI
Deb:
In the last 20 years the installations of solar and wind apparatuses has been multiplicated by at least 1000 folds. The global warming in the same period is increased.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sir,
Don’t you think that the solar energy could resolve the problem of the global warming? Say it clearly.
Dear Andrea,
I just wanted to describe an alternative way how fossil fuels could be eliminated, which one could call ammonia economy. It has four parts:
1) Production of hydrogen from water, using solar electric power or solar heat.
2) Production of NH3 from hydrogen and atmospheric nitrogen by the Haber-Bosch process, using solar heat. This happens in the same site as the hydrogen production so hydrogen need not be transported and not much stored either.
3) Transportation of the obtained liquid NH3 to any location where energy is needed. One transports liquid NH3 in the same way as we now transport oil, gasoline, diesel and natural gas, that is, by trucks, railroads, tanker ships and pipelines. Ammonia is poisonous, but it is already now transported in large amounts for the fertilizer industry. It might be possible to further reduce the potential danger of NH3 by some type of gelling agent, perhaps nanocellulose fibre gelling.
4) Burning of ammonia in internal combustion engines. This can be done by minor modification to the engine; this has been known for at least half a century. Alternatively, burn NH3 in a fuel cell to obtain electricity for an electric car.
Ammonia is made of water and atmospheric nitrogen, and when combusted, it returns to water and nitrogen. No carbon is involved so the process does not interfere with the biosphere (no CO2 into atmosphere, no need to kill and burn plants). I believe that it would be possible to run the world using this process. Energy would be somewhat more expensive than it is today and there might be occasional ammonia accidents, but it would keep the world running. The required amount of solar electric power and heat would be large, but it could be done in places and times where there is optimal sunshine since ammonia would put the gathered energy is easily storable and transportable form.
Needless to say, the E-cat would be a more elegant and more cheap solution. But I think it’s good to have some alternatives, even if only at conceptual level.
regards, /pekka
Steven N. Karels:
If we will reach the necessary industrialization level, the intergration of the E-Cat tech with other technologies will produce positive effects.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco:
There are contrasting theories about the fact that changes are exponential. Changes happens along eras whose modifications are not aritmetically increasing, but exponentially increasing and I didn’ see convincing mathematical models. But again, I agree upon the fact that anyway we have to do what we can to increase what we can do, albeit without opportunistic and superficial considerations.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Can you explain better?
I am not able to understand.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Arjen:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Shawn Himes:
True.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today the QuarkkX is working well. From the factory,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
Thank you for your wishes and for the wishes from Eng Peter Gluck: I always appreciated his intellectual honesty and independence.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Andrea,
Please accept my best birthday wishes too. I thought you migh like to know Peter passed on his birthday wishes to you in his always remarkable “ego out” blog too.
I hope when you are both ready you two can meet you can meet some day. In my view you are both remarkable people.
Best Regards
Stephen
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Sahara desert was an amazon like area and this is an example about the fact that climate change is substantially independent from human activity: ” …it has been the global warming to make oil, not oil to make global warming”…point taken.
Shawn
Happy Birthday
May this be another exciting year for you and your family.
We all are excited about your progress, for all human mankind
Below a nice link about what the universe is made off, maybe you can make something like this, when you are ready to explain you theory.
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170404-the-physics-that-tells-us-what-the-universe-is-made-of
Dear Andrea,
If the E-cat wouldn’t work, one can replace fossil fuels by NH3 and make it using solar energy in sunny regions. Like the proposed “hydrogen economy”, but with ammonia replacing hydrogen as the energy carrier because ammonia is much easier to store.
regards, pekka
Dear Andrea,
Regarding global warming.
You are right that in the past we already had these temperatures or even higher, that is that mean temperature of today is not the history record.
But the variations were very slow, with a period of 22000 years given from the tilt of the earth axis and small variation given by natural phenomenon.
This comic ( https://xkcd.com/1732/ ) shows this very well, along with an exponential acceleration of the warming in the last century, a phenomenon that is not happened before…
Very warm regards,
Marco.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If all the electricity power generation coal-fired plants were converted to eCat technology, do you agree the US could meet its carbon emission goals?
Luis Navarro:
Thank you very much.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
True. That’s why I fight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you, I strongly appreciate your wishes. Yes, the coming years will not be easy, but I never had easy times in my life, honestly. As I said, I was just born, and already had problems with my birth date… ( he,he,he)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Happy Birthday and Happy and Healthy ‘Every-days’.
You have ‘a lot on your plate’ this year with the litigation and the demo of the QuarkX.
It is very likely that, with successful results, you will be even busier in future years.
But it will, I hope, be a much more pleasant type of busy.
Birthday Regards,
Joseph Fine
He has used only messes to fulfill His will. 🙂
Dear Andrea,
I hope you will have had a very Happy Birthday on your new birth day!
Best wishes to you and your family,
Luis
Toussaint:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Claud:
Solar energy can exist thanks to the funding that comes from the bills from the energy produced with traditional sources. Without those funds nobody could sustain the real costs of alternative energies, that are circa three times the costs of traditional energies. About the costs for the cure of cancer, that is a hypothesys that needs a much more profound analysis. Obviously, as I said, I still think that alternative energies must be funded and must be object of R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I wish you very happy birthday and a very successful presentation of your Quarx-X.
And I hope for next year a massive commercialization of your product.
Warm regards.
Toussaint françois
Brokeeper:
Thank you!
In our Team there are not servants, though…if one has to exist, that has to be me, since all this mess has been born by me.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Carlen Young:
What I do not believe is that the climate change depends in a relevant measure from human activity. Please read again what I wrote.
Warm Regards,
A.R.