United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

15,024 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1- yes
    2- yes
    3- yes
    4- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Heat.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    1. From your recent comments, it seems that your large E-Cat QX plants will be made up of smaller “sections” of approximately 4kW — is this correct?
    2. Will each section be driven by one control sytem?
    3. Does this mean that one section could one day be used independently as a small domestic heating unit?
    4. Is there any limit to the number of sections that could be combined to make a heater of any rating (e.g. 1MW, 10MW, etc.)?

    Thank you,

    Frank Acland

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Which will be the production of the first Ecat QX that you will introduce at the commercial launch?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mats Lewan:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    CC:
    Probably,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,
    I’m happy to announce that the New Energy World Symposium, focusing on the consequences of LENR based technologies, for society, industry, and financial systems is now open for registration, with an Early Bird discount until Feb 17: http://new-symposium.org
    The symposium will be held in Stockholm, Sweden on June 18-19, 2018.
    For your readers, I’d like to clarify that, as you know, the symposium has no connection with you or with Leonardo Corporation, and that you will not be part of the program.
    I also want to point out that the focus of the conference is not LENR science but its consequences and potential applications, and that the New Energy World Symposium has no aim to be an alternative to the scientific LENR conference ICCF.
    Kind Regards,
    Mats Lewan

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lance Peach:
    I agree, it has been done by top level professionality.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Lance Peach

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KkYMPp4c68&feature=youtu.be
    It is a 6 minutes very well done summary of the 4 hours combined of the test and theoretical lecture video of the Stockholm event made on November 24 with the Ecat QX
    Godspeed,
    Lance

  • CC

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Will the 1 MW plants be composed by means of 4 kW units as the one you are thinking to introduce when the product will be presented at the launch?
    Thanks if you can answer,
    Carl

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, With regards a possible cause of a LENR: To create a LENR I believe it requires a vacuum being a point of gravity, two unequal potentials with regards two dimensions of unequal mass plus specific mechanisms to create and control the desired effect. This process can be found active on various levels within nature from the macro to the micro. Electrical generating produces a vacuum on the atomic level (Two unequal potentials within one material separated by a resistance) Browns gas requires a vacuum on the molecular level (between two unequal potentials of mass). Solar illumination requires a vacuum but on the macro level. Unifying field oscillations require a vacuum on a mechanically induced level that generates two unequal mass potentials. All these reactions seem to produce a degree of energy that relates to a potential of a generated neutral structure containing a degree of of gravity. In the case of a manufactured induced system regarding air, the energies are that of manufactured helical trajectories containing gravity thereby providing an added state of solidity to an otherwise none solid state being air but which contains a degree of gravity that adds to an overall improvement of an effect.

    The LENR is thereby produced I believe by a necessary host being the nickel fissure/cavity. To strengthen the gravity value of the fissure, current is applied. Thereby, on each side of the fissure an unequal potential exists. Thereby two potentials of gravity from one within to one without and two potentials of charge on each side the fissure being one of a size potential and one of a volume potential. Then two unequal masses need to be introduced into the environment. Hydrogen no doubt being ideal with its proton mass of size and its electron mass of volume. Hydrogen having a weak bond can be easily stretched. Thereby the proton is gravitated into the fissure more so than the electron because of its dimensional discrepancy. Both the proton and electron contain gravity and rotate in the same direction due to there creator force being of the same environment. With an increase in the gap between the proton and electron a distinct event horizon appears that contains a gravity value providing for the manufacture of a rotating neutral, that rotates counter to that of the proton and electron so as to be in sync. The neutral contains a gravity value and a manufactured event horizon that contains charges that also have gravity values, dependent upon the strength of the manufactured neutral. Photons I believe are manufactured within the event horizon of a neutral and are dependent upon the intensity of the horizon.

    Every structure contains a binding force. Hydrogen very weak. Every structure contains a size positive charge structure and a volume negative charge structure, thereby two gravity values separated by an event horizon that contains the binding force. To create a reaction all that is required is a degree of displacement. The greater the force to displace, the more kinetic energy is generated and a more dynamic is the overall reaction. For now I shall take a break and return to explain kinetic energy with regards LENRs. Regards Eric Ashworth.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    If it will be a 100 modules, the rating will be 4 kW, but we did not decide yet.It will depend on many factors.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Thank you for your reply, may I ask what is the power rating of the prototype E-Cat QX that you have decided upon?

    Best regards,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    We will show the operation of the product. We have to decide the rating, but it will be probably at least a 100 modules Ecat.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hema:
    Thank you: I will pass it along to our IT guy.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hema

    Dr Rossi:
    The 6 minutes summary of the Stockholm event is a precious cameo. Done by a master, for sure and it was past due for the mass that cannot watch the 3 hours complete video plus the 1 hour lecture of Carl-Oscar Gullstrom. In these 6 min there is the essence of both.
    Godspeed,
    Hema

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    When you finally present the product, do you plan to demonstrate it in operation at a conference, or just show the product and discuss it without turning it on?

    Also, what will the power rating of the first product be?

    Thank you very much,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nick:
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Thank you for your opinion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I agree with the sceptics that say you will never make any product and no ecat will be put in the market, ever!

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    Yes, basically the lines will be the same.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chuck Davis

    Dr Rossi,
    I suspect that building the Ecat home will basically be a downscaling of the industrial plant and once the Ecat home has been certified it will be manufactured in the same production lines. It is customary to select the “Man of the year”, however I nominate you as “The Man”!
    Cheers
    Chuck Davis

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Thank you for the comment from EW.
    It has the dignity of an analysis. That’s what we are working for.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Here’s a comment from E-Cat World today by DocSiders. What do you think of it?

    “If the QX works, it will be disruptive on a scale never seen before. It will touch and effect everything…EVERYTHING. It could and should unseat the (illegitimatly) powerful and spread freedom and wealth to ALL. This will be a hard fought battle against entrenched powers. A slow and guarded entry into the fray makes no sense in this instance. It’s a revolution.

    “We are not talking about cautious expansion into existing markets with a “newish” product — where cautious business development would be prudent.

    “Sales could be in the $Billions per week for decades…so best to raise enough capital fast enough IN ORDER TO RAMP UP PRODUCTION FAST ENOUGH to bludgeon your way into dominance.”

    Best regards,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ray:
    c
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eugenio Kerstein:
    Yes: the selection will be careful and the training very thoroughly.
    Everybody will have to reach the excellency, whatever his role.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    J:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    LarryJ:
    It is a complete module like the one of the Stockholm presentation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Eugenio Kerstein

    Mr Rossi,
    Will have necessity of a particular training the employees of Leonardo that will manufacture the Ecat?

  • Ray

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    How much did you spend in R&D for the Ecat:
    a- tens of thousands of dollars
    b- hundreds of thousands of dollars
    c- millions of dollars

  • Leslie

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    This is the immediate access to the link of the 6 minutes summary of the Ecat QX presentation at the Royal Academy of Engineering (IVA) of Stockholm, the event of November 24th 2017:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KkYMPp4c68&feature=youtu.be

  • J

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    The theoretical approach mentioned in the 6 minutes video with the summary of the Stockholm event published on http://www.ecat.com is very intriguing. Will you describe the experiment that you are going to make with carl Oscar Gullstrom?
    Cheers
    J

  • LarryJ

    Dear Dr Rossi

    You recently announced that you now have a prototype ready for industrialization. Is this prototype the 1 MW reactor you plan to sell or is it a completed sub module that will be part of the assembly required for a 1 MW reactor.

    Thank You
    LarryJ

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    We have the funds.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, The following information involves the design of a mechanism. The mechanism is a constructed metallic plasm able to demonstrate a geometric principle with regards energy interactions of curvature forces.

    Geometry of structure: We have all read of the event horizon but what do we know about it?. The event horizon is actually a neutral position sandwiched between a potential a size dimension and that of a volume dimension and therefore relates to a structure, dependent upon the structure and its location, the horizon will be distinct or vague. A dimension of size is positive when compared to a dimension of volume. Zero gravity of a structure is surrounded by the positivity of the structure. The event horizon is surrounded by the negativity of the volume of the structure. The event horizon is a variable attribute dependent upon the exterior influence of the environment with regards an exterior environmental gravity value and the point of zero gravity within, intensity of the horizon is thereby a variable due to a pull between two gravity values involving one structure of a size/volume dimension and the term event horizon could in some instances be a misnomer due too an unrecognizable event, hydrogen having such an unrecognizable event. This is important: Every object is spherical and contains a positive dimension, a negative dimension and a neutral dimension of a structure due to there being an event horizon. There has to be an event horizon to provide the necessary separation created by the two masses rotating in the same direction, of being in the same environment. This configuration can be diagrammed. Draw a square and connect each corner with a line through the middle which represents zero point. Put the compass point at zero and draw a circle just inside the four flats of the square. Each corner represents a 90 degree angle. The area outside of the circle/event horizon represents the volume mass negative of the structure and that within represents degrees of a size positive mass. As that circle moves within, negativity increases and so too does the positivity, it’s a variable ratio and the gravity fixes the ratio. However, when a circle rotates it does not do so in jerky 90 degree angles but by two smooth forces being an outward and an inward tangential but such a diagram is described is able to explain the concept.
    Thereby it can be seen that three symbols are required to explain a structure/energy unit of three potentials. These being a cube, being the square, a sphere being the circle/variable horizon and a pyramid, being a triangle, the apex of which represents zero gravity and the base of which is in contact with an outer environmental gravity value. Once this set-up is understood and projected into various situations it becomes apparent that structures on various levels can be created from the micro to the macro. To create structure thereby requires a structure, in my case being a mechanism requires a metallic plasm to provide the required dimensions which contain the potentials of a created gravity value. In LENRs I believe the nickel structure together with an applied current provides a controllable gravity value. No structure can be created within the zero point of gravity. It can only be created as a potential of a power within an event horizon. It therefore has to that of a centripetal force and being centripetal it contains its own gravity value. Any created structure that sits between two unequal forces/potentials such as two unequal mass potentials has to rotate, oscillate and pulsate to adjust its dimension to become that of a size dimension and that of a volume dimension in space and time so as to be a true neutral. Being between two rotating masses the neutral has to counter rotate to compliment spin.
    I shall now take a break and return to explain the possible cause of a LENR. Regards Eric Ashworth.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter:
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Roy:
    Not yet, we are preparing the set up of the experiment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    If your goal is to produced thousands of E-Cat units during 2018, you are going to need substantial financial resources to do this. Do you already have the funds at your disposal to accomplish this, or will you need further investments?

    Best regards,

    Frank Acland

  • Peter

    Dr Andrea,
    Thanks for the summary of the Stockholm event published on http://www.ecat.com
    In 6 minutes there are shown the topics of the QX.
    Very well done.
    All the best,
    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    A) no
    B) yes, but for bigger numbers within this year
    To keep the line of communication wide open with you is a privilege for me.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    To good to be true, perhaps? Many readers of JONP may have the impression that you have completed a working prototype that “has been assigned to the production team.” I am not so sure yet, and while you know I am all in with you and your team, I have not seen a clear statement from you that you have signed off on the prototype you described to David in the JONP blog on January 11, 2018.

    A) Have you already passed this prototype to your industrial team with the intent of building at least 100 – 1000 units using robotic manufacturing?

    or

    B) Will you soon be hoping to pass this design to your team with the intent of building at least 100 – 1000 units using the robotic manufacturing?

    I am hoping that you will reply “A” as the answer, but we have waited along time, and it is not stated clearly in the blog what you meant to say, “A” or “B”.

    Regardless of your reply, I am happy to hear that you have made progress, and that at least within a few months you may have the prototype ready.

    Thank you for keeping the line of communications wide open with us on JONP.

    Warm regards,

    Tom

  • Roy

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Do you have the results of the theoretical experiment you are going to make with Carl-Oscar ullstrom described on this blog weeks ago?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Roy

  • Andrea Rossi

    James:
    Thank you for the link!
    Also, the same “condensed” 6 minutes video that resumes the highlights of the Stockholm event can be reached in the website
    http://www.leonardocorporation.com
    On the homepage click on “News”, then click on “Updated” then click on ” Watch a 6 mins summary video of the presentation ”
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    To make an Ecat QX. The robots are already there, it’s just matter to adjust the specific software, but there are strong analogies with applications in the electronic and pharmaceutical fields.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Mike:
    1- 100
    2- the same as when driving one module; its consume is recovered with COP 0.9 as heat, so that it does not affect the COP of the Ecat QX and the heat it produces can also be employed for uses different from the energy produced by the Ecat QX. By the way, the COP of the Ecat QX ( ratio between the energy at the output of the QX and the energy at the input of the QX ) is substantially higher.
    3- in the evolution of a technology nothing is final. I can answer that as it is now the Ecat QX, I think we are ready to pass to the industrialization phase. As a matter of fact, we will make a strong pressing on the industrialization phase now.
    4- several hundreds, but the term “exact” is quite optimistic: better couple it with “almost” to make it closer to reality, not only because I make many errors, but also because I am prone to make trials also when I have to replicate. This is also the reason for which we made substantial progress in these last 60 days.
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • James

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I saw this very beautiful link, that is a 6 minutes synthesis of the 4 hours long great demo you made at the IVA of Stockholm: very well done! In 6 minutes we can understand the highlights of that historical demonstration; here is the link, I found it on the website of Leonardo Corporation:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KkYMPp4c68&feature=youtu.be

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>