Have you decided the duration of the planned October demonstration? The longer the duration, the more credibility it will instill in the viewers. Any possibility of letting the demonstration run unattended for days with cameras letting the viewers view the data being produced?
as you pointed out, you need 24V DC (eg from two series-connected 12V car batteries) to keep the reactor of the E-Cat QX in operation, my question is, do you plan for the presentation in October also a demonstration of a Self Sustain Mode, so that the E-Cat QX reactor (or several reactors in series) generates sufficient charging current to maintain the 24V operating voltage of the car batteries?
Dear Andrea,
It is a relieve for us that you write more openly about your E-cats. The pressure of the NDA must have been heavy on you and I am sure it is also a pleasure for you not being limited in your words anymore.
Just a few questions if you will allow me:
1. Is the 1 Ohm resistor essential for the operation of the E-cat QX?
2. If the E-cat QX reaches the 5 sigma, will you then still consider making low temperature E-cats, or will all future E-cats be based on E-cat QX or further developed E-cats in the ‘hot series’?
Thank you, kind regards, Gerard
Mike Phalen:
No and it is not relevant to the COP of the E-Cat QX. By the way, I can say that such consume mainly is due to the cooling system and the heat can be recovered. We have a strong overheating of the electronic components due to the high temperature of the reactor that by conductivity through the copper cables reaches the circuitry. It has been a struggle against the time: how to exchange heat soon enough and efficiently enough to avoid the burn of some essential component. We burnt a lot of control systems before finding the solution, because the normal thermostatic systems were useless, due to the time lapsed between the set and the real exchange of enough heat to save the components. It seems stupid, but it was not. We tried without success all the traditional systems, but for one reason or another, they were either not efficient or too “dirt” ( like immersing all in dielectric oil). Most of our unreliability issues came from this problem. At the end we found the solution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The resistance of the E-Cat QX is close to zero, because it id an electric conductor, correct? Did you measure its resistance?
Regards,
Peter
From the picture in the Gullstroem-Rossi paper, and your information that E-Cat QX is fed by plain DC, I should derive that She has a heartbeat.
Which explains the other picture of you with the stethoscope !
And from the beating of her heart, you can know how hot or excited she is.
Maybe 5 sigma corresponds a number of hearbeats ?
Oystein Lande:
Our power source can be either 120 or 220 V AC, or we can use 24V DC batteries.
Obviously your calculation is wrong, because one thing is the voltage at the power source, a totally different thing is the voltage that goes to the E-Cat through the circuitry of the control system.
In the same Gullstroem-Rossi paper you can read the voltage measured by the 2 voltmeters.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
The heat exchangers can be different, depending on their employment.
The COP of the E-Cat does not depend on the efficiency of the heat exchanger. The COP of the system depends on it.
The E-Cat QX can use as a power source either a regular AC plug or series of batteries able to supply 24 V. In the first case we apply an inverter to get DC. The E-Cat QX works only with DC.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steve Swatman:
Yes, the 20 kW E-Cats LT had been charged by IH while I was in Doral to prepare the factory. We have to investigate the reactors to understand.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Oggi mi hanno riferito dell’ennesima bufala!!!!!
Qualcuno va a dire in giro che lei avrebbe vinto a tennis con sua moglie.
Prima che questa fake news prenda un empleur pericolosa la prego di smentirla ufficialmente.
Buon lavoro
😉
ENGLISH/LATIN:
Today I have been informed about the umpth B.S.: you won again a tennis match against your wife: usque tandem will you tolerate these innuendos? Please deny this slander before it becomes common and shared knowledge.
Pietro F.
You are now analysing the small 20 kW reactors that failed immediately after the beginning of the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat, so that you had to make the test with the 4 big reactors of 250 kW each of power.
I know the 4 259 kW reactors had been made and charged by you.
Were the 20 kW reactors made and charged by IH?
Do you suspect intentional sabotage? incorrect methods of manufacture? plain stupidity?
You write that the performance and the installation dimensions depend on the heat exchanger. Does this mean that the E-cat QX is a one-size-fits-all product, for which you make an adapter for the heated medium and temperature range depending on the application?
To make it conclusive: Imagine that I want to build a cooking pot to bake fries or fondue in 180 ° C vegetable oil. Then I have to leave with a series of 100 E-cat QX that I build in a housing with a surface of 150cm² that is then immersed in the oil in the cooking pot. The operating regime will then be: 5 minutes full of power, to heat the cooking pot with 2 litres of oil, then on average one and a half minutes “on” and half a minute “turned off” during baking. Normally this is regulated with a simple thermostat, and the cooktop manufacturer should not be concerned with the operation and control of the E-cat QX. The E-Cat QX is then integrated in a blackbox that can deliver to a maximum temperature (200°C) and maximum power (2000 Watt) on a set surface (150cm²).
The same device I can use, with other on / off times, to cook soup and potatoes or rice.
For the meat and the fish I would suggest a kind of grill. Someone of your team will think about something based on the experiments that work with heat radiation.
After the meal, I can use the cooker to heat water to wash the dishes.
I think everybody in the world wants such a device.
If we live a little bit sober, we can fulfill 90% of our basic household energy requirement with such a heater.
The blackbox and standalone character of the application must allow to get certification and to put the device quickly and easily in every supermarket.
Even if the whole world would have cheap energy, that cookie would still be useful. I do not like to throw away devices because someone else thinks I need to buy a new one.
In the developed world, we can then use the grid for other useful things, and manage this grid intelligently to pay off the current heavy investment in renewable energy.
Now a few tricky questions, because it tells about the performance of the E-cat QX: Would I have enough of 7.4 watt-hour small power bank (USB 5V output) to cook a meal (4kWh) with my cooking pot? Or should I buy a larger power bank? Or can’t we use a standard 1 Ampere USB plug to produce 2000 Watt with the 100-array E-cat QX ? Anyway, I would like the device with external power and without integrated batteries.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
LENR Forum is full of comments of Jed Rothwell and Dewey Weaver that continue to insult your work.
We all know, because it has been put in evidence by the papers of the trial of the litigation Rossi Vs Darden, that Jed Rothwell is an Advisor of IH and Dewey Weaver is a consultant of IH and also we read on the papers of the litigation that these two individuals combined cashed from IH hundreds thousand dollars from IH, but they continue to represent themselves as neutral experts of LENR. Note: none of them has an education beyond the middle schools, none of them has education in Physics, being one of them a translator of English language and the other some sort of a patent consultant, not being anyway a patent attorney or a patent engineer…
This having been said, I have the following questions to put, if you can answer:
1) what do you think of the LENR Forum?
2) why you do not sue them for damages?
3) why do you not respond or react to their comments?
Cheers,
Giovanni De Magistris
Al:
You can find also precise information about this issue on the brochure of the same pump, that is easy to pull from the internet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
All well with the E-Cat QX.
Today we are also working with the reactors that we have disassembled from the 1 MW plant, to analyse the charges and we are finding important information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Just asking for a clarification, if you don’t mind:
In the latest Rossi-Gullstrom paper you report under energy input: V=0.1 R=1 Ohm → W=0.01
You explained to me in our interview that the E-Cat has a resistance, but you did not include it to keep the resistance of the E-Cat confidential, and this meant that the COP was conservative.
My question: does this mean that the 0.1 V is the voltage across the resistance of the E-Cat and the 1 Ohm resistor combined?
Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
1- It has to be experimented
2- depends on the kind of the heat exchanging system. The generator itself can stay in less than a cubic meter
3- no, because you must leave the room necessary to the heat exchange. All the dimensions depend on the kind of the heat exchanging system
Warm Regards,
A.R.
They succeed in producing protein-rich food from hydrogen and CO2, with no green plants needed. “The method releases food production from restrictions related to the environment.” The press release is worth reading in its entirety.
Dear Andrea,
This is to let your readers know about the latest and very interesting interview at ECW by Mr. Frank Acland “Interview with Andrea Rossi on Current and Future Developments of the E-Cat
Posted on July 22, 2017”.
Congratulations for:
-your settlement with IH and your sole IP ownership
– your health recovery
– and your E-Cat QX development with a COP = 2000
Questions:
1- will this COP be confirmed for the industrial applications?
2- if you stacc the E-Cat QXes together what could be the dimensions, for example for a 1 MW plant, including the heat exchanger?
3- if the diameter of a module is 10 mm, could it be possible to include 10 x 10 modules in a 10 x 10 cm?
Thank you for your answers,
Ulrich W.A.Kranz
You answered to Michel:
“Actually, the resistor is at room temperature.”
This is reasonable since the input power is about 0.01W. But the Ecat QX output power is about 20W.
Does this means that
1) the coil is bigger and far away from the Ecat surface?
2) the fluid circulates in contact with the Ecat, taking away the heat and leaving the coil at almost room temperature (or at most at water temperature)?
3) the only stimulation is the constant magnetic field?
4) or that a pulsed current to generate RF pulses is superimposed as I suggested many times, to replicate in small scale a magnetic resonance gantry?
5) if the answer to 4) is no, could you please try to superimpose some RF train to test my theory? A sinusoidal pulse, convoluted with a sinc pulse, with main frequency 43.5*B MHz is the best, calculating B with the known formula of a solenoid…
Drew G.
We will see what we can reasonably do.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
Have you decided the duration of the planned October demonstration? The longer the duration, the more credibility it will instill in the viewers. Any possibility of letting the demonstration run unattended for days with cameras letting the viewers view the data being produced?
Uwe Doms:
67% of time it will be ssm
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
as you pointed out, you need 24V DC (eg from two series-connected 12V car batteries) to keep the reactor of the E-Cat QX in operation, my question is, do you plan for the presentation in October also a demonstration of a Self Sustain Mode, so that the E-Cat QX reactor (or several reactors in series) generates sufficient charging current to maintain the 24V operating voltage of the car batteries?
Thanks in advance and all the best!
Uwe Doms
https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/
Gerard McEk:
1- confidential
2- premature
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr. Rossi: You said the 20 kW failed reactors were charged by IH. Did IH know you had the 250 kW reactors in reserve?
Dear Andrea,
It is a relieve for us that you write more openly about your E-cats. The pressure of the NDA must have been heavy on you and I am sure it is also a pleasure for you not being limited in your words anymore.
Just a few questions if you will allow me:
1. Is the 1 Ohm resistor essential for the operation of the E-cat QX?
2. If the E-cat QX reaches the 5 sigma, will you then still consider making low temperature E-cats, or will all future E-cats be based on E-cat QX or further developed E-cats in the ‘hot series’?
Thank you, kind regards, Gerard
Peter:
Yes, it is a conductor, same conductivity of the silver, more or less. Yes, we measured its resistance.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mike Phalen:
No and it is not relevant to the COP of the E-Cat QX. By the way, I can say that such consume mainly is due to the cooling system and the heat can be recovered. We have a strong overheating of the electronic components due to the high temperature of the reactor that by conductivity through the copper cables reaches the circuitry. It has been a struggle against the time: how to exchange heat soon enough and efficiently enough to avoid the burn of some essential component. We burnt a lot of control systems before finding the solution, because the normal thermostatic systems were useless, due to the time lapsed between the set and the real exchange of enough heat to save the components. It seems stupid, but it was not. We tried without success all the traditional systems, but for one reason or another, they were either not efficient or too “dirt” ( like immersing all in dielectric oil). Most of our unreliability issues came from this problem. At the end we found the solution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
One hundred.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How many 20W E-Cat QX reactors would you be able to operate from a single control box like the one you used in the recent Gullstroem-Rossi paper?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Hi Dr. Rossi,
It sounds like you are saying that a 24 volt battery can drive both the control system and power the Ecat.
Can you tell us how many watts the control system consumes?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The resistance of the E-Cat QX is close to zero, because it id an electric conductor, correct? Did you measure its resistance?
Regards,
Peter
Willy:
We will give information about what is not confidential, for obvious reasons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
He,he,he…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
The E-Cat QX has the same conductivity of Ag.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
During the demo of the E-Cat QX will you give detailed information of it?
Godspeed,
W.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
From the picture in the Gullstroem-Rossi paper, and your information that E-Cat QX is fed by plain DC, I should derive that She has a heartbeat.
Which explains the other picture of you with the stethoscope !
And from the beating of her heart, you can know how hot or excited she is.
Maybe 5 sigma corresponds a number of hearbeats ?
Heartfull regards,
Koen
Dr Andrea Rossi
Is the E-Cat QX an electric conductor or does it have a resistance ?
Oystein Lande:
Our power source can be either 120 or 220 V AC, or we can use 24V DC batteries.
Obviously your calculation is wrong, because one thing is the voltage at the power source, a totally different thing is the voltage that goes to the E-Cat through the circuitry of the control system.
In the same Gullstroem-Rossi paper you can read the voltage measured by the 2 voltmeters.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
The heat exchangers can be different, depending on their employment.
The COP of the E-Cat does not depend on the efficiency of the heat exchanger. The COP of the system depends on it.
The E-Cat QX can use as a power source either a regular AC plug or series of batteries able to supply 24 V. In the first case we apply an inverter to get DC. The E-Cat QX works only with DC.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
No, we have to analyse each of them.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steve Swatman:
Yes, the 20 kW E-Cats LT had been charged by IH while I was in Doral to prepare the factory. We have to investigate the reactors to understand.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pietro F.:
This is a slander !!!
I lost 6-0, 6-0 !!!
Usque tandem or not as it might be !!!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giovanni:
1- I do not read LENR Forum
2- they did not cause damages to us
3- I have better things to do than feed a bunch of trolls
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear mr Rossi,
Regarding the Rossi-Gullstrom paper:
The total power supply was not mentioned, but some say you used a 24 V battery?
If this is correct your total input power to the experiment setup would be 24V * 0,1 A = 2,4 Watts.
Can you confirm the battery voltage?
Regards
Lande
Oggi mi hanno riferito dell’ennesima bufala!!!!!
Qualcuno va a dire in giro che lei avrebbe vinto a tennis con sua moglie.
Prima che questa fake news prenda un empleur pericolosa la prego di smentirla ufficialmente.
Buon lavoro
😉
ENGLISH/LATIN:
Today I have been informed about the umpth B.S.: you won again a tennis match against your wife: usque tandem will you tolerate these innuendos? Please deny this slander before it becomes common and shared knowledge.
Pietro F.
Dear Mr Rossi,
You are now analysing the small 20 kW reactors that failed immediately after the beginning of the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat, so that you had to make the test with the 4 big reactors of 250 kW each of power.
I know the 4 259 kW reactors had been made and charged by you.
Were the 20 kW reactors made and charged by IH?
Do you suspect intentional sabotage? incorrect methods of manufacture? plain stupidity?
Dr.Rossi, have you already found why the smallest E-Cat didn’t work in the 1MW plant?
Kind Regards
Italo R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
You write that the performance and the installation dimensions depend on the heat exchanger. Does this mean that the E-cat QX is a one-size-fits-all product, for which you make an adapter for the heated medium and temperature range depending on the application?
To make it conclusive: Imagine that I want to build a cooking pot to bake fries or fondue in 180 ° C vegetable oil. Then I have to leave with a series of 100 E-cat QX that I build in a housing with a surface of 150cm² that is then immersed in the oil in the cooking pot. The operating regime will then be: 5 minutes full of power, to heat the cooking pot with 2 litres of oil, then on average one and a half minutes “on” and half a minute “turned off” during baking. Normally this is regulated with a simple thermostat, and the cooktop manufacturer should not be concerned with the operation and control of the E-cat QX. The E-Cat QX is then integrated in a blackbox that can deliver to a maximum temperature (200°C) and maximum power (2000 Watt) on a set surface (150cm²).
The same device I can use, with other on / off times, to cook soup and potatoes or rice.
For the meat and the fish I would suggest a kind of grill. Someone of your team will think about something based on the experiments that work with heat radiation.
After the meal, I can use the cooker to heat water to wash the dishes.
I think everybody in the world wants such a device.
If we live a little bit sober, we can fulfill 90% of our basic household energy requirement with such a heater.
The blackbox and standalone character of the application must allow to get certification and to put the device quickly and easily in every supermarket.
Even if the whole world would have cheap energy, that cookie would still be useful. I do not like to throw away devices because someone else thinks I need to buy a new one.
In the developed world, we can then use the grid for other useful things, and manage this grid intelligently to pay off the current heavy investment in renewable energy.
Now a few tricky questions, because it tells about the performance of the E-cat QX: Would I have enough of 7.4 watt-hour small power bank (USB 5V output) to cook a meal (4kWh) with my cooking pot? Or should I buy a larger power bank? Or can’t we use a standard 1 Ampere USB plug to produce 2000 Watt with the 100-array E-cat QX ? Anyway, I would like the device with external power and without integrated batteries.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Dr Andrea Rossi,
LENR Forum is full of comments of Jed Rothwell and Dewey Weaver that continue to insult your work.
We all know, because it has been put in evidence by the papers of the trial of the litigation Rossi Vs Darden, that Jed Rothwell is an Advisor of IH and Dewey Weaver is a consultant of IH and also we read on the papers of the litigation that these two individuals combined cashed from IH hundreds thousand dollars from IH, but they continue to represent themselves as neutral experts of LENR. Note: none of them has an education beyond the middle schools, none of them has education in Physics, being one of them a translator of English language and the other some sort of a patent consultant, not being anyway a patent attorney or a patent engineer…
This having been said, I have the following questions to put, if you can answer:
1) what do you think of the LENR Forum?
2) why you do not sue them for damages?
3) why do you not respond or react to their comments?
Cheers,
Giovanni De Magistris
Anonymous:
No, we’ll use Omega certified K probe.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Al:
You can find also precise information about this issue on the brochure of the same pump, that is easy to pull from the internet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
All well with the E-Cat QX.
Today we are also working with the reactors that we have disassembled from the 1 MW plant, to analyse the charges and we are finding important information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I tested the Prominent pump and you were 100% right!
Godspeed,
Al
Dear Andrea
The temperature of the water will be measured by means of the thermometer in the photo of the Gullstrom-Rossi paper?
Frank Acland:
What I said is that should the E-Cat have an R the measurements would be conservative.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Just asking for a clarification, if you don’t mind:
In the latest Rossi-Gullstrom paper you report under energy input: V=0.1 R=1 Ohm → W=0.01
You explained to me in our interview that the E-Cat has a resistance, but you did not include it to keep the resistance of the E-Cat confidential, and this meant that the COP was conservative.
My question: does this mean that the 0.1 V is the voltage across the resistance of the E-Cat and the 1 Ohm resistor combined?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Marco:
I cannot give further information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
1- It has to be experimented
2- depends on the kind of the heat exchanging system. The generator itself can stay in less than a cubic meter
3- no, because you must leave the room necessary to the heat exchange. All the dimensions depend on the kind of the heat exchanging system
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Very interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
As a person devoted to solving third-world problems, you may be interested in the following news by Finnish scientists: Protein produced from electricity to alleviate world hunger, https://www.lut.fi/web/en/news/-/asset_publisher/lGh4SAywhcPu/content/protein-produced-from-electricity-to-alleviate-world-hunger .
They succeed in producing protein-rich food from hydrogen and CO2, with no green plants needed. “The method releases food production from restrictions related to the environment.” The press release is worth reading in its entirety.
regards, /pekka
Dear Andrea,
This is to let your readers know about the latest and very interesting interview at ECW by Mr. Frank Acland “Interview with Andrea Rossi on Current and Future Developments of the E-Cat
Posted on July 22, 2017”.
http://e-catworld.com/2017/07/22/interview-with-andrea-rossi-on-current-and-future-developments-of-the-e-cat/
Best wishes
Luis
Congratulations for:
-your settlement with IH and your sole IP ownership
– your health recovery
– and your E-Cat QX development with a COP = 2000
Questions:
1- will this COP be confirmed for the industrial applications?
2- if you stacc the E-Cat QXes together what could be the dimensions, for example for a 1 MW plant, including the heat exchanger?
3- if the diameter of a module is 10 mm, could it be possible to include 10 x 10 modules in a 10 x 10 cm?
Thank you for your answers,
Ulrich W.A.Kranz
Dear Andrea,
You answered to Michel:
“Actually, the resistor is at room temperature.”
This is reasonable since the input power is about 0.01W. But the Ecat QX output power is about 20W.
Does this means that
1) the coil is bigger and far away from the Ecat surface?
2) the fluid circulates in contact with the Ecat, taking away the heat and leaving the coil at almost room temperature (or at most at water temperature)?
3) the only stimulation is the constant magnetic field?
4) or that a pulsed current to generate RF pulses is superimposed as I suggested many times, to replicate in small scale a magnetic resonance gantry?
5) if the answer to 4) is no, could you please try to superimpose some RF train to test my theory? A sinusoidal pulse, convoluted with a sinc pulse, with main frequency 43.5*B MHz is the best, calculating B with the known formula of a solenoid…
Regards,
Marco.