Prof:
I think that coal can be used in an environmentally sustainable way applyng the BACT ( Best Available Control Technologies ), saving hundreds thousands of jobs and exploiting an immense reserve of energy.
This is a fact. All the rest are assumptions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I imagine you are waiting the money from the litigation to fasten the development of your enterpreneurial effort related to the E-Cat, am I correct?
Godspeed,
Barry
It has been a long time since you announced the E-Cat (January 2011), and it has been through a number of models (e.g Low Temperature E-Cat, Hot Cat, Tiger)
When you say that you are ‘satisfied’ with the COP and temperature stability, does this mean that you have reached a point of E-Cat/QuarkX development that you feel can go to market with, without the need for a new improved version.
For perspective, if you click on this google link for
Sunnyvale, California you will find many of the
global companies doing business around the world.
The QuarkX (now contained inside the heat exchanger for testing) could possibly allow you to calculate approximate dimensions for the planned version of the 1MW plants your customers have on order. Would you choose one of the guestimates below for us as the closest size that you envision please?
The one megawatt QuarkX with heat exchangers and controls is likely to require:
A: Less than 1 cubic meter; B: 1-4 cubic meters; or C:4 or more cubic meters.
Thank you for all that you share with us, even if you can’t help with this inquiry, and congratulations on holding strong in during the litigation. Only a few more weeks remain until the sun shines again.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
During this period of litigation and sigma-5-quest with the QuarkX, do you have also time to think about the industrialization of your products?
Prof:
Yes, the Team of LIGO ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory ) has detected about one year ago the evidence of gravitational waves for the first time and confirmed the validity of Einstein’s General Relativity theory.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
We all know that if we will have a real product it will be from you, so please take also some rest and never give up!
We trust in your work,
Godspeed!
To a question releted to the possibility of the solar energy to solve the global warming your reply was:
“Andrea Rossi
June 3, 2017 at 10:35 AM
Deb:
In the last 20 years the installations of solar and wind apparatuses has been multiplicated by at least 1000 folds. The global warming in the same period is increased.
Warm Regards,
A.R.”
I do not find that the answer is a proper one from a “scientific” point of view or maybe because I do not fully get your point.
Been true the two assertions that you made, they are not correlated directly. On the same period of time the green house emissions has increased too, what would explain the increase of the global warming if the theory of the human activity as the cause of the global warming is accepted, that I assume that is not your case given former comments from your side.
Therefore, the increase that you mention, that has been done from a very low starting point, has not been enough to reduce the emissions jet.
I could agree that the solar and wind energy are not the only paths to follow to reduce the pollution, but are important for sure. Living in the more polluted Capital City in the world for the last two consecutive years I do not care much about the global warming on the next 50 year as for my health in the next five, and feel, some times, that the global warming discussion is a way to make the pollution not such a urgent matter as it should be, talking of periods of decades or even a century even if is accepted as real, what make many people been not such concert of the problem.
This is because I would request you to clarify your point that could be understood as an attack to this kind of energies when other times I have read you that all the energies should by the in future mix, including these.
Please, keep working, mine and many others health will benefit from such a new technology if finally reach the market.
With a spectral maximum of 750 nm, the color emitted should appear to be a deep red. Yet this is inconsistent with the blue-white color previously photographed. A spectral maximum of 750 nm would correspond to a equivalent blackbody temperature of almost 4000 degK, which is probably too high for the likely exterior surfaces of the reactor. Yet the reported spectral width (700 nm to 1000 nm) seems too wide to be an emission line. Most curious. I will await your theory of operation when you are free to disclose it.
You were asked a question about the QuarkX visible spectrum and posted. “Yes, we measure the wavelength specter and it is between 700 and 1000 nm.”
This spectral area is in the near-infrared portion and not in the visible spectrum. Yet I recall pictures showing a bluish-white emission from the QuarkX device in operation.
Can you please clarify this discrepancy?
1. The limits you posted, is this the half-max, full width spectral width?
2. How far does the spectrum spread into the visible?
3. How far does the spectrum spread into the infrared?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Have you finished to study all the papers sent you by Leanne?
Frank Acland:
Yes, this is what I suppose based on the facts we are observing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Barry:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
I think that coal can be used in an environmentally sustainable way applyng the BACT ( Best Available Control Technologies ), saving hundreds thousands of jobs and exploiting an immense reserve of energy.
This is a fact. All the rest are assumptions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pietro F.:
The numbers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
The QuarkX is working well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Cosa Le fa pensare che il Quarkx abbia un maggiore successo commerciale rispetto all’impianto da 1MW?
What makes you think that Quarkx has more commercial success than the 1MW plant?
Buon lavoro
Pietro F.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
What do you think of the policy of the President of the USA about the use of coal?
Thanks if you can answer,
Prof
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I imagine you are waiting the money from the litigation to fasten the development of your enterpreneurial effort related to the E-Cat, am I correct?
Godspeed,
Barry
Dear Andrea,
It has been a long time since you announced the E-Cat (January 2011), and it has been through a number of models (e.g Low Temperature E-Cat, Hot Cat, Tiger)
When you say that you are ‘satisfied’ with the COP and temperature stability, does this mean that you have reached a point of E-Cat/QuarkX development that you feel can go to market with, without the need for a new improved version.
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Frank
Tom Conover:
B
Thank you for your kindness,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roger T.:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
For perspective, if you click on this google link for
Sunnyvale, California you will find many of the
global companies doing business around the world.
Sand Hill Road, Polo Alto is also is close by.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Sunnyvale,+CA/@37.3895838,-122.094161,12z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x808fb645a9d05d3b:0x768dfb26dd7cc3a2!8m2!3d37.36883!4d-122.0363496
Hello Andrea,
The QuarkX (now contained inside the heat exchanger for testing) could possibly allow you to calculate approximate dimensions for the planned version of the 1MW plants your customers have on order. Would you choose one of the guestimates below for us as the closest size that you envision please?
The one megawatt QuarkX with heat exchangers and controls is likely to require:
A: Less than 1 cubic meter; B: 1-4 cubic meters; or C:4 or more cubic meters.
Thank you for all that you share with us, even if you can’t help with this inquiry, and congratulations on holding strong in during the litigation. Only a few more weeks remain until the sun shines again.
Tom
H.S.:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Don:
It is proceeding, but I do not think it will be allowed before enough insustrial plants will have shown reliability.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
how goes the certification for the ecat home heater
Dr Andrea Rossi,
If I was you, I would call also the QuarkX E-Cat: this name is very strong and is already a trade mark of you.
Cheers
Herbert
JPR:
The temperatures are stable, the COP is stable both with spectrometry and with calorimetry, I am satisfied.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bill:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
During this period of litigation and sigma-5-quest with the QuarkX, do you have also time to think about the industrialization of your products?
Update?
JPR:
We are still on our way toward sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Donald:
No, the QuarkX is contained inside the heat exchanger by means of which we are making the calorimetry.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is it possible to see inside the QuarkX during its operation?
Cheers,
Donald
Corlee:
We are studying.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Ohh, I love Leanny and Tuffy…can’t wait!!!
JPR:
Also today is a good day for the QuarkX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
XYZ:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
When we will make the presentation of the QuarkX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you still planning to publish results of the QuarkX performance measured by calorimetry, and if so, when do you think it will happen?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you make the vacuum inside the QuarkX?
Update?
Rudy:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Good situation also today,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thomas Florek:
Thank you for your kindness.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes, the Team of LIGO ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory ) has detected about one year ago the evidence of gravitational waves for the first time and confirmed the validity of Einstein’s General Relativity theory.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea:
Do you know if the gravitational waves have ever been actually observed?
Happy you-know-what day to you! As I’ve said before, I’m a big fan of the E-cat, but I’m a way-bigger fan of the real-live Andrea Rossi.
Steven N.Karels:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
EXE:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
We all know that if we will have a real product it will be from you, so please take also some rest and never give up!
We trust in your work,
Godspeed!
Dear Sir,
To a question releted to the possibility of the solar energy to solve the global warming your reply was:
“Andrea Rossi
June 3, 2017 at 10:35 AM
Deb:
In the last 20 years the installations of solar and wind apparatuses has been multiplicated by at least 1000 folds. The global warming in the same period is increased.
Warm Regards,
A.R.”
I do not find that the answer is a proper one from a “scientific” point of view or maybe because I do not fully get your point.
Been true the two assertions that you made, they are not correlated directly. On the same period of time the green house emissions has increased too, what would explain the increase of the global warming if the theory of the human activity as the cause of the global warming is accepted, that I assume that is not your case given former comments from your side.
Therefore, the increase that you mention, that has been done from a very low starting point, has not been enough to reduce the emissions jet.
I could agree that the solar and wind energy are not the only paths to follow to reduce the pollution, but are important for sure. Living in the more polluted Capital City in the world for the last two consecutive years I do not care much about the global warming on the next 50 year as for my health in the next five, and feel, some times, that the global warming discussion is a way to make the pollution not such a urgent matter as it should be, talking of periods of decades or even a century even if is accepted as real, what make many people been not such concert of the problem.
This is because I would request you to clarify your point that could be understood as an attack to this kind of energies when other times I have read you that all the energies should by the in future mix, including these.
Please, keep working, mine and many others health will benefit from such a new technology if finally reach the market.
Regards.
EXE
Dear Andrea Rossi,
With a spectral maximum of 750 nm, the color emitted should appear to be a deep red. Yet this is inconsistent with the blue-white color previously photographed. A spectral maximum of 750 nm would correspond to a equivalent blackbody temperature of almost 4000 degK, which is probably too high for the likely exterior surfaces of the reactor. Yet the reported spectral width (700 nm to 1000 nm) seems too wide to be an emission line. Most curious. I will await your theory of operation when you are free to disclose it.
Steven N. Karels:
The area includes visible spectrum, whose max is around 750 nm.
Further information is not available.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You were asked a question about the QuarkX visible spectrum and posted. “Yes, we measure the wavelength specter and it is between 700 and 1000 nm.”
This spectral area is in the near-infrared portion and not in the visible spectrum. Yet I recall pictures showing a bluish-white emission from the QuarkX device in operation.
Can you please clarify this discrepancy?
1. The limits you posted, is this the half-max, full width spectral width?
2. How far does the spectrum spread into the visible?
3. How far does the spectrum spread into the infrared?