WaltC:
Thank you for your kind attention to our work.
Answers:
1- it depends on the kind of the reactor.
2- just a section
3- depends on the kind of reactor and of the kind of the problem
4- I prefer to delay this information to the day we will introduce the Ecat. The COP will be enough, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It’s exciting to hear about all of the industrialization and Research efforts you have underway currently. That’s clearly the sign of a strong and diverse team of contributors. You and your extended team deserve to be commended.
I’m not sure if you can speak to any of this or not, but in terms of your current plans and thinking, in the industrial product:
1) If a reactor fails and needs to be replaced, what is the size of the “replaceable unit”?
2) If a unit needs to be replaced, does the entire plant need to go off-line, or just a section?
3) If it’s a section, what is the size of the section?
4) If you can say– what is the current minimum COP that you’re offering customers? (I assume it would be a conservative lower bound.)
Dear Andrea,
As a client and an electrical engineer I would be willing to test a 20 kW unit for heating my home and give it all the professional care it would need (after being educated by the Leonardo Corp.). I would also be willing to report to you and openly to ECW and others about its performance and host visitors once and a while. Would this be an idea?
Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi,
When you will introduce the Ecat as an industrialized product, will this be in operation in the industry of a client, or in a conference site?
Cheers,
Elvin
Dear Andrea,
again thank you for the very convincing demo at the IVA of Stockholm; very beautiful the summary linked on http://www..ecat.com.
Today I also read on Ecatworld this: http://e-catworld.com/2018/03/20/hot-hot-cat-sk-reaches-11000c-1-eV
It seems to me that from November 24th to now you made another progress as impressive as the progress you made before. You don’t even rest, do you?
I agree with “Electro Nuclear Reaction Generation”, abbreviated to “ENRG”. Creative, descriptive, and easy to remember acronym for at least one of the Quark Series. Thought I would step into the name play fray for a moment.
E-Cat the new fire. E-Cat ENRG. It takes my breath away. 😊
Caro Andrea, ti sto seguendo a partire dalla depolimerizzazione dei pneumatici a Lacchiarella.
Nella mia pagina Facebook io descrivo ai miei amici l’ Effetto Rossi come una reazione elettronucleare, perchè a mio avviso coinvolge sia forza elettromagnetica che forza nucleare.
Da qui vorrei suggerire anche io un nome per il Quark-X.
E-Cat ENRG
Electro Nuclear Reaction Generation, cioè ENRG, che si può pronunciare Energy
Buon proseguimento
Dear Andrea, I am following you from the depolymerization of tires in Lacchiarella.
In my Facebook page I describe to my friends the Rossi Effect as an electronuclear reaction, because in my opinion it involves both electromagnetic force and nuclear force.
From here I would like to suggest a name for Quark-X too.
E-Cat ENRG
Electro Nuclear Reaction Generation, ie ENRG, which can be pronounced Energy.
Dear Andrea,
Although using eV as a unit of temperature is correct and is frequently done, there is a potential source of confusion. For example, the Sun emits mostly about 0.5 micron photons whose energy is about 2.5 eV. Yet, the Sun’s surface temperature of 6000K is only about 0.5 eV i.e. five times less than the photons. How can this be? The reason is the nonlinear nature of the Planck radiation law spectrum. It is mathematically explained e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_law ; there the quantity x whose numerical value is about 5 explains the difference. The quantity x is the root of a nonlinear equation involving the exponential function and a rational function.
regards, /pekka
> what do you think about the ITER project for the hot fusion, in which ENI has put 50 millions of the Italian taxpayers? Ciao, Fabio
I don’t know the contribute by ENI company, but if the estimate for ITER construction totals to 15 billions euros until 2020, and the european quota is 45%, and the italian quota is 13%, you can calculate that already 858 millions have been already spent by italian taxpayer (data from july 2017). You also have to consider the alternative project called DTT (divertor tokamak test facility) that already plans an amount of 135 millions for Italy. You also have to consider the alternative project Satellite super advanced tokamak JT-60SA, with an italan esbourse already of 90 millions.
Jazz Maker:
I suggest ” Physics and Our Universe: How It All Works ” of Prof Richard Wolfson ( Ed The Great Courses, USA, in books and DVDs ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Xavier Pitz:
Yes, 1 eV=~ 11 600 K ( 11 873 C )
The T of our sun is between 15 and 1 millions K, with cold areas at ~5-6 000 K
I agree on the fact that ” cold fusion ” is not a proper definition, LENR is better.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
If it is really is so hot (that’s hotter than the average (5778 K) temperature of the Sun when excluding solar flares), I think those who are still calling it “cold” fusion really have to find another name for it 🙂
Dear Andrea:
Which recent book would you suggest to a dummy with a high school diploma that wants to understand the fundamentals of Physics? Is it useful “Physics for dummies”?
Eric Ashworth:
to be more precise: to those in opposition I am not giving hard time: I am giving nothing. Only one thing counts: industrialization. All the rest is cellophane.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, with regards your comment to Yrka March 19th inst. I know for a fact (and I know this is a bold statement) that with regards your battle to get the E-cat and its technology recognized, has for you gone, far beyond making lots of money or even becoming famous. It’s more to do with knowledge regarding the real world and how it works for the minority and not the majority. Not many people are aware that unless, like yourself, they have something that some people do not want because for such people there is, for them, a very good reason to suppress knowledge/specific technologies. The exciting part is why they do not want it. Unfortunately money can corrupt some people, especially those without vision. My guess is that your technology when fully understood is able to throw light on a present day mystery that is obviously very important and one that must not, at this present time, be recognized, financed or investigated by main stream academia and as I said, without experiencing having something that some people do not want, it is difficult to fully understand why such unrelenting resistance should continue. I think you have and are giving those in opposition a hard time but the more the value is, the greater is the victory. All the best, Eric Ashworth.
Raffaele Bongo:
Theoretically, in Physics no event has probability zero, but every event is associated to a probability number, bigger or smaller as it might be.
The probability that an electron can pass through the nucleus of its atom are very, very, very, very small, because the electron is a Fermion, therefore it has half number of spin which makes it respect the exclusion principle of Pauli. About the possibility that it “hits or parks”, as you say, upon the nucleus of its atom, this phenomenon, called “electron capture”, has been observed in particular isotopes of heavy atoms with a strong excess of protons: in this case the event probability number is just very small and in fact it has been observed, albeit rarely and only in heavy isotopes with an excess of protons. By the way: forget “parking”, as soon as the electron nears the nucleus what happens is a disaster, worse than if you park your car inside the main door of the Duomo di Milano on a Sunday morning during the Mass.
Warm regards,
A.R.
I read a strange thing for me in a physics popularization article for Dummies. It is said that the probability that an electron of an atom passes through its nucleus would not be zero. Can you confirm this fact? If so, for example, what can become and what could a hydrogen atom do when its electron passes, hits or parks in its nucleus?
All my support and thank you for the time you give me.
Dear Andrea,
1. Can you tell if you are making progress with the 10 and 100kW SK units?
2. Have you already started the 5 Sigma tests with them?
3. If so, do you expect that to take a similar time as for the QX units?
Although you must be extremely busy with all these tasks like bringing the ECat QX to the market, developing the high power units and the theory of the Rossi effect, you still can find time to tell about it in a school class, WoW! I would have loved to be one of these yougsters!
All the best and kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi,
If I have understood, watching the 6 minutes summary of the Ecat demo made at the IVA in Stockholm, since you have a temperature of 1 eV in the Ecat, by the laws of Physics in that field should be raised waves and anti-waves with the same T. Did I understand well?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The Ecat you are going to present industrialized will be only industrial, or also domestic?
dear andrea,
How can you handle all that heat (1ev=11.000)? New materials or a totally new method to confine it?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
From the orginal 100W E-CAT QX, the power of your 10kW and 100kW prototype is a huge achievement, is it due to a technological breakthrough ?
Warm Regards.
Toussaint François
WaltC:
Thank you for your kind attention to our work.
Answers:
1- it depends on the kind of the reactor.
2- just a section
3- depends on the kind of reactor and of the kind of the problem
4- I prefer to delay this information to the day we will introduce the Ecat. The COP will be enough, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It’s exciting to hear about all of the industrialization and Research efforts you have underway currently. That’s clearly the sign of a strong and diverse team of contributors. You and your extended team deserve to be commended.
I’m not sure if you can speak to any of this or not, but in terms of your current plans and thinking, in the industrial product:
1) If a reactor fails and needs to be replaced, what is the size of the “replaceable unit”?
2) If a unit needs to be replaced, does the entire plant need to go off-line, or just a section?
3) If it’s a section, what is the size of the section?
4) If you can say– what is the current minimum COP that you’re offering customers? (I assume it would be a conservative lower bound.)
Thanks,
WaltC
Peter:
We are advancing with our tests and the results we got so far are encouraging.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DT:
None that I am aware of. But I know only all that is published.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Whistle Guy:
I am very satisfied. We made enormous progresses. With the help of God, we are marching on, working very hard.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How would you consider the status of the industrialization progress now that we are close to the end of the first quarter of the year?
Gerard McEk:
When we will sell domestic Ecats it will be possible.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
As a client and an electrical engineer I would be willing to test a 20 kW unit for heating my home and give it all the professional care it would need (after being educated by the Leonardo Corp.). I would also be willing to report to you and openly to ECW and others about its performance and host visitors once and a while. Would this be an idea?
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Do you see any competitor that can be considered a match for the Ecat so far?
Warm Regards,
DT
Dr Rossi,
Can you give an update about the development of the 10/100 kW reactors?
Thank you if you can answer,
Peter
Frank Acland:
I hope one of our Clients will accept this.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Do you have a client who is willing to host a public presentation of an industrial E-Cat plant?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Elvin:
I think and hope in the industry of a Client,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
F.S.:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are the components of the powders described in your patent still used in the EcatQX?
Dr Rossi,
When you will introduce the Ecat as an industrialized product, will this be in operation in the industry of a client, or in a conference site?
Cheers,
Elvin
Anonymous:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
He,he,he…Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Energized with a high COP.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How is morale among those who are working with you on the industrialization. Frustrated? Energized?Optimistic? Exhausted, or …. ?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
Since we are trying acronyms, how about:
Advanced
Nuclear
Development &
Research
Engineering
Activity (ANDREA) LOL.
Dear Andrea
Thank you for the very well done summary of the demo of the Ecat at the IVA of Stockholm on Nov 24th.
Godspeed,
John
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Still on schedule for the presentation of a product in operation by the end of the year?
Ramona Jordan:
Time is flowing too fast.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
again thank you for the very convincing demo at the IVA of Stockholm; very beautiful the summary linked on http://www..ecat.com.
Today I also read on Ecatworld this:
http://e-catworld.com/2018/03/20/hot-hot-cat-sk-reaches-11000c-1-eV
It seems to me that from November 24th to now you made another progress as impressive as the progress you made before. You don’t even rest, do you?
Tom Conover:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I agree with “Electro Nuclear Reaction Generation”, abbreviated to “ENRG”. Creative, descriptive, and easy to remember acronym for at least one of the Quark Series. Thought I would step into the name play fray for a moment.
E-Cat the new fire. E-Cat ENRG. It takes my breath away. 😊
Tom
Enea Romagnoli:
Thank you for your attention to my work and for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
I am using eV in this period because that’s the unit we use in the context of the theory we are working on.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Caro Andrea, ti sto seguendo a partire dalla depolimerizzazione dei pneumatici a Lacchiarella.
Nella mia pagina Facebook io descrivo ai miei amici l’ Effetto Rossi come una reazione elettronucleare, perchè a mio avviso coinvolge sia forza elettromagnetica che forza nucleare.
Da qui vorrei suggerire anche io un nome per il Quark-X.
E-Cat ENRG
Electro Nuclear Reaction Generation, cioè ENRG, che si può pronunciare Energy
Buon proseguimento
Dear Andrea, I am following you from the depolymerization of tires in Lacchiarella.
In my Facebook page I describe to my friends the Rossi Effect as an electronuclear reaction, because in my opinion it involves both electromagnetic force and nuclear force.
From here I would like to suggest a name for Quark-X too.
E-Cat ENRG
Electro Nuclear Reaction Generation, ie ENRG, which can be pronounced Energy.
Good continuation
Dear Andrea,
Although using eV as a unit of temperature is correct and is frequently done, there is a potential source of confusion. For example, the Sun emits mostly about 0.5 micron photons whose energy is about 2.5 eV. Yet, the Sun’s surface temperature of 6000K is only about 0.5 eV i.e. five times less than the photons. How can this be? The reason is the nonlinear nature of the Planck radiation law spectrum. It is mathematically explained e.g. in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_law ; there the quantity x whose numerical value is about 5 explains the difference. The quantity x is the root of a nonlinear equation involving the exponential function and a rational function.
regards, /pekka
> what do you think about the ITER project for the hot fusion, in which ENI has put 50 millions of the Italian taxpayers? Ciao, Fabio
I don’t know the contribute by ENI company, but if the estimate for ITER construction totals to 15 billions euros until 2020, and the european quota is 45%, and the italian quota is 13%, you can calculate that already 858 millions have been already spent by italian taxpayer (data from july 2017). You also have to consider the alternative project called DTT (divertor tokamak test facility) that already plans an amount of 135 millions for Italy. You also have to consider the alternative project Satellite super advanced tokamak JT-60SA, with an italan esbourse already of 90 millions.
Jazz Maker:
I suggest ” Physics and Our Universe: How It All Works ” of Prof Richard Wolfson ( Ed The Great Courses, USA, in books and DVDs ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Xavier Pitz:
Yes, 1 eV=~ 11 600 K ( 11 873 C )
The T of our sun is between 15 and 1 millions K, with cold areas at ~5-6 000 K
I agree on the fact that ” cold fusion ” is not a proper definition, LENR is better.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Could you please elaborate on the temperature measurement in eV ?
I’d like to understand how “hot” is 1eV, and I’m only used to °C or K.
Is 1eV really equals to 11604.5250061657 kelvin [K] like I could read here :
https://www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/en/energy/11-65/electron-volt-kelvin/ ?
If it is really is so hot (that’s hotter than the average (5778 K) temperature of the Sun when excluding solar flares), I think those who are still calling it “cold” fusion really have to find another name for it 🙂
eV Regards,
Xavier
Dear Andrea:
Which recent book would you suggest to a dummy with a high school diploma that wants to understand the fundamentals of Physics? Is it useful “Physics for dummies”?
Eric Ashworth:
to be more precise: to those in opposition I am not giving hard time: I am giving nothing. Only one thing counts: industrialization. All the rest is cellophane.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, with regards your comment to Yrka March 19th inst. I know for a fact (and I know this is a bold statement) that with regards your battle to get the E-cat and its technology recognized, has for you gone, far beyond making lots of money or even becoming famous. It’s more to do with knowledge regarding the real world and how it works for the minority and not the majority. Not many people are aware that unless, like yourself, they have something that some people do not want because for such people there is, for them, a very good reason to suppress knowledge/specific technologies. The exciting part is why they do not want it. Unfortunately money can corrupt some people, especially those without vision. My guess is that your technology when fully understood is able to throw light on a present day mystery that is obviously very important and one that must not, at this present time, be recognized, financed or investigated by main stream academia and as I said, without experiencing having something that some people do not want, it is difficult to fully understand why such unrelenting resistance should continue. I think you have and are giving those in opposition a hard time but the more the value is, the greater is the victory. All the best, Eric Ashworth.
Raffaele Bongo:
Theoretically, in Physics no event has probability zero, but every event is associated to a probability number, bigger or smaller as it might be.
The probability that an electron can pass through the nucleus of its atom are very, very, very, very small, because the electron is a Fermion, therefore it has half number of spin which makes it respect the exclusion principle of Pauli. About the possibility that it “hits or parks”, as you say, upon the nucleus of its atom, this phenomenon, called “electron capture”, has been observed in particular isotopes of heavy atoms with a strong excess of protons: in this case the event probability number is just very small and in fact it has been observed, albeit rarely and only in heavy isotopes with an excess of protons. By the way: forget “parking”, as soon as the electron nears the nucleus what happens is a disaster, worse than if you park your car inside the main door of the Duomo di Milano on a Sunday morning during the Mass.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes, that is the hypothesis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
I read a strange thing for me in a physics popularization article for Dummies. It is said that the probability that an electron of an atom passes through its nucleus would not be zero. Can you confirm this fact? If so, for example, what can become and what could a hydrogen atom do when its electron passes, hits or parks in its nucleus?
All my support and thank you for the time you give me.
Raffaele
Gerard McEk:
1- yes
2- yes
3- no
4- they are the future
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. Can you tell if you are making progress with the 10 and 100kW SK units?
2. Have you already started the 5 Sigma tests with them?
3. If so, do you expect that to take a similar time as for the QX units?
Although you must be extremely busy with all these tasks like bringing the ECat QX to the market, developing the high power units and the theory of the Rossi effect, you still can find time to tell about it in a school class, WoW! I would have loved to be one of these yougsters!
All the best and kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi,
If I have understood, watching the 6 minutes summary of the Ecat demo made at the IVA in Stockholm, since you have a temperature of 1 eV in the Ecat, by the laws of Physics in that field should be raised waves and anti-waves with the same T. Did I understand well?
Cecilia:
Yes: please send detail to
info@leonardocorp1996.com
I will do it for free.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonimous:
yes, probably up to a power of 100 kW.
Warm Regards,
A.R.