Virginia W:
We are working now exclusively on the industrialization of the E-Cat QX. No more public tests will be made before the launch of the product in the market.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rossi
Dear Andrea,
Whith this presentation you made the “New Fire” more closer to everbody. Congrats to you, your staff and to Mats Lewan for the great meeting management. Have a big future.
May me ask some questions:
a) are you working on international certification for the QX ?
b) if yes, have you any idea how long does it take ?
b) you mentioned now you are focused on industrialization, what is the first market you will approch ? Industrial or Consumer ?
Many thanks in advace. I whish you big things.
Yours sicerely
Roberto
Rick57:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
We already are working toward all the issues connected with the industrialization.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Virginia W.:
Yes, we now are focused on the industrialization, which means factories and a product ready to be produced in million pieces ( miniaturization of the control box and other connected problems, robotization etc). No, we will not make further public demos of prototypes. The next presentation will be the product.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
congrats for the astonishing results presented on Nov 24th.
A COP over 500 is really an achievement I couldn’t expect even if I am following your work since the beginnings !
In order to solve the issue of the control system cooling did you consider (or think it is feasible) to use other means to ignite the plasma like a pulsed laser beam ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Now the IVA demonstration is past. Are you already working on the industrialization or you think you will make further public tests?
Cheers
Virginia
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I viewed all the videos of the event of Stockolm at the IVA. The demo is very convincing for the measurements. The use of the two resistances of 1 Ohm and 800 Ohms as dummies has been genial: did you invent this solution?
W.Y.
Koen Vandewalle:
Mistakes can be a patrimony, provided you accept to analyse them brutally against yourself to print the experience in the brain; I experienced that self frienship is more dangerous than an enemy.
Thank you for your sustain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A self-critical attitude can be stimulating and can produce a high level of self-correction.
But still I think that sometimes you really exaggerate. I would expect a bit more mildness from a scientist and entrepreneur with your track record.
The negative reactions and the attacks in all possible ways, were also a form of respect: they see you as an avid opponent.
Your presentation was a hit.
Now it’s up to the radar technicians and the microprocessor experts.
Jack:
My fault. I did not consider that a giant screen would have spread too much light to allow the spectrometer focus on the eye of the E-Cat. I never experienced this situation and stupidly did not understand it by myself. The light from the big screen interfered with the optic line between the reactor and the optic fibers end.
I had to bring with me some black cover to hide the light of the screen from the spectrometer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Silent Majority Member:
From now on the focus will be on the industrialization.
Probably today we reached a very important agreement toward it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
oltre ad averla vista in ottima forma e molto attento a tutto quanto succedeva intorno al “SUO” QX
ho avuto l’impressione che in realtà ciò che Lei (Voi) sapete sul Qx sia già ben oltre a quello mostratoci
nel video girato a Stoccolma. Quanto detto deriva anche dall’estrema sicurezza con cui l’ing. Fabiani si muoveva
e commentava.
Sono sicuro che presto ci saprà stupire con altre grosse novità.
Anonymous:
Thank you for your attention to our work…waiting for your contact on Monday!
You know that to contact me you can email info@leonardocorp1996.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Today has been published on the Journal of Nuclear Physics the complete text of the lecture of Carl-Oscar Gullstroem that has been presented in Stockolm on November 24 in the IVA.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I am the CTO of an important company in the aerospace field. I am following your publications and tests since the Bologna event of January 2011 and I think the test at the IVA of Stockolm has been a masterpiece. The measurements made are all fully satisfactory to us and it is clear to me that you made a technological miracle. I am reading in the blogosphere many comments of amateurs lecturing about this and that without knowledge of the matter, but I can assure you that our experts I am talking with are extremely impressed, even shocked, by what they saw in the video, that we scrutinized second by second.
We can help you to resolve the overheating of the control box easily.
We will contact you next Monday, so you will know me. I cannot expose myself in a blog.
Godspeed, Andrea and see you soon.
What I gather from the Nov.24 presentation is, that there is still some R&D work to be done on the Hot Cat. Can you give a time estimate, even tentative, of when the E-Cat QX is finally going to be ready for mass production?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am still shocked by the ratio between the energy produced by the E-Cat and the energy consumed. This invention of yours is probably the most important thing happened in the last 100 years.
I hope we will see its development also in my Country.
From Russia, with love,
Dimitri Travchenko
Dr Andrea Rossi:
What has impressed me more about the test made in the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering is the consumption of electricity actually supplied to the E-Cat. The dummies gave evidence that the E-Cat has a resistance more or less equal to the resistance of the copper- actually plasma is a very good conductor- therefore your measurement system is correct. You got a stunning COP of 500 or more.
Fantastic.
Infinite congratulations.
This is part of a comment from
Thomas Kaminski on ECat World.
It is clear that the controller is pretty fancy — however, over the years, I have seen large motor control racks be replaced by small devices as high voltage IGBT’s replaced older components. The efficiencies have also gone way up, reducing thermal cooling requirements. I suspect that the power electronics industry could help Rossi with the controller size and efficiency. He needs to find the right partner. He might try this consortium:
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I watched the two videos of the complete demo of Stockolm and I think you made a very convincing test. It has been very convincing for the water flow, for the measurements of the temperatures and for the measurements of the electric energy consumed.
I think you have made a masterpiece and all the experts I have spoken with agree with me.
Congratulations.
Dear Andrea,
The standard way to create a short high-voltage pulse (to ignite a plasma arc) is to load a capacitor to the wanted high voltage and then discharge it. Loading of the capacitor can be done slowly so it can be done by a small high-voltage source (commercial manufacturers: Picoelectronics, EMCO, or use custom-made “charge pump” systems https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_pump ). Another benefit is that the energy of the “shot” i.e. the energy of the capacitor, is precisely known (=0.5*C*V^2 where C=capacitance, V=voltage).
regards, /pekka
Martyn Aubrey:
Q1- It was also so, eventually resolved
Q2- We are working on the miniaturization and heat elimination of the control circuitry system. I am hiring specialists.
Thank you for your attention to our work and for your suggestions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Damian:
Yes, Mats Lewan has retrieved the water pump and the wooden board with the connectors for the 1 Ohm and 800 Ohms resistances at the end of the test and he can do with them whatever he wants, I do not need to have them back.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for the demo: clear, simple, evident. A genial masterpiece. In the audio I heard that you gave the pump and the board of the resistances connections to Mats Lewan, to allow him to check their integrity, with nothing hidden inside: did you actually donate pump and connectors board to Mats?
Godspeed with the industrialization!
Damian
Dear Readers:
Please find hereunder the link to the reflections of the scientific journalist Mats Lewan related to the demo of Stockolm: https://animpossibleinvention.com
I very much enjoyed following the reports of and watching your presentation of the E-Cat QX.
As always with these things a lot of answers were answered and of course also new ones arise. But it’s definitely moving forward incredibly.
As a bystander and observer in this story It’s amazing to think some years back I would have been amazed to see a basic large device Even produce COP 3. Whoever produced it. Even a cop of 1.001 would have made me smile from a scientific curiosity point of view. But now we are talking about devices that can produce COPs in the hundreds and thousands. and thes are tiny devices tat can be combined and scaled an all kinds of concievable ways. It’s astonishing. And easy to forget where we were in our hopes and expectation even a few years ago. And you talk about a Moores Law for LENR devices… My mind boggles where we wil be in a few years time.
About the presentation may I ask you about the spectra measurements? If they are confidential at this time I understand.
1. Was the spectra measurement of the 0.08mm * 6mm plasma in the reactor itself?
2. Or was it from a Secondary plasma around the reactor.
3. Or was it from a separate component in the device tharpt surrounded the reactor that radiated the heat.
4. If 3 did the secondary component generated its own plasma in surrounding gas.
5.Are the dimensions of the reactor given the dimensions of the plasma in the reactor gap.
6. Or the whole device. (I suppose is correct)
7. If 5 is correct can you give some dimensions of the whole device… Is this the same as those previously mentioned here and elsewhere before the presentation.
A lot of questions, which I must apologise for. I don’t want to swamp you in questions.
All the best with the way forward. I hope have fast progress with resolving the thermal control issues and miniturisation of the controller. I have the feeling it is remarkable in its own right and may have other intersting uses in power control and distribution for all kinds of reactive devices in the future… May be even how how power is distributed. who knows…
Good luck to all the team… I was happy to see Fabiani taking part again… It’s a good team
Andrew ( second answer ):
You made me curious and now I had the time to watch with focused attention the part of the video you refer to. Please you too watch with attention the segment between 2h30′ and 2h32′: it is very interesting about your issue. Before I open the air window, that is on the side of the control box in front of me, Fabiani says to me absolutely nothing either before or during the action of opening the air window; after the action is finished and the box has been lowered in normal position, Fabiani says me to turn the switch, and at that point I go to the side of the box at my right, where the switch is, and make the switching action.
Just to be clear and precise.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrew:
When Fabiani is saying me to turn the switch, he refers to the switch that turns off and on the power. We had to turn off/on the power when we passed from calorimetry to spectrometry, and when we passed from spectrometry to dummy 1 Ohm and when we passed from the dummy with 1 Ohm to the dummy with 800 Ohms. It is obvious that when we had to substitute the components of the circuit we had to turn the power off, make the substitution and, after that, turn the power on again. The switch is in the right side of the control box from my point of view, left side from the point of view of the public. The air window is in my side of the box. The window gives access to the circuitry.
When I opened the air window, obviously, Fabiani said nothing, because in that moment I was not operating with any switch.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Virginia W:
We are working now exclusively on the industrialization of the E-Cat QX. No more public tests will be made before the launch of the product in the market.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, you have written:
“…From now on the focus will be on the industrialization.
Probably today we reached a very important agreement toward it…”
Is there any news you can share with us if possible?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Rossi
Dear Andrea,
Whith this presentation you made the “New Fire” more closer to everbody. Congrats to you, your staff and to Mats Lewan for the great meeting management. Have a big future.
May me ask some questions:
a) are you working on international certification for the QX ?
b) if yes, have you any idea how long does it take ?
b) you mentioned now you are focused on industrialization, what is the first market you will approch ? Industrial or Consumer ?
Many thanks in advace. I whish you big things.
Yours sicerely
Roberto
Dear Andrea,
how many ECAT-QX (maximum) is it possible to feed with the controller you used during the demo?
5, 10, 100 ?
Thx
Tamerlano
Dr Andrea Rossi
Congratulations, great demonstration and convincing measurement.
Rick57:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
We already are working toward all the issues connected with the industrialization.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Virginia W.:
Yes, we now are focused on the industrialization, which means factories and a product ready to be produced in million pieces ( miniaturization of the control box and other connected problems, robotization etc). No, we will not make further public demos of prototypes. The next presentation will be the product.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
congrats for the astonishing results presented on Nov 24th.
A COP over 500 is really an achievement I couldn’t expect even if I am following your work since the beginnings !
In order to solve the issue of the control system cooling did you consider (or think it is feasible) to use other means to ignite the plasma like a pulsed laser beam ?
Warmest Regards,
Riccardo
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Now the IVA demonstration is past. Are you already working on the industrialization or you think you will make further public tests?
Cheers
Virginia
W.Y.:
No, it has been proposed to me from Mats Lewan, and I accepted.
Thank you for your attention to the demo.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I viewed all the videos of the event of Stockolm at the IVA. The demo is very convincing for the measurements. The use of the two resistances of 1 Ohm and 800 Ohms as dummies has been genial: did you invent this solution?
W.Y.
Koen Vandewalle:
Mistakes can be a patrimony, provided you accept to analyse them brutally against yourself to print the experience in the brain; I experienced that self frienship is more dangerous than an enemy.
Thank you for your sustain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear dr. Andrea Rossi,
A self-critical attitude can be stimulating and can produce a high level of self-correction.
But still I think that sometimes you really exaggerate. I would expect a bit more mildness from a scientist and entrepreneur with your track record.
The negative reactions and the attacks in all possible ways, were also a form of respect: they see you as an avid opponent.
Your presentation was a hit.
Now it’s up to the radar technicians and the microprocessor experts.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Jack:
My fault. I did not consider that a giant screen would have spread too much light to allow the spectrometer focus on the eye of the E-Cat. I never experienced this situation and stupidly did not understand it by myself. The light from the big screen interfered with the optic line between the reactor and the optic fibers end.
I had to bring with me some black cover to hide the light of the screen from the spectrometer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian Luca:
Yes, we operated with the E-Cat QX about at the 30% of its power.
I was afraid.Sincerely.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Silent Majority Member:
From now on the focus will be on the industrialization.
Probably today we reached a very important agreement toward it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have been moved to watch at you during the fantastic demo of Stockolm.
Now we wait for your product.
God bless you,
SMM
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Why the spectrometry did not work?
Cheers,
Jack
Carissimo Andrea,
oltre ad averla vista in ottima forma e molto attento a tutto quanto succedeva intorno al “SUO” QX
ho avuto l’impressione che in realtà ciò che Lei (Voi) sapete sul Qx sia già ben oltre a quello mostratoci
nel video girato a Stoccolma. Quanto detto deriva anche dall’estrema sicurezza con cui l’ing. Fabiani si muoveva
e commentava.
Sono sicuro che presto ci saprà stupire con altre grosse novità.
Grazie e buon lavoro.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Sifferkoll report
E-Cat QX Demo in Stockholm Results = COP ~550
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/andrea-rossi-e-cat-qx-demo-in-stockholm-cop-550/
Anonymous:
Thank you for your attention to our work…waiting for your contact on Monday!
You know that to contact me you can email
info@leonardocorp1996.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Today has been published on the Journal of Nuclear Physics the complete text of the lecture of Carl-Oscar Gullstroem that has been presented in Stockolm on November 24 in the IVA.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I am the CTO of an important company in the aerospace field. I am following your publications and tests since the Bologna event of January 2011 and I think the test at the IVA of Stockolm has been a masterpiece. The measurements made are all fully satisfactory to us and it is clear to me that you made a technological miracle. I am reading in the blogosphere many comments of amateurs lecturing about this and that without knowledge of the matter, but I can assure you that our experts I am talking with are extremely impressed, even shocked, by what they saw in the video, that we scrutinized second by second.
We can help you to resolve the overheating of the control box easily.
We will contact you next Monday, so you will know me. I cannot expose myself in a blog.
Godspeed, Andrea and see you soon.
Sam:
Thank you for the link and for your goodwill to give us suggestions. The more we know, the better.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Vladimir:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DT:
Your Country is very important for everybody!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Obro:
I will do all my best to make it happen within 2018. I hope my optimism will become truth.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chris Johnson:
Thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Congratulations on a successful demonstration! In your presentation you mentioned that the controller has cooling problems. Have you thought about submersing the entire control system in 3M’s Novec cooling fluid? See https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/novec-us/applications/immersion-cooling for more info and http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/65495O/3mtm-thermal-management-fluids.pdf for properties of the different coolants. The liquid coolants are high voltage compatible, with a 0.1″ gap breakdown of around 40Kv. There is a video of a PC motherboard running fully submersed in the liquid at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqptp3buRM0 .
Chris Johnson
Dear Dr. Rossi,
What I gather from the Nov.24 presentation is, that there is still some R&D work to be done on the Hot Cat. Can you give a time estimate, even tentative, of when the E-Cat QX is finally going to be ready for mass production?
Kindest regards,
Obro
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am still shocked by the ratio between the energy produced by the E-Cat and the energy consumed. This invention of yours is probably the most important thing happened in the last 100 years.
I hope we will see its development also in my Country.
From Russia, with love,
Dimitri Travchenko
Dr Andrea Rossi:
What has impressed me more about the test made in the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering is the consumption of electricity actually supplied to the E-Cat. The dummies gave evidence that the E-Cat has a resistance more or less equal to the resistance of the copper- actually plasma is a very good conductor- therefore your measurement system is correct. You got a stunning COP of 500 or more.
Fantastic.
Infinite congratulations.
Hello DR Rossi
This is part of a comment from
Thomas Kaminski on ECat World.
It is clear that the controller is pretty fancy — however, over the years, I have seen large motor control racks be replaced by small devices as high voltage IGBT’s replaced older components. The efficiencies have also gone way up, reducing thermal cooling requirements. I suspect that the power electronics industry could help Rossi with the controller size and efficiency. He needs to find the right partner. He might try this consortium:
https://wempec.wisc.edu/
I have taken courses from them — excellent content in power electronics.
Thought it might interest you.
Regards
Sam
Prof:
Thank you for the attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I watched the two videos of the complete demo of Stockolm and I think you made a very convincing test. It has been very convincing for the water flow, for the measurements of the temperatures and for the measurements of the electric energy consumed.
I think you have made a masterpiece and all the experts I have spoken with agree with me.
Congratulations.
Dear Readers:
In our website are now available the 2 links to the integral transmission of the Stockolm event:
https://ecat.com/news/ecat-qx-presentation-in-stockolm
https://ecat.com/news/carl-oscar-gullstrom-working-with-theory-about-the-rossi-effect
Pekka Janhunen:
That system, that obviously I know, is not useful to us. Our situation is more complex by orders of magnitude.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The standard way to create a short high-voltage pulse (to ignite a plasma arc) is to load a capacitor to the wanted high voltage and then discharge it. Loading of the capacitor can be done slowly so it can be done by a small high-voltage source (commercial manufacturers: Picoelectronics, EMCO, or use custom-made “charge pump” systems https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_pump ). Another benefit is that the energy of the “shot” i.e. the energy of the capacitor, is precisely known (=0.5*C*V^2 where C=capacitance, V=voltage).
regards, /pekka
Martyn Aubrey:
Q1- It was also so, eventually resolved
Q2- We are working on the miniaturization and heat elimination of the control circuitry system. I am hiring specialists.
Thank you for your attention to our work and for your suggestions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
1- yes
5- yes
7- confidential
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Damian:
Yes, Mats Lewan has retrieved the water pump and the wooden board with the connectors for the 1 Ohm and 800 Ohms resistances at the end of the test and he can do with them whatever he wants, I do not need to have them back.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for the demo: clear, simple, evident. A genial masterpiece. In the audio I heard that you gave the pump and the board of the resistances connections to Mats Lewan, to allow him to check their integrity, with nothing hidden inside: did you actually donate pump and connectors board to Mats?
Godspeed with the industrialization!
Damian
Ing Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Reflections on the Nov 24 E-Cat QX demo in Stockholm
Mats Lewan
http://animpossibleinvention.com/2017/11/26/reflections-on-the-nov-24-e-cat-qx-demo-in-stockholm/
Dear Readers:
Please find hereunder the link to the reflections of the scientific journalist Mats Lewan related to the demo of Stockolm:
https://animpossibleinvention.com
Dear Andrea Rossi.
I very much enjoyed following the reports of and watching your presentation of the E-Cat QX.
As always with these things a lot of answers were answered and of course also new ones arise. But it’s definitely moving forward incredibly.
As a bystander and observer in this story It’s amazing to think some years back I would have been amazed to see a basic large device Even produce COP 3. Whoever produced it. Even a cop of 1.001 would have made me smile from a scientific curiosity point of view. But now we are talking about devices that can produce COPs in the hundreds and thousands. and thes are tiny devices tat can be combined and scaled an all kinds of concievable ways. It’s astonishing. And easy to forget where we were in our hopes and expectation even a few years ago. And you talk about a Moores Law for LENR devices… My mind boggles where we wil be in a few years time.
About the presentation may I ask you about the spectra measurements? If they are confidential at this time I understand.
1. Was the spectra measurement of the 0.08mm * 6mm plasma in the reactor itself?
2. Or was it from a Secondary plasma around the reactor.
3. Or was it from a separate component in the device tharpt surrounded the reactor that radiated the heat.
4. If 3 did the secondary component generated its own plasma in surrounding gas.
5.Are the dimensions of the reactor given the dimensions of the plasma in the reactor gap.
6. Or the whole device. (I suppose is correct)
7. If 5 is correct can you give some dimensions of the whole device… Is this the same as those previously mentioned here and elsewhere before the presentation.
A lot of questions, which I must apologise for. I don’t want to swamp you in questions.
All the best with the way forward. I hope have fast progress with resolving the thermal control issues and miniturisation of the controller. I have the feeling it is remarkable in its own right and may have other intersting uses in power control and distribution for all kinds of reactive devices in the future… May be even how how power is distributed. who knows…
Good luck to all the team… I was happy to see Fabiani taking part again… It’s a good team
Best Regards
Stephen
Andrew ( second answer ):
You made me curious and now I had the time to watch with focused attention the part of the video you refer to. Please you too watch with attention the segment between 2h30′ and 2h32′: it is very interesting about your issue. Before I open the air window, that is on the side of the control box in front of me, Fabiani says to me absolutely nothing either before or during the action of opening the air window; after the action is finished and the box has been lowered in normal position, Fabiani says me to turn the switch, and at that point I go to the side of the box at my right, where the switch is, and make the switching action.
Just to be clear and precise.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
It has been published on youtube the last part of the demo of Stockolm, with the theoretical presentation by Carl-Oscar Gullstrom: please go to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud6-KRbvKqE&feature=youtu.be
Andrew:
When Fabiani is saying me to turn the switch, he refers to the switch that turns off and on the power. We had to turn off/on the power when we passed from calorimetry to spectrometry, and when we passed from spectrometry to dummy 1 Ohm and when we passed from the dummy with 1 Ohm to the dummy with 800 Ohms. It is obvious that when we had to substitute the components of the circuit we had to turn the power off, make the substitution and, after that, turn the power on again. The switch is in the right side of the control box from my point of view, left side from the point of view of the public. The air window is in my side of the box. The window gives access to the circuitry.
When I opened the air window, obviously, Fabiani said nothing, because in that moment I was not operating with any switch.
Warm Regards,
A.R.