Tom Conover:
The Judge has fixed the calendar of the trial, it will begin on June 26th and will end on July 24th.
Obviously I cannot comment about any issue related to the litigation.
About your question: I will answer with facts when we will present the apparatus.
Thank you for your kindness and support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
We all hope that the legal proceedings can be ended much before the end of July, hopefully within the two weeks that was originally planned. Even though many issues have been raised by both sides, it still remains that you sent a bill for services delivered, and they didn’t pay. Yet. Even a blind jury can recognize that, and the trial may simply end at that point. Perhaps I am a fool to think that anything can be that simple. You certainly have my best wishes for the positive outcome of the upcoming litigation. Many of us will dearly miss you until you return to your blog to chat with us.
Please do not comment on my thoughts about the upcoming trial! I only try to offer support to you.
Howerver, on another note, @ 2700`C operational temperature, based on my brief experience in working with LENR experimentation, it occurs to me that you may be holding a bit of a cloth in front of the candle here.
Please kind sir, is it possible that you have rated the QuarkX at substantially below the measured output? (Y/N)
I’m pretty sure that if many of your blog readers might have had this very question cross their mind more than once.
I see where you have devised new materials at where the Quark can operate somewhere around 2700`C.
Is this a natural steady state where the Rossi effect is stabilized(thrives) where it neither tends to spontaneously stop nor tries to runaway without constant monitoring and intervention of the controls.
If so, then the final piece of the puzzle is a long lived material(At least exceeding the life of the fuel charge) to a marketable product.
VGera:
I’d rate my tennis ability as follows: when they are worse than me, they are usually buried. But still I like it, because I can play with my wife.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi!
In your answers you mentioned that having a rare free time you go play tennis. How would you rate your level basing on NTRP? How long have you been playing: since you were a kid or started recently?
Dr Rossi,
I assume that the domestic Ecat will be born after at least a couple of years after the diffusion of the industrial applications.
Does this make sense to you?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Fingers crossed for the trial.
We of the silent majority are all with you, hoping in your victory to reach faster your dream of the industrialization of the Ecat, dream that we all share with you,
Myriam
Pablo:
Absolutely not.
During the period of the trial with the Jury, which means from June 26th through July 24th, the activity of this blog will be suspended, because any energy of mine will be focused exclisively on the trial, without any form of distraction.
The activity will be resumed from July 25th, after the verdict.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Surely it has been useful to explain the missing massless e.p. , but I am not able to say if it is correct or not. As far as I know, the issue is still debated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Assuming the QuarkX commercial unit would be used irregularly, is there a way to tell how much charge is still left (besides counting hours in operation or input power consumed)?
Steven N. Karels:
Good point. It should last 12 years, as far as I know, but I do not have experience about this issue, I can only make projections on the base of what I can theorize.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Assuming the QuarkX commercial unit has a nominal lifetime of one year of continuous operation and an application requires only one month of continuous operation per year, will the lifetime of a single QuarkX unit then be good for 12 years? Are there other lifetime limiting restrictions besides fuel exhaustion?
Half of 2017 will soon be over, Sigma 5 is still not achieved and the promised industrial roll out of the Quark X seems to be getting further and further away. This is my pessimistic view.
My optimistic view is an imminent sigma 5 achievement and a Quark X product rolling out in 2018.
Dr Joseph Fine:
1) yes
2) I will put in the tennis court a chair as a proxy, the result will be the same.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In the past few years, there have been a number of articles posted here about SCO2 (super-critical CO2).
I just saw this update on Super-Critical Carbon Dioxide turbines. (See link below.)
http://www.gereports.com/call-ecomagination-ge-building-co2-powered-turbine-generates-10-megawatts-fits-table/
If this 10 MW-e turbogenerator has approx. 40% efficiency, over 1 million (1.25+ million) 20 W Quarxes (and spares)
would be needed to test this reactor::heat exchangers::SCO2-system::turbogenerator combination at full power.
Obviously, a 1 MW-e generator would use “ONLY” 100,000+ Quarx systems for a smaller-scale system test.
(And also smaller-scale costs.)
1) Assuming that future results both in the court and in the lab are excellent, will it be possible to manufacture 100,000+
QuarkX systems for a small-scale (or large-scale) system test in the next 2-3 years?
2) If you consider this project as being feasible, do you think you will still be be able to find time to play Tennis?
Super regards,
Joseph Fine
Tom Conover:
The Judge has fixed the calendar of the trial, it will begin on June 26th and will end on July 24th.
Obviously I cannot comment about any issue related to the litigation.
About your question: I will answer with facts when we will present the apparatus.
Thank you for your kindness and support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
We all hope that the legal proceedings can be ended much before the end of July, hopefully within the two weeks that was originally planned. Even though many issues have been raised by both sides, it still remains that you sent a bill for services delivered, and they didn’t pay. Yet. Even a blind jury can recognize that, and the trial may simply end at that point. Perhaps I am a fool to think that anything can be that simple. You certainly have my best wishes for the positive outcome of the upcoming litigation. Many of us will dearly miss you until you return to your blog to chat with us.
Please do not comment on my thoughts about the upcoming trial! I only try to offer support to you.
Howerver, on another note, @ 2700`C operational temperature, based on my brief experience in working with LENR experimentation, it occurs to me that you may be holding a bit of a cloth in front of the candle here.
Please kind sir, is it possible that you have rated the QuarkX at substantially below the measured output? (Y/N)
I’m pretty sure that if many of your blog readers might have had this very question cross their mind more than once.
Kudos to you and your TEAM!
Warmest Regards,
Tom
Dan C.:
Correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I see where you have devised new materials at where the Quark can operate somewhere around 2700`C.
Is this a natural steady state where the Rossi effect is stabilized(thrives) where it neither tends to spontaneously stop nor tries to runaway without constant monitoring and intervention of the controls.
If so, then the final piece of the puzzle is a long lived material(At least exceeding the life of the fuel charge) to a marketable product.
Wishing you the best.
Dan C.
VGera:
I’d rate my tennis ability as follows: when they are worse than me, they are usually buried. But still I like it, because I can play with my wife.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi!
In your answers you mentioned that having a rare free time you go play tennis. How would you rate your level basing on NTRP? How long have you been playing: since you were a kid or started recently?
JPR:
We are proceeding well with our R&D with the QuarkX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Carol:
By new material I had to invent and make.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is the QuarkX made by materials off the shelf, or by meterials you had to invent?
Thanks,
Carol
Update?
Steve:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Preventing Thermal Runaways of LENR Reactors.
https://www.iscmns.org/work12/RuerJpreventingtherm.pdf
Myriam:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Joe:
Yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Teemu:
Thank you,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Umbi:
Impossible.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Michel:
We will see.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Based on your own measurements, could you give some indications about the COP of the Quark-X?
-Is it between 1.1 and 6 (like the first version of the E-cat) ?
-More than 6?
Regards,
Michel
I hope to have a domestic E.CAT for next winter
Dear Andrea,
We will surely miss you and this blog for the duration that it will be offline.
Best Regards,
Teemu
Dr Rossi,
I assume that the domestic Ecat will be born after at least a couple of years after the diffusion of the industrial applications.
Does this make sense to you?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Fingers crossed for the trial.
We of the silent majority are all with you, hoping in your victory to reach faster your dream of the industrialization of the Ecat, dream that we all share with you,
Myriam
JJ:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pablo:
Absolutely not.
During the period of the trial with the Jury, which means from June 26th through July 24th, the activity of this blog will be suspended, because any energy of mine will be focused exclisively on the trial, without any form of distraction.
The activity will be resumed from July 25th, after the verdict.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Surely it has been useful to explain the missing massless e.p. , but I am not able to say if it is correct or not. As far as I know, the issue is still debated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
C:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bene:
No. Theoretically, the sign should be a lowering of the efficiency.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Assuming the QuarkX commercial unit would be used irregularly, is there a way to tell how much charge is still left (besides counting hours in operation or input power consumed)?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is the duration of at least 1 year of the QuarkX charge confirmed?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
What do you think of the Anderson theory about the missing massless particles?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Will this blog give information of what happens in the trial on course of it?
Pablo
Mr Andrea Rossi:
Will you publish the 1270 pages about the activity of IH that you received?
Steven N. Karels:
Good point. It should last 12 years, as far as I know, but I do not have experience about this issue, I can only make projections on the base of what I can theorize.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still toward sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Assuming the QuarkX commercial unit has a nominal lifetime of one year of continuous operation and an application requires only one month of continuous operation per year, will the lifetime of a single QuarkX unit then be good for 12 years? Are there other lifetime limiting restrictions besides fuel exhaustion?
JPR:
On our way toward sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kasom:
I do not have a plan B.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
“The optimistic view is reasonable, but I hope to make the presentation within this year.”
Your answer implies that You have a “PLAN B”, please tellus about!
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the interesting information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Compressed glassy carbon: An ultrastrong and elastic interpenetrating graphene network
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/6/e1603213.full
Albert Ellul:
Thank you for your opinion. The optimistic view is reasonable, but I hope to make the presentation within this year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Half of 2017 will soon be over, Sigma 5 is still not achieved and the promised industrial roll out of the Quark X seems to be getting further and further away. This is my pessimistic view.
My optimistic view is an imminent sigma 5 achievement and a Quark X product rolling out in 2018.
Which of my two views is the closest to reality?
Neil:
No,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
J.Jobert:
No.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Roby:
Yes.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can the primary fluid be water instead of oil, as in the Gullstrom -Rossi paper?